Bitcoin Forum
December 11, 2024, 11:59:44 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 [309] 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 ... 849 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] [ASIC-RESISTANT] UltraCoin (UTC) - Ultrafast 6 second transactions!!  (Read 946638 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
Protagonus
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 100



View Profile
February 28, 2014, 04:33:30 PM
 #6161

Hash rate just halved !


Changing settings now.
NickPortland
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 98
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 28, 2014, 04:34:43 PM
 #6162

Hash rate just halved !


Changing settings now.
What to? I=11?

Official Ambassador for UTC-PND relations
*donations here*
 UTC: Ujff1xrc8brmHkRaFG3BcG5nVScXdh5Wu1 BTC: 159uuxJCfUsG44N52NUsydi2bCNeFSYyTi
samesstee
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 126
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 28, 2014, 04:38:31 PM
 #6163

The PND launch at Mintpal went crazy, prices dropped as low as 4 satoshi!!
Who wants to buy in cheap?  Grin

Good try... you're at 4 satoshi everywhere else  Tongue

It's a bargain Wink normal price is 5-7, should be higher now that we hit a big exchange, lots of money to be made right now.
fuck off

fuck YOU mastercoin wanker

no need to bring the vibe down
imginy
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 224
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 28, 2014, 04:40:34 PM
 #6164

my hashrate just been raped?

70 khashes out of my 280x?

I was on 180 yesterday.

Can someone get ziggy to explain a bit about whats going on with nfactor and if botnets are going to take over.

Anyone that can get me over 100 hashes can have 10 utc,
ultracoinminer -o  stratum+tcp://utc.idcray.com:10001  -u imginy.1 -p x --scrypt-jane --sj-nfmin 4 --sj-nfmax 30 --sj-time 1388361600 --thread-concurrency 8000 -g 2 -I 11 -w 256
NickPortland
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 98
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 28, 2014, 04:42:09 PM
 #6165

my hashrate just been raped?

70 khashes out of my 280x?

I was on 180 yesterday.

Can someone get ziggy to explain a bit about whats going on with nfactor and if botnets are going to take over.

Anyone that can get me over 100 hashes can have 10 utc,
ultracoinminer -o  stratum+tcp://utc.idcray.com:10001  -u imginy.1 -p x --scrypt-jane --sj-nfmin 4 --sj-nfmax 30 --sj-time 1388361600 --thread-concurrency 8000 -g 2 -I 11 -w 256


Try TC 8192 or 1 or 3 , gpuengine 1070

edit-disregard that, with I=11 i barely get 75 khs on a 280x. Have to keetp it at 12 and get HW errors.

Official Ambassador for UTC-PND relations
*donations here*
 UTC: Ujff1xrc8brmHkRaFG3BcG5nVScXdh5Wu1 BTC: 159uuxJCfUsG44N52NUsydi2bCNeFSYyTi
fredeq
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1537
Merit: 1005


View Profile WWW
February 28, 2014, 04:42:44 PM
 #6166

Anyone knows if operating tc and lookup gap will do anything good? Or we better try sgminer - it has more intensity options to find the best one?

https://whattomine.com - Check what to mine Smiley
Jarod1231
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 951
Merit: 252



View Profile
February 28, 2014, 04:43:12 PM
 #6167

Only way I'm not getting HW errors on 270x is by dropping intensity to 11 ... but I'm only getting 37kh now.. any other settings I could change?

--scrypt-jane --sj-nfmin 4 --sj-nfmax 30 --sj-time 1388361600 -I 11 --gpu-powertune 20

SxC
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 336
Merit: 250



View Profile
February 28, 2014, 04:43:19 PM
 #6168

my 280x is @ 80 hash and my 7850 is @ 72 hash
Protagonus
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 100



View Profile
February 28, 2014, 04:47:01 PM
 #6169



okay I have my 7950's doing 125 Kh/s each no HW errors

I'm running -w 512  -I 18 -TC 35k-40k    1050/1500 and 1080/1600 clocks

Really just changed the TC and dropped intensity as I was running 19.   Tc in the 35k -40K range not changing WU yet.   Can't say whats optimal there atm
flashg
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 16
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 28, 2014, 04:49:10 PM
 #6170

7950 with 3Gb ram here (no OC, 850 core,1200 mem speed, undervolted to 0.962), after the new N factor I've changed the following:

Thread concurrency from 16384 to 32768

Intensity from 17 to 15

No Hw errors

Hash dropped from 205 to 95

--intensity 15 --lookup-gap 2 --worksize 256 --expiry 10 --scan-time 1 --gpu-threads 1 --vectors 1 --thread-concurrency 32768 --shaders 1792 --no-submit-stale
NickPortland
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 98
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 28, 2014, 04:49:56 PM
 #6171



okay I have my 7950's doing 125 Kh/s each no HW errors

I'm running -w 512  -I 18 -TC 35k-40k    1050/1500 and 1080/1600 clocks

Really just changed the TC and dropped intensity as I was running 19.   Tc in the 35k -40K range not changing WU yet.   Can't say whats optimal there atm

Ye, with g2 I=11 is too low and I=12 too high(HW errors).

