Claymore's ZCash/BTG AMD GPU Miner v12.6 (Windows/Linux)

[citronick]

Bravo Claymore!

v8 now gives me R9 390 = 270 H/s per card!

Updates:

R9 290 = 268 H/s

R9 290x = 278 H/s

RX 480 = 172 H/s

R9 Nano = 278 H/s 297 H/s !

R7 370 = 110 H/s

Best performer after v8, R9 Nano (HBM 8GB), 297 H/s !

[1714669400]

1714669400

[1714669400]

1714669400

[RidgyDidge]

Claymores V8.0 You've got to be kidding me, No Way !

I can't believe I am getting 210sol/s on my 280x, outstanding work Claymore !

[snakey]

Rx 480 at 205 sol and  99w at gpu z
Rx 470 at 182 sol and  61w
-i is at 6

Total power draw is 330
Total hashing power is 387

Waiting for my usb risers so i can put more videocards in my mobo

can you please  send me your 470 ROM ?

Would love to know how you did that too please?

[peteycamey]

R9 280X *6
Error message:


10:35:21:595   ff4   got 36 bytes
10:35:21:595   ff4   buf: {"id":4,"result":true,"error":null}

10:35:21:595   ff4   parse packet: 35
10:35:21:596   ff4   ZEC: Share accepted (359 ms)!

10:35:21:596   ff4   new buf size: 0
10:35:22:292   ae4   GPU #0 returned incorrect data! 4da31152
10:35:22:695   e7c   GPU #0 returned incorrect data! 8511e9db
10:35:25:132   c38   GPU #0 returned incorrect data! 9366fdf0
10:35:28:417   b5c   GPU #0 returned incorrect data! 45f27137
10:35:28:606   e7c   GPU #0 returned incorrect data! a8e12452
10:35:29:379   ae4   GPU #0 returned incorrect data! c133ed50
10:35:30:777   b5c   GPU #0 returned incorrect data! f1c118da

V7.0 no problem
what is the problem?

I have the same problem.

[Nthused]

R9 280X *6
Error message:


10:35:21:595   ff4   got 36 bytes
10:35:21:595   ff4   buf: {"id":4,"result":true,"error":null}

10:35:21:595   ff4   parse packet: 35
10:35:21:596   ff4   ZEC: Share accepted (359 ms)!

10:35:21:596   ff4   new buf size: 0
10:35:22:292   ae4   GPU #0 returned incorrect data! 4da31152
10:35:22:695   e7c   GPU #0 returned incorrect data! 8511e9db
10:35:25:132   c38   GPU #0 returned incorrect data! 9366fdf0
10:35:28:417   b5c   GPU #0 returned incorrect data! 45f27137
10:35:28:606   e7c   GPU #0 returned incorrect data! a8e12452
10:35:29:379   ae4   GPU #0 returned incorrect data! c133ed50
10:35:30:777   b5c   GPU #0 returned incorrect data! f1c118da

V7.0 no problem
what is the problem?

I have the same problem.

Your intensity is set too high, I get more hashrate if I set it at 4 or 6 intensity but more GPU #0 returned incorrect data!, I use -i 2 with no problems and it never gets them and is stable as anything.
210sol/s with 280x stock everything besides intensity

[Simon_Grape]

a little over 1 hour of mining with CM v8.

7 x RX 480 8GB ASUS Strix - stock clocks and Roms
MSI Z97 motherboard
Intel Celeron 1840
8GB RAM
USB3 powered risers
Windows 10
20GB Page file (manual)
intensity -i 6
eVGA 1600 psu
1081 Watts (average at wall)

GPU #0: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units
GPU #1: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units
GPU #2: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units
GPU #3: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units
GPU #4: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units
GPU #5: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units
GPU #6: Ellesmere, 8192 MB available, 36 compute units
ZEC - Total Speed: 1372.253 H/s, Total Shares: 5494, Rejected: 14, Time: 01:10
ZEC: GPU0 192.734 H/s, GPU1 197.576 H/s, GPU2 196.919 H/s, GPU3 195.264 H/s, GPU4 197.817 H/s, GPU5 195.069 H/s, GPU6 196.874 H/s
Pool switches: ZEC - 0
Current ZEC pool share target: 0x00418937 (diff: 1000H)
GPU0 t=54C fan=46%

Great Work Claymore!!! Looks great so far - Averaging about 196 H/s with stock RX 480

[mamboOo]

v8
3x r9 390x 900H/s
3x 480 8gb 600H/s

1.5kH/s  1200w

[naeme18720]

Radeon 7850 2GB - 110 H/S
R7 370 - 122 H/S
R9 7970/280x HACKED BIOS - 220 H/s
Radeon 7950 - 200 H/s
R9 290 Stilt bios - 280 H/s


Worst is ....

