Bitcoin Forum
September 27, 2024, 06:08:15 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.1 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: When will BTC get back above $70K:
7/14 - 0 (0%)
7/21 - 1 (0.9%)
7/28 - 11 (10.3%)
8/4 - 16 (15%)
8/11 - 7 (6.5%)
8/18 - 6 (5.6%)
8/25 - 7 (6.5%)
After August - 59 (55.1%)
Total Voters: 107

Pages: « 1 ... 18988 18989 18990 18991 18992 18993 18994 18995 18996 18997 18998 18999 19000 19001 19002 19003 19004 19005 19006 19007 19008 19009 19010 19011 19012 19013 19014 19015 19016 19017 19018 19019 19020 19021 19022 19023 19024 19025 19026 19027 19028 19029 19030 19031 19032 19033 19034 19035 19036 19037 [19038] 19039 19040 19041 19042 19043 19044 19045 19046 19047 19048 19049 19050 19051 19052 19053 19054 19055 19056 19057 19058 19059 19060 19061 19062 19063 19064 19065 19066 19067 19068 19069 19070 19071 19072 19073 19074 19075 19076 19077 19078 19079 19080 19081 19082 19083 19084 19085 19086 19087 19088 ... 33771 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 26465320 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (174 posts by 3 users with 9 merit deleted.)
AlexGR
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1708
Merit: 1049



View Profile
January 09, 2018, 12:40:44 PM

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-01-09/jamie-dimon-i-regret-calling-bitcoin-fraud

Quote
Jamie Dimon: "I Regret Calling Bitcoin A Fraud"
...
Less than four months after Jamie Dimon lashed out at bitcoin, warning that it was would "eventually blow up" because it was "worse than tulip bulbs" and that "any trader trading bitcoin" will be "fired for being stupid", the JPMorgan CEO said he "regrets" his infamous criticism of bitcoin, in which he called the cryptocurrency a "fraud."

In an interview with FOX Business' Maria Bartiromo, Dimon repented, softening the comments he made in a September banking conference, saying "I regret making them."

Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy
ragnar0k
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 154
Merit: 101



View Profile
January 09, 2018, 12:46:37 PM

When bitcoin first appeared I imagined a world of peer to peer payments with no central institutions. LN is most definately not that.

The graphic tries to show how funding a channel is like funding a 'hot wallet'. A more accurate description is that funding a channel is like depositing money with a bank.

I always said LN will be supported by big money. No doubt there will be an epic pump, because 'scalability is solved'. I don't like it but I can profit from it. The original dream of bitcoin doesn't exist though.

Wrong. LN is just a spec, how it is implemented will be up to the service. For example, it could go through a series of TOR nodes (slower), or could be implemented by the likes of expressvpn and such - or vendors will choose a solution for that, hopefully making a choice will be easy. There are tons of options, and if you don't like any of them, you can still stick to segwit
BitcoinBunny
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1540
Merit: 2766


Far, Far, Far Right Thug


View Profile
January 09, 2018, 12:49:48 PM

Segwit. Bech32. MAST. Signature aggregation. Key aggregation. Batch validation. Covenants. CT & bullet proofs. Dandelion. Neutrino. Tx compression. Set reconciliation for tx relay. Block template delta compression. NODE_NETWORK_LIMITED. UTXO commitments. TXO commitments. TXO bitfields. Rolling UTXO set hashes. Client-side validation. Peer encryption & auth. Fraud proofs. Scriptless atomic swaps. Zerolink/tumblebit. [Cut:] layer 2, HF rsrch, bip 8. (@rusty_twit)
and a paaartridge in a pear tree

<huge image deleted>


That's exactly what I'm talking about, that just made my brain hurt, without telling me how to use it.

A few observations about the graphic.

The picture of the network is highly distorted, showing only 3 end users! when really theres hundred of thousands or millions potentially. HIghly connected hubs will be numbered in the hundreds (I feel I'm being generous with that number). That is a highly centralised network, nothing like the depiction.

I doubt many people use a hot wallet for everyday spending. The use case in which people have a spending wallet is already defunct. Who spends bitcoin when the fees are more than the cost of the purchase, you don't spend it.

The promise of low fees on LN was also made onchain in the early days. When I first used bitcoin most people didnt even put a fee. I suspect fees will not be low on LN, only lower than onchain fees.

