BTCMILLIONAIRE
|
|
February 18, 2018, 10:44:10 PM |
|
One of the four was his biological child. The other three children he had raised as his own from birth.
To turn his back on those children for something that was not the fault of those children, means he is a piece of shit.
Yes. One out of four. That doesn't mean that he should be paying child support for four out of four but one out of four kids. And not wanting to pay child support for kids that aren't yours isn't the same as not being there for them if they want to visit either, especially when it's to be assumed that most of the child support goes to the filthy cheating whore and not to the children.
|
|
|
|
HairyMaclairy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1442
Merit: 2282
Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist
|
|
February 18, 2018, 10:45:46 PM |
|
One of the four was his biological child. The other three children he had raised as his own from birth.
To turn his back on those children for something that was not the fault of those children, means he is a piece of shit.
Yes. One out of four. That doesn't mean that he should be paying child support for four out of four but one out of four kids. And not wanting to pay child support for kids that aren't yours isn't the same as not being there for them if they want to visit either, especially when it's to be assumed that most of the child support goes to the filthy cheating whore and not to the children. Tough shit. Man up. Pay the fucking support.
|
|
|
|
Ibian
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2268
Merit: 1278
|
|
February 18, 2018, 10:48:05 PM |
|
One of the four was his biological child. The other three children he had raised as his own from birth.
To turn his back on those children for something that was not the fault of those children, means he is a piece of shit.
Yes. One out of four. That doesn't mean that he should be paying child support for four out of four but one out of four kids. And not wanting to pay child support for kids that aren't yours isn't the same as not being there for them if they want to visit either, especially when it's to be assumed that most of the child support goes to the filthy cheating whore and not to the children. Tough shit. Man up. Pay the fucking support. no u Seriously, you pay for the fucking three kids that aren't yours. Be the change you want to see in the world.
|
|
|
|
BTCMILLIONAIRE
|
|
February 18, 2018, 10:48:27 PM |
|
One of the four was his biological child. The other three children he had raised as his own from birth.
To turn his back on those children for something that was not the fault of those children, means he is a piece of shit.
Yes. One out of four. That doesn't mean that he should be paying child support for four out of four but one out of four kids. And not wanting to pay child support for kids that aren't yours isn't the same as not being there for them if they want to visit either, especially when it's to be assumed that most of the child support goes to the filthy cheating whore and not to the children. Tough shit. Man up. Pay the fucking support. I don't wish it upon you, but you would certainly deserve getting cheated by the person you love and being forced to pay for 3 kids that aren't yours while knowing that the cunt that cheated on you will be spending the majority of that money.
|
|
|
|
jojo69
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3360
Merit: 4658
diamond-handed zealot
|
|
February 18, 2018, 10:51:16 PM |
|
I think some of these folks were kicked too much when they were puppies.
Now all they've got is snarl.
|
|
|
|
Ibian
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2268
Merit: 1278
|
|
February 18, 2018, 10:52:12 PM |
|
I don't wish it upon you, I do. The only thing lefties understand are personal consequences.
|
|
|
|
HairyMaclairy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1442
Merit: 2282
Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist
|
|
February 18, 2018, 10:52:21 PM |
|
One of the four was his biological child. The other three children he had raised as his own from birth.
To turn his back on those children for something that was not the fault of those children, means he is a piece of shit.
Yes. One out of four. That doesn't mean that he should be paying child support for four out of four but one out of four kids. And not wanting to pay child support for kids that aren't yours isn't the same as not being there for them if they want to visit either, especially when it's to be assumed that most of the child support goes to the filthy cheating whore and not to the children. Tough shit. Man up. Pay the fucking support. I don't wish it upon you, but you would certainly deserve getting cheated by the person you love and being forced to pay for 3 kids that aren't yours while knowing that the cunt that cheated on you will be spending the majority of that money. It’s happened to a buddy of mine. He still loves his kids, pays support and guess what, he now has majority custody because he is the better parent. Now the ex-wife only has custody every second weekend. He has them the rest of the time.
|
|
|
|
BTCMILLIONAIRE
|
|
February 18, 2018, 10:53:18 PM |
|
One of the four was his biological child. The other three children he had raised as his own from birth.
To turn his back on those children for something that was not the fault of those children, means he is a piece of shit.
