Vanitygen: Vanity bitcoin address generator/miner [v0.22]

[guillzini]

Maybe a totally noob question, but if I use a file with 10 prefixes, does vanitygen work down the list 1 by 1 or search for them all together?

[1714095287]

1714095287

[1714095287]

1714095287

[1714095287]

1714095287

[LoyceV]

Maybe a totally noob question, but if I use a file with 10 prefixes, does vanitygen work down the list 1 by 1 or search for them all together?

All together: Vanitygen generates random addresses, and checks each address against your list.
In my experience, oclvanitygen doesn't show a noticeable speed reduction with at least 10,000 prefixes. You can create a long list of very difficult prefixes and eventually hit a rare one.

[OgNasty]

Maybe a totally noob question, but if I use a file with 10 prefixes, does vanitygen work down the list 1 by 1 or search for them all together?

All together: Vanitygen generates random addresses, and checks each address against your list.
In my experience, oclvanitygen doesn't show a noticeable speed reduction with at least 10,000 prefixes. You can create a long list of very difficult prefixes and eventually hit a rare one.

The only time vanitygen works prefixes one at a time is if you’re working on the vanity pool or using another method of split key generation.

I’ve always got mine searching for >100 addresses. I’ve never noticed a speed decline.

[LoyceV]

I’ve always got mine searching for >100 addresses. I’ve never noticed a speed decline.

I've just tested it again (GeForce 840M):
1 prefix: 9 Mkey/s
15,000 prefixes: 9Mkey/s
400,000 prefixes: 5Mkey/s

[guillzini]

Thanks for the answers guys. I appreciate it!

[DaveF]

Does anyone know the speed that a GTX 1050 should be getting also the 1050Ti?
I'm not sure if my 25Mkey/s is proper or not because of all the problems I am having the the 7970.
Trying to narrow down the issue to card vs something (anything) else but I have no benchmark of what most of these should be giving me.

Thanks,
Dave

[7Seas]

Any new developments on any projects like this like with regex on GPU?

I get 100mkey on a 1080ti if anyone wanted to know

[ken3go]

noob here. I'm confused which generator I should be running.  I need to generate only BTC addresses.  I've used what I believed to be samr7's 0.22 code but now I'm using exploitagency's vanity gen plus 1.52 (GPU version oclvanitygen).  I have used both to varying degrees of success, but they usually crash after a few days (I'll post those issues later, once I figure out where to post them!).  Thanks for the help.

https://github.com/samr7/vanitygen
this 0.22 thread?

https://github.com/exploitagency/vanitygen-plus/releases
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1777048.0
vanity gen plus 1.52 thread

and I think axerunner is working on yet another fork
https://github.com/AXErunners/vanitygen-plus

[bbopa637]

hi dears I have a questions
1)Can the program in Windows generate 100 addresses with 1bbopa**** and automatically import all of them in to my wallet.dat file??
2)Can the program generate 100 random addresses beginning with 1**** and automatically import them into my wallet.dat file?
and how can I do that?
3)if no 1) and 2) can be done with program, then how can I generate 1000 1bbopa**** addresses in windows and how can i search into them whatererv I want to import in my wallet.dat manually?

[LoyceV]

hi dears I have a questions
1)Can the program in Windows generate 100 addresses with 1bbopa**** and automatically import all of them in to my wallet.dat file??
2)Can the program generate 100 random addresses beginning with 1**** and automatically import them into my wallet.dat file?
and how can I do that?

I see no reason to do 2: Bitcoin Core can generate random addresses on it's own.

Generating 100+ addresses is easy: just add these options to your command line:

Code:

-k            Keep pattern and continue search after finding a match
-o <file>     Write pattern matches to <file>

Depending on your hardware it can take a few days to find them.

To import them in Bitcoin Core, see here.

[davoski]

I’ve always got mine searching for >100 addresses. I’ve never noticed a speed decline.

I've just tested it again (GeForce 840M):
400,000 prefixes: 5Mkey/s

I got a limitation for git bash on Windows. How did you manage to input such long command?

[LoyceV]

How did you manage to input such long command?

Don't use the command line to add prefixes, just use an input file:

Code:

-f <file>     File containing list of patterns, one per line
              (Use "-" as the file name for stdin)

If you use a long list of prefixes and search case insensitive, your available RAM may become the limitation.