 

When the internet appeared I was sure it would fail because I could not imaging a scenario where companies would pay to run expensive undersea cables that keep up with the demand (and all the other infrastructure) - and let me use it for 'free'. Somehow it works. This time I'm am keeping an open mind. There is enough money on the table so I'm sure something workable will emerge.

When bitcoin first appeared I imagined a world of peer to peer payments with no central institutions. LN is most definately not that.

The graphic tries to show how funding a channel is like funding a 'hot wallet'. A more accurate description is that funding a channel is like depositing money with a bank.

I always said LN will be supported by big money. No doubt there will be an epic pump, because 'scalability is solved'. I don't like it but I can profit from it. The original dream of bitcoin doesn't exist though.

I actually would regard using LN as the natural progression of scaling up peer to peer payments. Consider that much of the peer to peer traffic on the internet itself which we used to have has moved more to peer - "cloud" - peer system. Can't remember the last time I used a torrent program to get data.

Of course I wouldn't want banks involved in LN but if BTC is really going to replace all digital payments I think LN will have to exist. Vendors already usually only get paid out no more than once per day from payment gateways etc.

Also this would make it possible to accept BTC in a plane or even in space, who the hell knows what will be possible in the future.
d_eddie
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2632
Merit: 3460



View Profile
January 09, 2018, 12:51:58 PM

Translation of SEC concerns: "Futures as implemented now are totally inadequate since they can't manipulate the price."

At least the way I understand it.
d_eddie
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2632
Merit: 3460



View Profile
January 09, 2018, 12:54:48 PM

I actually would regard using LN as the natural progression of scaling up peer to peer payments. Consider that much of the peer to peer traffic on the internet itself which we used to have has moved more to peer - "cloud" - peer system.
Good parallel.

Can't remember the last time I used a torrent program to get data.
... but if some data should get censored everywhere from "cloud peer" systems, it would spread through torrents like wildfire. That is, base blockchain transfers will always be an option, no matter what.
afbitcoins
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2101
Merit: 1061



View Profile WWW
January 09, 2018, 01:17:11 PM

I actually would regard using LN as the natural progression of scaling up peer to peer payments. Consider that much of the peer to peer traffic on the internet itself which we used to have has moved more to peer - "cloud" - peer system.
Good parallel.

Can't remember the last time I used a torrent program to get data.
... but if some data should get censored everywhere from "cloud peer" systems, it would spread through torrents like wildfire. That is, base blockchain transfers will always be an option, no matter what.

Not sure if I understood that correctly but if I did, I could view torrents being replaced by cloud services as a regression from a decentralised system back towards a more centralised one. Cloud services are provided by a small number of large companies. Anyway I still find torrents useful.

But anyway, thanks for a civilised response. I prefer reasoned debate than being told to fuck off.
Rosewater Foundation
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 254



View Profile
January 09, 2018, 01:24:44 PM

Naw. The price is way too low now. I'm calling it.
TERA2
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 222


Deb Rah Von Doom


View Profile
January 09, 2018, 01:40:49 PM

WTF bitcoin selling off again. Just go up you bastard, it's the future for christs sake.
But what date in the future is bitcoin the future and what price will it be? Lets say in 10-20 years it will be $1M and will be the dominant currency. 15 years is actually a short amount of time for so many public systems to be changed - look how long it took grandma to adopt the internet or use a credit card. Is the current trajectory sustainable? No. At the current rate it would reach that level in only 1-2 years. It is going way too fast and needs to pull back and have retracements.
fluidjax
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 750
Merit: 601



View Profile
January 09, 2018, 01:42:31 PM

The graphic tries to show how funding a channel is like funding a 'hot wallet'. A more accurate description is that funding a channel is like depositing money with a bank.


