Do you believe in ICO Ratings?

[Grigorashev]

I do not trust the ratings, because they can not objectively assess the prospects of ICO. In addition, some sites may assign an unfair assessment of the project.

[Eddieboy]

Yes I do believe in ico ratings and this is the important things or aspect prior to invest on ico.

Here's the below aspects and elements that need deeper examination for proper investing research. 👇📝

>Personnel/ or developer (team, credibility, track record, history)

>Whitepaper (fundamental purpose, vision, mission & story timeline)

>Coin Supply (max/min capped, burned coin)

>Thoughtout Realistic Timeline (roadmap)

>Use Cases (how practical is the application to be used, its tradable value and unique selling claim to fame)

>Communication Channels (community)

> Rules, Laws & Regulations (pertaining on ICO crowdfunding).

Goodluck. 😎👍

[Gituyqux]

If you use the expert rating, it is not an objective opinion. If the rating is targeted program of specific data on investment risks, development team, escroy, and to the rest, it is the surest way. 

[akirasendo7]

yes i do believe on the ratings, its been compile from many different sources
the only reason why this coins sometimes dont go as what the rating,
is because there are lots of whales holding the coins, and they are manipulating
it, in return, the coins becomes worthless, and no one loose interest on the
coin it happens everytime whales controlled most of the tokens, and its bad for the community

[toygama]

ICO Ratings can be very useful and beneficial in providing a general overview of the ICO, some of these sights are quite accurate, but not all tell the true story and potential of the ICO, remember, these are independent sights that might be influenced, so before you put your trust in them and use their take as a guide to invest, carryout your own research, it will be more helpful you knowing where to put your moneys

ICO ratings of different websites must be used as a reference guide only we don't trust fully and try to make our own efforts to screen those top ICOS, support team must also be considered in choosing a legitimate project to invest.

[Kettle255]

Mostly,  ICO rating sites have criteria they use in conducting their reviews, ranging from the team members, project quality, whitepaper and some other factors... I think some rating site such as icobench and icodrops could be trusted. But it is also advised that individuals do indepth research in prospective ICO's you're willing to invest.

[Bolabi]

I think websites like ICObench, ICOrating are just as one of the reference factors when we are going to invest in a project. The best result is when we do our own research on the projects we will invest, because the high rating is not a guarantee of success for the project.

[Libbbbbbb]

I think a website like ICObench, ICOrating only as one of the reference factors when we will invest on a project. The best result is when we do our own research on the project that we will invest.

[Riddikulo]

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

I can hardly believe in ratings of ICOs. First of all it is almost impossible to analyze objectively every particular project and ICO terms. Moreover information on the site could be paid for and doesn’t represent true data.

[Crypto Girl]

All these rating sites aren't reliable and in fact we can't actually tell what's their basis to say it isn't risky and some are just a pure hype. Otherwise, nothing beats a diligent research before joining any ICO especially now scam is evitable from everyone. Better be more cautious than be wary.

[shone08]

All these rating sites aren't reliable and in fact we can't actually tell what's their basis to say it isn't risky and some are just a pure hype. Otherwise, nothing beats a diligent research before joining any ICO especially now scam is evitable from everyone. Better be more cautious than be wary.

Exactly!! Dont trust any ico rating website because theres no guarantee this is accurate no basis to tell so its better to do your own research if you are interested to invest in some ico project, invest only to the project that have a great team and white paper!!

[hammo]

i believe but i don't invested just look at the ratings. this is stupid dude, things not that easy.

[Marlyn1]

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

I do not usually believe i everything i read i will always verify it and do research. In fairness there are still legit ICO's with good projects and has good ratings the answer is that we have to validate.

[StLee]

I think ICO rating is just where we look for basic information about ICO a coin. The rest we have to look for other information related to the ICO.  The more people who talk about ICO from a coin the more people will be interested in investing.

[LynielZbl]

In my opinion, I am not so sure with the ICO rating given because it could be the Ico rating can be through the voting of the project campaign participants, because it has been proven ICO with a high rating also did not experience good sales and even with low ratings have good sales.Therefore the ICO rating can not be used as our benchmark to know whether the project is potential or not..

[emanbea07]

Think is no because ICO rating is a guide. I beleive my own research and my own analys always a check a white paper and read and analys.

[deepali01]

for me itself, ico rating is just as a refferer for short detail info about that ICO, high rating ICO at first time is not always a good one, you might found one ICO at first week it got at first page of icobench with a good rating, but eventually if the tokensale are good or even soldout, it rating will keep or even more great than before, but if not its rating will decrease.
instead of just see on ico rating website, i prefer to ask some friend about the ICO

[Lubang Bawah]

I think ICO ratings only become one reference and we still need other supporting data such as teams, forums, social media and so on, if we rely on ICO ratings then we can get stuck because there are hundreds of ICO that get high rating.

[PJRLJRAC]

I don't trust it that much yet I read them now and then to check whether data I missed with respect to the venture. Each ico rating utilizes an alternate benchmark for their rating so I may discover a point vital yet they don't stamp it by any stretch of the imagination. That is the reason I generally rate the undertaking myself on the grounds that by doing that I know whether the task is appropriate for me or not.

[livandiya]

I do not trust the ratings, because they can not objectively assess the prospects of ICO. In addition, some sites may assign an unfair assessment of the project.

I think that all existing ICO ratings are created to confuse people, especially trustful people start participating in ICO projects that are not successful