Bitcoin Forum
January 21, 2018, 10:43:58 AM *
News: Electrum users must upgrade to 3.0.5 if they haven't already. More info.
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 [38] 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [7PH] ckpool.org ZERO FEE SPLNS no registration mining pool  (Read 73083 times)
ComputerGenie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 532


Retired IRCX God


View Profile
January 05, 2018, 11:42:20 AM
 #741

...Not a single satoshi is wasted or put aside here.
Every reason why this is the only pool that I invest in. While it's great for my income wallet, I think it's one of the best contributions to the space in quite some time!

If you have to ask why, you wouldn`t understand my answer.
1516531438
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1516531438

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1516531438
Reply with quote  #2

1516531438
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1516531438
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1516531438

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1516531438
Reply with quote  #2

1516531438
Report to moderator
1516531438
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1516531438

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1516531438
Reply with quote  #2

1516531438
Report to moderator
nowaltcoin
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 149


View Profile
January 05, 2018, 11:42:46 AM
 #742

hmmm

i've been mining since the 25'th of october with 550 GH, but i've been paid every second block
so i have been paid  not on the 29'th of november but
on the  14'th of December
not paid at the 5'th of january but now on the paylist for the next block....

so it seems even with 550 GH you will not paid every block.....

BTW: Happy new year to all

8 * Blackarrow Prospero at Low-Voltage mining @ ckpool.org
20 * GPU's mining XMR/ETN/Sumocoin
You like to mine something different: https://deutsche-emark.de/
-ck
Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2408


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
January 05, 2018, 11:59:23 AM
 #743

hmmm

i've been mining since the 25'th of october with 550 GH, but i've been paid every second block
so i have been paid  not on the 29'th of november but
on the  14'th of December
not paid at the 5'th of january but now on the paylist for the next block....

so it seems even with 550 GH you will not paid every block.....

BTW: Happy new year to all
Happy New Year indeed.

That sounds about right. Only the top 100 miners are guaranteed of a payout with each block and as the hashrate rises the size of miner that gets interleaved will get larger. While it's done to limit the size of the generation transaction on the pool, there is actually a benefit to the miner - they don't lose any accumulated payout if they miss one of the payouts, they get a larger payout instead of multiple smaller ones. The advantage of this is that many smaller payouts end up costing you a lot more in fees when you want to spend your earned bitcoin later on. Halve the number of payouts - half the fees, quarter the number of payouts - quarter the fees, and so on.

Primary developer/maintainer for cgminer and ckpool/ckproxy.
ZERO FEE Pooled mining at ckpool.org 1% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
TheNerdyType
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 19


View Profile
January 05, 2018, 12:09:16 PM
 #744

Woohoo!!!! Good morning, indeed! I’m still new here, but enjoying the camaraderie and information sharing. I didn’t find that in the large pool I started with.
harviak
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 6


View Profile
January 05, 2018, 02:14:44 PM
 #745

looks like we'vw got another block found Smiley
Philopolymath
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 322

Walter Russell's Cosmogony is RIGHT!


View Profile
January 05, 2018, 05:16:42 PM
 #746

RIGHT ON!

Thanks to


"solvedby": "1EcH7pHYTHLo3cbdXfkf6e6Zh5JzCPGumc",
 "date": "[2018-01-05 10:34:09.327]",
 "hash": "0000000000000000003fe07d5b83f59499f7f721da189ac72437c810cd875292",
 "shares": 1767395279946,
 "diff": 91.5

"height": 502677,
 "reward": 17.06318344,
 "fee": 0.0,



A little early @ 91.5% and a good chunk of Tx fees...yippee..

MINE ON!

Support Alien Beer Circle research...www.youtube.com/watch?v=MRXDk2RMQ4A
igorfosp
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 7


View Profile
January 05, 2018, 11:33:18 PM
 #747

I read like 26 pages before this message. How long it takes to reach the 100% dep performance? I was doing my math and was more than a year? Is that right?
-ck
Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2408


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
January 05, 2018, 11:44:53 PM
 #748

I read like 26 pages before this message. How long it takes to reach the 100% dep performance? I was doing my math and was more than a year? Is that right?
5 x network diff or 9.6 trillion shares, which hasn't happened yet on this pool thanks to a low hashrate but is now about 80 days. As the pool gets larger, this time gets shorter. However compared PPLNS, it ramps up more quickly and would be close to maximum long before the 5 x network diff. We're currently at 5.6 trillion shares. That means anyone mining now, their shares are worth more than once we get up to the full Last N Shares.

