Scrypt.CC | Scrypt Cloud Mining

[ThorSWO]

I haven't lost money in Scrypt.cc

All my withdraws are fulfilled.

Same here.
2 deposits still stuck, but i'm sure they'll hit my account today.

[1714834794]

1714834794

[clownius]

I haven't lost money in Scrypt.cc

All my withdraws are fulfilled.

Same here.
2 deposits still stuck, but i'm sure they'll hit my account today.

You must be the only two.

The only two still stupid enough to shill for scam.cc

[CanariAnali]

I haven't lost money in Scrypt.cc

All my withdraws are fulfilled.

Same here.
2 deposits still stuck, but i'm sure they'll hit my account today.

You must be the only two.

The only two still stupid enough to shill for scam.cc

3

[scryptongoloidhuhuhu]

I haven't lost money in Scrypt.cc

All my withdraws are fulfilled.

Same here.
2 deposits still stuck, but i'm sure they'll hit my account today.

You must be the only two.

The only two still stupid enough to shill for scam.cc

https://i.imgur.com/fL4Czmw.jpg?1

[avalonboy]

Ok they pay after restart or no?

[Shinpako09]

really lol.. I just found out today that there still people who doesn't know scrypt.cc is a big scam as well as COINSERA.

[CanariAnali]

 

really lol.. I just found out today that there still people who doesn't know scrypt.cc is a big scam as well as COINSERA.

who knows  

I just found out that some people don't know how it works 

[LMGTFY]

That word, "FACT". It would be more useful if it was backed by - you know - an actual fact.

I think what you really meant to say was something like "Two posters claim to have been paid by scrypt.cc but many, many more claim the exact opposite. Is scrypt.cc is being selective about who it pays? Can you afford to take the risk?"

The thing is, when you post breathlessly enthusiastic posts like you do, you're encouraging others to take risks. You're complicit in any losses they make. And yet, reading what so many people have posted here, you seem quite happy to continue to paint a rosy picture. That's pretty shameful.

[suchmoon]

deposits still dont work .   admin doesnt know what the frack they are doing

so this scrypt cc is dead ?
am i late to join this cloudmining ?
i calculate buy mhs and i get faster ROI than hashnet

YOU CANNOT WITHDRAW !!!!!!!!

Thank's for your reply/coment that can help me
now im research to other cloudmining (where i can get fast ROI + profit )

Screw Scrypt CC.

So far, the best option I have found for fast ROI + profit that seems legit, is Stakeminers. It is not conventional cloud mining, but POS. All investments are put together to stake as much as possible and maximize profit, and then we reap the rewards. The nature of the beast holds the potential of increasing rewards over time, instead of decreasing them. Read up on staking if you don't know the difference between POW and POS mining, and give Stakeminers a try In my opinion it is not selling a pipe dream, but a rather good business model that benefits all parties.

I don't see the added benefit of pooling coins in a POS setting above doing it yourself in your wallet. Well, minus the work that it saves you.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but staking solo is only more lucrative if you have huge amounts of BTC and know what you are doing (takes a bit of work). You will be able to stake more effectively and gain higher rewards when pooling together, as each contributor's "staking power" and interest rates will compound and benefit each other. Even when the pool grows, it yields higher rewards in spite of a lessened weight percent of the staking.

Im not sure where you get that from.  Advertising from some POS staking site that probably takes a percentage of income fromn staking as fees?

I am referring to the service in this thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=989670.0. I cannot vouch for it yet though, I have only invested a sum to test it before making any further conclusions. I believe there are no fees. POS staking requires no electricity in particular or hardware, so it's a different kind of story than conventional cloud mining.

You believe there are no fees?

https://stakeminers.com/terms.php

8.4. A Withdraw Penalty will be imposed for investors wishing to withdraw their investment with StakeMiners. The schedule for such a withdraw is as follows. Investments Withdrawn Within 30 days 30% Penalty, Investments Withdrawn Within 60 days 20% Penalty, Investments Withdrawn Within 90 days 10% Penalty, Investments Withdrawn Within 120 to 364 1/4 days 5% Penalty. Investments withdrawn after 365 days will receive a 2% Penalty.

