Bitcoin Forum
May 21, 2024, 11:10:00 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 [290] 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 ... 849 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] [ASIC-RESISTANT] UltraCoin (UTC) - Ultrafast 6 second transactions!!  (Read 946566 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
musicmaker613
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 93
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 27, 2014, 03:31:34 AM
 #5781

Nvidia ti 750's meant to be the new low budget king

Something like 250 kh @ 100 watts

More like 320 kh @ 65 watts !!
http://cryptomining-blog.com/1098-trying-gigabyte-gtx-750-ti-video-card-for-crypto-mining/
Would be about 130kh/s on scrypt jane at current UTC nfactor, and about 65kh/s in a couple days.

Wow, I was asking about a trio of R7 260x vs a single 280x a few pages back, but it looks like the 750ti could be even better.  I still suspect that having three separate budget cards with 2GB dedicated memory EACH will out perform a single faster card with 2 or 3GB as n-factor increases.  But the real gem is the TDP.  60 WATTS?  Are you kidding me?  That thing doesn't even need a 6-pin power plug.  I'm tempted to build a rig with a few and see how it goes...

SYS: SjFeMefQpgCRWuwRdiN3Hf8V6CkocV3Xdq
DOGE: DG4EwxvNCM5YFBQ8xo7pkEua2Nf1jRMmQg
Protagonus
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 100



View Profile
February 27, 2014, 03:37:50 AM
 #5782


original post here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=413978.msg5377220#msg5377220

Okay the first Ultracoin Quiz has concluded.  Thank you for all who participated and I hope you had a bit of fun.  As mentioned in the first post, I will now reveal the correct words!! 
Unfortunately there was only 1 of 3 words picked.   Here's the screenshot proof of the winners, sent to myself yesterday.



First place: Atonic
Second place: Triac
Third place: Lion



   The only correct answer given of those 3 was; Lion.


I choose "Lion" if that hasnt been guesed already.


I really hoped all 3 words would have been picked, but since there IS only one who picked a correct answer;  I will go ahead and just award First Place prize to skribnod.

Congratulations Skribnod!!!!  You win 10 UTC!!


Please PM your UTC address for payment and I'll send the  10 UTC your way.

Thanks again to everyone for trying the quiz!  I hope to do this again in about a week;  if everyone would like.   However I'll come up with something new / different for a quiz. 
And of course;  Always about community, always about Ultracoin.  Wink
Wirly
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 136
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 27, 2014, 03:42:45 AM
 #5783

Nvidia ti 750's meant to be the new low budget king

Something like 250 kh @ 100 watts

More like 320 kh @ 65 watts !!
http://cryptomining-blog.com/1098-trying-gigabyte-gtx-750-ti-video-card-for-crypto-mining/
Would be about 130kh/s on scrypt jane at current UTC nfactor, and about 65kh/s in a couple days.

Wow, I was asking about a trio of R7 260x vs a single 280x a few pages back, but it looks like the 750ti could be even better.  I still suspect that having three separate budget cards with 2GB dedicated memory EACH will out perform a single faster card with 2 or 3GB as n-factor increases.  But the real gem is the TDP.  60 WATTS?  Are you kidding me?  That thing doesn't even need a 6-pin power plug.  I'm tempted to build a rig with a few and see how it goes...
I've been wondering this also. What is better as nfactor keeps rising, gpu or cpu???that is the question. Unless profit is there it seems pointless to dedicate high end gpu's to this project but should one go with cheaper more efficient gpu or invest in a cpu farm???
skribnod
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 95
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 27, 2014, 03:56:53 AM
 #5784

Thnx Protagonus, finally got a few more coins to store while i wait for CT to reopen and get my other coins out ( if they ever do).

Pm sent.
Protagonus
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 100



View Profile
February 27, 2014, 04:05:17 AM
 #5785

Thnx Protagonus, finally got a few more coins to store while i wait for CT to reopen and get my other coins out ( if they ever do).

Pm sent.

