Bitcoin Forum
January 24, 2022, 03:21:22 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 22.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: Highest price we'll see in 2022:
50,000 - 0 (0%)
60,000 - 0 (0%)
70,000 - 0 (0%)
80,000 - 0 (0%)
90,000 - 0 (0%)
100,000 - 0 (0%)
125,000 - 0 (0%)
150,000 - 0 (0%)
175,000 - 0 (0%)
200,000 - 0 (0%)
225,000 - 0 (0%)
250,000 - 0 (0%)
275,000 - 0 (0%)
300,000 - 0 (0%)
>300,000 - 0 (0%)
Total Voters: 0

Pages: « 1 ... 19544 19545 19546 19547 19548 19549 19550 19551 19552 19553 19554 19555 19556 19557 19558 19559 19560 19561 19562 19563 19564 19565 19566 19567 19568 19569 19570 19571 19572 19573 19574 19575 19576 19577 19578 19579 19580 19581 19582 19583 19584 19585 19586 19587 19588 19589 19590 19591 19592 19593 [19594] 19595 19596 19597 19598 19599 19600 19601 19602 19603 19604 19605 19606 19607 19608 19609 19610 19611 19612 19613 19614 19615 19616 19617 19618 19619 19620 19621 19622 19623 19624 19625 19626 19627 19628 19629 19630 19631 19632 19633 19634 19635 19636 19637 19638 19639 19640 19641 19642 19643 19644 ... 30193 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 25529908 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (158 posts by 14 users with 9 merit deleted.)
pacman7331
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 638
Merit: 118



View Profile
February 18, 2018, 11:54:30 PM

Out of three as if it makes any difference.  These are little people not lines on graphs.
Let me try a different angle.

Do you see how the judges decision to force the man in question to pay for the child support of three children that are not biologically his own with a court order could set a precedent for some women to seek out men out of which they'd essentially extort child support by simply playing nice for a period of time?

 I believe this falls under caveat emptor.

You are calling women objects there. Might want to check your male privilege.
Hey. Hey don't run off. This is serious. If a feminist saw what you just posted, they would dox you and get you fired. You better disavow yourself while you still have the chance.

(i'm not a feminist. don't worry, i wouldn't even dox you mate. just do the right thing.)


Hey I dunno what ya'll are talking about... but...Holy shit. When did the Wall observer turn in to RadHub?

Hey yea bro... I for one know the courts are anti-male. But Dunno who you are bro cuz there are so many re-quotes..  Cheesy


1642994482
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1642994482

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1642994482
Reply with quote  #2

1642994482
Report to moderator
1642994482
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1642994482

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1642994482
Reply with quote  #2

1642994482
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1642994482
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1642994482

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1642994482
Reply with quote  #2

1642994482
Report to moderator
xhomerx10
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2996
Merit: 4641


Go! BTC Go!


View Profile
February 18, 2018, 11:54:58 PM

Out of three as if it makes any difference.  These are little people not lines on graphs.
Let me try a different angle.

Do you see how the judges decision to force the man in question to pay for the child support of three children that are not biologically his own with a court order could set a precedent for some women to seek out men out of which they'd essentially extort child support by simply playing nice for a period of time?

 I believe this falls under caveat emptor.

You are calling women objects there. Might want to check your male privilege.
Hey. Hey don't run off. This is serious. If a feminist saw what you just posted, they would dox you and get you fired. You better disavow yourself while you still have the chance.

(i'm not a feminist. don't worry, i wouldn't even dox you mate. just do the right thing.)

 We never like to think that marriage and family as contractual yet we probably all know someone paying child support and/or alimony.  Marriage is a contract and it comes with certain legal rights and obligations.  So I would say that the term Caveat Emptor applies to either party - male or female.


Dude you are digging your own grave here. Nobody cares if you call men objects or even dismiss them outright, but you just called women objects AGAIN! Don't you care about yourself?

