Do you believe in ICO Ratings?

[zero4five]

Many rating sites are useless because they do not use experienced analysts and they are not managed by people who have the knowledge or skills to evaluate crypto projects. Such projects are likely to encourage start-ups to buy a high ICO rating on their platforms. Most just want to make money on the ICO fashion.

[JulkaEsya]

I never believed in the ratings of even the most advanced sites.Always need to remember that information can be use as on favor of so and in their interest,so that listen to mass unrest based on temporary resonance about growth or the fall of I think at least foolish!

[int226]

I'm not sure on the reviews from those sites, but at least there is some ground to believe in the project.

[Elysio]

Not all believe ico rating. Only 2 website folling. They are giving me ico. I am researching projects and teams. If i like i join icos not like i don't join. This simply

[Mypanara19]

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

Ico ratings and the likes could somehow has great influence with any crypto projects because most of the investors would have positive and pleasant regard with a project if they would see that it has good ratings. As for me it's hard to rely solely with the rating result because I do not have any clear idea on how and where do they base their rating results. I mean what and how are the parameters they use for their rating? How they qualify a coin or token to have such rating. And certainly, ico ratings will not guarantee that a coin/token would be huge and become successful.

[ronalsi]

I do not believe it, I just believe in what I have to evaluate the ICO

[Leenwar]

I do not trust most of these ico ratings sites, because there can buy a rating even a scam project. Moreover, I think that such sites are dangerous for beginners.

[Sam$oN]

I do not believe it, I just believe in what I have to evaluate the ICO

I agree, the personal conclusion is always better than the output of people who do not explain what it is based on, but we all know what this very ICO  rating is based on

[rahul10948]

You should not trust the ratings 100%, but it’s a good reference to have. If it’s not even listed on these sites, it’s an issue. If the ratings and comments from the expert reviews are consistently good or bad, it could be an indicator of the validity of the project. It’s just a piece of the important puzzle that is DYOR. Follow the social media sites, see how active they are. Does the website and white paper look good? Do they have viable product and roadmap? Reading for yourself is good on top of the review sites. So its just helping to get you some material on your research

[mel_smog]

nope, esp from shitty sites like ICOBench

ICO Drops is the only trustworthy ico related website with so much value to their community!

[Rhaizan]

I do not believe it, I just believe in what I have to evaluate the ICO

I agree, the personal conclusion is always better than the output of people who do not explain what it is based on, but we all know what this very ICO  rating is based on

For me ico rating is just a simple way for me to assist where is the good ico but it's not always saying that when ico listed on ico rating means it good and you will get huge profit, of course you need to research by your own because for me not all ico that be listed in ico rating is trusted ICO.

[kiemnhieutien]

I believe in them but they are not the only clue for me to make an invest decision. ICO rating sites only have an overview look at listed projects, like team, vision, whitepaper... then export the rates. So there is nothing to ensure that high rated ICO will be success. Like that, invest in ICO projects always has risks and investors can lose their funds anytime.

[fosco333]

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

Don't just believe blindly with ICO rating site. They are good to give review indeed, but we must do our own research about the project.
There are several good ICO Projects, one of them is EON. EON is a game platform, but based on blockchain.

[bountyhunter433]

I read the rankings from time to time but I am not totally dependent on them and prefer to compare the various sources. It's even better to do your own project analysis, so at least there'll be no one to blame except yourself in case of ICO failure.

[Matilda]

Even if a project is really good, it is impossible to have a good development trend when the market falls sharply. So the rating can only represent a certain degree.

[macchiato]

Back when I still have few knowledge about ICOs, I rely on ico rating sites. But after some time, I realized that not all their ratings are real. Some are just too good to be true. The value of tokens do not reach the amount they claim after being listed on exchanges. So I don't think ico rating sites are 100% reliable, not even 70%.

About ICO bench, I have read articles about ICO experts being paid in exchange for high ratings. That made it more untrustworthy.

[Luntop]

I try not to trust the ratings on different sites, I prefer to do it myself

[InitialCoinList.com]

This has to change! Alot of the top Ico listing sites operate with the same model: Pay us to be on top. Continue paying or your score will decrease.People have to realize that a 4.5/5 or A score will not guarantee anything.The paid rating systems only provide a fake assurance to investors and have misused the ICO economy,, to put it lightly.

As investors, we must do our own research,
I found this article on Medium and I wanted to share it, It is a real example of what happened to RoomDao when they came into the ICO Launching world.

https://medium.com/@roomdao/corruption-at-ico-listing-sites-5fec6506afa7

 

[ElenaN]

I think they sometimes specifically overestimate and underestimate the ratings to ask the money from companies!

[kudryas]

Even if a project is really good, it is impossible to have a good development trend when the market falls sharply. So the rating can only represent a certain degree.

That's true, it happens from time to tiem that some ICO looks good but it fails in the end unexpectedly. You can't blame the ratings because sometimes they're just a representation of current state of the ICO, in the end you shouldn't go all in in any investment and you'll be safe.