BiblePay | 10% to Orphan-Charity | RANDOMX MINING | Sanctuaries (Masternodes)

[joelles]

Openledger returned my email. Their listing fee is 2btc and queue about 1.5month I have attached email correspondence in slack for any interested person to read. What are opinions

[1714493432]

1714493432

[1714493432]

1714493432

[1714493432]

1714493432

[1714493432]

1714493432

[1714493432]

1714493432

[bible_pay]

I just did the 'The Bible' test on the Biblepay University Got most of it right, but also learned a few things.

Very nice! Would be fun to eventually have a lot of tests there.

Thanks a lot.  Yes, the reason I didnt even announce BiblePay University as a feature - is because I planned on making it nicer before the release.    (Then when we got busy with the pool issues, I was sort of forced to release what I had.)

I wrote a program that imports Christian tests in XML format (basically a very obscure format).

I wanted the "review" process to be nicer, and the window to be a constant size.

Anyway, I've been derailed on a groundbreaking partnership.  Im following the potential value for BBP and going where we can help the most orphans with the most magnitude. 

Been working with Togo and Luke on this.  Its basically a pie in the sky partnership that might turn out to be beneficial for us and will take a lot of my time and preparation for this new whitepaper, as soon as it is ready, I will share the entire idea with the community.

[bible_pay]

Openledger returned my email. Their listing fee is 2btc and queue about 1.5month I have attached email correspondence in slack for any interested person to read. What are opinions

Its kind of a high fee for an exchange who is only slightly bigger than c-cex.  (They are #105 on coinmarketcap and have a volume of only $900,000 total per day).  I see they have a "debit card" for cryptopurchases though on their web site.  Could you ask them if its been shut down? 
Maybe ask them to do it for .15 btc also - tell them we sponsor orphans, so we should have a 90% discount.

[MIP]

Openledger returned my email. Their listing fee is 2btc and queue about 1.5month I have attached email correspondence in slack for any interested person to read. What are opinions

My opinion is that we should create an exchange venture right now 

[zthomasz]

Right now (6:34 pm ct US) the HPS for my miners is roughly 4 to 5 times higher than it was this morning.

We're also hitting more blocks now. I don't know if it's coincidental or not, but there appears to a correlation between the two (higher HPS & blocks solved).

      Updated       Height
1/28/2018 19:47   27831
1/28/2018 19:31   27830
1/28/2018 18:22   27823
1/28/2018 18:01   27820
1/28/2018 17:06   27815

Another significant change is the ratio of Physical to Logical machines. Earlier today is was 1.56 PM to 1 LM, (1.56/1). Now it's 1 PM to 2 LM (1/2).

Two more blox solved.

        Updated        Height
1/28/2018 8:34 PM  27836
1/28/2018 8:19 PM  27832
1/28/2018 7:47 PM  27831
1/28/2018 7:31 PM  27830
1/28/2018 6:22 PM  27823
1/28/2018 6:01 PM  27820
1/28/2018 5:06 PM  27815
1/28/2018 9:03 AM  27764

Three more blocks solved in the pool in less than 2 hours, we're on a roll now.

   Updated        Height
1/28/2018 10:21PM  27849
1/28/2018 9:45 PM  27845
1/28/2018 9:36 PM  27843
1/28/2018 8:34 PM  27836
1/28/2018 8:19 PM  27832
1/28/2018 7:47 PM  27831
1/28/2018 7:31 PM  27830
1/28/2018 6:22 PM  27823
1/28/2018 6:01 PM  27820
1/28/2018 5:06 PM  27815
1/28/2018 9:03 AM  27764

Since about 5 to 6:00 pm ct yesterday (block 27815), my pool mining horses have been running perfectly, like a fine-tuned machine.

HPS is way up - a 400% to 500% improvement.

Miners are very stable (less than 0.007 dropout rate).

Solved-block production is way up.

Updated           Height
1/29/2018 9:08   27913
1/29/2018 9:02   27912
1/29/2018 8:01   27908
1/29/2018 6:07   27898
1/29/2018 5:53   27896
1/29/2018 5:42   27892
1/29/2018 4:33   27887
1/29/2018 3:58   27883
1/29/2018 2:56   27875
1/29/2018 2:47   27874
1/29/2018 1:46   27868
1/29/2018 0:32   27864
1/28/2018 23:15   27853
1/28/2018 22:29   27851
1/28/2018 22:21   27849
1/28/2018 21:45   27845
1/28/2018 21:36   27843
1/28/2018 20:34   27836
1/28/2018 20:19   27832
1/28/2018 19:47   27831
1/28/2018 19:31   27830
1/28/2018 18:22   27823
1/28/2018 18:01   27820
1/28/2018 17:06   27815
1/28/2018 9:04   27764

[SEO_Account]

I can't believe I missed out on all the pool blocks  lol.

