Bitcoin Forum
December 11, 2016, 04:39:06 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.13.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 ... 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 [68] 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 ... 226 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [1200 TH] EMC: 0 Fee DGM. Anonymous PPS. US & EU servers. No Registration!  (Read 462106 times)
Inaba
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260



View Profile WWW
January 09, 2012, 08:11:43 PM
 #1341

Your total is actually the last 50 blocks, so your total will fluctuate as blocks fall off/add on.  I am thinking of just making the change so the total for all blocks is displayed at the bottom.  If I look at all of your blocks, you're at +2.73% and as I said, that total does not include your banked positive. You will actually see your total rate jump quite a bit in 9 more blocks as all those -% blocks at the bottom of your current list drop off.

If I look at say the last 17 blocks, you're at +0.15% proportional differential.  Or, if I take the last 41 blocks, you're score would improve from -1.09% to -0.69% (~40% improvement) - that does not take into account the 9 additional blocks we've yet to find, so that might actually improve further.


So... yeah, it's kind of a useless stat I am becoming more and more convinced.  An aggregate total would seem to be more useful, but it would be far more slower moving.  Especially as more and more blocks are gained.

If you're searching these lines for a point, you've probably missed it.  There was never anything there in the first place.
1481431146
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481431146

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481431146
Reply with quote  #2

1481431146
Report to moderator
1481431146
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481431146

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481431146
Reply with quote  #2

1481431146
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
Hotdog453
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 120



View Profile
January 09, 2012, 10:55:18 PM
 #1342

The mobile formatted site is quite possibly the cleverest thing ever.
NetworkerZ
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 114


View Profile
January 09, 2012, 10:58:58 PM
 #1343

+1
Inaba
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260



View Profile WWW
January 10, 2012, 01:12:50 AM
 #1344

I had to make some changes to a table to accommodate the display of stale shares, so hashrate went up dramatically on every worker due to the way hashrate is calculated, it should return to normal in about 15 minutes.  Not that anyone would panic if we really had 1 TH/s but you know.

I'm going to have to restart the getwork server at some point to make the shares since reset work, but I'll give a bit of notice before I do that.

In the meantime, can those who are interested let me know what stats you'd like to see on a dedicated stats page?

*EDIT* it seems to have freaked out the failed miner notification for a few miners (some data probably got pushed off the end of a table by the update) so the system is thinking some miners are idle if they take a bit of time to submit a share, even though they really aren't.

*EDIT 2* I went ahead and just cleared the table, so hashrate will build up again as appropriate.  The spurious alerts only applied to disabled miners, not active ones, so you can disregard that, unless you received an alert for one of your disabled miners.  I apologize.

If you're searching these lines for a point, you've probably missed it.  There was never anything there in the first place.
Inaba
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260



View Profile WWW
January 10, 2012, 01:57:17 AM
 #1345

Wow ok, so I really bolloxed that up... sorry to those that got a bunch of failed miner email or SMS messages.  Things should be good now and no more false alerts should be going out.

I'm going to stop poking at it after I get the stale count display correct, but that shouldn't affect anything as far as hashrate or failed miners go.

If you're searching these lines for a point, you've probably missed it.  There was never anything there in the first place.
jjiimm_64
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1680


View Profile
January 10, 2012, 03:42:12 AM
 #1346

Anaba,
  I dont know if you realize that the sorting is not working after adding the stales.

for instance, if I sort by my reset column: (desc)
16216(0)
14149(0)
16384(0)
16258(0)

I hope I didn't send this too early.?


1jimbitm6hAKTjKX4qurCNQubbnk2YsFw
Inaba
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260



View Profile WWW
January 10, 2012, 04:04:29 AM
 #1347

Doh, I forgot to add that fix.  I'll do that now, should be working in about 10 minutes.

If you're searching these lines for a point, you've probably missed it.  There was never anything there in the first place.
jjiimm_64
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1680


View Profile
January 10, 2012, 06:51:26 AM
 #1348

Doh, I forgot to add that fix.  I'll do that now, should be working in about 10 minutes.


Thanks for the hard work. we appreciate it..

Is there anyway to get the table back to a single row.?  I have alot of rigs and the data is harder to compare because of the unaligned numbers and the spacing in the table.  with 16 rigs and more on the way i have to scroll alot too.

thxs again
Jim

edit:  I see you have a nowrap on the td...... hmmmmmm. damn HTML drives me crazy..........

1jimbitm6hAKTjKX4qurCNQubbnk2YsFw
stoppots
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 271


View Profile
January 10, 2012, 08:52:34 AM
 #1349

Very impressed with the many features and feedback eclipse offers. Keep up the good work.
jjshabadoo
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 519


View Profile
January 10, 2012, 09:12:35 AM
 #1350

I'd like to see a 24 hour, 7 day and one month hash rate average per worker. This was my favorite feature of yourbtc.net.

Even if not for each individual worker, just for your total account.

