Icutgrass205
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 4
Bitcoin is today what the internet was decades ago
|
|
September 28, 2018, 08:12:30 PM |
|
So then why do so many people in the crypto community trash CSW and call him a scammer when there is legally verified evidence that he was a part of satoshi?
|
Bitcoin, a peer-to-peer electronic cash system for the world. BTC tips are greatly appreciated 35BqJwcycsLDoPrBxmxuh1e4MY7bcDPvGW
|
|
|
bones261
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1806
Merit: 1828
|
|
September 28, 2018, 09:07:57 PM |
|
So then why do so many people in the crypto community trash CSW and call him a scammer when there is legally verified evidence that he was a part of satoshi?
CSW legal team filed a motion to dismiss. One of the things they are claiming is that CSW does not have the private keys for Kleiman's coins. https://www.coindesk.com/craig-wright-moves-dismiss-shakedown-bitcoin-lawsuit/
|
|
|
|
Icutgrass205
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 4
Bitcoin is today what the internet was decades ago
|
|
September 28, 2018, 09:24:36 PM |
|
So then it's "case closed". How can people in the crypto community who call him "faketoshi" still have credibility when the information that proves he was in fact one half of satoshi is publicly available to everyone?
|
Bitcoin, a peer-to-peer electronic cash system for the world. BTC tips are greatly appreciated 35BqJwcycsLDoPrBxmxuh1e4MY7bcDPvGW
|
|
|
bones261
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1806
Merit: 1828
|
|
September 28, 2018, 09:51:36 PM |
|
So then it's "case closed". How can people in the crypto community who call him "faketoshi" still have credibility when the information that proves he was in fact one half of satoshi is publicly available to everyone? The validity of the court documents have not be confirmed by any court ruling or settlement between the parties involved. CSW has made it pretty clear that he will not be providing any conclusive evidence that he is indeed Satoshi. All he would need to do is sign a message using the private key for any of the addresses the coinbase reward went to in the first 100 blocks. It's not that difficult unless he lost the private keys. However, loosing the private keys would appear to contradict Satoshi's advise. Sigh... why delete a wallet instead of moving it aside and keeping the old copy just in case? You should never delete a wallet.
One of the possibilities would be that Kleiman had access to all of the private keys and encrypted them, leaving everyone in the dark on what the password was.
|
|
|
|
sirsplashalot
|
|
September 28, 2018, 10:46:18 PM |
|
So then it's "case closed". How can people in the crypto community who call him "faketoshi" still have credibility when the information that proves he was in fact one half of satoshi is publicly available to everyone? Because at least half of the cryptocurrency community is misinformed and valid sources of news have yet to be established, this is why independent research is very important.
|
Worried about my trust rating? I am too. Bitcointalk users ‘Lauda’ and ‘gmaxwell’ have abused their superior powers in trust system to align their views with the ‘correct views.’ In no legal system in any jurisdiction do we have a definition for what Bitcoin is, they do not have the power to tell us what it is based on the rule of law.
|
|
|
bones261
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1806
Merit: 1828
|
|
September 28, 2018, 10:59:57 PM |
|
So then it's "case closed". How can people in the crypto community who call him "faketoshi" still have credibility when the information that proves he was in fact one half of satoshi is publicly available to everyone? Because at least half of the cryptocurrency community is misinformed and valid sources of news have yet to be established, this is why independent research is very important. Is that why CSW himself retweeted this tweet of mine? https://twitter.com/bones261/status/1035621686140391426 Because I am so misinformed? Simple fact of the matter is CSW does not wish to confirm or deny that he is indeed Satoshi at this time. Respect his wishes and leave it alone.