Primary developer/maintainer for cgminer and ckpool/ckproxy.
ZERO FEE Pooled mining at ckpool.org 1% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
igorfosp
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 7


View Profile
January 05, 2018, 11:51:34 PM
 #749

What is network diff? I want to learn that to feel comfortable and be capable to do the math by myself. Now I can see that the hash is 6.12P. What is the relationship with the hp and the network diff? Why u say that if we have more hp in your pool would decrease this time.

EDIT:
If I have started yesterday with 54 TH, so only after those 80 days that I will be in my max performance?

-ck
Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2408


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
January 05, 2018, 11:58:25 PM
 #750

What is network diff? I want to learn that to feel comfortable and be capable to do the math by myself. Now I can see that the hash is 6.12P. What is the relationship with the hp and the network diff? Why u say that if we have more hp in your pool would decrease this time.

EDIT:
If I have started yesterday with 54 TH, so only after those 80 days that I will be in my max performance?


Network difficulty is the current difficulty share required to solve a bitcoin block.

bitcoin-cli getmininginfo
{
  "blocks": 502754,
  "currentblockweight": 9280,
  "currentblocktx": 5,
  "difficulty": 1931136454487.716,
  "errors": "",
  "networkhashps": 1.384324312220417e+19,
  "pooledtx": 33864,
  "chain": "main"
}

Note the difficulty value is 1.9 trillion. This means it takes on average 1.9 trillion shares to find a block. When the pool's stats show "herp" equal to 5x that value, it will have plateaued. As hashrate rises on the pool, we find 9.6 trillion shares faster. Most of your performance will happen in a lot less than those 80 days, more like about 20 to see the bulk of the effect, but yes, the maximum you can earn currently will be if you mine here continuously for 80 days. It's the only way to guarantee fairness for people that have been consistently mining here. We're hoping for more hashrate on the pool to keep bringing that value down.

Primary developer/maintainer for cgminer and ckpool/ckproxy.
ZERO FEE Pooled mining at ckpool.org 1% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
philipma1957
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1988