Explain why you think that statement is true, and I will explain why you are wrong.




ivomm
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1885
Merit: 3077


All good things to those who wait


View Profile
January 09, 2018, 01:47:18 PM

Regarding that noobs are boasting with alt profits: Looking at the charts of those that are at least 3 years old, you can see that the price is constantly declining with 1 or 2 pumps  (mostly in May 2017 and in Dec 2017/Jan 2018). Between the pumps there is a huge drop. In other words, even if one gets lucky to chose one of those alts and waits years with 60-90% loss in terms of fiat, at the end he may earn at most ten fold. On the other hand, if one bought BTC and holded for 3 years... you can do the math. Now, the noobs are too emotional and buy these alts at current prices waiting for the next pump. But my questions are: Do you know when the next pump will be? In May 2018, or Jan 2019, or Jan 2020? Do you be comfortable to wake up each morning and see another 10% drop in price for months/years? In the meantime, BTC will steadily rise to prices that now may seem unimaginable. After all, BTC is still in its early adoption phase with a cap of 21 mln coins, 80% of which are now in circulation.
Paashaas
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3535
Merit: 4617



View Profile
January 09, 2018, 01:50:46 PM

The graphic tries to show how funding a channel is like funding a 'hot wallet'. A more accurate description is that funding a channel is like depositing money with a bank.


Explain why you think that statement is true, and I will explain why you are wrong.

Afbitcoins is a Bcash shill/shit noob.
Rosewater Foundation
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 254



View Profile
January 09, 2018, 02:38:45 PM

Naw. The price is way too low now. I'm calling it.

TERA2
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 222


Deb Rah Von Doom


View Profile
January 09, 2018, 02:49:46 PM

low? you must have the chart upside down. it's up 1400% in the last year since it broke ath, 10,000% in 2 years. It's still at this ridiculous enormous peak. I don't you know what you mean by low. Are you zoomed into 1 minute?
ragnar0k
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 154
Merit: 101



View Profile
January 09, 2018, 02:52:10 PM

Did we just defeat a gigantic head and shoulder?
Or I am being too optimistic?
Last of the V8s
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1652
Merit: 4392


Be a bank


View Profile
January 09, 2018, 03:03:55 PM

Naw. The price is way too low now. I'm calling it.





even with retracements Cool
TERA2
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 222


Deb Rah Von Doom


View Profile
January 09, 2018, 03:12:29 PM

I just don't get how something at an all time peak can be a "bottom". it's not physically possible
Rosewater Foundation
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 254



View Profile
January 09, 2018, 03:13:33 PM

I just don't get how something at an all time peak can be a "bottom". it's not physically possible

Imbatman
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 85
Merit: 13


View Profile
January 09, 2018, 03:27:07 PM

Does anyone think it's interesting that the CBOE futures -- which started a month ago today --- had an opening set price at $14,800 --- It's my understanding that the first month of pricing predictions will close today at 4pm EST, and the price is hovering right around --- $14,800?

Rosewater Foundation
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 254



View Profile
January 09, 2018, 03:32:21 PM
Last edit: January 09, 2018, 04:03:35 PM by Rosewater Foundation


What the fuck is up with that crackers johnson ? It looks like it was stung by a swarm of bees.

(sings)
 The ouzel cock, so black of hue
 With orange-tawny bill,
 The throstle with his note so true,
 The wren with little quill—


Idk.
pfrtlpfmpf
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 420
Merit: 257


View Profile
January 09, 2018, 03:33:23 PM

low? you must have the chart upside down. it's up 1400% in the last year since it broke ath, 10,000% in 2 years. It's still at this ridiculous enormous peak. I don't you know what you mean by low. Are you zoomed into 1 minute?

Yep, now i´m getting the next problem: how do i spend all that shit ?
First, you make the dosh, then you ask yourself how to spend it. It´s really hard, guys . . .
I spent all my thoughts making it, while i completely forgot how to spend it. Is there a button on my computer ?  Smiley
Buying a lambo is just to lame.


Pages: « 1 ... 18988 18989 18990 18991 18992 18993 18994 18995 18996 18997 18998 18999 19000 19001 19002 19003 19004 19005 19006 19007 19008 19009 19010 19011 19012 19013 19014 19015 19016 19017 19018 19019 19020 19021 19022 19023 19024 19025 19026 19027 19028 19029 19030 19031 19032 19033 19034 19035 19036 19037 [19038] 19039 19040 19041 19042 19043 19044 19045 19046 19047 19048 19049 19050 19051 19052 19053 19054 19055 19056 19057 19058 19059 19060 19061 19062 19063 19064 19065 19066 19067 19068 19069 19070 19071 19072 19073 19074 19075 19076 19077 19078 19079 19080 19081 19082 19083 19084 19085 19086 19087 19088 ... 33771 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!