|
|
|
|
sirsplashalot
|
|
September 28, 2018, 11:19:24 PM |
|
So then it's "case closed". How can people in the crypto community who call him "faketoshi" still have credibility when the information that proves he was in fact one half of satoshi is publicly available to everyone? Because at least half of the cryptocurrency community is misinformed and valid sources of news have yet to be established, this is why independent research is very important. Is that why CSW himself retweeted this tweet of mine? https://twitter.com/bones261/status/1035621686140391426 Because I am so misinformed? Simple fact of the matter is CSW does not wish to confirm or deny that he is indeed Satoshi at this time. Respect his wishes and leave it alone. Not at all. Its in no ones best legal interest to claim the Satoshi title. I believe the 'faketoshi' references are unbacked claims with respect to craig wright. Gavin Andresen claims to be convinced beyond reasonable doubt whereas the rest cannot constitute that as valid proof and then there is the 'misinformed side' where i've seen people go as far as to claim that Vitaliks rant against Craig Wright constitutes 'proof,' when such claims are no more than opinions. I very much respect his claim to leave it alone. What I do find interesting about Bitcoin is that there is whitepaper to begin with. This whitepaper is in academic format, very much as Craig Wright would have had it as a lifelong academic with multiple masters and doctorate degrees.
|
Worried about my trust rating? I am too. Bitcointalk users ‘Lauda’ and ‘gmaxwell’ have abused their superior powers in trust system to align their views with the ‘correct views.’ In no legal system in any jurisdiction do we have a definition for what Bitcoin is, they do not have the power to tell us what it is based on the rule of law.
|
|
|
Icutgrass205
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 4
Bitcoin is today what the internet was decades ago
|
|
September 28, 2018, 11:28:56 PM |
|
Not to mention the emails sent from CSW to Kleiman before the white paper was even released. This is a quote from the main document of the court case, which can be found here https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/6309656/1/kleiman-v-wright/"In March 2008, just a few months before Satoshi’s paper on the Bitcoin protocol was published, Craig wrote Dave an email stating: “I need your help editing a paper I am going to release later this year. I have been working on a new form of electronic money. Bit cash, Bitcoin . . . [y]ou are always there for me Dave. I want you to be part of it all.”
|
Bitcoin, a peer-to-peer electronic cash system for the world. BTC tips are greatly appreciated 35BqJwcycsLDoPrBxmxuh1e4MY7bcDPvGW
|
|
|
nutildah
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3136
Merit: 8500
Happy 10th Birthday to Dogeparty!
|
|
September 29, 2018, 02:24:21 AM |
|
Not to mention the emails sent from CSW to Kleiman before the white paper was even released. This is a quote from the main document of the court case, which can be found here https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/6309656/1/kleiman-v-wright/"In March 2008, just a few months before Satoshi’s paper on the Bitcoin protocol was published, Craig wrote Dave an email stating: “I need your help editing a paper I am going to release later this year. I have been working on a new form of electronic money. Bit cash, Bitcoin . . . [y]ou are always there for me Dave. I want you to be part of it all.” Ever heard of something called "backdating"? In the same document you just linked: "It is unclear whether Craig, Dave, and/or both created Bitcoin." If Craig was Satoshi, why would he need to pull an elaborate hoax on Gavin Andresen where he presented keys that were already publicly available, embedded in the blockchain? Seems like he could have used any one of perhaps hundreds of other keys Satoshi should be in possession of. Besides, Satoshi Nakamoto was never the ill-mannered, egocentric, conniving drama queen bedwetter that CSW is every day.
|
|
|
|
boomboom
|
|
September 29, 2018, 04:23:46 AM |
|
Not to mention the emails sent from CSW to Kleiman before the white paper was even released. This is a quote from the main document of the court case, which can be found here https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/6309656/1/kleiman-v-wright/"In March 2008, just a few months before Satoshi’s paper on the Bitcoin protocol was published, Craig wrote Dave an email stating: “I need your help editing a paper I am going to release later this year. I have been working on a new form of electronic money. Bit cash, Bitcoin . . . [y]ou are always there for me Dave. I want you to be part of it all.” Ever heard of something called "backdating"? In the same document you just linked: "It is unclear whether Craig, Dave, and/or both created Bitcoin." If Craig was Satoshi, why would he need to pull an elaborate hoax on Gavin Andresen where he presented keys that were already publicly available, embedded in the blockchain? Seems like he could have used any one of perhaps hundreds of other keys Satoshi should be in possession of. Besides, Satoshi Nakamoto was never the ill-mannered, egocentric, conniving drama queen bedwetter that CSW is every day. So, you think Gavin meets Craig in person and he offers the same evidence as everybody else? You don't think Gavin would have used personal communications he had with satoshi to check if Craig was legit, like ask for dates and contents of emails and forum messages? Gavin wasn't fooled, and afaik witnessed in person Craig using satoshi's priv keys. Craig wants the situation we have, many doubters, he likes the uncertainty.
|
|
|
|
nutildah
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3136
Merit: 8500
Happy 10th Birthday to Dogeparty!
|
|
September 29, 2018, 04:31:39 AM |
|
So, you think Gavin meets Craig in person and he offers the same evidence as everybody else? You don't think Gavin would have used personal communications he had with satoshi to check if Craig was legit, like ask for dates and contents of emails and forum messages? Gavin wasn't fooled, and afaik witnessed in person Craig using satoshi's priv keys.