10 UTC sent.  you should have it confirmed now. 
Congratulations again!

Let me know that you got the UTC, if you could.
loganha112
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 80
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 27, 2014, 04:07:08 AM
 #5786

So if i get the 750 and put it in an old computer, would i still get the same hash rate? Or does it depend more on the computer specs?
klinmaining
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 98
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 27, 2014, 04:11:04 AM
 #5787

cgminer-3.7.2-sj-0.02



wtf  Huh

sapphire r9 290 tri-x
cgminer.exe -d 1 -o stratum+tcp://pickaxe.pool.pm:3306 -u xxx -p xxx --scrypt-jane --sj-nfmin 4 --sj-nfmax 30 --sj-time 1388361600  --thread-concurrency 24000 -w 512 -I 20 -g 1
MasterCATZ
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 426
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 27, 2014, 04:13:21 AM
 #5788

lol just got home , and was going to use  ATONIC as my 6 word and TORIC as my 5 letter

 

xwebnetwork
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 684
Merit: 500


Veni. Vidi. Vici.


View Profile WWW
February 27, 2014, 04:15:17 AM
 #5789

@klinmaining

Welcome to NFactor. Increases the amount of required memory to complete the calculations, hence the decrease in hash. Its all relative, though, so you're not out of the game just yet.

Validity.Bringing Advanced Utility to the Blockchain with the Validity SmartChain!
Website | BTCT Thread
klinmaining
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 98
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 27, 2014, 04:18:25 AM
 #5790

@klinmaining

Welcome to NFactor. Increases the amount of required memory to complete the calculations, hence the decrease in hash. Its all relative, though, so you're not out of the game just yet.
What to do?
imginy
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 224
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 27, 2014, 04:19:28 AM
 #5791

So would the 290x 8gb card be better for mining this after nfactor?

ps can't sleep without knowing whats happened to my coins.
MasterCATZ
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 426
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 27, 2014, 04:23:28 AM
 #5792

So if i get the 750 and put it in an old computer, would i still get the same hash rate? Or does it depend more on the computer specs?


you should be fine

normally the 16x slot is the fastest card

the rest of our fully populated slots are running only at 1x speed
not much speed difference between them  


normally 1x card = 16x speed
2x cards = 8x speed each
4x cards first slot 8x the rest 4x
more cards first slot 4x the rest 1x I think

depends on what the mobo is some have around 30x combined

actually its kind of amazed me the difference between the uncrippled slot and the other slots

I always get higher accepted ( around 2x )
from the GPU in first slot then the rest and only a slight kh/s drop on the other cards @ 1x





klinmaining
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 98
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 27, 2014, 04:24:26 AM
 #5793

difficult to communicate with you through Google translator, I'm from Russia
xwebnetwork
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 684
Merit: 500


Veni. Vidi. Vici.


View Profile WWW
February 27, 2014, 04:24:36 AM
 #5794

For starters, no need to run the intensity so high. Most people have been doing well at 12. Here's my config for a Sapphire R9 280X:

Code:
--scrypt-jane --sj-nfmin 4 --sj-nfmax 30 --sj-time 1388361600 -I 12 --gpu-engine 1150 --gpu-memclock 1250 -w 256 -g 2 --auto-fan --temp-target 70 --temp-overheat 80 --temp-cutoff 85 --shaders 2048

This nets me around 320KHs at a cool 60C. By dropping the intensity, your card will keep cool even at a higher engine clock.

Validity.Bringing Advanced Utility to the Blockchain with the Validity SmartChain!
Website | BTCT Thread
MasterCATZ
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 426
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 27, 2014, 04:29:10 AM
 #5795

Nvidia ti 750's meant to be the new low budget king

Something like 250 kh @ 100 watts

More like 320 kh @ 65 watts !!
http://cryptomining-blog.com/1098-trying-gigabyte-gtx-750-ti-video-card-for-crypto-mining/
Would be about 130kh/s on scrypt jane at current UTC nfactor, and about 65kh/s in a couple days.

Wow, I was asking about a trio of R7 260x vs a single 280x a few pages back, but it looks like the 750ti could be even better.  I still suspect that having three separate budget cards with 2GB dedicated memory EACH will out perform a single faster card with 2 or 3GB as n-factor increases.  But the real gem is the TDP.  60 WATTS?  Are you kidding me?  That thing doesn't even need a 6-pin power plug.  I'm tempted to build a rig with a few and see how it goes...