Most of the Terms have been plagiarized from CEX, so that kind of shows you the overall quality of the operation.

https://forum.gethashing.com/t/pos-mining-stakeminers/3925/969

The owner is a habitual liar, claiming to be Bitcoin's early adopter since 2009 and an experienced Forex trader too, although just a year ago was roaming various forums saying he was a newbie in both.

https://forum.gethashing.com/t/pos-mining-stakeminers/3925/970

Not to mention he runs a self-moderated thread here and deletes any questions he doesn't like. So I guess in a way that makes it a suitable replacement for scrypt.cc. Depends on what your lesson here is.

Do you think it is normal to throw money at questionable sites and/or individuals that claim quick "ROI".

Or do you think doing a bit of due diligence is a prerequisite for any kind of investment.

Your choice.

[suchmoon]

I haven't lost money in Scrypt.cc

All my withdraws are fulfilled.

Same here.
2 deposits still stuck, but i'm sure they'll hit my account today.

You must be the only two.

The only two still stupid enough to shill for scam.cc

3

Oh nice, the shills numbered themselves. I'm really happy to be able to refer to ThorSWO "the screenshot guru" as number two, a very fitting title.

[scryptongoloidhuhuhu]

https://i.imgur.com/fL4Czmw.jpg?1

That word, "FACT". It would be more useful if it was backed by - you know - an actual fact.

I think what you really meant to say was something like "Two posters claim to have been paid by scrypt.cc but many, many more claim the exact opposite. Is scrypt.cc is being selective about who it pays? Can you afford to take the risk?"

The thing is, when you post breathlessly enthusiastic posts like you do, you're encouraging others to take risks. You're complicit in any losses they make. And yet, reading what so many people have posted here, you seem quite happy to continue to paint a rosy picture. That's pretty shameful.

These are my current fulfilled withdrawals.

https://i.imgur.com/4ZtWGKJ.jpg?1

https://i.imgur.com/tvVNofT.jpg?1

https://i.imgur.com/BWXYFXy.jpg?1

[LMGTFY]

These are my current fulfilled withdrawals.

Awesome. But you've not addressed anything I said in my post.

Edit: quote tree pruned.

[ThePhwner]

Screw Scrypt CC.

So far, the best option I have found for fast ROI + profit that seems legit, is Stakeminers. It is not conventional cloud mining, but POS. All investments are put together to stake as much as possible and maximize profit, and then we reap the rewards. The nature of the beast holds the potential of increasing rewards over time, instead of decreasing them. Read up on staking if you don't know the difference between POW and POS mining, and give Stakeminers a try In my opinion it is not selling a pipe dream, but a rather good business model that benefits all parties.

I don't see the added benefit of pooling coins in a POS setting above doing it yourself in your wallet. Well, minus the work that it saves you.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but staking solo is only more lucrative if you have huge amounts of BTC and know what you are doing (takes a bit of work). You will be able to stake more effectively and gain higher rewards when pooling together, as each contributor's "staking power" and interest rates will compound and benefit each other. Even when the pool grows, it yields higher rewards in spite of a lessened weight percent of the staking.

Im not sure where you get that from.  Advertising from some POS staking site that probably takes a percentage of income fromn staking as fees?

In this case run by known scammer Leroy Fodor. But there's already a scam accusation thread open and well attended for StakeMiners so that's a story for another day.

[scryptongoloidhuhuhu]

These are my current fulfilled withdrawals.

https://i.imgur.com/4ZtWGKJ.jpg?1

https://i.imgur.com/tvVNofT.jpg?1

https://i.imgur.com/BWXYFXy.jpg?1

Awesome. But you've not addressed anything I said in my post.

Edit: quote tree pruned.

Well how can I know if Scc is being selective into whom it pays? What I know is that it paid its users. Some users with btc in their hot wallets got reinvested and they say that it got cancelled but it really wasn't cancelled because it got reinvested by the magically turned-on autobuy feature.

Risks? I do not encourage anyone to invest at scryptcc, what I cannot accept is the accusation that it does not pay because it does pay.

[LMGTFY]

Well how can I know if Scc is being selective into whom it pays? What I know is that it paid its users. Some users with btc in their hot wallets got reinvested and they say that it got cancelled but it really wasn't cancelled because it got reinvested by the magically turned-on autobuy feature.