You're being bullheaded about the fact that Craig obtained the keys from the bitcoin blockchain. He used recycled keys that were out in the public and obtainable by anybody. Its impossible for Gavin to have communicated with Satoshi about the matter because he hadn't communicated with him in over 4 (maybe even 5) years by that point. Craig wants the situation we have, many doubters, he likes the uncertainty.
Nobody gives a flying fuck what Craig wants. He's clearly a sociopathic narcissist and he hasn't contributed anything of note to the crypto community in his pursuit of even more money. He's an extremely crass, divisive figure hellbent on fooling the weak-minded into believing he is Satoshi for purpose of quenching his insatiable ego.
|
|
|
|
boomboom
|
|
September 29, 2018, 04:49:13 AM |
|
So, you think Gavin meets Craig in person and he offers the same evidence as everybody else? You don't think Gavin would have used personal communications he had with satoshi to check if Craig was legit, like ask for dates and contents of emails and forum messages? Gavin wasn't fooled, and afaik witnessed in person Craig using satoshi's priv keys.
You're being bullheaded about the fact that Craig obtained the keys from the bitcoin blockchain. He used recycled keys that were out in the public and obtainable by anybody. Its impossible for Gavin to have communicated with Satoshi about the matter because he hadn't communicated with him in over 4 (maybe even 5) years by that point. Craig wants the situation we have, many doubters, he likes the uncertainty.
Nobody gives a flying fuck what Craig wants. He's clearly a sociopathic narcissist and he hasn't contributed anything of note to the crypto community in his pursuit of even more money. He's an extremely crass, divisive figure hellbent on fooling the weak-minded into believing he is Satoshi for purpose of quenching his insatiable ego. I have no idea why Craig chose to prove to Gavin conclusively in private using methods that satisfied Gavin, and then use a method in public that obviously attracts the criticism you and others make, but that is what he did. Gavin and Matonis are not idiots, and not profiting from craig afaik, and I am sure the proof he used in person included many aspects including bitcoin priv keys not used publicly, and probably also details of emails and other communications. Craig wants people like you to do exactly what you are doing, and people like Gavin to know he is satoshi, but why ... Only he knows. None of us knows the proof gavin saw, all we know is it satisfiec him, and then craig chose to make his public proofs dodgy, but I suspect all will be revealed eventually.
|
|
|
|
hv_
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2534
Merit: 1055
Clean Code and Scale
|
|
September 29, 2018, 05:37:30 AM |
|
|
Carpe diem - understand the White Paper and mine honest. Fix real world issues: Check out b-vote.com The simple way is the genius way - Satoshi's Rules: humana veris _
|
|
|
nutildah
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3136
Merit: 8500
Happy 10th Birthday to Dogeparty!
|
|
September 29, 2018, 07:10:54 AM |
|
None of us knows the proof gavin saw, all we know is it satisfiec him, and then craig chose to make his public proofs dodgy, but I suspect all will be revealed eventually.
Actually its all very, very public and very easy to understand how Craig was pulling over a fast one on poor Gavin. The debate of whether Craig is a charlatan or not has long been over with. Everybody knows he was lying. Its facetious to pretend its still up in the air. https://www.ccn.com/gavin-andersen-craig-wright-blog-mistake/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2qLI3VIHuKUBesides, never in any of his public communications was Satoshi 1/10th as big an asshole as CSW is on any given day. And unless CSW has an opposite sleep pattern from 99% of all human beings on earth their sleep cycles do not match up. The reasons why CSW is NOT Satoshi are many and varied and its fallacious of you to continue pretending any doubt remains in the matter.
|
|
|
|
boomboom
|
|
September 29, 2018, 07:49:45 AM |
|
None of us knows the proof gavin saw, all we know is it satisfiec him, and then craig chose to make his public proofs dodgy, but I suspect all will be revealed eventually.
