Bitcoin Forum
December 11, 2016, 08:24:55 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.13.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 ... 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 [78] 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 ... 226 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [1200 TH] EMC: 0 Fee DGM. Anonymous PPS. US & EU servers. No Registration!  (Read 462149 times)
The00Dustin
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 806


View Profile
January 22, 2012, 11:09:10 AM
 #1541

cgminer version 2.1.2 - Started: [2012-01-21 20:10:39]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 (5s):2206.5 (avg):2205.3 Mh/s | Q:538  A:1247  R:49  HW:0  E:232%  U:28.40/m
 TQ: 12  ST: 12  SS: 0  DW: 13  NB: 5  LW: 3477  GF: 0  RF: 0
 Connected to http://us.eclipsemc.com:9009 ...
Code:
[2012-01-21 20:52:01] Accepted 00000000.17b8643c.12ab092b GPU 3 thread 3 pool 0
[2012-01-21 20:52:04] Rejected 00000000.81bcbb88.7355e585 GPU 4 thread 10 pool 0
[2012-01-21 20:52:06] Rejected 00000000.1ba415a5.c6cf9de6 GPU 3 thread 9 pool 0
[2012-01-21 20:52:06] Rejected 00000000.146d4aa8.ad6da923 GPU 5 thread 5 pool 0
[2012-01-21 20:52:06] Rejected 00000000.4d9b5a18.5cd36cbb GPU 4 thread 10 pool 0
[2012-01-21 20:52:07] Rejected 00000000.ea38dd8e.0e5615f7 GPU 5 thread 5 pool 0
[2012-01-21 20:52:08] Rejected 00000000.6b7ca07e.2958207f GPU 2 thread 8 pool 0
[2012-01-21 20:52:08] Rejected 00000000.d8acb32f.ce7cc697 GPU 5 thread 11 pool 0
[2012-01-21 20:52:10] Rejected 00000000.2f222707.1ce7a6e1 GPU 2 thread 2 pool 0
[2012-01-21 20:52:11] Rejected 00000000.ffcee7b5.fc09caa7 GPU 3 thread 9 pool 0
[2012-01-21 20:52:13] Rejected 00000000.316304f5.c4489c52 GPU 0 thread 0 pool 0
[2012-01-21 20:52:14] Rejected 00000000.0f95e848.02301d77 GPU 0 thread 0 pool 0
[2012-01-21 20:52:14] Rejected 00000000.1ef6fd64.d82cb77e GPU 0 thread 6 pool 0
[2012-01-21 20:52:14] Rejected 00000000.66137bdb.7bd5782d GPU 2 thread 8 pool 0
[2012-01-21 20:52:16] Rejected 00000000.14f62233.a2a4bace GPU 1 thread 1 pool 0
[2012-01-21 20:52:16] Rejected 00000000.0dbd70e7.79156fd9 GPU 2 thread 8 pool 0
[2012-01-21 20:52:18] Rejected 00000000.7f3c4f52.9a10195a GPU 3 thread 9 pool 0
[2012-01-21 20:52:19] Rejected 00000000.c7822d9f.7693234d GPU 5 thread 5 pool 0
[2012-01-21 20:52:22] Rejected 00000000.4cb30895.5772a449 GPU 4 thread 10 pool 0
[2012-01-21 20:52:23] Rejected 00000000.c2d95a8b.94714269 GPU 2 thread 8 pool 0
[2012-01-21 20:52:26] Rejected 00000000.80321797.a988cd73 GPU 0 thread 0 pool 0
[2012-01-21 20:52:31] Rejected 00000000.0924cd0f.d040acef GPU 1 thread 7 pool 0
[2012-01-21 20:52:34] New block detected on network before longpoll, waiting on fresh work
[2012-01-21 20:52:35] Accepted 00000000.40349dda.0911c766 GPU 1 thread 1 pool 0
This happened to me too, quite possibly at the same time, but my connected line indicated I was connected with LP.  LP problem?
1481444695
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481444695

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481444695
Reply with quote  #2

1481444695
Report to moderator
1481444695
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481444695

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481444695
Reply with quote  #2

