cointradero
|
 |
February 28, 2014, 09:42:11 PM |
|
Hmm anyone mining on 290/290x without HW errors?  --intensity 18 --thread-concurrency 56320 --gpu-threads 1 --lookup-gap 2 --worksize 64 gives me 174 kH/s for a R9 290, 1035/1250, 8gB w7 rig, catalyst 13.11 beta UR9XyoSXCJYU639DQjBREkJTeWrcb2sRrF Hmm .. looks good i try How many cards are you running? That TC won't work with a lot of them unless you have a ton of RAM too.
|
|
|
|
playspel
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 40
Merit: 0
|
 |
February 28, 2014, 09:47:43 PM |
|
Hmm anyone mining on 290/290x without HW errors?  --intensity 18 --thread-concurrency 56320 --gpu-threads 1 --lookup-gap 2 --worksize 64 gives me 174 kH/s for a R9 290, 1035/1250, 8gB w7 rig, catalyst 13.11 beta UR9XyoSXCJYU639DQjBREkJTeWrcb2sRrF Works perfect for me... 10UTC for you...
|
|
|
|
Puycheval
Member

Offline
Activity: 95
Merit: 10
|
 |
February 28, 2014, 09:47:58 PM Last edit: February 28, 2014, 09:58:20 PM by Puycheval |
|
Hmm anyone mining on 290/290x without HW errors?  --intensity 18 --thread-concurrency 56320 --gpu-threads 1 --lookup-gap 2 --worksize 64 gives me 174 kH/s for a R9 290, 1035/1250, 8gB w7 rig, catalyst 13.11 beta UR9XyoSXCJYU639DQjBREkJTeWrcb2sRrF Hmm .. looks good i try How many cards are you running? That TC won't work with a lot of them unless you have a ton of RAM too. This rig has 1x 7950 and 1x R9 290 Another one running 4x R9 290 @ 169 kH/s , TC = 47930 (didn't restart it to try 56320 yet) 1035/1250, Bamt 1.3, 8 GB
|
|
|
|
Puycheval
Member

Offline
Activity: 95
Merit: 10
|
 |
February 28, 2014, 09:56:59 PM |
|
Hmm anyone mining on 290/290x without HW errors?  --intensity 18 --thread-concurrency 56320 --gpu-threads 1 --lookup-gap 2 --worksize 64 gives me 174 kH/s for a R9 290, 1035/1250, 8gB w7 rig, catalyst 13.11 beta UR9XyoSXCJYU639DQjBREkJTeWrcb2sRrF Works perfect for me... 10UTC for you... Thank you but we need good setting for 290/290x without HW errors. 250 UTC waiting  was a better deal 
|
|
|
|
Jarod1231
|
 |
February 28, 2014, 09:59:40 PM |
|
It's things like this that drive me nuts. he's not wrong. It is 5 times more profitable per KH/s. Unfortunately, you can only get 1/5th the hashrate of scrypt coins now, so at best, it's a wash. I don't know if it's a disingenuous push or ignorance - both bother me. Yes it just cooked my brain when I see the news on twitter. I sold out, If things pick up I will buy back in. See you guys later I think bumface punched 1000kh into the calculator on coinwarz and temporarily spaced out about jane giving you a lower hash rate, that would explain his comments
|
|
|
|
untalented
|
 |
February 28, 2014, 09:59:56 PM |
|
Hmm anyone mining on 290/290x without HW errors?  --intensity 18 --thread-concurrency 56320 --gpu-threads 1 --lookup-gap 2 --worksize 64 gives me 174 kH/s for a R9 290, 1035/1250, 8gB w7 rig, catalyst 13.11 beta UR9XyoSXCJYU639DQjBREkJTeWrcb2sRrF Very nice! Works on my 290 (1040/1400Mhz) 8GB ~180khs Try too TC~45000 250 UTC sent thank you
|
|
|
|
|
cointradero
|
 |
February 28, 2014, 10:03:26 PM |
|
Hmm anyone mining on 290/290x without HW errors?  --intensity 18 --thread-concurrency 56320 --gpu-threads 1 --lookup-gap 2 --worksize 64 gives me 174 kH/s for a R9 290, 1035/1250, 8gB w7 rig, catalyst 13.11 beta UR9XyoSXCJYU639DQjBREkJTeWrcb2sRrF Very nice! Works on my 290 (1040/1400Mhz) 8GB ~180khs Try too TC~45000 250 UTC sent thank you Did it work on your 4x rig, that's what I have and honestly need to try to do some work before I leave my office today or I'd try it myself.
|
|
|
|
untalented
|
 |
February 28, 2014, 10:07:33 PM |
|
Hmm anyone mining on 290/290x without HW errors?  --intensity 18 --thread-concurrency 56320 --gpu-threads 1 --lookup-gap 2 --worksize 64 gives me 174 kH/s for a R9 290, 1035/1250, 8gB w7 rig, catalyst 13.11 beta UR9XyoSXCJYU639DQjBREkJTeWrcb2sRrF Very nice! Works on my 290 (1040/1400Mhz) 8GB ~180khs Try too TC~45000 250 UTC sent thank you Did it work on your 4x rig, that's what I have and honestly need to try to do some work before I leave my office today or I'd try it myself. Yes  on 4x290 works well 
|
|
|
|
Puycheval
Member

