Do you believe in ICO Ratings?

[IlfarIldarovich]

I like the sites that provide different ratings, because it is very much easier to work with statistics. personally, I use this site.
https://foundico.com/ru/ it helps me a lot when I want to choose a particular project.

[1714692642]

1714692642

[1714692642]

1714692642

[1714692642]

1714692642

[1714692642]

1714692642

[1714692642]

1714692642

[1714692642]

1714692642

[BitcoVast]

for now I still believe in ico ratings, because I still use ico ratings as a benchmark that ico is good or not, but in support with other data also like teams, the number of sales and whitepaper

[Babayan]

Yes, i believe in ratings by Icobench.com, because there are a lot of professionals who really know which of the project will be very useful in future.

[548khen]

Yes it will help us fot the reference before participating in the campaign. And I think these ratings can be trusted and if you have all your opinion and a lot of free time, you can study each project independently by your criteria.

[tuikindu01]

I think sites like ICObench are just giving ICO ratings, but some of those ratings are not entirely correct, and there may be some insider trading. But I think it's always good for us to have another rating site because the final decision is in our own hands.

[DiscretePatriot]

I believe ICO rating, although sometimes the result is not imaginary, but they helped us filter out a lot of scams.

I agree; not 100% accurate, but still helpful in exposing scam projects. This July, I will be moving to menlo.one as soon as its token sale launches and platform goes live. Menlo.one enables us to view ICOs, join/make discussions as well as reviews, buy tokens and manage our portfolio. I still need to do a little bit more research, but their CEO seemed sincere and knowledgeable about their project. Any thoughts about it?

[Omooba098]

some websites are credible like ICObench, it's where I get most of my bounty now a days. They also give what the company is targeting with the hard and soft cap, also the bounty counts, when it started and when it will end

[briana samomingkir]

With the ICO rating system, I think it is easier to understand and read about the quality of ICO from the lowest to the highest. And from there, it becomes easier for us to know the position of ICO that we are currently following. In addition, we also become more aware of what strategy is more appropriate for us to do now.

[@hosimanaka]

I just believe that part of the indicators, probably the ICO will spend money to beautify those indicators. I believe that you must evaluate many other factors to make the decision to choose your own potential ICO.

[jdacer95]

I have been reading an article recently about paid ICO ratings. It doesn't cost a lot fo bitcoin to get five stars on most of the ratings sites.

[BurakTurk]

The ICO rating sites are nearly worthless. I have seen scams that were easily detectable being given positive reviews by ICO rating sites. You should only trust your own due diligence.

[drippx]

ICO ratings do not really guarantee that we choose a good ICO, as you can say, ICO with a good rating sometimes fails to reach their soft limits. For me, the ICO rating is just the other reference, not the main reason for choosing a good ICO. I suggest that you do research by yourself.

[the_dump1]

Sometimes I look at the ratings of ICO. I do not think that if the project has a good indicator in one of these ratings, it is a guarantee of something.

[alshulk]

When I choosing an ICO project, I focus not only on the rating, but also on the excitement that is created around the project.  I look at the number of subscribers in social networks, especially Twitter and telegram. But the rating also plays an important role in the selection of the project.

[btharry]

I don't believe in ico rating any more. Many highly rated ico have cheated me, resulting in a huge investment loss.

[handsomes]

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

rarely when i joined in campaign i always see is ratings and then the projects of the ICO if legit and successful in the future the other campaign or sometimes higher ratings it will be succeed.

[PurpleNights]

There is like too many of those rating sites with increasing popularity, Still, I think it's better that the investor is the one to do the research of the ICOs, research for their background of the people behind the project, their website, etc.

[SpringfieldM1A]

ICO ratings is one of the basis to invest into ICO projects. But i do not believe it 100% because some of it are not true and some are  getting advertisement also. It really pays to read and learn about there projects and do research in order to understand more about it. I always read these opinions, sometimes you can find interesting and needful information in there. And on these sites  you can find the latest information on funds raised on the moment. Not all the info we get from these websites is accurate, but the info is still worth to use as our reference. Best to do your own research,with ICO ratings, plus it does not hurt to check forums to see what others have to say.

[heocon571]

I believe, maybe the ico rating is given after analyzing the whole ico, and become a benchmark to know the ico is good or not

[salamonKK]

ICO project ratings are only additional help when choosing ICO, but they should not be the decisive factor in the choice.