[mr.oz]

the wallet is the best altcoin wallet synchronization time which I ever try before 

[joelles]

Openledger returned my email. Their listing fee is 2btc and queue about 1.5month I have attached email correspondence in slack for any interested person to read. What are opinions

Its kind of a high fee for an exchange who is only slightly bigger than c-cex.  (They are #105 on coinmarketcap and have a volume of only $900,000 total per day).  I see they have a "debit card" for cryptopurchases though on their web site.  Could you ask them if its been shut down? 
Maybe ask them to do it for .15 btc also - tell them we sponsor orphans, so we should have a 90% discount.

Ill CC you in the email correspondance and will ask so to do them too.

[exyacminer]

regarding the state of the pool I believe the only long running problem it has ever had is the subsidy system. this is now badly abused. all you have to do is double-click on a record in the 'block distribution' tab on the pool site. look at the top ten miners there. some are mining fairly with serious hash but many have split  their (still considerable) hash into over a hundred very small workers to maximize their return. this has at least two serious effects.
1. it actually dilutes the benefit that genuine small miners receive
2. it is the largest disincentive to putting a decent amount of hash on the pool as a large percentage now simply enriches people with more hashpower than you yourself!

another effect is that no-one really knows how much their hash contribution is really worth. i have no idea whether i would be a net donator or a net receiver of subsidy, i suspect the latter. Either way i believe the current situation is both unfair and unjust.

ps no-one is mining 'against' the pool. people are just mining.

[slovakia]

POL/POS working  

solo mining is best ...

[togoshigekata]

canopus in Discord is saying that multiple wallet mining is still an issue:

bible_pay will f8000 disable big miners with multi wallet mining? xeons machines with 12c/24t= 24wallets with cpuprotlimit=8 example    thanks

I don't understand your example of multi wallet mining. I have a number of machines (PC, VPS, dedicated servers) in the pools ... each machine runs one biblepay wallet/software as a single miner. How is that different from multi wallet mining?

inblue ran tests and found that running multiple instances of BiblePay gave more HPS than running one instance of BiblePay at multiple threads:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2042657.msg22321536#msg22321536
http://wiki.biblepay.org/Multiple_Instances

Will Proof of Loyalty (POL) [Staking?] help with this? I assume so.

Proof of Loyalty Wiki:
http://wiki.biblepay.org/Proof_Of_Loyalty

Proof of Loyalty Proposal:
http://forum.biblepay.org/index.php?topic=90

Proof of Loyalty Testnet thread:
http://forum.biblepay.org/index.php?topic=89.0

We still need more testers helping test Proof of Loyalty in Testnet!

Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/BiblePay/comments/7s3g3y/proof_of_loyalty_staking/

[slovakia]

TOGO why we need POL testers,when POL is working in PROD?  

[togoshigekata]

I dont believe its in production, unless you found a bug?

https://github.com/biblepay/biblepay/blob/c8e151b80393cb54bbcc61538169a59f56152967/src/init.cpp#L1091

https://github.com/biblepay/biblepay/blob/3d592404a5b00dd04e1858a6f6e6540cbe6a9106/src/main.cpp#L4382

[slovakia]

check canopus´s screenshot in discord  

we are staked on 27945?

[616westwarmoth]

Offering 10% share in a Sanctuary for 155000 BBP for a month .

daily 10% payouts of MN income guaranteed.
will provide an auditable MN escrow address to control the output .

after 1 month deposit will be returned or new MN formed with more shareholders .

I take care of renting a VPS, setup and maintenance .

To make it clear :    only 1 10% share is offered .    the rest 90% are mine .
MN will be up and running in 1 day .

Just a quick question regarding this offer (sorry if it's a stupid question^^): assuming one would send you the 155000 BBP, what "security" does he have to receive the payments and/or get his share back? Of course we are a Christian community and I shouldn't assume anyone would use this to scam other's BBP, but I was just wondering about the general rules being applied to this. I'm fairly new in all this crypto stuff, but from my understanding if you send coins to any address you have no tools in your own hand to get them back, right?

That being said, I'm really contemplating getting in on your offer, since POL won't be here for some weeks/months and right now the mining output is ridiculously low :/.

You really just have the reputation of a person based on what they've posted and how well you know them.  I've got a shared pool running with three other people, but we all know each other so the trust factor was there.  That said, Tiras has been around for quite a while and been very helpful, plus offering to run for free is a nice bonus, I take 7% of my shared pool for hosting it.

