br2459
|
|
March 07, 2017, 05:05:44 PM |
|
Hello all, anyone using XFX R9 280x Black Edition with Elpida memory? What are you hashrates?
|
|
|
|
golden0707
|
|
March 07, 2017, 05:24:41 PM |
|
Probably nicehash changed ports/settings for some reason. I will check it and change ports in next update, it will be available in 2-3 days. Just noticed about a problem in linux, don't know if was already mentioned, but need to be fixed asap. I'm getting this error continually and is filling really fast my log folder in /var/log/kern.log specially, also some in syslog
Fixed, will be included in next update. Do you have an ETA for us? It will be in 2 to 3 days. How d'u know ?
|
|
|
|
scryptr
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1797
Merit: 1028
|
|
March 07, 2017, 05:30:58 PM |
|
Probably nicehash changed ports/settings for some reason. I will check it and change ports in next update, it will be available in 2-3 days. Just noticed about a problem in linux, don't know if was already mentioned, but need to be fixed asap. I'm getting this error continually and is filling really fast my log folder in /var/log/kern.log specially, also some in syslog
Fixed, will be included in next update. Do you have an ETA for us? It will be in 2 to 3 days. How d'u know ? CLAYMORE SAID SO-- There are many informative posts within just the last 2-3 pages of this thread. In one of them, Claymore said that the latest update will be within a couple days. He is aware of the bug. --scryptr
|
|
|
|
rpg
|
|
March 07, 2017, 07:31:13 PM |
|
@Claymore
not a big bug and probably a pain to fix as it needs a new timer, but when a gpu hangs and you restart the miner you process a new dev fee as it seems to be using the connect time instead of the time the miner is up
|
|
|
|
Muddybit
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 18
Merit: 0
|
|
March 08, 2017, 12:46:12 AM |
|
ubuntu 16.04 kernel 4.8 with amdgpu-pro 16.6 amd r9 270x. getting only 10 s/s. I know fglrx is recommended for older amd cards, but is 10 s/s expected? Using default intensity.
|
|
|
|
prichina
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 82
Merit: 0
|
|
March 08, 2017, 01:01:26 AM |
|
dwarwpool is so fast, lets make it great pool, it needs more workers. It does not need ssl/tlc connection btw...you dont need to worry about 2.5 dev fee
|
|
|
|
PetATL
|
|
March 08, 2017, 04:39:53 AM |
|
Cl v12.2
Gigabyte 280x 301 H/s Gigabyte 290 331 H/s to slow I try overlock 1150/1250 but only 7 H/s more
|
|
|
|
Westant
Member
Offline
Activity: 355
Merit: 10
|
|
March 08, 2017, 07:08:57 AM |
|
Cl v12.2
Gigabyte 280x 301 H/s Gigabyte 290 331 H/s to slow I try overlock 1150/1250 but only 7 H/s more
You need faster memory for the 290.
|
|
|
|
shadabahmed
|
|
March 08, 2017, 07:54:12 AM |
|
dwarwpool is so fast, lets make it great pool, it needs more workers. It does not need ssl/tlc connection btw...you dont need to worry about 2.5 dev fee
dwarfpool is a thief. flypool is doing good job now a days
|
Am I spamming? Report me!
|
|
|
jelin1984
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2408
Merit: 1004
|
|
March 08, 2017, 08:41:59 AM |
|
does anyone try
nanopool
|
|
|
|
Visbay
|
|
March 08, 2017, 08:51:57 AM |
|
dwarwpool is so fast, lets make it great pool, it needs more workers. It does not need ssl/tlc connection btw...you dont need to worry about 2.5 dev fee
dwarfpool is a thief. flypool is doing good job now a days Maybe the variation in Dwarfpool is too high as it has fewer users.
|
|
|
|
lucianh
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
|
|
March 08, 2017, 09:05:51 AM |
|
Can anyone please tell me what's the hasing rate of 290x :d
|
|
|
|
Bananana
|
|
March 08, 2017, 12:09:40 PM |
|
anybody know if xfx is a good brand? Also is it undervolt locked?
|
|
|
|
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325
Miners developer
|
|
March 08, 2017, 02:25:02 PM |
|
v12.3:
- slightly improved speed, about 410H/s on stock 390X, 465H/s on stock Nano, 300H/s on stock 280X, 305H/s on stock RX480. - improved stability for high "-i" option values, added "-i 9" option value. - fixed a few bugs.
|
|
|
|
IOTUSA
|
|
March 08, 2017, 02:47:55 PM |
|
v12.3:
- slightly improved speed, about 410H/s on stock 390X, 465H/s on stock Nano, 300H/s on stock 280X, 305H/s on stock RX480. - improved stability for high "-i" option values, added "-i 9" option value. - fixed a few bugs.
