|
El duderino_
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2856
Merit: 14105
“They have no clue”
|
 |
October 18, 2019, 11:56:04 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
jojo69
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3514
Merit: 4964
diamond-handed zealot
|
 |
October 19, 2019, 12:17:04 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
LUCKMCFLY
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2758
Merit: 1884
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
|
 |
October 19, 2019, 12:21:20 AM |
|
It's great, just that governments won't like it, especially the one from the U.S.  Banking and governments alike always look for ways to regulate and complicate everything.
|
|
|
|
gentlemand
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2604
Merit: 3088
Welt Am Draht
|
 |
October 19, 2019, 12:23:02 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
Hueristic
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4158
Merit: 5892
Doomed to see the future and unable to prevent it
|
 |
October 19, 2019, 12:29:18 AM |
|
What's up WO Bullish speculative masters, missed us? Wanna change your mind about us pumping BTC to +$35,000.00? (Y) or (N) Love ya all still the same  Nobody here is going to be against @35K, so go for it... . No need to ask!  Sure brothers right away, but there is a price for that to pay as we talked about it last time  It was alot so we are prepared to come down a little bit so : 1,593.00 ETH for a Global Advertisement Event Remember us : The Cryptonians - Your 16/17 Pumpy master ? We came here a few monts ago for funding but we were attacked verbally online so it was a pain in the ass to actualy achieve something. It is still a take it or leave it kind of deal ^^ I'm willing to escrow this deal. Collect 1593 ETH (and I wonder, why not 35 BTC instead). Wait for BTC to hit $35k on named exchange or site (bitstamp? bitcoinaverage?) within specified time frame. Maintain that level for a few days or go even higher. Release ETH to them. Or refund everyone if pump fails. There's gotta be a time frame. Ugh ogh, Dabs, means we have to buy ETH? oh noooo  This is how he plans to fulfill an ETH pump promise.  Check this channel out guys. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC7sDT8jZ76VLV1u__krUutA
|
|
|
|
El duderino_
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2856
Merit: 14105
“They have no clue”
|
 |
October 19, 2019, 01:09:25 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
El duderino_
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2856
Merit: 14105
“They have no clue”
|
 |
October 19, 2019, 01:16:27 AM |
|
Bitcoin block # 600,000 was just mined and there are now 18,000,000 bitcoins in circulation. It will take approx 2.5 years to reach 19,000,000 and another 4 years to reach 20,000,000. After that it's going to take more than 100 years to reach the 21,000,000 limit. via Imgflip Meme Generatorhttps://twitter.com/cryptobull/status/1185345965068296192?s=21
|
|
|
|
El duderino_
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2856
Merit: 14105
“They have no clue”
|
 |
October 19, 2019, 01:17:28 AM |
|
#HODLsleep
|
|
|
|
LUCKMCFLY
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2758
Merit: 1884
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
|
 |
October 19, 2019, 01:37:11 AM |
|
The good thing is, it is not a monopoly who decides to coveneincia to be 21 million Bitcoin. BREAKING: The 18th million Bitcoin was just mined in the last block of transactions.
There are only #3MillionLeft to mine in total and 375,000 to mine before the next block reward halving.  Source: @APompliano
|
|
|
|
Negotiation
Sr. Member
  
Offline
Activity: 1344
Merit: 281
Hire Bitcointalk Camp. Manager @ r7promotions.com
|
 |
October 19, 2019, 01:54:25 AM |
|
yeah, done bitcoin another milestone next 20 millionth waiting.
|
|
|
|
jojo69
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3514
Merit: 4964
diamond-handed zealot
|
 |
October 19, 2019, 01:56:14 AM |
|
I sure hope Satoshi didn't blow it with the curve he chose.
Fees are going to have to, umm, increase, to incentivize miners.
|
|
|
|
HairyMaclairy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1442
Merit: 2282
Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist
|
 |
October 19, 2019, 02:24:29 AM |
|
I sure hope Satoshi didn't blow it with the curve he chose.
Fees are going to have to, umm, increase, to incentivize miners.
Are they? Prices can go up, hash can become more efficient or hash rate can drop. All remain options - and not mutually exclusive ones.
|
|
|
|
|
JayJuanGee
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4060
Merit: 12085
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to "non-custodial"
|
 |
October 19, 2019, 02:40:02 AM |
|
I did? I thought that I was merely battling out the matter with Biodom to suggest that conclusion is bullshit and to suggest for the vast majority of cases DCA rules - especially for less sophisticated investors, even though anyone can put in some work, research, thinking about their own financial circumstances and create more advanced versions of DCA..... or maybe a kind of DCA hybrid that is prudent and customized to their own situation, or if they have a lot of money, then they have a lot more options including DCA or lump sum or whatever they like, but they will still be advantaged by doing some tailorizing fo their strategy, if they have time.
|
|
|
|
rolling
|
 |
October 19, 2019, 02:41:13 AM |
|
I sure hope Satoshi didn't blow it with the curve he chose.