A new tool for prediction https://bitvol.info/


View Profile
January 06, 2018, 12:25:53 AM
 #751

Nice  here I am.   0.00854429


Code:
"height": 502677,
 "reward": 17.06318344,
 "fee": 0.0,
 "payouts": {
  "1EcH7pHYTHLo3cbdXfkf6e6Zh5JzCPGumc": 11.03057436,
  "176sh81PQupUsFyX6hNL2PTYydSuL7Wu73": 1.3395927,
  "16sx9rJR7sDaKEB4xjHnh8Cw2Ci2mwh747": 0.83390967,
  "1FVK2VLqWUpFSqptLmg5DZM9NcKWDA6QQF": 0.74080404,
  "1Fd7in5wQ5QUmbAc6zFMAcfS7M2yR6d1SA": 0.70894275,
  "1GeniexG7MnLr9WH48jG1cPLqgGbqUsaFM": 0.55874182,
  "1B5nA9AyLxtRmA16S4YCXR5D1r9Z9j1wBg": 0.16883478,
  "1EEggteW9M1nUtbXnv9Am9RjSnEXNVPXfF": 0.12838563,
  "3HWbABbZj1pNWGE8njHNQqDfGC4c5ZMDnA": 0.12118281,
  "18Yv7cyUXJhdtN3J3tpYNcsoG4Qbz4z62e": 0.09364871,
  "17fLF6ZYXFDqpistGUyLnKuPcGhrQ7Xuqm": 0.07585182,
  "16r2NjZuLmye6v34L9ySqDVzRk4aScmAU2": 0.0731584,
  "1FTwbE7DagdmaCbuCFW3yb9FHZsUgdRoSa": 0.07138554,
  "1EjTdmm8768CPvt8kXQRrZoby2ivXjyPpb": 0.06053692,
  "198fMgE5q92r3HUWCrWiobBWQAq9d8FHAx": 0.05947852,
  "1AnJHGLmBBhwxTmn8avcZ9FANUpq84Aczq": 0.0582624,
  "17zyuMZzuD4cd4WCP24WcnnMcBkYiRc3es": 0.05220357,
  "12rMUe15NqZsLDUaJb5VWwgshR3Gvqr3ha": 0.04853001,
  "3Lp6dqavhqjGR8NLKhXYm8Q5d5351Wb2Xg": 0.03653698,
  "18NivBmhxubygKacXSgomS3mBPq4WxHbZj": 0.03372781,
  "1EnFgD1z8Qhz5jLT2Dsqbf1w2pGkt5XZmD": 0.03120408,
  "1NpJZ84TYRgjD9jFcevd5HtTWXnuceV9h7": 0.02982374,
  "1Dsf35RmLdGRa9iwUuuZVH1YUuawsGQktv": 0.02755165,
  "13thF1oor6CAwyzyxXPNnRvu3nhhYeqZdc": 0.02359003,
  "1AhnyWPGwkWjrxtz6khAQNhuvppRW7eV8h": 0.02345831,
  "1J2Ce25U6kDfKtz5iKm3jHePzGVT529g8w": 0.0208441,
  "1Lu4coZqQxgaSrXsB3Y1ZctDjKgRNVugd8": 0.01998833,
  "17g9Frex53fVUzX45Dw28Caw4pFYVmHAbn": 0.0178456,
  "1N9UWvnF42EWc2Q2nXvmgHRfLc2dH52Ype": 0.01780734,
  "12PbPgw7e5SANspLJYezBxsi4ociS1PBiK": 0.01672755,
  "144xhJYYvPsW8a31ZJ244YjBEEJc3h2dsk": 0.01613886,
  "1HihVDkPJsJyQr5isVx6FXCdvHo1o7Ru1X": 0.01562979,
  "1Cko1QNx7mC4dS5R2mcm12zYpDCQJt5rmm": 0.01549329,
  "1AUrEziNG7cH5fytYFBGQsnYivtYh2zqT8": 0.01530291,
  "1LFepM1Jv84nWo9hTeG5SbasXM7kHVnAaZ": 0.01396627,
  "1NyN2Y6vH75gr6zQenad3DG1QgZdJ2Uztg": 0.01366313,
  "19BgtBNx4UGxNTZqQKCfRXUUrdNruDnuTQ": 0.0132491,
  "144RnTangRbu89UdfEMimNXzZkJ2JoDCYA": 0.01320924,
  "12v4oypi7qUpkfkMWAeHHtxv9jZyBy32S7": 0.01314671,
  "112BRCKfaigKrRCgK3rF9WB6Lcbd2GFXmq": 0.0130303,
  "1KeR1jwghL5oHTSiDEfRZpfsKkh8CUopLr": 0.01292327,
  "195bMEnezoPAjxYGr4cMQqsQmeghD8XvFJ": 0.01269116,
  "1LqGC9oQggKngF7dn7cV9mzZsz65JYcgEN": 0.01262189,
  "17gWFbqYyQHFziHJ4rhkSBUsR2EWZJz1yd": 0.01241608,
  "1Q3j9nyM353ikitd2qj5AYy7EnKywQkMHD": 0.01170298,
  "1Leon1Z1X7fn54Rki2ubMUvdkCJJtipUQY": 0.01154635,
  "1BdcszfZn7ufNAND1KiGyvExG5eED2Acdj": 0.01121788,
  "1CEQ91zArq5pbReQ2J27VEuyZRHo2KSQU8": 0.01118326,
  "1BHYzdSHRd8kNSrQeSQytS2yQs1wynXEyj": 0.01100116,
  "18Tc7P4L5D6LyEhNVcJgCcgzCC58iFXeG2": 0.00983816,
  "18yQTCLBzwmDCnNBCcvw2fRkRRvTGp81xK": 0.0088024,



 "1JdC6Xg3ajT3rge3FgPNSYYFpmf53Vbtje": 0.00854429,  


"1NW6YzvP6SiXbx884KAyqAANDdksYZAPPg": 0.00813216,
MOD EDIT: Put in code tags.

Please support sidehack with his new miner project Send to : 1BURGERAXHH6Yi6LRybRJK7ybEm5m5HwTr
I mine alt coins with https://simplemining.net I see BTC as the super highway and alt coins as taxis and trucks needed to move transactions.
swanny88
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 5


View Profile
January 06, 2018, 12:32:37 AM
 #752

Nice  here I am.   0.00854429
MOD EDIT: Trimmed quote.

Just curious.  What is you Hash rate?

philipma1957
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1988


A new tool for prediction https://bitvol.info/


View Profile
January 06, 2018, 12:56:12 AM
 #753

Nice  here I am.   0.00854429
MOD EDIT: Trimmed quote.

Just curious.  What is you Hash rate?



it was 500th for 3 or four days in a row.


Please support sidehack with his new miner project Send to : 1BURGERAXHH6Yi6LRybRJK7ybEm5m5HwTr
I mine alt coins with https://simplemining.net I see BTC as the super highway and alt coins as taxis and trucks needed to move transactions.
Rodderman
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 59


View Profile
January 06, 2018, 01:02:30 AM
 #754

Yo Phil why leave just curios you still mining here? if not why?
philipma1957
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1988


A new tool for prediction https://bitvol.info/


View Profile
January 06, 2018, 03:09:26 AM
 #755

Yo Phil why leave just curios you still mining here? if not why?