my only concern is I am wanting separate power to the video card :S

tho i guess a fully loaded ti750 PC would run with 650 watt PSU

6x 70 watts GPU = 420
+
200 watt mobo / reserve = 620

5~10% PSU breathing space
comes to around 650~700watts

1.8 MHS / 700watts
under 380 watts / MH


fully loaded r9 290
6x300 watts = 1800
+
200 watt mobo / reserve = 2000watts

5~10% PSU breathing space
comes to around 2200 watts

5.4 MH/s / 2200 watts

410 watts / MHS

loganha112
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 80
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 27, 2014, 04:30:45 AM
 #5796

So if i get the 750 and put it in an old computer, would i still get the same hash rate? Or does it depend more on the computer specs?


you should be fine

normally the 16x slot is the fastest card

the rest of our fully populated slots are running only at 1x speed
not much speed difference between them  


normally 1x card = 16x speed
2x cards = 8x speed each
4x cards first slot 8x the rest 4x
more cards first slot 4x the rest 1x I think

depends on what the mobo is some have around 30x combined

actually its kind of amazed me the difference between the uncrippled slot and the other slots

I always get higher accepted ( around 2x )
from the GPU in first slot then the rest and only a slight kh/s drop on the other cards @ 1x

Awesome thank you, how many coins per/day would you guess lol with i guess 65kh's?
klinmaining
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 98
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 27, 2014, 04:33:02 AM
 #5797

For starters, no need to run the intensity so high. Most people have been doing well at 12. Here's my config for a Sapphire R9 280X:

Code:
--scrypt-jane --sj-nfmin 4 --sj-nfmax 30 --sj-time 1388361600 -I 12 --gpu-engine 1150 --gpu-memclock 1250 -w 256 -g 2 --auto-fan --temp-target 70 --temp-overheat 80 --temp-cutoff 85 --shaders 2048

This nets me around 320KHs at a cool 60C. By dropping the intensity, your card will keep cool even at a higher engine clock.
85 page of this topic
cointradero
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 224
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 27, 2014, 04:34:49 AM
 #5798

For starters, no need to run the intensity so high. Most people have been doing well at 12. Here's my config for a Sapphire R9 280X:

Code:
--scrypt-jane --sj-nfmin 4 --sj-nfmax 30 --sj-time 1388361600 -I 12 --gpu-engine 1150 --gpu-memclock 1250 -w 256 -g 2 --auto-fan --temp-target 70 --temp-overheat 80 --temp-cutoff 85 --shaders 2048

This nets me around 320KHs at a cool 60C. By dropping the intensity, your card will keep cool even at a higher engine clock.

He is using a 290 card.  The -g 2 will work, but doesn't work as well as single thread.  And Intensity should be 19 after the last N change.  Only 280 / 7970 run optimal with I 12 and 2 threads.  

klinmaining:  As said above, trying turning your intensity down.  I'd start with 15 on both cards and try to up each one to 19 and see if you make it.  How much system ram do you have as well?  
xwebnetwork
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 684
Merit: 500


Veni. Vidi. Vici.


View Profile WWW
February 27, 2014, 04:37:19 AM
 #5799

That was before the last Nfactor increase. Now hashrates are about half which is exactly why ~300 is perfectly fine, for the 280X at least.

On a side note, if anybody has an online business for selling goods/services in exchange for UTC, shoot me a PM. As I mentioned a few pages back, I am putting together a Shopping page for the website. Thank you in advance!

Edit: Thanks for the clarification cointradero!

Validity.Bringing Advanced Utility to the Blockchain with the Validity SmartChain!
Website | BTCT Thread
cointradero
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 224
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 27, 2014, 04:38:35 AM
 #5800

For starters, no need to run the intensity so high. Most people have been doing well at 12. Here's my config for a Sapphire R9 280X:

Code:
--scrypt-jane --sj-nfmin 4 --sj-nfmax 30 --sj-time 1388361600 -I 12 --gpu-engine 1150 --gpu-memclock 1250 -w 256 -g 2 --auto-fan --temp-target 70 --temp-overheat 80 --temp-cutoff 85 --shaders 2048

This nets me around 320KHs at a cool 60C. By dropping the intensity, your card will keep cool even at a higher engine clock.
85 page of this topic



The hashrate of this coin mutates with the N-factor.  A schedule is posted on the website.  You can't compare hashrates with something you found on page 85 of this thread with hashrates today.  They will change again in a couple days.  At that point, they will be even lower.
Pages: « 1 ... 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 [290] 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 ... 849 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!