Hash rate and maybe BTC generated per worker also with same parameters(24hrs 7days 1 month)also.

awesome pool man. I'm up to about 10 GH/s with two accounts so far and looking to add more.
Inaba
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260



View Profile WWW
January 10, 2012, 01:37:58 PM
 #1351

Jjjim - Yes, I have 35 workers, so I feel your pain.  I will try to get that fixed asap.  For some reason the <div> tag is causing the cell to wrap... not sure why.

stoppots - Thanks!  If there's anything you'd like to see, let me know!

jjsabadoo - I will be adding some of that to the new stats page I am trying to put together, at least as an overall.  I will see what I can do about doing stuff for individual workers, too.

If you're searching these lines for a point, you've probably missed it.  There was never anything there in the first place.
Inaba
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260



View Profile WWW
January 10, 2012, 11:05:35 PM
 #1352

My Workers should no long be wrapping the text.

If you're searching these lines for a point, you've probably missed it.  There was never anything there in the first place.
jjiimm_64
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1680


View Profile
January 10, 2012, 11:07:05 PM
 #1353

My Workers should no long be wrapping the text.

works....  thank you, thank you, thank you....

question about the stale number.

my top row sorted by since reset is.  62925 (0)  5779 (36)    1276554 (6470)

if the number in parans are stales, how is it possible to have more stales since block found then since reset?


1jimbitm6hAKTjKX4qurCNQubbnk2YsFw
Inaba
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260



View Profile WWW
January 11, 2012, 01:03:48 AM
 #1354

Reset stales are not really active yet, since i need to restart the getwork server to make it live and I have not done that yet.  Additionally, resetting them is not possible at the moment due to the way hashrate is calculated, so I have to recode some stuff to make share resets resettable anyway.

If you're searching these lines for a point, you've probably missed it.  There was never anything there in the first place.
gnar1ta$
Donator
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 756


View Profile
January 11, 2012, 04:58:10 AM
 #1355

Inaba, how is the Pay to Script vote handled with pooled mining? I'm assuming the decision is yours?

Losing hundreds of Bitcoins with the best scammers in the business - BFL, Avalon, KNC, HashFast.
Inaba
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260



View Profile WWW
January 11, 2012, 01:21:27 PM
 #1356

I'm sorry I don't understand your question.  What do you mean by Pay to Script?

If you're searching these lines for a point, you've probably missed it.  There was never anything there in the first place.
gnar1ta$
Donator
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 756


View Profile
January 11, 2012, 02:58:59 PM
 #1357

https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/BIP_0016
I'm sure thee is a thread in technical discussion that's way over my head, but Coinlab posted this:

Quote
Especially of note  is that Gavin asked miners who agreed with the proposal to add the string “P2SH” in blocks they mine; he will count blocks mined during January to determine how the BitCoin mining community ‘votes’ on this issue. This is an interesting and novel development in BitCoin governance, and we look forward to seeing how this ‘voting’ mechanism evolves.

I was just wondering if it is going in our blocks.

Losing hundreds of Bitcoins with the best scammers in the business - BFL, Avalon, KNC, HashFast.
Inaba
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260



View Profile WWW
January 11, 2012, 03:12:13 PM
 #1358

Ah... hmm... no I don't see that happening by the timeframe he has put forth.  With the way merged mining is handled now, upgrading bitcoind is somewhat complicated and it's not going to happen prior to February most likely.  

I'm also unsure (even though it doesn't affect EMC at the moment) how that would affect how PSJ handles both BTC work generation (and subsequently work submittal) and how that would interact with the merged mining in PSJ.  As I am still moving toward (albeit slowly) a PSJ test roll out, it will also be an issue going forward.  

In either case, it doesn't seem as it will affect end users one way or another as far as mining goes - but it would be a handy change for bitcoin in general.  But the timeframe is just too short.  

If you're searching these lines for a point, you've probably missed it.  There was never anything there in the first place.
kano
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 1932


Linux since 1997 RedHat 4


View Profile
January 11, 2012, 03:30:50 PM
 #1359

just add it on the end of the coinbase - 5 extra characters '0x04' and 'P2SH'
(although it could be '0x06' '/P2SH/' the wording isn't really clear Tongue)

Pool: https://kano.is BTC: 1KanoiBupPiZfkwqB7rfLXAzPnoTshAVmb
CKPool and CGMiner developer, IRC FreeNode #ckpool and #cgminer kanoi
Help keep Bitcoin secure by mining on pools with Stratum, the best protocol to mine Bitcoins with ASIC hardware
Inaba
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260



View Profile WWW
January 11, 2012, 03:42:03 PM
 #1360

But that would imply that the bitcoind would be ready to process those transactions and it wouldn't.  Or do I misunderstand the BIP?

Quote
To gracefully upgrade and ensure no long-lasting block-chain split occurs, more than 50% of miners must support full validation of the new transaction type and must switch from the old validation rules to the new rules at the same time.
To judge whether or not more than 50% of hashing power supports this BIP, miners are asked to upgrade their software and put the string "/P2SH/" in the input of the coinbase transaction for blocks that they create.
On February 1, 2012, the block-chain will be examined to determine the number of blocks supporting pay-to-script-hash for the previous 7 days.

Just adding the appearance of support would be counterproductive, to my understanding.  

If you're searching these lines for a point, you've probably missed it.  There was never anything there in the first place.
Pages: « 1 ... 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 [68] 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 ... 226 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!