Yes. One out of four. That doesn't mean that he should be paying child support for four out of four but one out of four kids. And not wanting to pay child support for kids that aren't yours isn't the same as not being there for them if they want to visit either, especially when it's to be assumed that most of the child support goes to the filthy cheating whore and not to the children. Tough shit. Man up. Pay the fucking support. I don't wish it upon you, but you would certainly deserve getting cheated by the person you love and being forced to pay for 3 kids that aren't yours while knowing that the cunt that cheated on you will be spending the majority of that money. It’s happened to a buddy of mine. He still loves his kids, pays support and guess what, he now has majority custody because he is the more better parent. Now the ex-wife only has custody every second weekend. He has them the rest of the time. Good for him. He clearly made a choice. And the cunt has no chance to spend his money. Using that as an argument to force other men to pay for children that are not theirs doesn't fly though.
|
|
|
|
Ibian
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2268
Merit: 1278
|
|
February 18, 2018, 10:53:30 PM |
|
One of the four was his biological child. The other three children he had raised as his own from birth.
To turn his back on those children for something that was not the fault of those children, means he is a piece of shit.
Yes. One out of four. That doesn't mean that he should be paying child support for four out of four but one out of four kids. And not wanting to pay child support for kids that aren't yours isn't the same as not being there for them if they want to visit either, especially when it's to be assumed that most of the child support goes to the filthy cheating whore and not to the children. Tough shit. Man up. Pay the fucking support. I don't wish it upon you, but you would certainly deserve getting cheated by the person you love and being forced to pay for 3 kids that aren't yours while knowing that the cunt that cheated on you will be spending the majority of that money. It’s happened to a buddy of mine. He still loves his kids, pays support and guess what, he now has majority custody because he is the better parent. Now the ex-wife only has custody every second weekend. He has them the rest of the time. How many (out of how many) are biologically his?
|
|
|
|
HairyMaclairy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1442
Merit: 2282
Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist
|
|
February 18, 2018, 10:55:02 PM |
|
One of the four was his biological child. The other three children he had raised as his own from birth.
To turn his back on those children for something that was not the fault of those children, means he is a piece of shit.
Yes. One out of four. That doesn't mean that he should be paying child support for four out of four but one out of four kids. And not wanting to pay child support for kids that aren't yours isn't the same as not being there for them if they want to visit either, especially when it's to be assumed that most of the child support goes to the filthy cheating whore and not to the children. Tough shit. Man up. Pay the fucking support. I don't wish it upon you, but you would certainly deserve getting cheated by the person you love and being forced to pay for 3 kids that aren't yours while knowing that the cunt that cheated on you will be spending the majority of that money. It’s happened to a buddy of mine. He still loves his kids, pays support and guess what, he now has majority custody because he is the better parent. Now the ex-wife only has custody every second weekend. He has them the rest of the time. How many (out of how many) are biologically his? One is not his. She doesn’t know. He treats her identically to the others and loves her just as much.
|
|
|
|
Ibian
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2268
Merit: 1278
|
|
February 18, 2018, 10:56:14 PM |
|
One of the four was his biological child. The other three children he had raised as his own from birth.
To turn his back on those children for something that was not the fault of those children, means he is a piece of shit.
Yes. One out of four. That doesn't mean that he should be paying child support for four out of four but one out of four kids. And not wanting to pay child support for kids that aren't yours isn't the same as not being there for them if they want to visit either, especially when it's to be assumed that most of the child support goes to the filthy cheating whore and not to the children. Tough shit. Man up. Pay the fucking support. I don't wish it upon you, but you would certainly deserve getting cheated by the person you love and being forced to pay for 3 kids that aren't yours while knowing that the cunt that cheated on you will be spending the majority of that money. It’s happened to a buddy of mine. He still loves his kids, pays support and guess what, he now has majority custody because he is the better parent. Now the ex-wife only has custody every second weekend. He has them the rest of the time. How many (out of how many) are biologically his? One is not his. She doesn’t know. He treats her identically to the others and loves her just as much. Out of how many.
|
|
|
|
HairyMaclairy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1442
Merit: 2282
Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist
|
|
February 18, 2018, 10:59:11 PM |
|
Out of three as if it makes any difference. These are little people not lines on graphs.
|
|
|
|
Ibian
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2268
Merit: 1278
|
|
February 18, 2018, 11:01:22 PM |
|
Out of three as if it makes any difference. These are little people not lines on graphs.