Maybe your method with g1 and I=18 is the only doable at this particular N-factor stage.

Official Ambassador for UTC-PND relations
*donations here*
 UTC: Ujff1xrc8brmHkRaFG3BcG5nVScXdh5Wu1 BTC: 159uuxJCfUsG44N52NUsydi2bCNeFSYyTi
pieterjanvh
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 668
Merit: 500


View Profile
February 28, 2014, 04:51:06 PM
 #6172



okay I have my 7950's doing 125 Kh/s each no HW errors

I'm running -w 512  -I 18 -TC 35k-40k    1050/1500 and 1080/1600 clocks

Really just changed the TC and dropped intensity as I was running 19.   Tc in the 35k -40K range not changing WU yet.   Can't say whats optimal there atm

What's your WU?
cointradero
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 224
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 28, 2014, 04:52:54 PM
 #6173

I can only comment on 290/290x cards right now. but they didn't seem to require any changes.  

I'm getting 194 at 1070/1500 out of one 290x.  The other two I'm getting 205.6 at 1100/1500.  The 290 is runnung at 180 at 1050/1500.  

Intensity still 19 on all of them.  0 hardware errors.  Difficulty is falling off a cliff right now which makes me think most people mine with 7970/280x.  
Protagonus
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 100



View Profile
February 28, 2014, 04:53:05 PM
 #6174

Ye, with g2 I=11 is too low and I=12 too high(HW errors).

Maybe your method with g1 and I=18 is the only doable at this particular N-factor stage.

Yeah sorry I forgot to say G1, I assumed with that High TC all would know.  It's G1


95 is pretty low for 7950


WU is 120 per card 343 (for 3) .  Pool varying shown rate between 650-850  (6 total gpu)
fredeq
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1537
Merit: 1005


View Profile WWW
February 28, 2014, 04:54:07 PM
 #6175

Lucky you. My 290 only work with I12, down from I20.

It may be result of me running 4gb or ram. I cannot get 28k+ TC.

https://whattomine.com - Check what to mine Smiley
Jmattes
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 28, 2014, 04:54:49 PM
 #6176

Both the 270 and 280x needed to go to i11 to run...

atleast there running..

where did coinbase go!!

I went to withdraw my btc.. its pending.. then it got cancelled only they could do that..
then i put the request in again.. waiting.. waiting.. now the site is gone!
joawaywego
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 9
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 28, 2014, 04:55:23 PM
 #6177

ugh...had to set -I 12 to get rid of HW errors. I have 3x 7950s each at 66kh right now.
cointradero
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 224
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 28, 2014, 04:57:50 PM
 #6178

Lucky you. My 290 only work with I12, down from I20.

It may be result of me running 4gb or ram. I cannot get 28k+ TC.


I'm only running 24000 TC on all of mine.
flashg
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 16
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 28, 2014, 04:59:16 PM
 #6179



okay I have my 7950's doing 125 Kh/s each no HW errors

I'm running -w 512  -I 18 -TC 35k-40k    1050/1500 and 1080/1600 clocks

Really just changed the TC and dropped intensity as I was running 19.   Tc in the 35k -40K range not changing WU yet.   Can't say whats optimal there atm

Ye, with g2 I=11 is too low and I=12 too high(HW errors).

Maybe your method with g1 and I=18 is the only doable at this particular N-factor stage.

Yeah sorry I forgot to say G1, I assumed with that High TC all would know.  It's G1

7950 with 3Gb ram here, after the new N factor I've changed the following:

Thread concurrency from 16384 to 32768

Intensity from 17 to 15

No Hw errors

Hash dropped from 205 to 95

Tips welcome Wink

95 is pretty low for 7950



okay I have my 7950's doing 125 Kh/s each no HW errors

I'm running -w 512  -I 18 -TC 35k-40k    1050/1500 and 1080/1600 clocks

Really just changed the TC and dropped intensity as I was running 19.   Tc in the 35k -40K range not changing WU yet.   Can't say whats optimal there atm

What's your WU?

WU is 120 per card 343 (for 3) .  Pool varying shown rate between 650-850  (6 total gpu)

Yes 95Khs is low, but it's a Sapphire card with inadequate cooling.Temp is around 57 and I'm fine with these temps.
Don't want to fry the GPU.It's also undervolted to VDCC 0.962 with std clock speeds.
regnevacs
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 28, 2014, 05:01:00 PM
 #6180

Bingo on my 280xs... running 130+ each no HW errors.. still trying to figure out how it can increase more..
Pages: « 1 ... 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 [309] 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 ... 849 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!