Offline
Activity: 95
Merit: 10
|
 |
February 28, 2014, 10:12:20 PM |
|
Hmm anyone mining on 290/290x without HW errors?  --intensity 18 --thread-concurrency 56320 --gpu-threads 1 --lookup-gap 2 --worksize 64 gives me 174 kH/s for a R9 290, 1035/1250, 8gB w7 rig, catalyst 13.11 beta UR9XyoSXCJYU639DQjBREkJTeWrcb2sRrF Very nice! Works on my 290 (1040/1400Mhz) 8GB ~180khs Try too TC~45000 250 UTC sent thank you It's my pleasure 
|
|
|
|
SxC
|
 |
February 28, 2014, 10:16:45 PM |
|
What price do you guys think we gonna bottom out @
Looking like it could be low 1's
|
|
|
|
fredeq
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1537
Merit: 1005
|
 |
February 28, 2014, 10:20:37 PM |
|
For 290 miners with 4gb of ram:
--intensity 18 --thread-concurrency 42000 --gpu-threads 1 --lookup-gap 3 --worksize 64
This will net you 135 khash. Tomorrow I will try gap 4 but I really doubt it will lead anywhere. Thank you Puycheval for worksize modification.
|
|
|
|
nanoprobe
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 980
Merit: 1000
Traveling in subspace
|
 |
February 28, 2014, 10:26:38 PM |
|
What price do you guys think we gonna bottom out @
Looking like it could be low 1's
The morons selling fractions of UTC @ stupid prices should be.......... NM
|
You'll never know what you're living for until you know what you're willing to die for. Never look back, something might be gaining on you.
|
|
|
cointradero
|
 |
February 28, 2014, 10:27:57 PM |
|
Hmm anyone mining on 290/290x without HW errors?  --intensity 18 --thread-concurrency 56320 --gpu-threads 1 --lookup-gap 2 --worksize 64 gives me 174 kH/s for a R9 290, 1035/1250, 8gB w7 rig, catalyst 13.11 beta UR9XyoSXCJYU639DQjBREkJTeWrcb2sRrF Very nice! Works on my 290 (1040/1400Mhz) 8GB ~180khs Try too TC~45000 250 UTC sent thank you Did it work on your 4x rig, that's what I have and honestly need to try to do some work before I leave my office today or I'd try it myself. Yes  on 4x290 works well  3 of the 4 290s refused to start with those settings 
|
|
|
|
camper111
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 22
Merit: 0
|
 |
February 28, 2014, 10:29:19 PM |
|
tc: 45056 (704x64=45056)
|
|
|
|
untalented
|
 |
February 28, 2014, 10:30:15 PM |
|
For 290 miners with 4gb of ram:
--intensity 18 --thread-concurrency 42000 --gpu-threads 1 --lookup-gap 3 --worksize 64
This will net you 135 khash. Tomorrow I will try gap 4 but I really doubt it will lead anywhere. Thank you Puycheval for worksize modification.
With 4/6GB of ram 290 RIGS must be --lookup-gap 3, it works but only ~140khs vs 8GB ~180khs Looks 8GB is necessary to 290 rigs --lookup-gap 4 is lower hashrate ~115khs Good job!:)
|
|
|
|
NetAlp
|
 |
February 28, 2014, 10:45:47 PM |
|
why continuous down utc price?
|
|
|
|
Jarod1231
|
 |
February 28, 2014, 10:52:22 PM |
|
why continuous down utc price?
Because there's a sucker born every day.
|
|
|
|
untalented
|
 |
February 28, 2014, 10:53:41 PM |
|
So.. The best settings to mine UTC :
HD7950 (1044/1500) ~100khs
setx GPUMAXALLOCPERCENT 100 setx GPUUSESYNC_OBJECTS 1 ultracoinminer -o stratum+tcp://ultra.nitro.org:3337 -u xxx -p xxx --scrypt-jane --sj-nfmin 4 --sj-nfmax 30 --sj-time 1388361600 -w 256 -g 2 -I 12 --thread-concurrency 16384 --no-submit-stale --expiry 10 --scan-time 1 --queue 0
HD7970/280x (1044/1500) ~135khs(280x)
setx GPUMAXALLOCPERCENT 100 setx GPUUSESYNC_OBJECTS 1 ultracoinminer -o stratum+tcp://ultra.nitro.org:3337 -u xxx -p xxx --scrypt-jane --sj-nfmin 4 --sj-nfmax 30 --sj-time 1388361600 -w 256 -g 2 -I 12 --thread-concurrency 16384 --no-submit-stale --lookup-gap 2 --expiry 10 --scan-time 1 --queue 0 R9 290 8GB RAM (1040/1400) ~180khs
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100 setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1 ultracoinminer -o stratum+tcp://ultra.nitro.org:3337 -u xxx -p xxx --scrypt-jane --sj-nfmin 4 --sj-nfmax 30 --sj-time 1388361600 -w 64 -g 1 -I 18 --thread-concurrency 45000 --no-submit-stale --lookup-gap 2 --expiry 10 --scan-time 1 --queue 0
R9 290 4GB/6GB RAM (1040/1400) ~140khs
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100 setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1 ultracoinminer -o stratum+tcp://ultra.nitro.org:3337 -u xxx -p xxx --scrypt-jane --sj-nfmin 4 --sj-nfmax 30 --sj-time 1388361600 -w 64 -g 1 -I 18 --thread-concurrency 42000 --no-submit-stale --lookup-gap 3 --expiry 10 --scan-time 1 --queue 0
|
|
|
|
lemfuture
|
 |
February 28, 2014, 11:06:35 PM |
|
why continuous down utc price?
because crypto trade got hacked which was the main exchange for utc
|
1ADLcfwTofFXb95pKhebpeRkJ4WTWsvQXB
|
|
|
|