I used to rent large rentals from nicehash when the pool started and btc was only 2-4k  a coin.

I wanted to support _ck     when he began this pool.

So when btc got to 15k  I simply could not afford the big rentals.

I don't have a lot of sha-256 gear

about 45th  and I am using them at buysolar's solar array.  my fee is 50-50 coin split  he is doing rather well with that deal.  But when btc was 2k  I was better off.

I will come back here down the road  with big rentals and the like.

But  with the 45th I have   I go with lower variance then this pool.  Since ½ the coins go to buysolar  and since s-9's break a lot  my 45th  is due to 2 dead boards  I would be

52-56th mining here with high variance is not easy for me. 

Please support sidehack with his new miner project Send to : 1BURGERAXHH6Yi6LRybRJK7ybEm5m5HwTr
I mine alt coins with https://simplemining.net I see BTC as the super highway and alt coins as taxis and trucks needed to move transactions.
LoneRangir
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 647


View Profile
January 06, 2018, 03:19:04 AM
 #756

please be aware that bech32 addresses (starting with bc) which have started appearing in some wallets are not currently supported by this pool

Why is this?  Just not popular enough to add support?  The 'standard' has been around for a while now.  I've found a few places reject this format, even though electrum has offered the format for some time now.
-ck
Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2408


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
January 06, 2018, 03:22:26 AM
 #757

please be aware that bech32 addresses (starting with bc) which have started appearing in some wallets are not currently supported by this pool

Why is this?  Just not popular enough to add support?  The 'standard' has been around for a while now.  I've found a few places reject this format, even though electrum has offered the format for some time now.
No code in the pool to support it? I'm also not sure on whether you can generate directly to a bech32 address since it's meant to be segwit to segwit only.

Primary developer/maintainer for cgminer and ckpool/ckproxy.
ZERO FEE Pooled mining at ckpool.org 1% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
LoneRangir
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 647


View Profile
January 06, 2018, 03:29:29 AM
 #758

please be aware that bech32 addresses (starting with bc) which have started appearing in some wallets are not currently supported by this pool

Why is this?  Just not popular enough to add support?  The 'standard' has been around for a while now.  I've found a few places reject this format, even though electrum has offered the format for some time now.
No code in the pool to support it? I'm also not sure on whether you can generate directly to a bech32 address since it's meant to be segwit to segwit only.

So we've not successfully mined a block to a native SewWit address?  I'm a bit fascinated by the (lack of) SegWit adoption.   
-ck
Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2408


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
January 06, 2018, 03:31:21 AM
 #759

please be aware that bech32 addresses (starting with bc) which have started appearing in some wallets are not currently supported by this pool

Why is this?  Just not popular enough to add support?  The 'standard' has been around for a while now.  I've found a few places reject this format, even though electrum has offered the format for some time now.
No code in the pool to support it? I'm also not sure on whether you can generate directly to a bech32 address since it's meant to be segwit to segwit only.

So we've not successfully mined a block to a native SewWit address?  I'm a bit fascinated by the (lack of) SegWit adoption.   
Segwit address yes we have, plenty. Bech32 is a unique segwit to segwit only address format. Virtually all segwit in use today is using the 3x address format though.

Primary developer/maintainer for cgminer and ckpool/ckproxy.
ZERO FEE Pooled mining at ckpool.org 1% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
LoneRangir
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 647


View Profile
January 06, 2018, 03:34:39 AM
 #760

please be aware that bech32 addresses (starting with bc) which have started appearing in some wallets are not currently supported by this pool

Why is this?  Just not popular enough to add support?  The 'standard' has been around for a while now.  I've found a few places reject this format, even though electrum has offered the format for some time now.
No code in the pool to support it? I'm also not sure on whether you can generate directly to a bech32 address since it's meant to be segwit to segwit only.

So we've not successfully mined a block to a native SewWit address?  I'm a bit fascinated by the (lack of) SegWit adoption.  
Segwit address yes we have, plenty. Bech32 is a unique segwit to segwit only address format. Virtually all segwit in use today is using the 3x address format though.

So you cannot spend a bech32 to a 'standard' address?  If so, I was not aware.  Maybe that's not what you said....

I get that '3' addresses are segwit-compatible-multi-sig addresses.  

Anyways.. would you not be spending to a bech32 adddress upon a block found/payout?  Is the finding address not a '1' or a '3' address?

Honestly...   I'm not trying to be a troll.  I just would like to know the reason for the slow rollout of such 'upgrades'.  Is it technical?  Political?   Trying to understand the landscape...
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 [38] 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!