 Yes and I would need to be drinking to continue this discussion but I am not.  Maybe another time?
BTCMILLIONAIRE
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358
Merit: 834



View Profile
February 18, 2018, 11:58:27 PM

I don't see how somebody who didn't put themselves and their own development (economical, emotional, intellectual, spiritual) first would raise children. Such a person would have nothing to offer to their offspring and just propagate problems through generations instead of making improvements.
You appear to like thinking in absolutes.  Life doesn't work that way. If your small kid is sick and crying in the night, will you offer up your hours of sleep for him/her? There are moments when there is a tradeoff between what is best for you personally, and what is best for them.
I understand very well how life works. And making sure that I put myself in the best position that I possibly could from the above mentioned perspectives ensures that my children will be significantly better off than the children of somebody who chose to play along with their peers instead.

Do I have to argue out how being emotionally stable, intellectually honest, and financially independent are traits that would be beneficial for any child's parents to have?
You could start by actually responding to my argument, Mr. Intellectual Honesty.
You haven't made any arguments. You've brought up a random example that is pretty much irrelevant to the point. But let's entertain it. If I've made sure that I'm financially stable I will be capable of providing better health care to my child as a result.
You think having good health care means your children will never get sick?  Why don't you actually answer the question: If your small kid is sick and crying in the night, will you offer up your hours of sleep for him/her?
Do you understand comparatives? I've specifically talked about better health care as a result of putting my own growth above hive mind before having children. And last I've checked better is a descriptor that indicates superiority over inferior instances.
But since that still doesn't seem to get into your head, here's another angle, from the same argument that I've already made multiple times now. If I've made sure to put myself first, which includes emotional stability, then I would still have a far easier time to give up my sleeping hours and be more capable of providing emotional support and soothing to my sick child.

If you put the same amount of effort into understanding my argument that you put into trying to make up some pointless example and trying to twist and bend it to make up nonsensical arguments you might actually get why making sure that you're fully self-responsible before having kids is the highest goal that any parent can achieve (as a person responsible for the life of a child).
I never made any claims that being a responsible and self-sufficient person isn't a great start for being a parent, in fact I agree with that.
For me it is strange that you don't see giving up your hours of sleep for someone else and always putting yourself first as logically conflicting, but I guess your personal definition of 'putting yourself first' is different from mine.
If I don't put myself and find myself in a situation where I first have to fend off an attacker before I can tend to my child I would be a moron not to make sure that I'm safe in order to be in a position where I can help my child. There's a reason why you put your own oxygen mask on first, before tending to your child.
It's a very simple order. Make sure that I am in the best position that I can be to help my child, then help my child, and then if I have enough energy left help my wife. And if I can be bothered, then perhaps I might even do something good for the rest of humanity. But that's the dead last priority.
There is a certain amount of growth that needs to take place before you can genuinely provide reasonable support for others, and that takes a long time. There's a reason why there's so many snowflakes on the US left that keep making up the most ridiculous cases such as affirmative action. And I say that as someone who could easily exploit the bullshit that they make up.
BTCMILLIONAIRE
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358
Merit: 834



View Profile
February 19, 2018, 12:01:05 AM

Thought experiment. On his way up the dusty trail to retrieve his silver stash, roach encounters ibian asleep. Afraid he might try to steal his silver on the way back down, roach considers poisoning ibian's whisky. And according to the logic of self-interest, he does. Later, ibian shoots roach and robs him. Then he drinks some whisky and dies.

Had roach and ibian cared more about the welfare of others and less about themselves, they would still be alive today.
Jokes on you, I never drink whisky. Or whiskey. Makes me barf. So the bug dies and I get to live. Everyone wins!
I would describe you as a savage. But the internet has deprived the term of the intended meaning.
bitserve
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1610
Merit: 1343


Self made HODLER ✓


View Profile
February 19, 2018, 12:04:07 AM

Won't somebody please think of the bitcorns!?
explorer
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1932
Merit: 1257



View Profile
February 19, 2018, 12:04:53 AM



 I believe this falls under caveat emptor.

Very true.
How about don't stick your dick in a woman you wouldn't want to be the mother of your child.  Simple concept requires long view, self control.  So nevermind, it will never fly.
pacman7331
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 638
Merit: 118



View Profile
February 19, 2018, 12:06:13 AM



 I believe this falls under caveat emptor.

