Do you believe in ICO Ratings?

[kam2446]

Many ico rating are credible.  I just use those sites for basic information. The best result is when we do our own research.

[thresher]

Is not that reliable but if you look on the factors regarding how an ICO is rated you could see that it doesnt really predicts the outcome of the token sale you can see that ratings are just a prior knowledge and what a simple person thinks of that ICO not considering the factors that affects the end game. These rating sites we can use to review projects. Always do your own research on the project that you want to invest in. There is always a risk in this market.

[heds0n]

I don't believe these ratings. You should count on your strength. It is necessary to analyze the projects in which you invest.

[sonphamuser]

Sometimes I look at the ratings of ICO. I do not think that if the project has a good indicator in one of these ratings, it is a guarantee of something.

Me too, I has visit ICO rantings site for looking some bounty, the bad site I not recommend is https://icorating.com, they has rating all 3-5 star 

[Beet1e]

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

You should not believe in ratings on various sites for sure, but as practice shows, projects with a rating of 4+ are successful (icobench)
But if you take for example 10 projects with a rating of 4+, there will still be unsuccessful about 50% or even more.

[deveiz888]

ICO rating assessed by a portal. And I think is a very honest assessment. because a portal must of course give our best in order not to disappoint the public. because the community is of course the hope is full so that the information provided is real.

[P_percy]

Most of the times those websites who rate icos are paid for the promotions and you can't expect 100% visibility from them.



It's always better to do your own research, rather than believing any third party sources.

[wolffy0216]

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

rarely when i joined in campaign i always see is ratings and then the projects of the ICO if legit and successful in the future the other campaign or sometimes higher ratings it will be succeed.

Sometime I don't believe in Ico ratings because I believe some of them are not legit and a paid ratings. But not all of this, maybe only some of ico ratings site. Anyway, we should not focus on this but also check other factors to consider in making investments.

[Babayan]

Yes, i believe some ICO ratings like Icobench and Icodrops, because they dont recieve any payment for their ratings and its always objective.

[Henrobakkara]

I think the ico rating is just a prediction from some experts who are experts in the field but can not guarantee success on a project I think the ico rating is just a grip for any investor who wants to invest but all also return on the project they have good deals or not in interesting interest of investors

[OSEIBOATENG]

I have seen so many ICO's being rated 4.8/5 and they have been some shit coins in my wallet. ICO rating for now I dont really believe in it.

[JRACPJRL]

You have to see how the rating is given before trust it or not. A few evaluations site simply utilize a check rundown to see whether certain things like wire gathering, whitepaper exist or not. These are far less valuable at that point destinations that really endeavoring to comprehend what the undertaking and potential is, for example, crushcrypto and for some situation even some youtuber are better. In any case, it's best utilizing evaluations as reference, some youtuber could be positioning the coins as the best ICO in light of the fact that they as of now arranged presale rebate and put a considerable measure of cash in it. End of day we settle on our own choices. Closely-held convictions not monetary guidance

[GelatikKembar]

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

I never trust the rating because it is just a formality, which convinces a good project or not is from reading their whitepapers, because the rating does not affect the sales of a project and in cryptocurrency slalu has surprises and wonders for an ICO project, so all can still happen with any rating owned by a project.

[Cryptohelpyou]

I believe that the ICO rating of 80% is paid by someone's interest, since many people are looking at it, so the campaigns are paid to rating sites for good performance.

[coinmaster241]

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

Need to know Marketing is the King of Sales. promotion is part of marketing, so if there is a project that doesn't require marketing, promotion, etc. it will be hard to compete with dozens of other ICOs running at that time.
Interest is also not necessarily 100% considering ICO rating, because in fact people noticed only the ICO is being a hot conversation through promotions either from the Bitcointalk forum, social media, blogs, etc.

[minerdiary]

I do not believe in ratings, however, I use them in finding a new bounty campaign. For example, on Icobench there is a filter that helps sort projects in which there is a bounty. Also I'm looking through the creators' profiles on LinkedIn.

[Sky_Flower]

I use ratings ICObench.com I believe that they help to evaluate the project. But for the full confidence it is better to conduct its investigation of the project, and ratings to use only as an aid

[markuly]

I do not believe in ICO rating and I will choose ICO which I think will have a future in crypto and strong team

[reverseflash]

ICO rating shall be only one of methods which you estimate the project. It is impossible to tell based on one judgement  it is the project good or not. Conduct the research, read a white list, check line-up of the team of developers, etc.

[badakjawa]

Several times i trust to web ico ratings, and it turns out ico its fail in some ways. such as one unable to touch softcap. This is what makes bounty hunters and investors who dare to invest a little money in ico feel the loss. do not get too fixated by web ico rating. actually the ico ratings were made only for investor reference only.