Bitcoin Forum
March 19, 2024, 06:46:14 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 26.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: What happens first:
$65,000 - 59 (86.8%)
$48,000 - 9 (13.2%)
Total Voters: 68

Pages: « 1 ... 19528 19529 19530 19531 19532 19533 19534 19535 19536 19537 19538 19539 19540 19541 19542 19543 19544 19545 19546 19547 19548 19549 19550 19551 19552 19553 19554 19555 19556 19557 19558 19559 19560 19561 19562 19563 19564 19565 19566 19567 19568 19569 19570 19571 19572 19573 19574 19575 19576 19577 [19578] 19579 19580 19581 19582 19583 19584 19585 19586 19587 19588 19589 19590 19591 19592 19593 19594 19595 19596 19597 19598 19599 19600 19601 19602 19603 19604 19605 19606 19607 19608 19609 19610 19611 19612 19613 19614 19615 19616 19617 19618 19619 19620 19621 19622 19623 19624 19625 19626 19627 19628 ... 33173 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 26330512 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (170 posts by 1 users with 9 merit deleted.)
Ibian
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2268
Merit: 1278



View Profile
February 18, 2018, 10:48:05 PM

One of the four was his biological child.  The other three children he had raised as his own from birth.

To turn his back on those children for something that was not the fault of those children, means he is a piece of shit.
Yes. One out of four. That doesn't mean that he should be paying child support for four out of four but one out of four kids. And not wanting to pay child support for kids that aren't yours isn't the same as not being there for them if they want to visit either, especially when it's to be assumed that most of the child support goes to the filthy cheating whore and not to the children.

Tough shit. Man up.  Pay the fucking support.
no u

Seriously, you pay for the fucking three kids that aren't yours. Be the change you want to see in the world.
1710830774
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1710830774

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1710830774
Reply with quote  #2

1710830774
Report to moderator
1710830774
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1710830774

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1710830774
Reply with quote  #2

1710830774
Report to moderator
"Bitcoin: mining our own business since 2009" -- Pieter Wuille
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1710830774
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1710830774

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1710830774
Reply with quote  #2

1710830774
Report to moderator
1710830774
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1710830774

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1710830774
Reply with quote  #2

1710830774
Report to moderator
1710830774
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1710830774

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1710830774
Reply with quote  #2

1710830774
Report to moderator
BTCMILLIONAIRE
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358
Merit: 834



View Profile
February 18, 2018, 10:48:27 PM

One of the four was his biological child.  The other three children he had raised as his own from birth.

To turn his back on those children for something that was not the fault of those children, means he is a piece of shit.
Yes. One out of four. That doesn't mean that he should be paying child support for four out of four but one out of four kids. And not wanting to pay child support for kids that aren't yours isn't the same as not being there for them if they want to visit either, especially when it's to be assumed that most of the child support goes to the filthy cheating whore and not to the children.

Tough shit. Man up.  Pay the fucking support.
I don't wish it upon you, but you would certainly deserve getting cheated by the person you love and being forced to pay for 3 kids that aren't yours while knowing that the cunt that cheated on you will be spending the majority of that money.
jojo69
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3122
Merit: 4271


diamond-handed zealot


View Profile
February 18, 2018, 10:51:16 PM

I think some of these folks were kicked too much when they were puppies.

Now all they've got is snarl.
Ibian
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2268
Merit: 1278



View Profile
February 18, 2018, 10:52:12 PM

I don't wish it upon you,
I do. The only thing lefties understand are personal consequences.
HairyMaclairy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1414
Merit: 2174


Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist


View Profile
February 18, 2018, 10:52:21 PM

One of the four was his biological child.  The other three children he had raised as his own from birth.

To turn his back on those children for something that was not the fault of those children, means he is a piece of shit.
Yes. One out of four. That doesn't mean that he should be paying child support for four out of four but one out of four kids. And not wanting to pay child support for kids that aren't yours isn't the same as not being there for them if they want to visit either, especially when it's to be assumed that most of the child support goes to the filthy cheating whore and not to the children.

Tough shit. Man up.  Pay the fucking support.
I don't wish it upon you, but you would certainly deserve getting cheated by the person you love and being forced to pay for 3 kids that aren't yours while knowing that the cunt that cheated on you will be spending the majority of that money.

It’s happened to a buddy of mine. He still loves his kids, pays support and guess what, he now has majority custody because he is the better parent.  Now the ex-wife only has custody every second weekend.  He has them the rest of the time.
BTCMILLIONAIRE
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358
Merit: 834



View Profile
February 18, 2018, 10:53:18 PM

One of the four was his biological child.  The other three children he had raised as his own from birth.

To turn his back on those children for something that was not the fault of those children, means he is a piece of shit.
Yes. One out of four. That doesn't mean that he should be paying child support for four out of four but one out of four kids. And not wanting to pay child support for kids that aren't yours isn't the same as not being there for them if they want to visit either, especially when it's to be assumed that most of the child support goes to the filthy cheating whore and not to the children.

