Do you believe in ICO Ratings?

[dukemc]

ICO Ratings can be bought by the company but if you research well and don´t use one site for ico ratings its good

[Vilagra]

No, I don't believe in ICO ratings. Almost all of them are bought by ICOs, which want a big rating for involving more people to their ICO.

[coinpecker87]

No, I don't believe in ICO ratings. Almost all of them are bought by ICOs, which want a big rating for involving more people to their ICO.

Have anyone of you heard about menlo.one? They're an ICO review platform more like a marketplace for all of the ICO, do you think this kind of approach can also be corrupted?

[catsmile]

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

Those sites only evaluate based on their views. Although they have the knowledge but can not fully see the future of a project. That is why I use those web sites for reference, not to see them appreciate and invest accordingly.

[Accelerando.now]

What do you think guys? How should look the best and reliable ICO listing / rating? Should it be for free or paid? Should only selected projects be presented there? Which information is the most important for you?

[WildFire.ca]

I do not always trust them, you can always buy yourself a rating. It is better to learn how to choose good projects yourself.

[makerst]

I can only conclude that people take into account the opinion of what these rating sites say, because if you take seriously these rating sites decisions today, you can lose your money very quickly.

[FLHippy]

Yes, I still believe but you have to think about that they can´t be always trusted. Do your own research is the golden rule and that's always true.

[Bokugo]

Yes, I still believe but you have to think about that they can´t be always trusted. Do your own research is the golden rule and that's always true.

Yes, you need to analyze yourself. But ranking is just a guide that gives you information. It will also depend on the ICO you invested. You may believe and believe the ICO rating but you can not blame it if it is not accurate because it is up to you if you make it research and invest.

[golovayv]

I think that now it is not necessary to fully trust the ratings of ICO projects. Because in most cases they are evaluated by the advisors that participate in the project. Rating is the beginning of the ICO analysis, and it's best to check everything yourself.

[pharaon]

Yes, I still believe but you have to think about that they can´t be always trusted. Do your own research is the golden rule and that's always true.

Yes, you need to analyze yourself. But ranking is just a guide that gives you information. It will also depend on the ICO you invested. You may believe and believe the ICO rating but you can not blame it if it is not accurate because it is up to you if you make it research and invest.

I agree with you that everything depends only on ourselves, and we need to take into account many factors when choosing the ICO project for investment, and not blindly believe the ratings on the sites. But the site icodrops.com can be a great help in choosing.

[beurk]

Well, it's like asking "do you believe in trust indice of weather forcasting ?". An indice made by professionnals in the domain with all the tools they have in hand to rate the best they can.
BUT, even if an ICO project has the best rating, there still is that uncertainness none can quantify, it's a psychic job.
I trust the ICO ratings but i won't blindly throw myself in a project thanks/because of it.

... in most cases they are evaluated by the advisors that participate in the project...

That can be dangerous, there can be conflict of interest. That's not a goind point IMHO.

[Pejoh Asu]

I made ICO ratings several times for reference in ICO invest, but unfortunately many failed to reach softcap so I would never trust ICO ratings, which became the basis for ICO invest is whitepaper, and team.

[tina87]

Crypto-enthusiasts need some guidance in this area. Ratings and other related elements of the industry help not only beginners, but also serve as a signal for experienced investors, i think

[Impros88]

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

I think that we can use this ratings on their life confirming of our own opinion because if you would rely on the opinion that somebody else you are always having the great chance to lose your money, because of the mistake of somebody else.

[coin5haker]

I don't believe these ratings are independent. Otherwise how come we see 8+ score for the shittiest scam (which is 90% of the projects actually).

[pekavcilar01]

I do not believe too much.
Project officials may be giving money or coins to ICO evaluation sites. That's why ICO ratings are high.
Nobody in the market trusts anyone.

[angelomoraaaa]

ICO ratings and reviews for me are just mere guides for looking to some references and backgrounds about the conducted campaigns and projects. There are sites that provide good and legit ICO ratings, the thing is not everyone of them present legit ratings that are worth trusting. You should be the one to decisde wheter you're chosen campaign is trusworthy and legit to participate with. Legit conducted projects are not so difficult to distinguish, but neither not so easy, so looking for some reviews and ratings to help determine it essential as well.

[vbscarred]

I don't believe it lately. I realized that this is just a tool to attract investment in a particular project. There are many examples where the rating is high and the project failed. See the idea and the team and not the ratings.

[kudryas]

I have seen a ton of projects that got 4.9/5 on ico bench or somewhere around that area and they failed to reach their soft cap. I think even if the rating is good and the project has potential eventually it might not get the necessary funds.

Ico rating can't be used to judge project most time ico review are biased and what if they are paid to rate them high to attractive massive investors therefore i don't believe in ico ratings.

This sites that give ICO ratings are not that necessary. If you like the idea behind the project and you like the dev team why not invest some money in it? I mean some coin can have best ratings but if you don't like the idea you won't invest, right? Now if you don't DYOR then this sites are probably your only source of information and that's the problem.