Very true.
How about don't stick your dick in a woman you wouldn't want to be the mother of your child.  Simple concept requires long view, self control.  So nevermind, it will never fly.

You believe sex is only for reproduction? Comon...  Cheesy
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2870
Merit: 5520


ESG, KYC & AML are attack vectors on Bitcoin


View Profile
February 19, 2018, 12:07:02 AM

Your subsequent explanation seems to concede that we are in the early stages of bitcoin's adoption; however,  I conclude, to my own health detriment, that your chart seems to suggest that we are past the hype cycle in BTC and all matters are downhill from here.. I can see it visually on your chart.   And, from my perspective, I doubt that we are going downhill from here whether we are talking about hype or we are talking about adoption, or we are talking about development or we are talking about financial.
I thought we were just, you know..talking..but if you want to break down each of those...by all means.

I tend to take a holistic approach when discussing the future, bitcoin and technology JJG. They will all be massively integrated. That chart is just an illustration of hype cycles and how long after something is hyped that it ramps up to productivity.
You did notice that each of the iconography placed on the perceived bubble is also a representation in time right? So our lovely bitcoin blockchain is just cresting over the hype bubble but the full productivity plateau is still several years into the future.

This is just hype..not price...not adoption...ok?  All these other things do have correlation..but that is not what my point was. It was forcasting that even tho we we are at the top of hype or just past it that all the good things are still coming...is that spelled out clear enough now?

#btfd

I pretty much accepted that your intentions were good and bullish all along..  yet I think that your chart was "lacking,"  and sure I was employing some drama in my response to exaggerate my position, especially when you were kind of inviting me to yell.... hahahahahahaha

I am all calm and settled, yet my proclivity for violence just comes out... in a kind of exaggerated form, like this:




Even though on the inside, I am really feeling like this:


 Kiss Kiss Kiss...... (if you know what I am saying, Toxic Moxic?)
BTCMILLIONAIRE
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358
Merit: 834



View Profile
February 19, 2018, 12:08:06 AM



 I believe this falls under caveat emptor.

Very true.
How about don't stick your dick in a woman you wouldn't want to be the mother of your child.  Simple concept requires long view, self control.  So nevermind, it will never fly.

You believe sex is only for reproduction? Comon...  Cheesy
He never said that you can't pork the mother of your (future) children for fun.
HairyMaclairy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1414
Merit: 2174


Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist


View Profile
February 19, 2018, 12:09:48 AM

To answer the earlier question, the biological father is a deadbeat in another country and irrelevant. The ex-wife takes reasonable care of the kids when they are in her custody and that’s all that really matters.  I don’t care for her other lifestyle choices but again irrelevant.  

My buddy now has a new wife. And she has taken on the stepchildren as her own as well. Even though none of them are hers.  So all of you making a fuss about the kids not being biologically yours, do you think the stepmom should kick these kids out of the house ?  Yeah I thought not.  
You didn't answer the question. However much of a scumbag the biological father is doesn't matter in this argument, which is about setting a dangerous precedent that poses a serious threat to society.

Your buddy also has no relevance to this argument. Whatever choices he freely makes is entirely up to him. Using his choices as a justification for legally forcing somebody to pay for children that are not his is ridiculous.

Cmon dude. Taking care of children is a serious threat to society? On a forum where most of us have earned more than the US average annual wage in the past week, if not much much more?  You are better than this.


Maybe worry about the alt-right muppets who go shoot up a school every second week.  Now there’s a threat to society.
explorer
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1932
Merit: 1257



View Profile
February 19, 2018, 12:10:16 AM



 I believe this falls under caveat emptor.

Very true.
How about don't stick your dick in a woman you wouldn't want to be the mother of your child.  Simple concept requires long view, self control.  So nevermind, it will never fly.

You believe sex is only for reproduction? Comon...  Cheesy

I believe you forgot to start with " So you're saying..."

No, that is not what I said at all, but it happens to be a frequent result.  You, me, the rest of us...
marcus_of_augustus
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3794
Merit: 2227



View Profile
February 19, 2018, 12:10:50 AM
Last edit: February 19, 2018, 12:31:14 AM by marcus_of_augustus
Merited by BTCMILLIONAIRE (1)

cohabitation is where the legal trap gets sprung these days, a marriage contract is not even necessary when de facto relationship has become an implied contract to provide income and share assets.

