I don't know why you won't use coinbase but if you have never used coinbase and don't have an account setup thats a reason.
Very simple actually - I had a fully verified account in 2013 they froze for no reason. Fought them for months on it and basically ripped off a very large chunk of coin from me. During that time and even now there have been hundreds upon hundreds of people they've done this to.
To each their own, if you're comfortable using them by all means, I'm just more comfortable handling large sums of cash in person.
Thanks Phil... I have a bit of confusion on the Coinbase/IRS ruling coming from the wording, but I will address that below. First, thanks for the tip about not using ebay for BTC sales (I assume this is valid even through LocalBitcoins?). I personally really like the functionality and capabilities of Coinbase but my hesitation is continuing to use them to cash out BTC to fiat is indeed based in this IRS issue. since I have my mining registered as a business and file the taxes accordingly, I certainly plan on paying whatever tax I owe for this year when it comes time to file. However, I simply was looking to avoid and extra layer of scrutiny that could be caused by the IRS getting my transnational info from CB. I am keeping good records and have a good understanding about how crypto taxes are treated under current law, but due to the high complexity of multi-coin trading and how that effects your actual basis when you sell, I have do desire to have my math 2nd guessed by the IRS.
So, with that said, there are 2 statements coming from this article (and others) that could be construed as having completely different meanings in regard to the $20k rule. Now granted, I know this is only from 2013-2015, when i didn't trade any BTC, but I am going under the assumption that the same materiality threshold will be put in place for this and subsequent years, which is what has me concerned.
http://fortune.com/2017/07/10/bitcoin-irs-coinbase/- excerpt #1: "...only for those
accounts that engaged in transactions worth $20,000 or more."
to me, this verbiage indicates the $20k threshold refers to a single transaction. Meaning, like you explain, if you have say 15 sells of BTC to USD for $2k each and spread out over time, you would have $30k total but would not be part of the record forwarding since all single transactions were well under that $20k amount.
- excerpt #2: "to users with “at least the equivalent of $20,000 in any one transaction
type (buy, sell, send, or receive) in any one year during the 2013-15 period.”
To me, this could mean that if you sold a SUM TOTAL of $20k+ of BTC for fiat through CB, you would be subject to the record forwarding.
So, to me it comes down to the difference between "transaction", which clearly indicates a single action... vs "transaction type", which really seems like it could mean a sum total of that transaction type.
It is also a bit strange that they include buy send and receive because none of those inherently indicate a tax liability. Typically, one would only incur a potential liability if they sold BTC to fiat at a gain over their basis in that BTC. Now of course it's different if you are actually mining BTC because all of that would be subject to taxed, but that's gotta be a minor # of people compared to overall users of BTC.
Anyone have further insight on this? I suppose I could write to CB support for further clarification.