Bitcoin Forum
December 06, 2016, 04:26:50 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.13.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 ... 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 [83] 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 ... 226 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [1200 TH] EMC: 0 Fee DGM. Anonymous PPS. US & EU servers. No Registration!  (Read 461344 times)
NetworkerZ
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 114


View Profile
January 28, 2012, 07:03:01 PM
 #1641

This is only shown, when you refresh in that moment a block is solved and a new one starts. Must be a "maximum" number belonging to a lib or something. If you add a new worker, and don't use it, the maximum number at "Last Activity" is 15367 too ;-)

Greetz
NetworkerZ
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1481041610
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481041610

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481041610
Reply with quote  #2

1481041610
Report to moderator
1481041610
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481041610

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481041610
Reply with quote  #2

1481041610
Report to moderator
1481041610
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481041610

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481041610
Reply with quote  #2

1481041610
Report to moderator
stiftmaster
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 246


View Profile
January 28, 2012, 08:48:09 PM
 #1642

Idea:

How about charge 5% auto to anyone who uses , um lets see 100-1000000+ Ip's

I think this would be a good offset to da botmastaz, they prolly don't care much and with all the extra traffic and load I think they should prolly pay a fee.. and I don't think they would mind too much


can split fee 2.5% to urself and 2.5% to miners who use less than 100 IPs


everyone is happy!

rejoice! huzzah!

Good Idea,
but if each bot-member has his own ip, the criterion should be the the number of workers per user
stoppots
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 271


View Profile
January 29, 2012, 02:59:02 AM
 #1643

longest block we had in a while, lets get it found and move on
cyberlync
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 226



View Profile
January 29, 2012, 03:01:44 AM
 #1644

I've been thinking about something for some time, and perhaps I should ask others that know better than me.

If the pool set up a VPN for dedicated miners (perhaps filter it somehow so it's not used to stream hulu or whatever), could that improve the stale share count etc? Is it viable in any way with existing hardware or would the increased cpu/memory/bandwidth load require a separate server (and with that, rising running costs etc)?

Giving away your BTC's? Send 'em here: 1F7XgercyaXeDHiuq31YzrVK5YAhbDkJhf
Inaba
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260



View Profile WWW
January 29, 2012, 03:49:38 AM
 #1645

I actually had a white list IP thing in place back when the pool first started, meant to somewhat mitigate DDoS attacks, but it didn't really work out for some reason.  I think instead of charging by the IP, maybe increasing by lack of efficiency would be a better solution.  If someone is requesting 10 getworks and only returning 2 of them, that's kind of a problem... whereas if you have 100 miners and request 200 getworks and return 180 of them, that's much more acceptable.

I'm still evaluating different options - I may try Eloipool, since it would be the easiest to work with with regards to DGM as implemented on EMC.  

And for those of you following the BIP16/17 debate, against my better judgement I upgraded the bitcoind's to the latest mainline git, and for the past several days, it's been basically destroying all the transaction fees, so they went poof.  This is why I was and still am totally NOT in support of BIP 16 because of the timeline involved.  It's a perfect example of why a less than 4 week timeline for a change of this magnitude is not viable.  Fortunately, Luke alerted me to the problem today and I reverted to an earlier rev.

If you're searching these lines for a point, you've probably missed it.  There was never anything there in the first place.
Meni Rosenfeld
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1890



View Profile WWW
January 29, 2012, 05:00:33 AM
 #1646

And for those of you following the BIP16/17 debate, against my better judgement I upgraded the bitcoind's to the latest mainline git, and for the past several days, it's been basically destroying all the transaction fees, so they went poof.  This is why I was and still am totally NOT in support of BIP 16 because of the timeline involved.  It's a perfect example of why a less than 4 week timeline for a change of this magnitude is not viable.  Fortunately, Luke alerted me to the problem today and I reverted to an earlier rev.
Gavin has pledged to personally reimburse all lost transaction fees and quickly fix the problem (he may or may not have done this already).

1EofoZNBhWQ3kxfKnvWkhtMns4AivZArhr   |   Who am I?   |   bitcoin-otc WoT
Bitcoil - Exchange bitcoins for ILS (thread)   |   Israel Bitcoin community homepage (thread)
Analysis of Bitcoin Pooled Mining Reward Systems (thread, summary)  |   PureMining - Infinite-term, deterministic mining bond
Inaba
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260



View Profile WWW
January 29, 2012, 05:44:05 AM
 #1647

Unfortunately I don't think that's going to apply to EMC, since I had disabled the P2SH announce on block creation due to the fact that there was no guarantee of support at any given time from blocks created on EMC.  I don't think there's any way for Gavin to deduce which blocks were affected from EMC... but I could be wrong about that.  The whole situation gives me a headache.


