|
rearwheels
|
 |
August 16, 2011, 06:09:01 PM |
|
Inaba, I realised that the JSON API is not returning the worker list. Can you take a look?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Bitcoin software, network, and concept is called "Bitcoin" with a capitalized "B". Bitcoin currency units are called "bitcoins" with a lowercase "b" -- this is often abbreviated BTC.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
PoulGrym
Member
 Offline
Activity: 83
Merit: 10
|
|
August 16, 2011, 10:26:20 PM
Last edit: August 16, 2011, 11:22:54 PM by PoulGrym |
|
another one.. Why can't I stop.. I know it's no use to do it.
[edit] Thanks for a great site, this pool just isn't for me no more.. bye! GL!
|
If you found my post helpful, use my tip jar!
BTC: 1Q4um62DJ8kBRMzQ4VQqG6W7eLoPNfx6zn
NODE: 11993447274130959091 NXT: MINT:
|
|
|
|
village.idiot
|
|
August 16, 2011, 10:28:40 PM |
|
Glad to see you're still here.
It is rather addicting.
|
|
|
|
|
Reuef
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 40
Merit: 0
|
|
August 17, 2011, 02:10:12 AM |
|
Argh....one of my rig's PSU died 45 min before the block ended...bye bye 50% of hash until tomorrow.
|
|
|
|
|
1984
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 51
Merit: 0
|
|
August 17, 2011, 04:56:44 AM
Last edit: August 17, 2011, 07:15:10 AM by 1984 |
|
Have there been some changes to the getwork server? I've seen a huge reduction in rejected shares  awesome EDIT: back to my usual %2.5 now but it was under %1 for a few hours. |
|
|
|
|
Inaba (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000
|
|
August 17, 2011, 01:21:17 PM |
|
Other than fixing the memory leak a few days ago, I haven't made any changes to the getwork servers at the moment, other than to put in some code for the new pooling methods.
|
If you're searching these lines for a point, you've probably missed it. There was never anything there in the first place.
|
|
|
Inaba (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000
|
|
August 17, 2011, 01:32:30 PM |
|
Inaba, I realised that the JSON API is not returning the worker list. Can you take a look?
For which output? What URL are you using? |
If you're searching these lines for a point, you've probably missed it. There was never anything there in the first place.
|
|
|
|
|
Inaba (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000
|
|
August 17, 2011, 01:50:01 PM |
|
Are you putting your key after the = ?
|
If you're searching these lines for a point, you've probably missed it. There was never anything there in the first place.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inaba (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000
|
|
August 17, 2011, 02:04:40 PM |
|
Found the bug... sorry about that. It should be fixed now.
|
If you're searching these lines for a point, you've probably missed it. There was never anything there in the first place.
|
|
|
|
village.idiot
|
|
August 17, 2011, 02:17:04 PM |
|
Hey Inaba,
When you're not busy someday...
I've been looking at the graphs on occasion. Nice job, by the way.
I have a request. Could you put links to the graphs under (or above) the graph displayed so we don't have to go back to "GRAPHS" to see another chart.
Also, I think "Daily Hash Rate Graph" should be called "24 Hour Hash Rate" to go along with "60 Minute Hash Rate".
Can we have one that displays the past week? Maybe 3 or 6 hour increments?
|
|
|
|
|
Inaba (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000
|
|
August 17, 2011, 02:35:13 PM |
|
Sure, I will add all those things this week.
|
If you're searching these lines for a point, you've probably missed it. There was never anything there in the first place.
|
|
|
|
|
|
rearwheels
|
|
August 17, 2011, 05:56:49 PM |
|
Found the bug... sorry about that. It should be fixed now.
Working now. Tks. |
|
|
|
|
PoulGrym
Member
Offline
Activity: 83
Merit: 10
|
|
August 17, 2011, 10:40:58 PM |
|
Just wanted to tell I tried to change to 100% donation. It only worked with 9.99 >_<
Bye guys! might have a look here when PPS .. right now ABC is pretty sweet! less then 0.5 rejected. Inaba you should check what they do to keep it so low. Here i had about 3~4% Rejected shares.
|
If you found my post helpful, use my tip jar!
BTC: 1Q4um62DJ8kBRMzQ4VQqG6W7eLoPNfx6zn
NODE: 11993447274130959091 NXT: MINT:
|
|
|
Inaba (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000
|
|
August 17, 2011, 11:42:54 PM |
|
They modify their getwork server to report less rejects/stales. There's no mystery there. I can do the same here if it'll make you feel better, though. I can, in fact, using their methods, give you 0 rejects.
They have the same reject rate as here, they just don't report it to you, so you will never know if you are having a problem or not and therefore causing a detriment to the pool as a whole. On an individual level, it's not a big deal, but when you start getting a lot of miners, and if everyone has absolutely no idea if there's a problem, it can add up to a significant drain on the pools true hashing power (vs reported hashing power). Unless they've done some mathematical gymnastics with stat reporting, their true hashrate is 1.5 - 3.5% lower than their reported hash rate. That means you are losing out on 1.5 - 3.5% of your potential income vs variance when you make a decision to mine at a given pool. (That is not to say your overall income is materially affected, only your decision making ability to assess whether one pool is better than another. Although, if enough people have unreported problems it will also affect your overall income as well. But you'll never know unless people self report a lower than expected income.)
They bill this as a "feature," and in so far as they pay you on stale shares it is definitely a bonus, but in reality it's basically dishonest math when measured against the accepted standard. I've not found anywhere that they confirm or deny that they report stats based on stale shares as well.
|
If you're searching these lines for a point, you've probably missed it. There was never anything there in the first place.
|
|
|
|
village.idiot
|
|
August 17, 2011, 11:49:30 PM |
|
So when I thought I was getting 0 rejects at Triplemining there were rejects while accepted was scrolling up the terminal?!
|
|
|
|
|
Inaba (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000
|
|
August 17, 2011, 11:51:44 PM |
|
Indeed. Well, the "rejects" you see in the terminal aren't really rejected in the literal since. They are accepted and found to be invalid for one reason or another and reported as rejected. It's fairly easy to turn that off and just report accepted for every share, regardless of its' true disposition in finding a block.
|
If you're searching these lines for a point, you've probably missed it. There was never anything there in the first place.
|
|
|
|
