Bitcoin Forum
November 20, 2017, 06:55:05 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.15.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [29] 30 31 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [FREE] ckpool.org ZERO FEE SPLNS no registration mining pool  (Read 61013 times)
AtraxPool
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 84

Block Hunting


View Profile
October 22, 2017, 11:00:25 PM
 #561

My god how is it that this pool only has 1.8Ph...

What a shame...
People are so short sighted...

Shame people just don't seem to understand the name of this game is PROPORTIONALITY...and this pool by far offers the highest rewards/hash rate.
All the fancy stats and pool sites are completely unneeded...The core stats are here and refresh every minute.
It also has great connectivity. and ZERO FEE for christs sake...

Variance on small pools can be a bitch ...but bad luck is bad luck period...And even big pools get hit bad..like Kano's recent 875% block.
The pathetically small payouts on big pools are deceptive and cumulatively more expensive..less cost efficient...


The only real problem is the constantly changing Diff..they keep moving the goal posts..this sure as shit hurts small pools big time...

CK is such a legend...They just don't get any better than this pool...

Where the hell is everyone?
WAKE UP PEOPLE! Get onboard this gravy train.


Don't forget the amazing solo pool!

■ BLOCKHUNT ■ «  COMMUNITY BLOCKHUNTING - »  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2207363.0
1511160905
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1511160905

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1511160905
Reply with quote  #2

1511160905
Report to moderator
Join ICO Now A blockchain platform for effective freelancing
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1511160905
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1511160905

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1511160905
Reply with quote  #2

1511160905
Report to moderator
1511160905
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1511160905

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1511160905
Reply with quote  #2

1511160905
Report to moderator
Philopolymath
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252

Walter Russell's Cosmogony is RIGHT!


View Profile
October 23, 2017, 12:01:24 AM
 #562

Solo is silly suicide....


So this pool has only found ONE block EVER...and it took 161% of expected shares to find..Right?
So how does that affect the PPLNS 5N situation?


And now almost two months later we are still only at..... "diff": "85.0"   so... 85% of expected right?

Ah wait just hit 86%


8x S9's and  A Polarity Controlled  Electric Gyroscope
Suzobo
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 50


View Profile
October 23, 2017, 12:37:06 AM
 #563

Yes that is correct until we find many more blocks.
-ck
Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2338


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
October 23, 2017, 12:40:25 AM
 #564

So this pool has only found ONE block EVER...and it took 161% of expected shares to find..Right?
So how does that affect the PPLNS 5N situation?
This is not PPLNS, but is very close, with a score based variant of PPLNS. The window is 5N and so far we haven't even filled one full window. The LNS in the pool stats means Last N Shares and tells you how many are in the current window. Block finding has no influence on the window at all.

Primary developer/maintainer for cgminer and ckpool/ckproxy.
ZERO FEE Pooled mining at ckpool.org 1% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
ComputerGenie
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 462


Retired IRCX God


View Profile
October 23, 2017, 12:57:23 AM
 #565

Technically, whatever the "official" block find count is, it's that +1 for one that didn't count during the beta stage (and if I remember right, that's part of that 161% number, which would be 161% shares /2); so, there's that   Tongue

If you have to ask why, you wouldn`t understand my answer.
Philopolymath
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252

Walter Russell's Cosmogony is RIGHT!


View Profile
October 23, 2017, 01:10:25 AM
 #566

Ah yes excuse me...S-plns indeed as in SUPER-PLNS
I am most impressed by the weighted share calcs.

and thanks for confirming what LNS stands for..I kinda figured that..


LOVE THE HERPY DERP

8x S9's and  A Polarity Controlled  Electric Gyroscope
Mathen
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 13


View Profile WWW
October 23, 2017, 01:59:25 PM
 #567

somebody big pulled out of the pool.  We've lost 2/3 of our hashrate.   Undecided

http://www.cryptolopolis.com (under construction)
Philopolymath
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252

Walter Russell's Cosmogony is RIGHT!


View Profile
October 23, 2017, 03:35:24 PM
 #568

I noticed

{"hashrate1m": "466T", "hashrate5m": "458T", "hashrate15m": "465T", "hashrate1hr": "547T", "hashrate6hr": "1.29P", "hashrate1d": "1.6P", "hashrate7d": "1.38P"}

More for the rest of us...LOL

My oh My but the DERP is slow to increase ..maybe a little faster now but our block expectancy rate is just sooooooo slow....
The payout will be terrible for quite some time...if we ever find more blocks...