If you're searching these lines for a point, you've probably missed it.  There was never anything there in the first place.
tenzor
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 316


View Profile
January 29, 2012, 09:51:55 AM
 #1648

Why validity of more recent block are higher then late blocks?
Block 164217 (441) has validity 100/120
and
Block 164243 (443) has 112/120

BTW for block 164217 there are a chain up to 164354 (more then 120 blocks)
stoppots
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 271


View Profile
January 29, 2012, 01:13:31 PM
 #1649

man that last block was very fckn unfriendly
stoppots
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 271


View Profile
January 29, 2012, 01:16:39 PM
 #1650

Why validity of more recent block are higher then late blocks?
Block 164217 (441) has validity 100/120
and
Block 164243 (443) has 112/120

BTW for block 164217 there are a chain up to 164354 (more then 120 blocks)
seems blocks 164217 (441) and 164223 (442) are stuck with 100/120 and 94/120 confirmations at the time of this post and still counted as unconfirmed BTC
Inaba
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260



View Profile WWW
January 29, 2012, 03:07:59 PM
 #1651

Should be fixed now ... not sure what happened there, the bitcoind wasn't responding properly.  Grr this is why there needs to be proper testing before deployment. 

If you're searching these lines for a point, you've probably missed it.  There was never anything there in the first place.
jjshabadoo
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 519


View Profile
January 29, 2012, 07:11:01 PM
 #1652

Stick with your instincts inaba. I don't know shet about running a pool, but I bet it's similar to running rigs, don't make any major changes until it is obvious there are solid advantages an things are stable. Same with the pool, 100% up time is what it's all about, stable, stable, stable.

Let the rest of these clowns work out the bugs.

Do what you're comfortable with, you're not making enough off this to make it stressful. This is supposed to be a fun and lucrative hobby for you.

I hope the 3% donation drive is still going on and growing.
Palmdetroit
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 882


PHS 50% PoS - Stop mining start minting


View Profile WWW
January 30, 2012, 02:09:35 AM
 #1653

I actually had a white list IP thing in place back when the pool first started, meant to somewhat mitigate DDoS attacks, but it didn't really work out for some reason.  I think instead of charging by the IP, maybe increasing by lack of efficiency would be a better solution.  If someone is requesting 10 getworks and only returning 2 of them, that's kind of a problem... whereas if you have 100 miners and request 200 getworks and return 180 of them, that's much more acceptable.

Interesting, clever idea.

GenTarkin
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1918


View Profile
January 30, 2012, 05:34:07 PM
 #1654

LOL I come back mining on this pool and it seems to have the worse luck ever as of late....eek .. =/
Heres to better luck! =)

GenTarkin's MOD Kncminer Titan custom firmware! v1.0.4! <--- CLICK HERE
Donations: bitcoin- 1Px71mWNQNKW19xuARqrmnbcem1dXqJ3At || litecoin- LYXrLis3ik6TRn8tdvzAyJ264DRvwYVeEw
stiftmaster
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 246


View Profile
January 30, 2012, 08:50:28 PM
 #1655

LOL I come back mining on this pool and it seems to have the worse luck ever as of late....eek .. =/
Heres to better luck! =)

That wasn´t lucky
2012-01-29     19:48:53     8139891
NetworkerZ
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 114


View Profile
January 30, 2012, 08:58:46 PM
 #1656

Yeah, we really have no luck these days!

Greetz
NetworkerZ
freshzive
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 447


View Profile
January 30, 2012, 10:05:44 PM
 #1657

Donation rate below 0.5% again? Come on guys Sad

But yes, these 9 hour + blocks are deadly

yochdog
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1666



View Profile
January 30, 2012, 10:16:51 PM
 #1658

Donation rate below 0.5% again? Come on guys Sad

But yes, these 9 hour + blocks are deadly

Killing me.  I chose the wrong time to leave Deepbit.  There is something to be said for low variance. 

I am a trusted trader!  Ask Inaba, Luo Demin, Vanderbleek, Sannyasi, Episking, Miner99er, Isepick, Amazingrando, Cablez, ColdHardMetal, Dextryn, MB300sd, Robocoder, gnar1ta$ and many others!
rjk
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 420


1ngldh


View Profile
January 30, 2012, 10:20:50 PM
 #1659

Donation rate below 0.5% again? Come on guys Sad

But yes, these 9 hour + blocks are deadly

Killing me.  I chose the wrong time to leave Deepbit.  There is something to be said for low variance. 
So join a lower fee PPS pool, or maybe even use GPUMAX, then you have the same zero variance and still a better payout.

Mining Rig Extraordinaire - the Trenton BPX6806 18-slot PCIe backplane [PICS] Dead project is dead, all hail the coming of the mighty ASIC!
yochdog
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1666



View Profile
January 30, 2012, 10:27:22 PM
 #1660

Donation rate below 0.5% again? Come on guys Sad

But yes, these 9 hour + blocks are deadly

Killing me.  I chose the wrong time to leave Deepbit.  There is something to be said for low variance. 
So join a lower fee PPS pool, or maybe even use GPUMAX, then you have the same zero variance and still a better payout.

I have debated it.  Gonna stick with Eclipse for now.  The maths tell me the luck should equal out over time.... Wink

I am a trusted trader!  Ask Inaba, Luo Demin, Vanderbleek, Sannyasi, Episking, Miner99er, Isepick, Amazingrando, Cablez, ColdHardMetal, Dextryn, MB300sd, Robocoder, gnar1ta$ and many others!
Pages: « 1 ... 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 [83] 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 ... 226 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!