Tough shit. Man up.  Pay the fucking support.
I don't wish it upon you, but you would certainly deserve getting cheated by the person you love and being forced to pay for 3 kids that aren't yours while knowing that the cunt that cheated on you will be spending the majority of that money.

It’s happened to a buddy of mine. He still loves his kids, pays support and guess what, he now has majority custody because he is the more better parent.  Now the ex-wife only has custody every second weekend.  He has them the rest of the time.
Good for him. He clearly made a choice. And the cunt has no chance to spend his money.

Using that as an argument to force other men to pay for children that are not theirs doesn't fly though.
Ibian
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2268
Merit: 1278



View Profile
February 18, 2018, 10:53:30 PM

One of the four was his biological child.  The other three children he had raised as his own from birth.

To turn his back on those children for something that was not the fault of those children, means he is a piece of shit.
Yes. One out of four. That doesn't mean that he should be paying child support for four out of four but one out of four kids. And not wanting to pay child support for kids that aren't yours isn't the same as not being there for them if they want to visit either, especially when it's to be assumed that most of the child support goes to the filthy cheating whore and not to the children.

Tough shit. Man up.  Pay the fucking support.
I don't wish it upon you, but you would certainly deserve getting cheated by the person you love and being forced to pay for 3 kids that aren't yours while knowing that the cunt that cheated on you will be spending the majority of that money.

It’s happened to a buddy of mine. He still loves his kids, pays support and guess what, he now has majority custody because he is the better parent.  Now the ex-wife only has custody every second weekend.  He has them the rest of the time.
How many (out of how many) are biologically his?
HairyMaclairy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1414
Merit: 2174


Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist


View Profile
February 18, 2018, 10:55:02 PM

One of the four was his biological child.  The other three children he had raised as his own from birth.

To turn his back on those children for something that was not the fault of those children, means he is a piece of shit.
Yes. One out of four. That doesn't mean that he should be paying child support for four out of four but one out of four kids. And not wanting to pay child support for kids that aren't yours isn't the same as not being there for them if they want to visit either, especially when it's to be assumed that most of the child support goes to the filthy cheating whore and not to the children.

Tough shit. Man up.  Pay the fucking support.
I don't wish it upon you, but you would certainly deserve getting cheated by the person you love and being forced to pay for 3 kids that aren't yours while knowing that the cunt that cheated on you will be spending the majority of that money.

It’s happened to a buddy of mine. He still loves his kids, pays support and guess what, he now has majority custody because he is the better parent.  Now the ex-wife only has custody every second weekend.  He has them the rest of the time.
How many (out of how many) are biologically his?

One is not his.  She doesn’t know. He treats her identically to the others and loves her just as much. 
Ibian
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2268
Merit: 1278



View Profile
February 18, 2018, 10:56:14 PM

One of the four was his biological child.  The other three children he had raised as his own from birth.

To turn his back on those children for something that was not the fault of those children, means he is a piece of shit.
Yes. One out of four. That doesn't mean that he should be paying child support for four out of four but one out of four kids. And not wanting to pay child support for kids that aren't yours isn't the same as not being there for them if they want to visit either, especially when it's to be assumed that most of the child support goes to the filthy cheating whore and not to the children.

Tough shit. Man up.  Pay the fucking support.
I don't wish it upon you, but you would certainly deserve getting cheated by the person you love and being forced to pay for 3 kids that aren't yours while knowing that the cunt that cheated on you will be spending the majority of that money.

It’s happened to a buddy of mine. He still loves his kids, pays support and guess what, he now has majority custody because he is the better parent.  Now the ex-wife only has custody every second weekend.  He has them the rest of the time.
How many (out of how many) are biologically his?

One is not his.  She doesn’t know. He treats her identically to the others and loves her just as much. 
Out of how many.
HairyMaclairy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1414
Merit: 2174


Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist


View Profile
February 18, 2018, 10:59:11 PM

Out of three as if it makes any difference.  These are little people not lines on graphs.
Ibian
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2268
Merit: 1278



View Profile
February 18, 2018, 11:01:22 PM

Out of three as if it makes any difference.  These are little people not lines on graphs.
A 50% increase in expenses per kid then.

Why isn't her father around? What does the mother have to say for herself?
Spaceman_Spiff_Original
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 417
Merit: 220



View Profile
February 18, 2018, 11:06:12 PM


Keep in mind the kids come first.  Everyone else comes second.

That means that making the kids suffer because the mother slept around is the wrong answer.
No. I come first. Then my kids - (...)


I seriously doubt you have kids. and if so, I feel really sorry for them.
I don't see how somebody who didn't put themselves and their own development (economical, emotional, intellectual, spiritual) first would raise children. Such a person would have nothing to offer to their offspring and just propagate problems through generations instead of making improvements.
You appear to like thinking in absolutes.  Life doesn't work that way. If your small kid is sick and crying in the night, will you offer up your hours of sleep for him/her? There are moments when there is a tradeoff between what is best for you personally, and what is best for them.
I understand very well how life works. And making sure that I put myself in the best position that I possibly could from the above mentioned perspectives ensures that my children will be significantly better off than the children of somebody who chose to play along with their peers instead.

