Bitcoin Forum
December 11, 2016, 02:17:24 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.13.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 [34] 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 ... 226 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [1200 TH] EMC: 0 Fee DGM. Anonymous PPS. US & EU servers. No Registration!  (Read 462190 times)
village.idiot
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 271


View Profile
August 17, 2011, 11:58:48 PM
 #661

I always thought there was something about their server that was working better.
Doesn't matter now.  I used to have one card on Eclipse and the other on Triple each using the other pool as backup.
Then Hoppers with hundreds of GH/s would jump in and I was getting too little for my efforts.  So I switched both cards to Eclipse.
Our rate goes up and down here but not like it did at Triple.  Looks like a lot of miners have pulled out of there.  They're under 18 GH/s as I type this.
1481465844
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481465844

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481465844
Reply with quote  #2

1481465844
Report to moderator
1481465844
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481465844

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481465844
Reply with quote  #2

1481465844
Report to moderator
1481465844
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481465844

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481465844
Reply with quote  #2

1481465844
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1481465844
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481465844

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481465844
Reply with quote  #2

1481465844
Report to moderator
1481465844
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481465844

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481465844
Reply with quote  #2

1481465844
Report to moderator
Inaba
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260



View Profile WWW
August 18, 2011, 12:48:12 AM
 #662

The pool is having a hardware issue.  It will be back up in about 30 - 45 minutes while I replace the failed part.

If you're searching these lines for a point, you've probably missed it.  There was never anything there in the first place.
village.idiot
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 271


View Profile
August 18, 2011, 01:41:39 AM
 #663

I wonder if I should set my backup to solo mine just on the chance that I might get really lucky  Grin
Inaba
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260



View Profile WWW
August 18, 2011, 03:26:44 AM
 #664

I apologize for the downtime.  I noticed a problem with the MySQL database and in the process of diagnosing it, I decided to reboot the server which turned out to be a bad idea.

After the server came back up, I continued diagnosing the problem and identified two separate issues causing slow queries on the DB.  I've completely fixed one I believe, the other one is related to the user stats in the API.

I need to do some code rewriting for that, as such, worker stats in the API (yeah, the same thing I just fixed earlier today, which is why the problem just showed up) are disabled until I get it rewritten.  Possibly tonight, but more likely tomorrow.

I apologize for the inconvenience... I guess the user stats hadn't been working since I made a change a few days ago and when I fixed the api to accommodate the change today the old method of calculating stats puts the new table under too big a strain.

I believe this is also the cause of the intermittent Can't connect to RPC errors some of you noticed as well, so this should eliminate that as well.  Three bugs fixed for the price of one!  Bonus... err wait..



If you're searching these lines for a point, you've probably missed it.  There was never anything there in the first place.
organofcorti
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1960


Poor impulse control.


View Profile WWW
August 18, 2011, 03:40:10 AM
 #665

Indeed.  Well, the "rejects" you see in the terminal aren't really rejected in the literal since.  They are accepted and found to be invalid for one reason or another and reported as rejected.  It's fairly easy to turn that off and just report accepted for every share, regardless of its' true disposition in finding a block.

Some pools (eg eligius) report rejects separately as 'stale' and 'invalid' - maybe that might clear some of these misconceptions up?

Bitcoin network and pool analysis 12QxPHEuxDrs7mCyGSx1iVSozTwtquDB3r
follow @oocBlog for new post notifications
1984
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 51


View Profile
August 18, 2011, 06:27:17 AM
 #666

EDIT: whoops wrong thread...
MintCondition
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 322



View Profile
August 18, 2011, 02:01:37 PM
 #667

They modify their getwork server to report less rejects/stales.  There's no mystery there. I can do the same here if it'll make you feel better, though.  I can, in fact, using their methods, give you 0 rejects.
PPS is the only reward type that trick wouldn't work for. For a full rebuttal, see https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=33586.msg465303#msg465303

Inaba
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260



View Profile WWW
August 18, 2011, 02:45:30 PM
 #668

I responded in your thread. My point still stands and is still valid unless there is something new and interesting that you've come up with that no one else has to reduce latency.

If you're searching these lines for a point, you've probably missed it.  There was never anything there in the first place.
Inaba
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260



View Profile WWW
August 18, 2011, 07:37:58 PM
 #669

Ok, userstats should be back in the API now.

