Bitcoin Forum
December 10, 2016, 12:53:35 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.13.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 [36] 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 ... 226 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [1200 TH] EMC: 0 Fee DGM. Anonymous PPS. US & EU servers. No Registration!  (Read 461946 times)
Inaba
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260



View Profile WWW
August 20, 2011, 03:29:40 PM
 #701

No kidding.  I am going to try to do some gaming today, maybe that'll clear it up.

If you're searching these lines for a point, you've probably missed it.  There was never anything there in the first place.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1481374415
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481374415

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481374415
Reply with quote  #2

1481374415
Report to moderator
1481374415
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481374415

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481374415
Reply with quote  #2

1481374415
Report to moderator
1481374415
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481374415

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481374415
Reply with quote  #2

1481374415
Report to moderator
PoulGrym
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 83


View Profile
August 20, 2011, 05:24:56 PM
 #702

I Left and you guys having trouble ;P I'll poke it a little with my "Magic" stick. *Puff* *Puff*

If you found my post helpful, use my tip jar!
BTC: 1Q4um62DJ8kBRMzQ4VQqG6W7eLoPNfx6zn
NODE: 11993447274130959091 NXT: MINT:
WebMonkey
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 100



View Profile WWW
August 21, 2011, 12:42:17 AM
 #703

best block ever!

'monkey

Team Calvary Racing

support the ministry
BTC: 1KXvwsDwRM2RUdwtnff3feuYrHH2a1JHnR
LTC: LWdf2pnmQqBkg7GP7rmfGYCZaAQrjsu2Yx
FreeJAC
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 112


View Profile
August 21, 2011, 02:17:15 AM
 #704

Crazy crazy stuff!! 4days Sad

Donate here.... 18NiDLDA3qRxkEPN36xrzsdSgvEkbDKgNr
Reuef
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 41


View Profile
August 21, 2011, 02:43:46 AM
 #705

Time to gather a mob of unwashed villagers and go slay this variance monster!

/Grabs a pitchfork and torch!

Reuef
12MjprGQKxhSHUKaqT7d4QuZ54LCPqr1pd
Inaba
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260



View Profile WWW
August 21, 2011, 02:47:47 AM
 #706

Lord, even my gaming isn't helping.  Although I haven't had a lot of time to game. 

I added a couple extra cards today, since I got a replacement PSU... allowed me to put a couple more on a machine that was running light.  Maybe that 6970 will be enough to kick it over the top! Smiley

If you're searching these lines for a point, you've probably missed it.  There was never anything there in the first place.
1984
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 51


View Profile
August 21, 2011, 04:31:40 AM
 #707

best block ever!

'monkey

If by best you mean worst I would have to agree.
kripz
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182



View Profile
August 21, 2011, 06:27:29 AM
 #708

Interested to see how much ill get from this block.

 Merged mining, free SMS notifications, PayPal payout and much more.
http://btcstats.net/sig/JZCODg2
bacon strips
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 31


View Profile
August 21, 2011, 01:12:24 PM
 #709

2 things. 

1. This block is taking way too long.
2. I like the new Historical Hash Rate Graph page, but why is the hash rate scale from 0 to 1000 GH/s for the 7 and 30 day graphs?
village.idiot
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 271


View Profile
August 21, 2011, 01:18:03 PM
 #710

2 things. 

1. This block is taking way too long.
2. I like the new Historical Hash Rate Graph page, but why is the hash rate scale from 0 to 1000 GH/s for the 7 and 30 day graphs?

1. Agreed
2. Looks like something hicuped

And I just noticed 'Proportional Block History' on the Block Stats page
Whatcha got goin' there?
Inaba
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260



View Profile WWW
August 21, 2011, 02:38:27 PM
 #711

We have transitioned from long block to ludicrous block. 

Yeah, I'm not sure why the scale on those graphs are going all the way to 1000.  I will look at that today.

If you're searching these lines for a point, you've probably missed it.  There was never anything there in the first place.
cengique
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 64


View Profile
August 21, 2011, 02:56:32 PM
 #712

I'm confused. My estimated reward shows 0.8 BTC although according to my calculations it should be around 50 *  2 / 60 = 1.6 BTC. My miners were down because of a crash, but I've been contributing 2.1 GH/s since two days. How long does it take for the algorithm to bring my contribution to its full value? When I was back in Continuum, it wouldn't take more than 15 minutes. Although, I know you guys are using different algorithm f and c parameters. Is there a chance we're back to proportional again?