Actually its all very, very public and very easy to understand how Craig was pulling over a fast one on poor Gavin. The debate of whether Craig is a charlatan or not has long been over with. Everybody knows he was lying. Its facetious to pretend its still up in the air. https://www.ccn.com/gavin-andersen-craig-wright-blog-mistake/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2qLI3VIHuKUBesides, never in any of his public communications was Satoshi 1/10th as big an asshole as CSW is on any given day. And unless CSW has an opposite sleep pattern from 99% of all human beings on earth their sleep cycles do not match up. The reasons why CSW is NOT Satoshi are many and varied and its fallacious of you to continue pretending any doubt remains in the matter. Andresen still thinks CSW is satoshi, and states clearly he wont discuss any of the private personal details that convinced him, as I said before CSW wants guys like you to discredit and doubt him, and you're doing what he wants. He deliberately made the public proof in his blog unbelievable, and his private proof to Andresen believable, all Gavin says now is he regrets getting dragged into the find satoshi game where CSW is for some reason happy to antagonise guys like you. I agree with Gavin though, in retrospect he should not have posted his supportive blog until after craig made a compelling public proof. CSW wants to be the bad guy in bitcoin, who knows why, but he does.
|
|
|
|
Icutgrass205
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 4
Bitcoin is today what the internet was decades ago
|
|
September 29, 2018, 08:54:36 AM |
|
None of us knows the proof gavin saw, all we know is it satisfiec him, and then craig chose to make his public proofs dodgy, but I suspect all will be revealed eventually.
Actually its all very, very public and very easy to understand how Craig was pulling over a fast one on poor Gavin. The debate of whether Craig is a charlatan or not has long been over with. Everybody knows he was lying. Its facetious to pretend its still up in the air. https://www.ccn.com/gavin-andersen-craig-wright-blog-mistake/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2qLI3VIHuKUBesides, never in any of his public communications was Satoshi 1/10th as big an asshole as CSW is on any given day. And unless CSW has an opposite sleep pattern from 99% of all human beings on earth their sleep cycles do not match up. The reasons why CSW is NOT Satoshi are many and varied and its fallacious of you to continue pretending any doubt remains in the matter. CSW is a savant with poor social skills..and hes Australian
|
Bitcoin, a peer-to-peer electronic cash system for the world. BTC tips are greatly appreciated 35BqJwcycsLDoPrBxmxuh1e4MY7bcDPvGW
|
|
|
|
notblox1
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1309
Logo Designer ⛨ BSFL Division1
|
|
September 29, 2018, 10:27:17 AM |
|
I think that he is the real Faketoshi, and BitcoinCash is the real Bcash. There can be only one...
|
|
|
|
nutildah
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3136
Merit: 8500
Happy 10th Birthday to Dogeparty!
|
|
September 29, 2018, 12:42:50 PM |
|
He deliberately made the public proof in his blog unbelievable, and his private proof to Andresen believable, all Gavin says now is he regrets getting dragged into the find satoshi game where CSW is for some reason happy to antagonise guys like you. I agree with Gavin though, in retrospect he should not have posted his supportive blog until after craig made a compelling public proof. CSW wants to be the bad guy in bitcoin, who knows why, but he does.
OK again, so no public proof = no proof. He doesn't antagonize me, its people like you who won't let reality damage their extraordinarily unfounded outlook that antagonizes me. You're free to believe what you want, but I prefer to believe in things backed by evidence. I'm sure you also believe BCH is the real bitcoin too so what's the point in continuing this silly discussion. You're only feeding the ego of one of crypto's biggest con artists.
|
|
|
|
jojo69
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3318
Merit: 4597
diamond-handed zealot
|
|
September 29, 2018, 07:47:38 PM |
|
POMP NAO!
|
This is not some pseudoeconomic post-modern Libertarian cult, it's an un-led, crowd-sourced mega startup organized around mutual self-interest where problems, whether of the theoretical or purely practical variety, are treated as temporary and, ultimately, solvable. Censorship of e-gold was easy. Censorship of Bitcoin will be… entertaining.
|
|
|
|