Do you believe in ICO Ratings?

[xuxunini]

I had tables with ratings and comments from different gurus. But in fact, with a table with twenty ico there are only two that are not scam. You must look at the team yourself and what kind of product the project offers.

[BlueBobbins1]

Personally I don't believe at all.Since it is not clear what makes them and how.The rating can be displayed only at the end of the project.And before you need to look at other points.Before the ICO is over, no one can say whether it is a good project or not!

[el_lobo]

I do not trust such pages any more. Since i read that on most sites, you can buy the rating, i lost my trust.
That's why I advise everyone not to rely on such a rating. I'd rather do some research yourself.
I relied on such a site on my first bounty and got caught in a scam.

[hamnghi167]

For me ICO Ratings is a good guide that we can check if an ICO is good to invest or not, its still best to make our own research and dig more deeper with the project and team before we invest because no matter how big the ratings are if they want to scam us we can't do anything about it.

[Psychee]

yes I believe but I still invest in new projects and criticize you Socratus

[Daydream 61]

Do you believe in ICO Ratings?  No.  Envion = Super rating. And today scam !  And many other ico are scam and rating to 4,5 and more. nei. This is often just a joke. I think who gets paid a lot gets a good ranking. that's all nonsense . then you can also read clever  and smart . it's better . Or Mickey Mouse Comic

[Polwynne]

I think it's good to read different opinions about different projects, but anyway we must do our own research before investing money.

[Bitcoinjheta]

Yes personally I believe ICO rating.I think it's only a single way to identify good ico from most of way.You can't depend only ICO ratings.It can only help but it can't give 100% surety for successful ICO.

That is not the basis of a good campaign having a highest percentage ICO ratings on bounty thread because you can not determined the project are scammed. Many bounty campaign have passes that kind ratings but the reputation are not totally 100% sureness at it all depends on how you research the project many times concluding that its good campaign.

[darkr]

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

You can not trust rating sites. I think that experts sell good reviews for those who pay them well. Many projects with a low rating were successful and with a high rating they turned out to be scam.

[suraniawan]

of course I believe. because this is an ICO rating portal. so I don't think it will give the information carelessly. And I always make the ICO's rating as one of the assessment of the ICO project.

[moonriver]

I only use ICO ratings as reference.
You can use it to select some projects you should do more research.
It is reluctant to rely on these ratings alone while investing in icos.

[Emilyearl]

Most times, those guys are paid for the rating services. The thing to do is look at for projects with real use case and at least an MVP. Also check how active the development team are and what kind of community they have not just thousands of telegram users. Most times the number of telegram users are all airdrop or bounty hunters who care less about the project.

[BraveSaw]

I understand that all those rating can be bought by projects, but anyway when I’m going to participate in any project, I take rating into account.

[zhineng2030]

In this market, I very much want to find an organization or an individual to trust him and give me guidance. Therefore, many people will choose the rating agencies. If they score very high projects, they will invest a lot, but the result is still a loss. So I don't believe them anymore. I just made them a reference.

[Tonygold1967]

I am using www.icoguide.com for the selecting of good projects, but final decision should be taken by ourselves, as there is not guarantee that even experts are not mistaken. Rating platforms are more like filters.

[kanmo]

Yes, I trust some notable rating websites like ICO bench and ICO drops. Those two websites have experts that do the rating and its not just ordinary rating. The experts are well experienced about initial coin offering.

[migmigbaby9897]

I do not always believe in ICO rating. I will choose ICO which I think will have a future. ICO rating is merely a formality. We need to carefully study the whitepapers that they make and note the roadmap so we can estimate the strategies they may be taking.

[Dandyhunter]

No, I do not believe such ratings. Often they display untruthful information and deceive many people. You should be very careful when choosing a company if you use the rating.

[Tamila]

I believe ico ratings are overall great reference to start reading, there are many links to specific icos and also how much money or coins they already collected etc.

[Maricurijohn]

No, I totally do not believe in that. Maybe they collate together to make beautiful numbers. So do not believe that we will become better if we believe in it blindly.