Do I have to argue out how being emotionally stable, intellectually honest, and financially independent are traits that would be beneficial for any child's parents to have?
You could start by actually responding to my argument/question instead of side-stepping it, Mr. Intellectual Honesty.
BlindMayorBitcorn
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1115



View Profile
February 18, 2018, 11:07:40 PM
Merited by jojo69 (1)

lines on graphs.

Ahem. I remember those.
BTCMILLIONAIRE
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358
Merit: 834



View Profile
February 18, 2018, 11:08:16 PM


Keep in mind the kids come first.  Everyone else comes second.

That means that making the kids suffer because the mother slept around is the wrong answer.
No. I come first. Then my kids - (...)


I seriously doubt you have kids. and if so, I feel really sorry for them.
I don't see how somebody who didn't put themselves and their own development (economical, emotional, intellectual, spiritual) first would raise children. Such a person would have nothing to offer to their offspring and just propagate problems through generations instead of making improvements.
You appear to like thinking in absolutes.  Life doesn't work that way.  If your small kid is sick and crying in the night, will you offer up your hours of sleep for him/her? There are moments when there is a tradeoff between what is best for you personally, and what is best for them.
I understand very well how life works. And making sure that I put myself in the best position that I possibly could from the above mentioned perspectives ensures that my children will be significantly better off than the children of somebody who chose to play along with their peers instead.

Do I have to argue out how being emotionally stable, intellectually honest, and financially independent are traits that would be beneficial for any child's parents to have?
You could start by actually responding to my argument, Mr. Intellectual Honesty.
You haven't made any arguments. You've brought up a random example that is pretty much irrelevant to the point. But let's entertain it. If I've made sure that I'm financially stable I will be capable of providing better health care to my child as a result.
Last of the V8s
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1652
Merit: 4392


Be a bank


View Profile
February 18, 2018, 11:09:48 PM

lines on graphs.

Ahem. I remember those.
BTCMILLIONAIRE
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358
Merit: 834



View Profile
February 18, 2018, 11:10:04 PM

Out of three as if it makes any difference.  These are little people not lines on graphs.
Let me try a different angle.

Do you see how the judges decision to force the man in question to pay for the child support of three children that are not biologically his own with a court order could set a precedent for some women to seek out men out of which they'd essentially extort child support by simply playing nice for a period of time?
xhomerx10
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3780
Merit: 7749



View Profile
February 18, 2018, 11:16:49 PM

lines on graphs.

Ahem. I remember those.

 Me too and they are looking very nice going forward.


xhomerx10
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3780
Merit: 7749



View Profile
February 18, 2018, 11:19:46 PM

Out of three as if it makes any difference.  These are little people not lines on graphs.
Let me try a different angle.

Do you see how the judges decision to force the man in question to pay for the child support of three children that are not biologically his own with a court order could set a precedent for some women to seek out men out of which they'd essentially extort child support by simply playing nice for a period of time?

 I believe this falls under caveat emptor.
Ibian
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2268
Merit: 1278



View Profile
February 18, 2018, 11:20:18 PM

Out of three as if it makes any difference.  These are little people not lines on graphs.
Let me try a different angle.

Do you see how the judges decision to force the man in question to pay for the child support of three children that are not biologically his own with a court order could set a precedent for some women to seek out men out of which they'd essentially extort child support by simply playing nice for a period of time?
He does not. Or doesn't care, it makes no difference. His eventual answer will reflect this.

Like I said, the only thing lefties understand are personal consequences.
Ibian
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2268
Merit: 1278



View Profile
February 18, 2018, 11:21:00 PM

Out of three as if it makes any difference.  These are little people not lines on graphs.
Let me try a different angle.

Do you see how the judges decision to force the man in question to pay for the child support of three children that are not biologically his own with a court order could set a precedent for some women to seek out men out of which they'd essentially extort child support by simply playing nice for a period of time?

 I believe this falls under caveat emptor.

You are calling women objects there. Might want to check your male privilege.
Pages: « 1 ... 19528 19529 19530 19531 19532 19533 19534 19535 19536 19537 19538 19539 19540 19541 19542 19543 19544 19545 19546 19547 19548 19549 19550 19551 19552 19553 19554 19555 19556 19557 19558 19559 19560 19561 19562 19563 19564 19565 19566 19567 19568 19569 19570 19571 19572 19573 19574 19575 19576 19577 [19578] 19579 19580 19581 19582 19583 19584 19585 19586 19587 19588 19589 19590 19591 19592 19593 19594 19595 19596 19597 19598 19599 19600 19601 19602 19603 19604 19605 19606 19607 19608 19609 19610 19611 19612 19613 19614 19615 19616 19617 19618 19619 19620 19621 19622 19623 19624 19625 19626 19627 19628 ... 33173 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!