|
BBristow79
|
 |
July 03, 2014, 02:36:54 AM |
|
Looks amazing. Can't wait to test it out |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
pjr77
|
|
July 03, 2014, 03:28:12 AM |
|
YEAH BABY !!!! 
|
|
|
|
|
|
nonny12
|
|
July 03, 2014, 06:54:38 AM |
|
YEAH BABY !!!! Anyone test it out yet? |
|
|
|
|
|
MichBjukenon
|
|
July 03, 2014, 07:38:34 AM |
|
vertverser+marketing campaign=interesting 2 week ahead  (again) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bionic345
Member
 Offline
Activity: 91
Merit: 10
|
|
July 03, 2014, 08:57:56 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
silencesilence
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1120
Merit: 1000
|
|
July 03, 2014, 10:26:42 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crypto_EX
Member
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
|
|
July 03, 2014, 01:19:13 PM |
|
i like this new vert-verser service, can it be included in the wallet itself somehow ?!
|
|
|
|
|
|
deky_
|
|
July 03, 2014, 01:48:58 PM |
|
OP can we put this on vertcoin.org? Also, advertise this guys, all of us... |
VTC Donations : VmdSExjrX9wxVt3mSq2mGXd4bLtNrpyGhJ
|
|
|
|
kalisto
|
|
July 03, 2014, 02:01:03 PM |
|
conVert would be much cooler as name imo
|
|
|
|
|
Crypto_EX
Member
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
|
|
July 03, 2014, 02:45:58 PM |
|
conVert would be much cooler as name imo
agreed  |
|
|
|
|
|
iGoodw1n
|
|
July 03, 2014, 02:48:45 PM |
|
conVert would be much cooler as name imo
I like reVerter. |
|
|
|
|
turtoro
|
|
July 03, 2014, 02:54:07 PM |
|
conVert would be much cooler as name imo
If it makes a difference I agree, if its not open for a rename, its still good. Either way well done! |
|
|
|
|
Crypto_EX
Member
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
|
|
July 03, 2014, 03:42:10 PM |
|
can this feature be included in the wallet itself somehow ? instead of it being on a separate website ?! this is a question to the devs please answer, thanks
|
|
|
|
|
|
jch9678
|
|
July 03, 2014, 04:37:55 PM |
|
I'm kind of confused on how to use VertVerser ( I like the name ConVerter myself ). I think it might be better to have 2 different areas for destination inputs on the site. A pay with VTC area and a pay with BTC area. I think this could simplify things. You don't want somebody inputting a BTC address and then putting the amount in VTC. That could get ugly unless I don't get how it's working, but the buffer would get filled pretty quickly.
Also is there an exchange rate and if so what is it based on? Maybe I don't understand how it's supposed to work.
|
BTC: 15GqpmqNNJ1REWrDWTfymh7moos1sEvz7A
|
|
|
Magic8Ball
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
|
|
July 03, 2014, 05:50:59 PM |
|
Stealth addresses rely on the Elliptic curve Diffie-Hellman algorithm, originally used by Bitcointalk.org forum member ByteCoin, to generate an anonymous key agreement between payors and payees, enabling them to share a “secret” that can be used for them to divide funds.
A step-by-step diagram illusrates how Stealth addresses work in four steps:
<snip>
The payee publishes a public key ‘Q‘ and a corresponding private key ‘d‘.
The payer generates a key pair where the private key = ‘e‘ public key of ‘P‘ where ‘P‘ is the transaction.
The payer calculates ‘S=eQ‘, where ‘S‘ is a shared secret between the two parties. The payee calculates ‘S=dP‘ to get ‘S‘.
With the secret shared, either side can calculate an offset to ‘Q‘, which acts as the address. The payee then checks the transaction, and if the address matches, spends the funds.
Very informative, thanks. Long back I was doubtful when Boris said they were working on some anonymiser technique. Now they have finally delivered. |
|
|
|
|
Crypto_EX
Member
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
|
|
July 03, 2014, 06:05:44 PM |
|
Stealth addresses rely on the Elliptic curve Diffie-Hellman algorithm, originally used by Bitcointalk.org forum member ByteCoin, to generate an anonymous key agreement between payors and payees, enabling them to share a “secret” that can be used for them to divide funds.
A step-by-step diagram illusrates how Stealth addresses work in four steps:
<snip>
The payee publishes a public key ‘Q‘ and a corresponding private key ‘d‘.
The payer generates a key pair where the private key = ‘e‘ public key of ‘P‘ where ‘P‘ is the transaction.
The payer calculates ‘S=eQ‘, where ‘S‘ is a shared secret between the two parties. The payee calculates ‘S=dP‘ to get ‘S‘.
With the secret shared, either side can calculate an offset to ‘Q‘, which acts as the address. The payee then checks the transaction, and if the address matches, spends the funds.
Very informative, thanks. Long back I was doubtful when Boris said they were working on some anonymiser technique. Now they have finally delivered. and it's a pretty clever way to achieve it ! |
|
|
|
|
|
Jiggy0001
|
|
July 03, 2014, 06:07:56 PM |
|
who is dumping?  |
|
|
|
|
|
iGoodw1n
|
|
July 03, 2014, 06:09:36 PM |
|
Would be great to add VertVerser in Android and iPhone app.
|
|
|
|
|