Males have gradually been relegated to sperm donor status by the perverse incentive structures imposed by court precedents, that is clear ... although I notice they are close to being able to grow ovaries in the lab, last week someone reported they had grown human eggs from stem cells, so the female monopoly on eggs maybe busted and then all bets are off for parentage questions in our esteemed courts.
Ibian
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2268
Merit: 1278



View Profile
February 19, 2018, 12:10:55 AM

To answer the earlier question, the biological father is a deadbeat in another country and irrelevant. The ex-wife takes reasonable care of the kids when they are in her custody and that’s all that really matters.  I don’t care for her other lifestyle choices but again irrelevant.  

My buddy now has a new wife. And she has taken on the stepchildren as her own as well. Even though none of them are hers.  So all of you making a fuss about the kids not being biologically yours, do you think the stepmom should kick these kids out of the house ?  Yeah I thought not.  
You didn't answer the question. However much of a scumbag the biological father is doesn't matter in this argument, which is about setting a dangerous precedent that poses a serious threat to society.

Your buddy also has no relevance to this argument. Whatever choices he freely makes is entirely up to him. Using his choices as a justification for legally forcing somebody to pay for children that are not his is ridiculous.

Cmon dude. Taking care of children is a serious threat to society? On a forum where most of us have earned more than the US average annual wage in the past week?  You are better than this.


Maybe worry about the alt-right muppets who go shoot up a school every second week. 
It's lefties who go on shooting rampages. You are officially not even worth reading anymore.
BTCMILLIONAIRE
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358
Merit: 834



View Profile
February 19, 2018, 12:13:56 AM

To answer the earlier question, the biological father is a deadbeat in another country and irrelevant. The ex-wife takes reasonable care of the kids when they are in her custody and that’s all that really matters.  I don’t care for her other lifestyle choices but again irrelevant.  

My buddy now has a new wife. And she has taken on the stepchildren as her own as well. Even though none of them are hers.  So all of you making a fuss about the kids not being biologically yours, do you think the stepmom should kick these kids out of the house ?  Yeah I thought not.  
You didn't answer the question. However much of a scumbag the biological father is doesn't matter in this argument, which is about setting a dangerous precedent that poses a serious threat to society.

Your buddy also has no relevance to this argument. Whatever choices he freely makes is entirely up to him. Using his choices as a justification for legally forcing somebody to pay for children that are not his is ridiculous.

Cmon dude. Taking care of children is a serious threat to society? On a forum where most of us have earned more than the US average annual wage in the past week, if not much much more?  You are better than this.


Maybe worry about the alt-right muppets who go shoot up a school every second week.  Now there’s a threat to society.
Do you not understand English? Or am I getting trolled here?
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2870
Merit: 5520


ESG, KYC & AML are attack vectors on Bitcoin


View Profile
February 19, 2018, 12:16:40 AM

also, I never regarded my partners as property, so really I just don't get it as an insult

Well, I mean, if you enjoy watching your devoted partner being fucked by someone else, then I guess you wouldn't see it as an insult...
If my devoted partner was being fucked by someone else I'd kick them the hell out of my house and not really care about the insult, as I'd be happy to have parted with such a piece of shit of a human being.


You MONOGAMIST PIG!!!!!!


Don't you know that sharing is caring?


 Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy
HairyMaclairy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1414
Merit: 2174


Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist


View Profile
February 19, 2018, 12:18:07 AM

To answer the earlier question, the biological father is a deadbeat in another country and irrelevant. The ex-wife takes reasonable care of the kids when they are in her custody and that’s all that really matters.  I don’t care for her other lifestyle choices but again irrelevant.  

My buddy now has a new wife. And she has taken on the stepchildren as her own as well. Even though none of them are hers.  So all of you making a fuss about the kids not being biologically yours, do you think the stepmom should kick these kids out of the house ?  Yeah I thought not.  
You didn't answer the question. However much of a scumbag the biological father is doesn't matter in this argument, which is about setting a dangerous precedent that poses a serious threat to society.

