jwinterm
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 3024
Merit: 1106
|
 |
July 24, 2014, 10:35:57 PM |
|
Jumping in with multipool issue. I personally voted for adding 1 week to the block maturation. But looking at the exit-poll - majority prefers no changes! WTF, multipool owners overvote the Vertans? Another thing - are there only 95 VertVoters (according to 2014, July 25)? I voted for 3 days, but I think in retrospect no change is better. Inconveniencing multipools almost by definition means inconveniencing all miners, and with the way the network hashrate has been decreasing since the release of Monocle, I think the last thing we want to do is make things tougher on miners, multipool or not. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The network tries to produce one block per 10 minutes. It does this by automatically adjusting how difficult it is to produce blocks.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
styxical
Member
Offline
Activity: 87
Merit: 10
|
|
July 24, 2014, 10:47:56 PM |
|
Jumping in with multipool issue. I personally voted for adding 1 week to the block maturation. But looking at the exit-poll - majority prefers no changes! WTF, multipool owners overvote the Vertans? Another thing - are there only 95 VertVoters (according to 2014, July 25)? I voted for no change because I don't think it will help the issue at all, while it certainly will cause greater mining centralization. |
|
|
|
|
WHaze
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 37
Merit: 0
|
|
July 24, 2014, 11:26:51 PM |
|
Jumping in with multipool issue. I personally voted for adding 1 week to the block maturation. But looking at the exit-poll - majority prefers no changes! WTF, multipool owners overvote the Vertans? Another thing - are there only 95 VertVoters (according to 2014, July 25)? Majority prefers no change  ? Are you kidding? 26 votes for no change but 70 votes for a change ! |
|
|
|
|
|
cubevtc
|
|
July 25, 2014, 04:32:37 AM |
|
I knew you would not be able to wait till 0.0001.  Welcome back.  With the change in algo to Lyra2, we essentially moving to a new coin - Vertcoin 2.0? With an introduction of Vertcoin 2.0 that is a FIRST in this new algo, will it come with a mad rush to get the shiny new coins? Who is buying up/accumulating? |
|
|
|
HR
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1011
Transparency & Integrity
|
|
July 25, 2014, 07:07:21 AM |
|
Very few coins actually have devs that know what they are doing. These guys know what they are doing, they just need to figure out the best direction, then work can start.
I'm of the same opinion. Very few coins have devs that know what they're doing. Do you think that perhaps we should start an independent thread one of these days with a list on the OP? . . . not that it would be easy by any means - opinions without factual events, incidents, interchanges, etc., that serve to justify those opinion are meaningless . . . It might be worth it though as it could become one of the most entertaining and interesting reads on BitCoin Forum. |
|
|
|
|
fran2k
|
|
July 25, 2014, 07:12:59 AM |
|
I knew you would not be able to wait till 0.0001. Welcome back. With the change in algo to Lyra2, we essentially moving to a new coin - Vertcoin 2.0? With an introduction of Vertcoin 2.0 that is a FIRST in this new algo, will it come with a mad rush to get the shiny new coins? Who is buying up/accumulating? Yes! Very good move. |
|
|
|
|
HR
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1011
Transparency & Integrity
|
|
July 25, 2014, 07:32:54 AM |
|
Good news. But what do devs who value reddit more than BitCoinTalk indirectly tell us? (This is not an isolated case either.) |
|
|
|
|
turtoro
|
|
July 25, 2014, 07:37:42 AM |
|
Good news. But what do devs who value reddit more than BitCoinTalk indirectly tell us? (This is not an isolated case either.) 1: it doesn't mean anything 2: Why exactly do you think BTC talk is inherently the only defacto forum to conduct communication 3: The simple and basic reason is that there is far more volume with reddit and the 5000+ readers than here which has the same ~30 people posting. |
|
|
|
|
|
MichBjukenon
|
|
July 25, 2014, 07:45:21 AM |
|
Good news. But what do devs who value reddit more than BitCoinTalk indirectly tell us? (This is not an isolated case either.) why is that a problem? becouse u like BCT more then reddit ? i dont,so what ? This is a community forum not devs forum...plus,u have all the important news on the devs blog... |
|
|
|
|
|
voephilis
|
|
July 25, 2014, 07:55:15 AM |
|
nice move to lyra! buying some verts |
|
|
|
|
|
ownerbest
|
|
July 25, 2014, 08:05:21 AM |
|
Still need 4 months to roll this Lyra2 out. So, the price will continue going down before that? Will be under 0.0001?
|
|
|
|
|
cubevtc
|
|
July 25, 2014, 08:15:21 AM |
|
Still need 4 months to roll this Lyra2 out. So, the price will continue going down before that? Will be under 0.0001?