Claymore, I have had constant issues with my Rx 480. The latest being 'GPU x hangs in OpenCL call' got any clue? Tried literally all drivers possible, currently on 16.3x all other settings and system variables are correct.
|
|
|
|
pelebel
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
|
|
March 08, 2017, 02:59:27 PM |
|
Make sure your AMD Gaming Evolve app didn't automatically update your drivers, I had to use DDU and reinstall 4 times until I figured out it does that EVEN IF you uncheck the box during installation. You have to manually open AMD Gaming Evolved, click on the wheel besides deriver update and uncheck auto updates.
|
|
|
|
IOTUSA
|
|
March 08, 2017, 03:01:20 PM |
|
Make sure your AMD Gaming Evolve app didn't automatically update your drivers, I had to use DDU and reinstall 4 times until I figured out it does that EVEN IF you uncheck the box during installation. You have to manually open AMD Gaming Evolved, click on the wheel besides deriver update and uncheck auto updates.
That's not it. And this is a 100% clean and updated Windows 10 x64 install with 4GB ram, 20 GB virtual mem, and NOTHING but AMD 16.3 drivers and claymore installed. Blows my damn mind. General behavior is: 1. A card (random) will hash at 0% while all others are fine 2. OpenCL call hangs. 3. Crash Sometimes all cards will be hashing just dandy for a minute or two, then one drops, then OpenCL call fail on 1 card.
|
|
|
|
cryptominer420
|
|
March 08, 2017, 03:06:25 PM |
|
For bonaire cards stick with 12.1 went from 102h/s with 12.1 to 73h/s with 12.3
|
╖╖ ╓╖╖ ╖╖╖ ,╖╖─ ║▒▒ ╢▒╜,@╢▒▒▒║ ╓╣╢╝║║*║▒╢ ╢▒╣ ]▒▒,╢▒╢`]▒▒░╢▒▒╖ ╢▒ ╥╢▒▒▒╢ @║╝╢▒╜ ▒▒Ñ╝╝╢▒▒]▒▒` ]▒▒`╙╢╢║║╖┌▒▒╣▒╢▒▒ ╢▒╝▒▒▒ ╢▒╜║▒╢▒▒╢▒░║▒╜ ╥╥─╙╢╢╢║N ║▒╢ ▒▒╜ ║▒▒╢▒▒╣╓╢@@╢╢╜║▒║ ╢▒╜ ║▒▒ ╙▒▒,║▒▒░▒╣ ║▒▒║ ╢▒▒╢▒▒▒»@╢@@╢╜
|
. | | |
█ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ | | | | | |
█ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ |
|
|
|
Bakemat
|
|
March 08, 2017, 04:02:51 PM |
|
v12.3:
- slightly improved speed, about 410H/s on stock 390X, 465H/s on stock Nano, 300H/s on stock 280X, 305H/s on stock RX480. - improved stability for high "-i" option values, added "-i 9" option value. - fixed a few bugs.
there is no speed improvement for the R9 390 or 7970 with the same intensity. Shall I use higher intensity?
|
|
|
|
pilalove
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 16
Merit: 0
|
|
March 08, 2017, 04:03:17 PM |
|
For bonaire cards stick with 12.1 went from 102h/s with 12.1 to 73h/s with 12.3
Just increase Volt core v12.3:
- slightly improved speed, about 410H/s on stock 390X, 465H/s on stock Nano, 300H/s on stock 280X, 305H/s on stock RX480. - improved stability for high "-i" option values, added "-i 9" option value. - fixed a few bugs.
there is no speed improvement for the R9 390 or 7970 with the same intensity. Shall I use higher intensity? Increase about 2%. From 230 to 234-235 sol for HD7950. Saphie faster than HIS 7950 with the same setting
|
|
|
|
|