By the way, thank you "ludicrously long block" for waiting for me to start contributing Wink
village.idiot
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 271


View Profile
August 21, 2011, 03:05:15 PM
 #713

I'm confused. My estimated reward shows 0.8 BTC although according to my calculations it should be around 50 *  2 / 60 = 1.6 BTC. My miners were down because of a crash, but I've been contributing 2.1 GH/s since two days. How long does it take for the algorithm to bring my contribution to its full value? When I was back in Continuum, it wouldn't take more than 15 minutes. Although, I know you guys are using different algorithm f and c parameters. Is there a chance we're back to proportional again?

By the way, thank you "ludicrously long block" for waiting for me to start contributing Wink

I know it's not my concern but where are your numbers coming from?

My numbers are 50 (coins per block) / 6514441 (shares for this damned block when I looked) * 37668 (my shares when I looked) = 0.28911153 (my est. reward when I looked)
cengique
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 64


View Profile
August 21, 2011, 03:19:32 PM
 #714

I'm confused. My estimated reward shows 0.8 BTC although according to my calculations it should be around 50 *  2 / 60 = 1.6 BTC.

I know it's not my concern but where are your numbers coming from?

My numbers are 50 (coins per block) / 6514441 (shares for this damned block when I looked) * 37668 (my shares when I looked) = 0.28911153 (my est. reward when I looked)
But that's exactly the calculation for proportional pay? I thought we're using Meni's algorithm that compares exponents of total and your shares. So I was looking in the "ideal" case, by dividing my hashrate to the total hashrate. Because Meni's algorithm uses exponential decay, this is what you should get at the "steady-state". That is, after you contributed long enough. That's why I was asking how long it takes to catch up.
village.idiot
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 271


View Profile
August 21, 2011, 03:26:32 PM
 #715

I remember Inaba and Meni discussing it further back in the thread but I understand it about as well as a woman understands going to Walmart to buy a specific item and then leaving.  Cheesy
cengique
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 64


View Profile
August 21, 2011, 03:54:49 PM
 #716

I remember Inaba and Meni discussing it further back in the thread but I understand it about as well as a woman understands going to Walmart to buy a specific item and then leaving.  Cheesy
It's ok, we can tolerate it because you're the topic idiot Tongue

BTW, you're probably right, using my round shares (111016) in your calculation gives the estimated reward, so we must be using proportional pay. Sad Or I entered this round too late and the leading contributors have much larger number of shares that makes it look like I'm getting proportional pay.
Inaba
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260



View Profile WWW
August 21, 2011, 03:55:10 PM
 #717

The estimated is still based on proportional.  I haven't had enough time to figure out a non-server destroying method for calculation estimated rewards based off of the Meni's algorithm in real time.  For this block, the estimated rewards are going to be way off.

I'll see what I can do about that today, hopefully I will have time this afternoon to sit down and get some work in edgewise. Smiley

But payout is calculated on the geometric score when the round ends.

If you're searching these lines for a point, you've probably missed it.  There was never anything there in the first place.
cengique
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 64


View Profile
August 21, 2011, 04:16:32 PM
 #718

The estimated is still based on proportional.  I haven't had enough time to figure out a non-server destroying method for calculation estimated rewards based off of the Meni's algorithm in real time.  For this block, the estimated rewards are going to be way off.

I'll see what I can do about that today, hopefully I will have time this afternoon to sit down and get some work in edgewise. Smiley

But payout is calculated on the geometric score when the round ends.
Ah, I was suspecting this may be the case. Then, it's no problem. Wink

Maybe the simplest way to implement the geometric reward algorithm in real time is to keep "S" (sum of user's collected score) everytime we submit a share by incrementing it by r^i, where i is the user's round shares. You're already maintaining the total number of shares "I", so it would be easy to calculate: R=(1-f)*B*S*(r-1)/r^I (taken from Meni's original post).
bacon strips
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 31


View Profile
August 21, 2011, 05:37:55 PM
 #719

Inaba, I have no problem with the estimate still being proportional.  I think an easy way to get a more accurate estimate would be to take the 15 min average total hash rate from the my workers page * 50 / pool hash rate. 
Inaba
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260



View Profile WWW
August 21, 2011, 06:18:51 PM
 #720

With the current implementation, all that would have to be pulled out of the database for each request and that gets resource intensive.

I figured a way to set it up with some triggers that will allow me to collect that information with a more simple query though.  I'm going to be working on that now and I will update it shortly.

If you're searching these lines for a point, you've probably missed it.  There was never anything there in the first place.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 [36] 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 ... 226 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!