On the other hand, it may be too late to get into the 'game' by then. Who knows? |
|
|
|
sammy007
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1003
|
|
July 25, 2014, 08:51:17 AM
Last edit: July 25, 2014, 09:09:43 AM by sammy007 |
|
Yacoin was the first Scrypt N coin.
The only difference was the starting N factor.
Fucking noobs.
There are a lot of coins, myriads of coins of all colors, animals, etc. Who the hell in a right mind can remember everything? |
|
|
|
|
|
xingqiaoyin
|
|
July 25, 2014, 09:52:17 AM |
|
I would like to see those scrypt-N asics like flowertech, lightningasic, blissdevices crying and begging for no change here because their overpriced miners even if it can reliably mine scrypt-N will be useless then we could all harras them i mean motivate them to make lyra asic LOL..  If it's all possible maybe the devs could tweak the algorithm that is optimal at 50% GPU load. That is going more than 50% will yield lower hashrate. X11 is succesful because it is cool. It's not a problem if you live far from the equator as winter or spring will take care of the temps. There are miners around the equator too and heat is constant all year long. |
|
|
|
|
HR
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1011
Transparency & Integrity
|
|
July 25, 2014, 10:17:23 AM |
|
The simple and basic reason is that there is far more volume with reddit and the 5000+ readers than here which has the same ~30 people posting.
" 5000+ readers" ...with a collective IQ that doesn't reach that same number.  " ~30 people posting" ...which often means that there's actual intelligence being expressed and the multitude of readers get their answers before having to post. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=stats ...and the idiots think twice before posting crap. Add: so in reference to my first question/allusion on the matter, if a Dev gives more importance to reddit than BitCoinTalk, then 1) he/she is afraid of the technical level inherent in BitCoinTalk 2) he/she is frivolous, juvenile and only interested in being "virtually" popular (i.e. "liked") 3) he/she is not interested in serious intellectual interchange regarding coin development 4) all the above (Now you have the full version of my original tongue-in-cheek humor - please show your intelligence when responding.) |
|
|
|
|
turtoro
|
|
July 25, 2014, 10:24:51 AM |
|
The simple and basic reason is that there is far more volume with reddit and the 5000+ readers than here which has the same ~30 people posting.
"5000+ readers" ...with a collective IQ that doesn't reach that same number. "~30 people posting" ...which often means that there's actual intelligence being expressed and the multitude of readers get their answers before having to post. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=stats ... and the idiots think twice before posting crap. Are we talking about the same site? |
|
|
|
|
HR
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1011
Transparency & Integrity
|
|
July 25, 2014, 10:28:38 AM |
|
Are we talking about the same site?
I think so. You tell me. http://www.reddit.com/ Packed to the hilt with twits and nitwits, IMO of course. |
|
|
|
|
turtoro
|
|
July 25, 2014, 10:31:00 AM |
|
Are we talking about the same site?
I think so. You tell me. http://www.reddit.com/ Packed to the hilt with twits and nitwits, IMO of course. ...i meant here. There is just as much inane posting on on btctlk. Anyways, the purpose of that was to spread it to as much pple as possible. I dont get ur problem. |
|
|
|
|
styxical
Member
Offline
Activity: 87
Merit: 10
|
|
July 25, 2014, 10:31:37 AM |
|
The simple and basic reason is that there is far more volume with reddit and the 5000+ readers than here which has the same ~30 people posting.
" 5000+ readers" ...with a collective IQ that doesn't reach that same number. " ~30 people posting" ...which often means that there's actual intelligence being expressed and the multitude of readers get their answers before having to post. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=stats ...and the idiots think twice before posting crap. Add: so in reference to my first question/allusion on the matter, if a Dev gives more importance to reddit than BitCoinTalk, then 1) he/she is afraid of the technical level inherent in BitCoinTalk 2) he/she is frivolous, juvenile and only interested in being "virtually" popular (i.e. "liked") 3) he/she is not interested in serious intellectual interchange regarding coin development 4) all the above (Now you have the full version of my original tongue-in-cheek humor - please show your intelligence when responding.) Both sites have their trolls and both have their intelligent discussions. Most people participate in both forums. You should go pull that stick out of your ass. |
|
|
|
|
|
turtoro
|
|
July 25, 2014, 10:34:03 AM |
|
The simple and basic reason is that there is far more volume with reddit and the 5000+ readers than here which has the same ~30 people posting.
Add: so in reference to my first question/allusion on the matter, if a Dev gives more importance to reddit than BitCoinTalk, then 1) he/she is afraid of the technical level inherent in BitCoinTalk 2) he/she is frivolous, juvenile and only interested in being "virtually" popular (i.e. "liked") 3) he/she is not interested in serious intellectual interchange regarding coin development 4) all the above (Now you have the full version of my original tongue-in-cheek humor - please show your intelligence when responding.) Are you being serious? holy shit... |
|
|
|
|
|