Your buddy also has no relevance to this argument. Whatever choices he freely makes is entirely up to him. Using his choices as a justification for legally forcing somebody to pay for children that are not his is ridiculous.

Cmon dude. Taking care of children is a serious threat to society? On a forum where most of us have earned more than the US average annual wage in the past week?  You are better than this.


Maybe worry about the alt-right muppets who go shoot up a school every second week. 
It's lefties who go on shooting rampages. You are officially not even worth reading anymore.

The latest school shooter was a white supremacist. Like yourself. Own it.
BlindMayorBitcorn
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1107



View Profile
February 19, 2018, 12:18:40 AM

Thought experiment. On his way up the dusty trail to retrieve his silver stash, roach encounters ibian asleep. Afraid he might try to steal his silver on the way back down, roach considers poisoning ibian's whisky. And according to the logic of self-interest, he does. Later, ibian shoots roach and robs him. Then he drinks some whisky and dies.

Had roach and ibian cared more about the welfare of others and less about themselves, they would still be alive today.
Jokes on you, I never drink whisky. Or whiskey. Makes me barf. So the bug dies and I get to live. Everyone wins!

It might be 'whiskey' to you. To me it's breakfast.
BTCMILLIONAIRE
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358
Merit: 834



View Profile
February 19, 2018, 12:23:42 AM

also, I never regarded my partners as property, so really I just don't get it as an insult

Well, I mean, if you enjoy watching your devoted partner being fucked by someone else, then I guess you wouldn't see it as an insult...
If my devoted partner was being fucked by someone else I'd kick them the hell out of my house and not really care about the insult, as I'd be happy to have parted with such a piece of shit of a human being.


You MONOGAMIST PIG!!!!!!


Don't you know that sharing is caring?


 Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy
Lmao, I'm sorry. Please let me pay 99% of my income in taxes, weeeeeeeeee Cheesy


Thought experiment. On his way up the dusty trail to retrieve his silver stash, roach encounters ibian asleep. Afraid he might try to steal his silver on the way back down, roach considers poisoning ibian's whisky. And according to the logic of self-interest, he does. Later, ibian shoots roach and robs him. Then he drinks some whisky and dies.

Had roach and ibian cared more about the welfare of others and less about themselves, they would still be alive today.
Jokes on you, I never drink whisky. Or whiskey. Makes me barf. So the bug dies and I get to live. Everyone wins!

It might be 'whiskey' to you. To me it's breakfast.
What is your favourite dram!
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2870
Merit: 5520


ESG, KYC & AML are attack vectors on Bitcoin


View Profile
February 19, 2018, 12:30:10 AM

It is a little mind boggling that anyone would sell during the weekend knowing they could sell for 10-20% more on Monday. Can a bear explain the mentality?

I'm not a bear but I will try to explain following a simple strategy that helps me sleep at night:
I sell 50% of my earnings daily, regardless of price.

 Invest -> Profit -> Protect



My strategy that helps me sleep at night is to convert all my daily earnings to bitcoin, regardless of price.


becoin = smart


grn = dumbass

 Wink
marcus_of_augustus
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3794
Merit: 2227



View Profile
February 19, 2018, 12:32:16 AM

It might be 'whiskey' to you. To me it's breakfast.

whiskey inevitably leads to children ... own it!
Pages: « 1 ... 19544 19545 19546 19547 19548 19549 19550 19551 19552 19553 19554 19555 19556 19557 19558 19559 19560 19561 19562 19563 19564 19565 19566 19567 19568 19569 19570 19571 19572 19573 19574 19575 19576 19577 19578 19579 19580 19581 19582 19583 19584 19585 19586 19587 19588 19589 19590 19591 19592 19593 [19594] 19595 19596 19597 19598 19599 19600 19601 19602 19603 19604 19605 19606 19607 19608 19609 19610 19611 19612 19613 19614 19615 19616 19617 19618 19619 19620 19621 19622 19623 19624 19625 19626 19627 19628 19629 19630 19631 19632 19633 19634 19635 19636 19637 19638 19639 19640 19641 19642 19643 19644 ... 30193 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!