|
n4ru
|
 |
July 12, 2013, 09:37:41 AM |
|
Actually the difficulty has been 7 from the start. it's now 7.91852725, I'm still finding blocks but only 15 coins per block now.
How many coins was it per block to start with? was always 999/diff^2, so beginning was about 20 coins 999/(diff^2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transactions must be included in a block to be properly completed. When you send a transaction, it is broadcast to miners. Miners can then optionally include it in their next blocks. Miners will be more inclined to include your transaction if it has a higher transaction fee.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Teka
|
|
July 12, 2013, 10:14:09 AM |
|
Exchange info should be added to the op
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stinky_Pete
|
|
July 12, 2013, 10:15:03 AM |
|
Odd. No blocks mined in the last ~20 hours, on four machines that were producing nicely before then. Three machines are running the original client, one with an updated client. They are all keeping up with the blockchain. Any explanations?
|
|
|
|
|
altsay
|
|
July 12, 2013, 10:17:46 AM |
|
Odd. No blocks mined in the last ~20 hours, on four machines that were producing nicely before then. Three machines are running the original client, one with an updated client. They are all keeping up with the blockchain. Any explanations?
Me neither in the last 17 hours. I hope it's just bad luck. |
|
|
|
|
|
LazyOtto
|
|
July 12, 2013, 10:20:08 AM |
|
What is one tenth of what you were getting a couple of days ago?
That, with variance, is what you should be expecting now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
oroqen
|
|
July 12, 2013, 10:20:40 AM |
|
Odd. No blocks mined in the last ~20 hours, on four machines that were producing nicely before then. Three machines are running the original client, one with an updated client. They are all keeping up with the blockchain. Any explanations?
25.2 hours since I seen one (not using VPS), blocks are being solved all the same whoever is getting them |
|
|
|
|
|
vinne81
|
|
July 12, 2013, 10:20:44 AM |
|
Odd. No blocks mined in the last ~20 hours, on four machines that were producing nicely before then. Three machines are running the original client, one with an updated client. They are all keeping up with the blockchain. Any explanations?
Mostly luck. I have 2 identical machines. One found 5 blocks yesterday, the other 0. Today it's the other way round. How much PPS in total? |
|
|
|
|
Jigsaw
Member
 Offline
Activity: 65
Merit: 10
|
|
July 12, 2013, 10:38:40 AM |
|
Happy 20,000 blocks.
But seriously, mined three blocks so far in 12 hours at 1100pps.
|
|
|
|
|
|
vinne81
|
|
July 12, 2013, 10:39:47 AM |
|
Happy 20,000 blocks.
But seriously, mined three blocks so far in 12 hours at 1100pps.
Seems "normal" I think. Even pretty good tbh. I'm mining with perhaps 8000pps, I don't have 20 blocks  |
|
|
|
|
Ethera
Member
Offline
Activity: 69
Merit: 10
|
|
July 12, 2013, 10:44:25 AM |
|
Happy 20,000 blocks.
But seriously, mined three blocks so far in 12 hours at 1100pps.
Seems "normal" I think. Even pretty good tbh. I'm mining with perhaps 8000pps, I don't have 20 blocks i wish i had his rate, mining at 14k pps and i got nowhere 20 blocks  got about 15 in last 24 hours... |
|
|
|
|
Lauda
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
|
|
July 12, 2013, 11:04:43 AM |
|
Happy 20,000 blocks.
But seriously, mined three blocks so far in 12 hours at 1100pps.
Seems "normal" I think. Even pretty good tbh. I'm mining with perhaps 8000pps, I don't have 20 blocks i wish i had his rate, mining at 14k pps and i got nowhere 20 blocks got about 15 in last 24 hours... Keep wasting money |
"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks" 😼 Bitcoin Core ( onion) |
|
|
robolove
Member
Offline
Activity: 129
Merit: 12
|
|
July 12, 2013, 11:53:23 AM |
|
what is prime calculation good for?
Primes are to mathematics what elements are to chemistry. You, sir, are awesome for bringing Chemistry into this Not really. There is a finite number of elements, but an infinite number of primes. |
|
|
|
|
Jigsaw
Member
Offline
Activity: 65
Merit: 10
|
|
July 12, 2013, 12:06:23 PM |
|
what is prime calculation good for?
For one thing, encryption schemes. |
|
|
|
|
|
hak8or
|
|
July 12, 2013, 12:09:07 PM |
|
FYI, I have a Core i5 2400S and release11 gives me ~350 pps while release12 ~500 pps. Numbers fluctuate though, but I was hoping release11 would be better for me.. Maybe I didn't wait long enough for numbers to improve, heh. EDIT: I don't understand the hashing algorithm, but why would pps rate fluctuate so much? "getmininginfo" returns anywhere from 400 to 550 pps... I've never seen such hash rate changes. Sadly release 12 is crashing for me when starting up. Edit: And release 11. I5-3570k Windows 8 64 bit SSD |
|
|
|
|
mr_random
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1001
|
|
July 12, 2013, 12:09:15 PM |
|
what is prime calculation good for?
Primes are to mathematics what elements are to chemistry. You, sir, are awesome for bringing Chemistry into this Not really. There is a finite number of elements, but an infinite number of primes. He's referring to primes being the building blocks of the integers. |
|
|
|
|
markm
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2940
Merit: 1090
|
|
July 12, 2013, 12:58:12 PM |
|
what is prime calculation good for?
Primes are to mathematics what elements are to chemistry. You, sir, are awesome for bringing Chemistry into this Not really. There is a finite number of elements, but an infinite number of primes. Are you sure? Neutron stars aren't effectively superheavy atoms, for example? Or do they contain no protons, or something? I suppose you could maybe claim universes are not infinite therefore there must be some finitely large largest atom in any specific non-infinite universe but even if our universe happens not to be infinite are all others also? Etc... Maybe there are islands of stability of infinite sized universes as well as islands of stability of elements? -MarkM- |
|
|
|
|
mustyoshi
|
|
July 12, 2013, 01:30:02 PM |
|
I'm connected to 67 nodes.
Anybody have a higher number?
|
|
|
|
|
|
E.Sam
|
|
July 12, 2013, 01:42:37 PM |
|
I know some had issues with very low primespersec and that was addressed in the last release. I m using the Mac osx client and used to have around 120 primespersec, know I m around 2-3. Any way to fix that?
Cheers
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cryptoin
|
|
July 12, 2013, 01:47:16 PM |
|
interesting indeed
|
|
|
|
|
|
