Protagonus
|
|
February 28, 2014, 04:33:30 PM |
|
Hash rate just halved !
Changing settings now.
|
|
|
|
NickPortland
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
February 28, 2014, 04:34:43 PM |
|
Hash rate just halved !
Changing settings now. What to? I=11?
|
Official Ambassador for UTC-PND relations *donations here* UTC: Ujff1xrc8brmHkRaFG3BcG5nVScXdh5Wu1 BTC: 159uuxJCfUsG44N52NUsydi2bCNeFSYyTi
|
|
|
samesstee
|
|
February 28, 2014, 04:38:31 PM |
|
The PND launch at Mintpal went crazy, prices dropped as low as 4 satoshi!! Who wants to buy in cheap? Good try... you're at 4 satoshi everywhere else It's a bargain normal price is 5-7, should be higher now that we hit a big exchange, lots of money to be made right now. fuck off fuck YOU mastercoin wanker no need to bring the vibe down
|
|
|
|
imginy
Member
Offline
Activity: 224
Merit: 10
|
|
February 28, 2014, 04:40:34 PM |
|
my hashrate just been raped?
70 khashes out of my 280x?
I was on 180 yesterday.
Can someone get ziggy to explain a bit about whats going on with nfactor and if botnets are going to take over.
Anyone that can get me over 100 hashes can have 10 utc, ultracoinminer -o stratum+tcp://utc.idcray.com:10001 -u imginy.1 -p x --scrypt-jane --sj-nfmin 4 --sj-nfmax 30 --sj-time 1388361600 --thread-concurrency 8000 -g 2 -I 11 -w 256
|
|
|
|
NickPortland
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
February 28, 2014, 04:42:09 PM |
|
my hashrate just been raped?
70 khashes out of my 280x?
I was on 180 yesterday.
Can someone get ziggy to explain a bit about whats going on with nfactor and if botnets are going to take over.
Anyone that can get me over 100 hashes can have 10 utc, ultracoinminer -o stratum+tcp://utc.idcray.com:10001 -u imginy.1 -p x --scrypt-jane --sj-nfmin 4 --sj-nfmax 30 --sj-time 1388361600 --thread-concurrency 8000 -g 2 -I 11 -w 256
Try TC 8192 or 1 or 3 , gpuengine 1070 edit-disregard that, with I=11 i barely get 75 khs on a 280x. Have to keetp it at 12 and get HW errors.
|
Official Ambassador for UTC-PND relations *donations here* UTC: Ujff1xrc8brmHkRaFG3BcG5nVScXdh5Wu1 BTC: 159uuxJCfUsG44N52NUsydi2bCNeFSYyTi
|
|
|
fredeq
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1537
Merit: 1005
|
|
February 28, 2014, 04:42:44 PM |
|
Anyone knows if operating tc and lookup gap will do anything good? Or we better try sgminer - it has more intensity options to find the best one?
|
|
|
|
Jarod1231
|
|
February 28, 2014, 04:43:12 PM |
|
Only way I'm not getting HW errors on 270x is by dropping intensity to 11 ... but I'm only getting 37kh now.. any other settings I could change?
--scrypt-jane --sj-nfmin 4 --sj-nfmax 30 --sj-time 1388361600 -I 11 --gpu-powertune 20
|
|
|
|
SxC
|
|
February 28, 2014, 04:43:19 PM |
|
my 280x is @ 80 hash and my 7850 is @ 72 hash
|
|
|
|
Protagonus
|
|
February 28, 2014, 04:47:01 PM |
|
Hash rate just halved !
Changing settings now. What to? I=11? okay I have my 7950's doing 125 Kh/s each no HW errors I'm running -w 512 -I 18 -TC 35k-40k 1050/1500 and 1080/1600 clocks Really just changed the TC and dropped intensity as I was running 19. Tc in the 35k -40K range not changing WU yet. Can't say whats optimal there atm
|
|
|
|
flashg
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 16
Merit: 0
|
|
February 28, 2014, 04:49:10 PM |
|
7950 with 3Gb ram here (no OC, 850 core,1200 mem speed, undervolted to 0.962), after the new N factor I've changed the following:
Thread concurrency from 16384 to 32768
Intensity from 17 to 15
No Hw errors
Hash dropped from 205 to 95
--intensity 15 --lookup-gap 2 --worksize 256 --expiry 10 --scan-time 1 --gpu-threads 1 --vectors 1 --thread-concurrency 32768 --shaders 1792 --no-submit-stale
|
|
|
|
NickPortland
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
February 28, 2014, 04:49:56 PM |
|
Hash rate just halved !