[davoski]

This way doesn't check all instances at once. Checked with easy prefix list of a few - it prints the first line's prefix only.

[LoyceV]

This way doesn't check all instances at once. Checked with easy prefix list of a few - it prints the first line's prefix only.

It works fine for me. If you post your sample prefix list and the command line options you used, I'll have a look.

[davoski]

Command:

Code:

vanitygen.exe -C BTC -k -o results2.txt -i -r -f addr.txt

addr.txt

Code:

1AA
1BB

result2.txt
http://prntscr.com/isvnsv

git bash window:
http://prntscr.com/isvnyz

Thanks!

[LoyceV]

Can you try it with less options to start with?

Code:

./vanitygen -f addr.txt -k # or the .exe alternative of course)

I've used several variations on this, and they work fine. Flags -r and -C don't work for me, so I omit them.

[charlie137]

is there a solution for high sierra without cuda drivers?) can't compile current https://github.com/exploitagency/vanitygen-plus

[starmyc]

Does the vanitygen searches for each prefix digit 1 by 1 or the entire prefix, I'm trying to see how does the vanitygen does its searches.

vanitygen has its source code available to understand how it works: https://github.com/samr7/vanitygen
In short, it generate a random private key, from which it will generate a batch of parameters to get a list of public keys that it will hash using sha256 & ripemd160 according to the Bitcoin protocol, and if address matches pattern, it stops. If not, it continues, regenerating a new private key once a while.
It can not search 1 by 1 because of the nature of the hashing algorithm.

[ken3go]

My searches usually error out after 7 days or so of running at 16Mkeys/sec (~12 quadrillion tries).   Are there settings that reduce the amount of GPU that is being used -- maybe it is busting the buffer ("out of resources")?  What does the "grid" attribute do?  I've tried without it, at 1024x1024, and 2048x2048.  Doesn't appear to make a difference.  Any ideas? Thanks.

clWaitForEvents(NDRange,1): CL_OUT_OF_RESOURCES
clEnqueueMapBuffer(4): CL_INVALID_COMMAND_QUEUE
ERROR: Could not map row buffer for slot 1
ERROR: allocation failure?


---------------------
c:\xxx>oclvanitygen.exe -D 0:0,grid=2048x2048 -v -k -f 2patterns.txt -o 2matches.txt
Loading Pattern #3: 1ZZZZZZZ
Prefix difficulty:       51529903411245 1XXXXXXX
Prefix difficulty:       51529903411245 1YYYYYYY
Prefix difficulty:       51529903411245 1ZZZZZZZ
Next match difficulty: 17176634470415 (3 prefixes)
Device: GeForce GTX 680M
Vendor: NVIDIA Corporation (10de)
Driver: 369.09
Profile: FULL_PROFILE
Version: OpenCL 1.2 CUDA
Max compute units: 7
Max workgroup size: 1024
Global memory: -2147483648
Max allocation: 536870912
OpenCL compiler flags: -DPRAGMA_UNROLL -cl-nv-verbose
Loading kernel binary 04c59513592276694f1b58b9124bba9c.oclbin
Grid size: 2048x2048
Modular inverse: 4096 threads, 1024 ops each
Using OpenCL prefix matcher
GPU idle: 2.75%
[16.00 Mkey/s][total 11653961744384][Prob 49.3%][50% in 4.4h]                  clWaitForEvents(NDRange,1): CL_OUT_OF_RESOURCES
clEnqueueMapBuffer(4): CL_INVALID_COMMAND_QUEUE
ERROR: Could not map row buffer for slot 1
ERROR: allocation failure?
c:\xxx>
---------------------

[LoyceV]

My searches usually error out after 7 days or so of running at 16Mkeys/sec (~12 quadrillion tries).

If you just restart it, nothing is lost. It just makes a clean random start at another point than where you started before.

Are there settings that reduce the amount of GPU that is being used

You can reduce the number of threads it uses:

Code:

./oclvanitygen -t 10 1testt
Difficulty: 15318045009
[868.99 Kkey/s][total 34037760][Prob 0.2%][50% in 3.4h] 

I highly doubt this will help though: it slows down my system just as much as when I run oclvanitygen at full speed. Unless your "out of resources" means out of memory, in that case less threads could help.

Alternative: set it to save results to a file, and set it to restart after it crashes.