1481444695
Report to moderator
1481444695
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481444695

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481444695
Reply with quote  #2

1481444695
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
Proofer
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 251


View Profile
January 22, 2012, 01:43:52 PM
 #1542

cgminer version 2.1.2 - Started: [2012-01-21 20:10:39]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 (5s):2206.5 (avg):2205.3 Mh/s | Q:538  A:1247  R:49  HW:0  E:232%  U:28.40/m
 TQ: 12  ST: 12  SS: 0  DW: 13  NB: 5  LW: 3477  GF: 0  RF: 0
 Connected to http://us.eclipsemc.com:9009 ...
This happened to me too, quite possibly at the same time, but my connected line indicated I was connected with LP.  LP problem?

I omitted the "LP" part of the line but it was there; sorry for the confusion.  Not quoted were many other instances of rejections of lesser number -- 2 to 12 -- preceding a "New block detected".
Inaba
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260



View Profile WWW
January 22, 2012, 03:07:32 PM
 #1543

I am going to be making some changes later today that should help with the problem.  I will have to bring US2 down for a brief period of time to make the switch.  Probably won't be a for a few hours yet.

Yes, there was a problem with LP on US2.  This change should also address that.

If you're searching these lines for a point, you've probably missed it.  There was never anything there in the first place.
The00Dustin
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 806


View Profile
January 22, 2012, 04:11:35 PM
 #1544

Yes, there was a problem with LP on US2.  This change should also address that.
Proofer's output shows us (not us2), and I was also on us, but at 8337.

EDIT:  Clearly my fingers were tangled up when I tried to type "Proofer" (fixed).
Inaba
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260



View Profile WWW
January 22, 2012, 04:21:27 PM
 #1545

Ah, yeah... that's right.  LP was having problems on all severs. 

I am going to disable port 9009 at some point, so switch over to port 8337 on either US1 or US2 as soon as possible.  US2 will be replacing 9009, and I may add a third server, depending how things work out.  All severs will be on 8337 though.

If you're searching these lines for a point, you've probably missed it.  There was never anything there in the first place.
Inaba
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260



View Profile WWW
January 22, 2012, 04:49:17 PM
 #1546

Ok... I made some changes to US2.  Let me know how that affects stales on US2 specifically and also possibly US1.

If you're searching these lines for a point, you've probably missed it.  There was never anything there in the first place.
JWU42
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1484


View Profile
January 22, 2012, 05:38:38 PM
 #1547

Will jump on us2 and advise...

UPDATE - 0.2% after 30 minutes across 3 miners -- best I've seen in my couple days here...

UPDATE 2 - .017% after 60 minutes  Grin Shocked

GPG PubKey | THREEMA | OTC | HeatWare | 1JWU42QLGFESoQCC4iPzUDTRiC9nx5bi95
Math Man
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 150


View Profile
January 22, 2012, 06:03:18 PM
 #1548

Ok... I made some changes to US2.  Let me know how that affects stales on US2 specifically and also possibly US1.


I just reset my workers on US2, and I'll report back later.

Update: On the rejects I'm getting in Phoenix, I'm getting this error "TypeError in RPC sendResult callback."  It's only been a few minutes.  So, my reject rate isn't meaningful at this point.
Proofer
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 251


View Profile
January 22, 2012, 06:49:15 PM
 #1549

Ok... I made some changes to US2.  Let me know how that affects stales on US2 specifically and also possibly US1.

Um, is "US1" a nickname for us.eclipsemc.com or is it part of a new domain name?  If the latter it's new enough that my DNS doesn't resolve it.

Separately...
After typing that question, I went to the web site to check.  The only place I see a server domain name there  is in two FAQ questions referring to specific mining software; the answers are command lines which include "us.eclipsemc.com:8337".  I know there's pool domain info in the OP here; mightn't it be good to have basic info on the home page of the pool web site?
Inaba
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260



View Profile WWW
January 22, 2012, 06:56:43 PM
 #1550

Sorry, US1 and US are synonymous at the moment.  US2 is the only new hostname available.

I'm not familiar with the Phoenix miner ... does anyone know what that error indicates?