Changing settings now. What to? I=11? okay I have my 7950's doing 125 Kh/s each no HW errors I'm running -w 512 -I 18 -TC 35k-40k 1050/1500 and 1080/1600 clocks Really just changed the TC and dropped intensity as I was running 19. Tc in the 35k -40K range not changing WU yet. Can't say whats optimal there atm Ye, with g2 I=11 is too low and I=12 too high(HW errors). Maybe your method with g1 and I=18 is the only doable at this particular N-factor stage.
|
Official Ambassador for UTC-PND relations *donations here* UTC: Ujff1xrc8brmHkRaFG3BcG5nVScXdh5Wu1 BTC: 159uuxJCfUsG44N52NUsydi2bCNeFSYyTi
|
|
|
pieterjanvh
|
|
February 28, 2014, 04:51:06 PM |
|
Hash rate just halved !
Changing settings now. What to? I=11? okay I have my 7950's doing 125 Kh/s each no HW errors I'm running -w 512 -I 18 -TC 35k-40k 1050/1500 and 1080/1600 clocks Really just changed the TC and dropped intensity as I was running 19. Tc in the 35k -40K range not changing WU yet. Can't say whats optimal there atm What's your WU?
|
|
|
|
cointradero
|
|
February 28, 2014, 04:52:54 PM |
|
I can only comment on 290/290x cards right now. but they didn't seem to require any changes.
I'm getting 194 at 1070/1500 out of one 290x. The other two I'm getting 205.6 at 1100/1500. The 290 is runnung at 180 at 1050/1500.
Intensity still 19 on all of them. 0 hardware errors. Difficulty is falling off a cliff right now which makes me think most people mine with 7970/280x.
|
|
|
|
Protagonus
|
|
February 28, 2014, 04:53:05 PM |
|
Ye, with g2 I=11 is too low and I=12 too high(HW errors). Maybe your method with g1 and I=18 is the only doable at this particular N-factor stage. Yeah sorry I forgot to say G1, I assumed with that High TC all would know. It's G1 95 is pretty low for 7950 WU is 120 per card 343 (for 3) . Pool varying shown rate between 650-850 (6 total gpu)
|
|
|
|
fredeq
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1537
Merit: 1005
|
|
February 28, 2014, 04:54:07 PM |
|
Lucky you. My 290 only work with I12, down from I20.
It may be result of me running 4gb or ram. I cannot get 28k+ TC.
|
|
|
|
Jmattes
|
|
February 28, 2014, 04:54:49 PM |
|
Both the 270 and 280x needed to go to i11 to run...
atleast there running..
where did coinbase go!!
I went to withdraw my btc.. its pending.. then it got cancelled only they could do that.. then i put the request in again.. waiting.. waiting.. now the site is gone!
|
|
|
|
joawaywego
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 9
Merit: 0
|
|
February 28, 2014, 04:55:23 PM |
|
ugh...had to set -I 12 to get rid of HW errors. I have 3x 7950s each at 66kh right now.
|
|
|
|
cointradero
|
|
February 28, 2014, 04:57:50 PM |
|
Lucky you. My 290 only work with I12, down from I20.
It may be result of me running 4gb or ram. I cannot get 28k+ TC.
I'm only running 24000 TC on all of mine.
|
|
|
|
flashg
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 16
Merit: 0
|
|
February 28, 2014, 04:59:16 PM |
|
Hash rate just halved !
Changing settings now. What to? I=11? okay I have my 7950's doing 125 Kh/s each no HW errors I'm running -w 512 -I 18 -TC 35k-40k 1050/1500 and 1080/1600 clocks Really just changed the TC and dropped intensity as I was running 19. Tc in the 35k -40K range not changing WU yet. Can't say whats optimal there atm Ye, with g2 I=11 is too low and I=12 too high(HW errors). Maybe your method with g1 and I=18 is the only doable at this particular N-factor stage. Yeah sorry I forgot to say G1, I assumed with that High TC all would know. It's G1 7950 with 3Gb ram here, after the new N factor I've changed the following: Thread concurrency from 16384 to 32768 Intensity from 17 to 15 No Hw errors Hash dropped from 205 to 95 Tips welcome 95 is pretty low for 7950 Hash rate just halved !
Changing settings now. What to? I=11? okay I have my 7950's doing 125 Kh/s each no HW errors I'm running -w 512 -I 18 -TC 35k-40k 1050/1500 and 1080/1600 clocks Really just changed the TC and dropped intensity as I was running 19. Tc in the 35k -40K range not changing WU yet. Can't say whats optimal there atm What's your WU? WU is 120 per card 343 (for 3) . Pool varying shown rate between 650-850 (6 total gpu) Yes 95Khs is low, but it's a Sapphire card with inadequate cooling.Temp is around 57 and I'm fine with these temps. Don't want to fry the GPU.It's also undervolted to VDCC 0.962 with std clock speeds.
|
|
|
|
regnevacs
|
|
February 28, 2014, 05:01:00 PM |
|
Bingo on my 280xs... running 130+ each no HW errors.. still trying to figure out how it can increase more..
|
|
|
|
|