8x S9's and  A Polarity Controlled  Electric Gyroscope
husnims
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1


View Profile
October 24, 2017, 08:54:59 AM
 #569

Hi,

I just started mining last week with my Antminer S7 mostly on NH. I'm interested in the Zero Fee that ckpool offer. Should I mine in ckpool if I'm looking for profit? Any advice is appreciated.

Thank you
nowaltcoin
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 137


View Profile
October 25, 2017, 10:25:17 AM
 #570

Hi

I'm in with nine Prospero Blackarrow  (just for fun)

I like the work of -ck !  Grin

Have a nice day

9 * Blackarrow Prospero at Low-Voltage mining @ ckpool.org
20 * GPU's mining minexcoin/bitcoin gold
You like to mine something different: https://deutsche-emark.de/
Mathen
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 13


View Profile WWW
October 26, 2017, 04:58:25 PM
 #571

Why did diff suddenly drop from 90 to 74?   

http://www.cryptolopolis.com (under construction)
ComputerGenie
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 462


Retired IRCX God


View Profile
October 26, 2017, 05:32:50 PM
 #572

Why did diff suddenly drop from 90 to 74?   
Height    Block Time                    Difficulty                        Change         Average Block    Average Hashrate
491,904    2017-10-26 11:52:42    1,452,839,779,145        + 21.39 %            08 min 14 s    10.40 EH/s

If you have to ask why, you wouldn`t understand my answer.
Mathen
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 13


View Profile WWW
October 26, 2017, 05:50:12 PM
 #573

Ah, so the overall difficulty of mining a coin just took a steep jump.   Got it.

http://www.cryptolopolis.com (under construction)
VRobb
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686


I'm in BTC XTC


View Profile
October 26, 2017, 06:18:42 PM
 #574

LOL, no that's not it!!   Cheesy

I don't believe in superstition because it's bad luck
In Hotels, I prefer the 13thF1oor6CAwyzyxXPNnRvu3nhhYeqZdc
These aren't the Droids you're looking for: S5 & S7 (Sold), R4B2, R4B4 (RIP), & S9-13.5
ComputerGenie
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 462


Retired IRCX God


View Profile
October 26, 2017, 06:24:12 PM
 #575

LOL, no that's not it!!   Cheesy
True story...
1 + 1 does not = 2
 Roll Eyes

If you have to ask why, you wouldn`t understand my answer.
nowaltcoin
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 137


View Profile
October 26, 2017, 10:10:18 PM
 #576

 Roll Eyes long jump.... Roll Eyes
https://bitcoinwisdom.com/bitcoin/difficulty


9 * Blackarrow Prospero at Low-Voltage mining @ ckpool.org
20 * GPU's mining minexcoin/bitcoin gold
You like to mine something different: https://deutsche-emark.de/
Mathen
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 13


View Profile WWW
October 27, 2017, 01:24:10 PM
 #577

Alright, I've got an S7 online and in the pool.  Next month I should be adding an S9.  Then I think my capital investment is probably tapped out.   Cheesy

http://www.cryptolopolis.com (under construction)
-ck
Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2338


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
October 27, 2017, 10:54:33 PM
 #578

somebody big pulled out of the pool.  We've lost 2/3 of our hashrate.   Undecided
I think that miner went onto the solo pool since there was a concomitant hashrate rise there. I guess he figured he was almost mining solo so he probably decided to formalise that fact.

Primary developer/maintainer for cgminer and ckpool/ckproxy.
ZERO FEE Pooled mining at ckpool.org 1% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
Mathen
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 13


View Profile WWW
October 28, 2017, 01:00:57 AM
 #579

So... I'm just kind of insanely curious about everything.  If I become obnoxious, let me know and I'll hush.    Are there any thoughts about what the "ideal" pool size/hash rate would be?  Obviously smaller nets the individual contributors more, however, it also statistically increases the time between blocks, yes?  Just wondering if there is a target size out there?

http://www.cryptolopolis.com (under construction)
Philopolymath
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252

Walter Russell's Cosmogony is RIGHT!


View Profile
October 31, 2017, 01:27:49 PM
 #580

Why does stats page report being one block ahead of everyone else?

8x S9's and  A Polarity Controlled  Electric Gyroscope
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [29] 30 31 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!