If you're searching these lines for a point, you've probably missed it.  There was never anything there in the first place.
Math Man
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 150


View Profile
January 22, 2012, 08:11:01 PM
 #1551

Sorry, US1 and US are synonymous at the moment.  US2 is the only new hostname available.

I'm not familiar with the Phoenix miner ... does anyone know what that error indicates?

I'll ask what that error means in the Phoenix miner thread.

Since my reset, I have about 8000 shares with a reject rate of 0.91%.  The My Workers page shows 0.42% stales.

What causes the My Workers page to report less stales/rejects?  Could it be a bad calculation on my end that is rejected before it is send back to the pool server to be verified?

edit: By the way, the reject rate is half what is was compared to the past few days.  Nice work.
Inaba
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260



View Profile WWW
January 22, 2012, 08:14:27 PM
 #1552

No, the My Workers page stales is not calculating right.  I wanted to get the stales under control before I looked into what was going on as far as why it's not calculating right.  

In addition to that, when I restart the server, your client counts all the rejects and the server doesn't, so you'll get less listed on the server vs what's listed on your client.

And lastly - I think most clients increment the reject counter for any reason - the server only increments the counter for actual stales.  So unknown, duplicate, etc... does not get counted.

If you're searching these lines for a point, you've probably missed it.  There was never anything there in the first place.
cyberlync
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 226



View Profile
January 22, 2012, 08:39:57 PM
 #1553

Did you just do something with the pools?

Giving away your BTC's? Send 'em here: 1F7XgercyaXeDHiuq31YzrVK5YAhbDkJhf
Inaba
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260



View Profile WWW
January 22, 2012, 09:03:55 PM
 #1554

Not for awhile now (an hour at least) - why?

If you're searching these lines for a point, you've probably missed it.  There was never anything there in the first place.
cyberlync
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 226



View Profile
January 22, 2012, 09:05:40 PM
 #1555

Must be my connection then, cards went on backup server. Approx half an hour ago.

Giving away your BTC's? Send 'em here: 1F7XgercyaXeDHiuq31YzrVK5YAhbDkJhf
Inaba
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260



View Profile WWW
January 22, 2012, 09:10:16 PM
 #1556

That might have been about when I reset one of the servers ... but I thought it was a bit longer.  In either case, it shouldn't have been down for more than a few seconds and both servers (us1 and us2) are up and taking requests right now.

I did make a DNS change, but it was just to add us1 to the dns table, I did not remove or change any existing records.

If you're searching these lines for a point, you've probably missed it.  There was never anything there in the first place.
JWU42
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1484


View Profile
January 22, 2012, 09:16:02 PM
 #1557

The stale /reject count was tracking fine for me after a reset but is now off - reporting about 50% of the rejects showing in CGminer.

Even with my higher reported rejects we are still under 1% -- about 0.85% after 3 1/2 hours on US2.*

GPG PubKey | THREEMA | OTC | HeatWare | 1JWU42QLGFESoQCC4iPzUDTRiC9nx5bi95
cyberlync
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 226



View Profile
January 22, 2012, 09:16:29 PM
 #1558

Yeah, forgot to mention (d'oh) that I was back and mining within a few mins or so. Sorry for the hassle.

Giving away your BTC's? Send 'em here: 1F7XgercyaXeDHiuq31YzrVK5YAhbDkJhf
Inaba
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260



View Profile WWW
January 22, 2012, 11:04:16 PM
 #1559

I'm not going to touch the servers again tonight, so reset your miners if it's not too much of a hassle and see how the stale count tracks.  If I do happen to have to restart the server(s) or if there is a problem with them, I will post here when the problem/reset occurred.


If you're searching these lines for a point, you've probably missed it.  There was never anything there in the first place.
twmz
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 737



View Profile
January 23, 2012, 04:59:06 AM
 #1560

Looks great now (0.6%):


Was I helpful?  1TwmzX1wBxNF2qtAJRhdKmi2WyLZ5VHRs
WoT, GPG

Bitrated user: ewal.
Pages: « 1 ... 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 [78] 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 ... 226 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!