A 50% increase in expenses per kid then. Why isn't her father around? What does the mother have to say for herself?
|
|
|
|
Spaceman_Spiff_Original
|
|
February 18, 2018, 11:06:12 PM |
|
Keep in mind the kids come first. Everyone else comes second.
That means that making the kids suffer because the mother slept around is the wrong answer.
No. I come first. Then my kids - (...) I seriously doubt you have kids. and if so, I feel really sorry for them. I don't see how somebody who didn't put themselves and their own development (economical, emotional, intellectual, spiritual) first would raise children. Such a person would have nothing to offer to their offspring and just propagate problems through generations instead of making improvements. You appear to like thinking in absolutes. Life doesn't work that way. If your small kid is sick and crying in the night, will you offer up your hours of sleep for him/her? There are moments when there is a tradeoff between what is best for you personally, and what is best for them. I understand very well how life works. And making sure that I put myself in the best position that I possibly could from the above mentioned perspectives ensures that my children will be significantly better off than the children of somebody who chose to play along with their peers instead. Do I have to argue out how being emotionally stable, intellectually honest, and financially independent are traits that would be beneficial for any child's parents to have? You could start by actually responding to my argument/question instead of side-stepping it, Mr. Intellectual Honesty.
|
|
|
|
BlindMayorBitcorn
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1116
|
|
February 18, 2018, 11:07:40 PM |
|
lines on graphs.
Ahem. I remember those.
|
|
|
|
BTCMILLIONAIRE
|
|
February 18, 2018, 11:08:16 PM |
|
Keep in mind the kids come first. Everyone else comes second.
That means that making the kids suffer because the mother slept around is the wrong answer.
No. I come first. Then my kids - (...) I seriously doubt you have kids. and if so, I feel really sorry for them. I don't see how somebody who didn't put themselves and their own development (economical, emotional, intellectual, spiritual) first would raise children. Such a person would have nothing to offer to their offspring and just propagate problems through generations instead of making improvements. You appear to like thinking in absolutes. Life doesn't work that way. If your small kid is sick and crying in the night, will you offer up your hours of sleep for him/her? There are moments when there is a tradeoff between what is best for you personally, and what is best for them. I understand very well how life works. And making sure that I put myself in the best position that I possibly could from the above mentioned perspectives ensures that my children will be significantly better off than the children of somebody who chose to play along with their peers instead. Do I have to argue out how being emotionally stable, intellectually honest, and financially independent are traits that would be beneficial for any child's parents to have? You could start by actually responding to my argument, Mr. Intellectual Honesty. You haven't made any arguments. You've brought up a random example that is pretty much irrelevant to the point. But let's entertain it. If I've made sure that I'm financially stable I will be capable of providing better health care to my child as a result.
|
|
|
|
Last of the V8s
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1652
Merit: 4392
Be a bank
|
|
February 18, 2018, 11:09:48 PM |
|
lines on graphs.
Ahem. I remember those.
|
|
|
|
BTCMILLIONAIRE
|
|
February 18, 2018, 11:10:04 PM |
|
Out of three as if it makes any difference. These are little people not lines on graphs.
Let me try a different angle. Do you see how the judges decision to force the man in question to pay for the child support of three children that are not biologically his own with a court order could set a precedent for some women to seek out men out of which they'd essentially extort child support by simply playing nice for a period of time?
|
|
|
|
xhomerx10
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4032
Merit: 8864
|
|
February 18, 2018, 11:16:49 PM |
|
lines on graphs.
Ahem. I remember those. Me too and they are looking very nice going forward.
|
|
|
|
xhomerx10
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4032
Merit: 8864
|
|
February 18, 2018, 11:19:46 PM |
|
Out of three as if it makes any difference. These are little people not lines on graphs.
Let me try a different angle. Do you see how the judges decision to force the man in question to pay for the child support of three children that are not biologically his own with a court order could set a precedent for some women to seek out men out of which they'd essentially extort child support by simply playing nice for a period of time? I believe this falls under caveat emptor.
|
|
|
|
|