[616westwarmoth]

Hi
I would like to ask for advice. When I want to link up few mining machines together on the local network for one wallet. How should I configure the biblepay.conf file?
Thanks.

If you want to share a wallet.dat across 5 machines, just copy the wallet.dat to each node.
Nothing goes in the biblepay.conf to link them together.

Hi Rob
Thanks for answer. But I don't want only share wallet. I was trying to link up the hashpower together as well. Any advise? Thanks.

Is there a reason you don't want to share a wallet?  Really that is by far the easiest way to combine the machines.  I'm sure there might be a technical way to actually make all the machines truly work as one, but from most experiences, you're better off running several machines of lower power than one machine of higher power.  That may have changed over time, but there's no drawback I have seen to running one wallet on multiple machines that you control.  Could you elaborate why you don't want to do that?

[bible_pay]

check canopus´s screenshot in discord  

we are staked on 27945?

I havent seen the screen shot, but Im sure the inner contents of the block will say POL Weight: 0.  Thats because the feature is still in testnet.

All I released in Prod in 1086 was a feature where we create a .01 bbp transaction in order to 'attempt' to make the block template unique (remember when we were trying to get the pool to solve more blocks?).  That is being handled with a narrative in the UI as "proof-of-loyalty" simply because it looks to the wallet like the future coinstake transaction it knows is coming in the future, but I can assure you nothing is in it except .01 cent from yourself to yourself with zero weight. 

The feature is turned off in prod with a switch, and on in testnet (fProofOfLoyalty=false in prod) etc.

It cant go live til we have a mandatory and of course still needs tested more.

[znffal]

** Daily reminder **

Please remember to vote/encourage others to vote to get us listed on next.exchange.
We currently have ~550 votes!
Our new goal (to get noticed) is 750 votes.

Please make it happen!
Thanks

https://nextexchange.featureupvote.com/suggestions/3384/biblepay-bbp

[inblue]

check canopus´s screenshot in discord 

we are staked on 27945?

I havent seen the screen shot, but Im sure the inner contents of the block will say POL Weight: 0.  Thats because the feature is still in testnet.

All I released in Prod in 1086 was a feature where we create a .01 bbp transaction in order to 'attempt' to make the block template unique (remember when we were trying to get the pool to solve more blocks?).  That is being handled with a narrative in the UI as "proof-of-loyalty" simply because it looks to the wallet like the future coinstake transaction it knows is coming in the future, but I can assure you nothing is in it except .01 cent from yourself to yourself with zero weight. 

The feature is turned off in prod with a switch, and on in testnet (fProofOfLoyalty=false in prod) etc.

It cant go live til we have a mandatory and of course still needs tested more.

I posted the screenshot on the BiblePay forum:

http://forum.biblepay.org/index.php?topic=89.msg1274#msg1274

It seems that it has PoL weight > 0 in the contents of the block?

[bible_pay]

regarding the state of the pool I believe the only long running problem it has ever had is the subsidy system. this is now badly abused. all you have to do is double-click on a record in the 'block distribution' tab on the pool site. look at the top ten miners there. some are mining fairly with serious hash but many have split  their (still considerable) hash into over a hundred very small workers to maximize their return. this has at least two serious effects.
1. it actually dilutes the benefit that genuine small miners receive
2. it is the largest disincentive to putting a decent amount of hash on the pool as a large percentage now simply enriches people with more hashpower than you yourself!

another effect is that no-one really knows how much their hash contribution is really worth. i have no idea whether i would be a net donator or a net receiver of subsidy, i suspect the latter. Either way i believe the current situation is both unfair and unjust.

ps no-one is mining 'against' the pool. people are just mining.

Its enjoyable when speaking to an individual who asserts oneself with authority on a subject, and quite another when one talks surely and appears to be incorrect about every facet.

Im sorry if I sound scathing, but, if the pool payout system was that crooked, I dont think anyone would pool mine.  And the very first requirement to writing a pool is paying a distributed amount per contribution relative to others.

So you are saying that large miners have an advantage?  Everyone else is saying small miners have an advantage.

The pool pays out in variable hardness shares.  Clicking on a large miners row and seeing how many physical machines only tells us how many physical machines they decided to spend money on.  It does not show any "advantage" - from what I can see.  Where do you get that "guess"?

Uh, yes, all those guys are mining "against" the pool.  They are not solo mining.  Why do you "guess" that?  PS they are against the pool because they are mining fractional shares.  And getting rewarded for them.  

How do you not know whether you are a donor or not when we have detailed pool reports?  Donor sounds like a blood delivery system.

=-=-=-=




Slovakia, lets let SEO tell us his two day results compared to pool first.