If you're searching these lines for a point, you've probably missed it.  There was never anything there in the first place.
PoulGrym
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 83


View Profile
August 18, 2011, 08:00:34 PM
 #670

@Inaba Hey thanks for taking the time to answer and ask the questions.. It's appreciated.

If you found my post helpful, use my tip jar!
BTC: 1Q4um62DJ8kBRMzQ4VQqG6W7eLoPNfx6zn
NODE: 11993447274130959091 NXT: MINT:
Inaba
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260



View Profile WWW
August 19, 2011, 01:19:56 AM
 #671

I've added two new graphs and combined them with the daily hashrate graph.  It's now called Historical Hashrate Graph.

I'll work on adding links to the pages to other graphs next.

If you're searching these lines for a point, you've probably missed it.  There was never anything there in the first place.
hermitagetool
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 10


View Profile
August 19, 2011, 01:30:48 AM
 #672

Hey Inaba, I vaguely recall you thought about providing some kind of incentive for top miners. I'm assuming you've dropped that? Variance is starting to make me think about trying a larger pool.
1984
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 51


View Profile
August 19, 2011, 05:01:54 AM
 #673

I thought the last round was bad....
rearwheels
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238


View Profile
August 19, 2011, 06:08:34 AM
 #674


Inaba's been busy adding new graphs instead of playing games.

Stop with the feature requests, damn it!

Monitor multiple pools - www.btc-poolwatch.com
(forum)

If it's useful, please consider donating: 18bvrJ9Kouxwv8g4tLUemsv1GuxgGk8Kn7
(Pls PM me so I can thank you.)
rearwheels
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238


View Profile
August 19, 2011, 11:32:35 AM
 #675


I'm so pissed of right now I'm going to hold my breath until this block is solved! Damn it!

Monitor multiple pools - www.btc-poolwatch.com
(forum)

If it's useful, please consider donating: 18bvrJ9Kouxwv8g4tLUemsv1GuxgGk8Kn7
(Pls PM me so I can thank you.)
Inaba
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260



View Profile WWW
August 19, 2011, 02:03:10 PM
 #676

Someone get a big stick.

But it's true, I haven't been able to game for the past two or three days!  

I've confirmed a NIC problem on the DB server. I will need to bring the server down to replace it.

I will be moving the server to another rack at the same time and replacing both NICs with some more reliable Intel ones. You should see a very slight increase in response time to the server (translating into slightly less stales).

I will be doing this today instead of next week like planned.  I will probably bring the server down in about an hour, so around 10 AM CST (15:00 UTC).  I hope for downtime to be less than 30 minutes.  But it's better than having intermittent drop outs for no apparent reason all weekend.


If you're searching these lines for a point, you've probably missed it.  There was never anything there in the first place.
Reuef
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 41


View Profile
August 19, 2011, 02:19:54 PM
 #677

Good to know...and thank you for the work you have been doing.

Hopefully this will stop the disconnects I have been getting when long polling ends.   I hate waking up in the morning to find that my rigs shifted to the backup due to disconnects.

Reuef
12MjprGQKxhSHUKaqT7d4QuZ54LCPqr1pd
village.idiot
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 271


View Profile
August 19, 2011, 03:00:28 PM
 #678

Good to know...and thank you for the work you have been doing.

+1
What he said
village.idiot
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 271


View Profile
August 19, 2011, 04:41:20 PM
 #679

stopped and restarted my miners after the server came back up

us.eclipsemc.com:8337 [207.112 MH/s (~177 MH/s)] [Rej: 10/118 (8.47%)]

us.eclipsemc.com:8337 [212.796 MH/s (~258 MH/s)] [Rej: 12/147 (8.16%)]

are we sure this is better? Huh

my CPU miner is showing zero rejects though  Grin
Inaba
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260



View Profile WWW
August 19, 2011, 04:56:57 PM
 #680

It's not better... eth1 is still dropping packets for some inexplicable reason. 

I'm going to be rebooting the server a couple times to see if I can manage to track down the issue.

If you're searching these lines for a point, you've probably missed it.  There was never anything there in the first place.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 [34] 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 ... 226 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!