Fees are going to have to, umm, increase, to incentivize miners.
No need to incetivize miners. It's a self-regulating system. If they can't make enough money, they will drop out which makes the remaining miners more profitable. Also, fees may increase as well and small transactions will be squeezed out. This is ok. There is no reason to use the worlds most secure transaction network to buy a cup of coffee.
|
|
|
|
Biodom
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4102
Merit: 4937
|
 |
October 19, 2019, 02:50:44 AM |
|
I sure hope Satoshi didn't blow it with the curve he chose.
Fees are going to have to, umm, increase, to incentivize miners.
No need to incetivize miners. It's a self-regulating system. If they can't make enough money, they will drop out which makes the remaining miners more profitable. Also, fees may increase as well and small transactions will be squeezed out. This is ok. There is no reason to use the worlds most secure transaction network to buy a cup of coffee. It remains to be seen that this would work long term, although so far the adjustment of hashing to price fluctuation was impressive. I worry a bit about mining concentration in the hands of the vertically integrated entities, like the recent P. Thiel venture. It might cause further centralization and such centralization might cause undue re-consideration of bitcoin's rules (in time).
|
|
|
|
rolling
|
 |
October 19, 2019, 02:58:18 AM |
|
I sure hope Satoshi didn't blow it with the curve he chose.
Fees are going to have to, umm, increase, to incentivize miners.
No need to incetivize miners. It's a self-regulating system. If they can't make enough money, they will drop out which makes the remaining miners more profitable. Also, fees may increase as well and small transactions will be squeezed out. This is ok. There is no reason to use the worlds most secure transaction network to buy a cup of coffee. It remains to be seen that this would work long term, although so far the adjustment of hashing to price fluctuation was impressive. I worry a bit about mining concentration in the hands of the vertically integrated entities, like the recent P. Thiel venture. It might cause further centralization and such centralization might cause undue re-consideration of bitcoin's rules (in time). If bitcoin is still mined worldwide by then, I doubt any changes to the rules would be possible. It would require consensus and the world I know can't get consensus on any topic. Therefore, the only way to change the rules is to fork off. That could happen many more times and the value will follow if there is a market for it. I think big daddy Bitcoin will be just fine though.
|
|
|
|
Biodom
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4102
Merit: 4937
|
 |
October 19, 2019, 03:03:14 AM Last edit: October 19, 2019, 03:15:43 AM by Biodom |
|
I sure hope Satoshi didn't blow it with the curve he chose.
Fees are going to have to, umm, increase, to incentivize miners.
No need to incetivize miners. It's a self-regulating system. If they can't make enough money, they will drop out which makes the remaining miners more profitable. Also, fees may increase as well and small transactions will be squeezed out. This is ok. There is no reason to use the worlds most secure transaction network to buy a cup of coffee. It remains to be seen that this would work long term, although so far the adjustment of hashing to price fluctuation was impressive. I worry a bit about mining concentration in the hands of the vertically integrated entities, like the recent P. Thiel venture. It might cause further centralization and such centralization might cause undue re-consideration of bitcoin's rules (in time). If bitcoin is still mined worldwide by then, I doubt any changes to the rules would be possible. It would require consensus and the world I know can't get consensus on any topic. Therefore, the only way to change the rules is to fork off. That could happen many more times and the value will follow if there is a market for it. I think big daddy Bitcoin will be just fine though.Cheers.
|
|
|
|
jojo69
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3514
Merit: 4964
diamond-handed zealot
|
 |
October 19, 2019, 03:40:57 AM |
|
I sure hope Satoshi didn't blow it with the curve he chose.
Fees are going to have to, umm, increase, to incentivize miners.
No need to incetivize miners. It's a self-regulating system. If they can't make enough money, they will drop out which makes the remaining miners more profitable. Also, fees may increase as well and small transactions will be squeezed out. This is ok. There is no reason to use the worlds most secure transaction network to buy a cup of coffee. I get all that. Allow me to flesh out my fears. I see the possibility of many miners jumping to a new, well marketed and timed, coin at some future halving. Were some other chain to have more hash power than BTC the specter of an attack would loom, further reinforcing the value proposition of the new coin.
|
|
|
|
|