RX 470 4GB - 180 H/s

For rx 470 what memory and gpu clock please say I'm just 167H/s claymore v8

[ZeroGee]

Some hash/ watt numbers from a single 295x2. At the wall only that one card connected to psu.

275s/s 180w
290s/s 195w
365s/s 230w
480s/s 350w
500s/s 400w
560s/s 560w (default for that card)

High and low end numbers could be better but I am more interested in that 200-400w zone. Also it is not that gpu alone, mb+ddr+cpu+os+riser+pcie slot combo still does something to equihash performance.

Thanks for posting. I'm getting 495Sol/s with stock clocks, powlim 0, default parameters (-i 4, etc), Crimson 16.9.2. What are you using?

[QuintLeo]

Claymore v8
Windows 7
Catalyst 15.12

 HIS IceQ HD 7870 (the huge-blower-style thing)

Afterburner settings (I prefer the custom fan profile option but do have -tt 5 set to keep an eye on temps)
900/1450 clock
-20 power limit (lowest it will go)

 appx. 110 h/s (I'm guessing h/s is actually solutions/sec)


 Clock anywhere from 900 to 1020 had no noticeable effect on hashrate, maxing out memory clock from the 1250 stock added about 10 h/s


 Card mis-identifies as a "R9 270/270x" in the miner but that's the AMD "recycled most of the HD 78xx/79xx cards to become R9 2xx cards" generational shuffle at work and is not an issue that needs addressing.


 Same card managed 10.5 Mh/s on Ethereum while running noticeably hotter.


 I was hoping to run the R9 280x that was originally in this rig but it appears to have died during my last move.

 Looks like time to reconfigure a couple rigs, 1x R9 280x and 1x R9 290 doesn't seem like a good choice any more on 2 of my old "spare parts" rigs.


 It would be interesting to see what my HD 7750s would manage but it looks like they don't have enough RAM to run this?

[sirslayer]

the  HD 7870 is based from the AMD Pitcairn family of chips. The AMD 7870, AMD8870 and AMD 270x are the same chip but with different DirectX requirments..  The AMD HD 7750 is from the Cape Verde chips which is only 512 shaders in therory should be at 40s/h using V8 on zcash  if you have the 2gb verison

[sfairat83]

2Gb version not necessary,
I have HD7850 1Gb it work fine 95sol on v8

[Assaro]

Is anyone else having problems controlling their rigs via ethmon with v8.0?

For my farm, v8.0 seems to have broken the communications between my miners and ethmon.  Everything is in read-only mode, even when I specify the correct -mport settings.  I have checked all firewall settings, including application-specific settings, and everything is normal.  I've even disabled the firewall to see if that was the issue.  Still doesn't work.  I can see stats on ethmon, but I can't tell ethmon to restart my rig.  It is very important I have control via ethmon, as I have over 40 rigs.  Whats going on?

Ppl had the same problem after the launching of v8. Claymore did some changes and reuploaded the miner. Try to download the miner again and try, should be workinng correctly.....

[kay5ive]

2Gb version not necessary,
I have HD7850 1Gb it work fine 95sol on v8

Would you like to share the price of HD 7850?

[grn]

any report on R9 Fury speed??

Fury X in default works with 310 H/s

Fury air  275H @ 155w at wall

[ocminer]

In case someone wnats 5% extra coins, there's a 0% fee and 5% bonus black friday on https://zcl.suprnova.cc and https://zec.suprnova.cc

[ffthomas]

I can't see the GPU temperature and FAN speed in Claymore (not just in v8, in older versions too). I also can't see or set any parameters in WattTool (and only see the GPU temperature and is jumping randomly between 0C and 1924761C). What could be the problem?

I use WIN 10, Catalyst 16.10.3, I have 6*RX470 and 6*RX480 rig, I get the same problem.

[Jinx99]

Tahiti cards, 2048 sp  ~ 200 h/s
Ellesmere, 2304 sp  ~ 200 h/s
Pitcairn, 1280 sp ~ 100 h/s
Tonga, 2048 sp - only 140. Why so nerfish? 

Claymore, fix this issue with Tonga cards pls.

[_ZET_]

In case someone wnats 5% extra coins, there's a 0% fee and 5% bonus black friday on https://zcl.suprnova.cc and https://zec.suprnova.cc

I can confirm BlackFriday promo is working properly.

Great event.


Btw

R9 280x 190-200 H/s;

RX 470 4GB 170-175 H/s

RX 480 8GB 200H/s

[Hotmetal]

In case someone wnats 5% extra coins, there's a 0% fee and 5% bonus black friday on https://zcl.suprnova.cc and https://zec.suprnova.cc

Very kind, thank you!