Risks? I do not encourage anyone to invest at scryptcc, what I cannot accept is the accusation that it does not pay because it does pay.

Well how can I know if Scc is being selective into whom it pays? What I know is that it paid its users.

Because you can read, because you've read people here say that they've not been paid. You know that you can't say with complete confidence that "Scrypt.cc pays. FACT". You know that some people haven't been paid, yet you claim otherwise.

What I know is that it paid its users.

Except you don't. Unless you're just posting here and not actually reading anything.

Some users with btc in their hot wallets got reinvested and they say that it got cancelled but it really wasn't cancelled because it got reinvested by the magically turned-on autobuy feature.

So their withdrawals were cancelled and "reinvested". They wanted to make a withdrawal, but they were unable. It is not at all clear to me how you can seriously claim that cancelled withdrawals were anything other than cancelled. They wanted their money back - they were prevented from getting their money back.

Risks? I do not encourage anyone to invest at scryptcc, what I cannot accept is the accusation that it does not pay because it does pay.

Except it doesn't pay everyone, and by failing to acknowledge that you're promoting the ideas that it's safe to invest at scrypt.cc - and, again, if you read this thread you can see that that's not something you can say with any confidence.

[scryptongoloidhuhuhu]

Well how can I know if Scc is being selective into whom it pays? What I know is that it paid its users. Some users with btc in their hot wallets got reinvested and they say that it got cancelled but it really wasn't cancelled because it got reinvested by the magically turned-on autobuy feature.

Risks? I do not encourage anyone to invest at scryptcc, what I cannot accept is the accusation that it does not pay because it does pay.

Well how can I know if Scc is being selective into whom it pays? What I know is that it paid its users.

Because you can read, because you've read people here say that they've not been paid. You know that you can't say with complete confidence that "Scrypt.cc pays. FACT". You know that some people haven't been paid, yet you claim otherwise.

What I know is that it paid its users.

Except you don't. Unless you're just posting here and not actually reading anything.

Some users with btc in their hot wallets got reinvested and they say that it got cancelled but it really wasn't cancelled because it got reinvested by the magically turned-on autobuy feature.

So their withdrawals were cancelled and "reinvested". They wanted to make a withdrawal, but they were unable. It is not at all clear to me how you can seriously claim that cancelled withdrawals were anything other than cancelled. They wanted their money back - they were prevented from getting their money back.

Risks? I do not encourage anyone to invest at scryptcc, what I cannot accept is the accusation that it does not pay because it does pay.

Except it doesn't pay everyone, and by failing to acknowledge that you're promoting the ideas that it's safe to invest at scrypt.cc - and, again, if you read this thread you can see that that's not something you can say with any confidence.

people here say that they've not been paid

You really wouldn't know that for a fact.

not actually reading anything.

Some users reported here that they were paid including me.

cancelled withdrawals were anything other than cancelled.

The most probable cause of that is the reinvestment.

Except it doesn't pay everyone

It pays, only most users are just so panicky that they took losses selling their hashes at low price, most did it making the price low, which some of that I bought, I can't miss the bargain hashes.

[LMGTFY]

people here say that they've not been paid

You really wouldn't know that for a fact?

not actually reading anything.

Some users reported here that they were paid including me.

cancelled withdrawals were anything other than cancelled.

The most probable cause of that is the reinvestment.

Except it doesn't pay everyone

It pays, only most users are just so panicky that they took losses selling their hashes at low price, most did it making the price low, which some of that I bought, I can't miss the bargain hashes.

Correct. I do not know whether all these people are telling the truth. I do not know whether you're telling the truth, either, by the way. I'm giving everyone the benefit of the doubt.

Yes, some users reported that they'd been paid. I believe I noted that several posts back. And some users reported that they hadn't been paid. "Scrypt.cc pays. FACT" doesn't really seem to chime with these two statements, does it?

I don't think I can help you understand the non-withdrawal thing. If someone applies for a withdrawal, they expect a withdrawal. If something else happens and they don't receive their withdrawal, they're not happy. They had requested a withdrawal and it didn't happen - it was, in fact, cancelled.

Your point about payment, absolutely. If you said that up front, instead of unambiguous statements like "Scrypt.cc pays. FACT", I'd have some respect for you. It's your complete lack of any critique, your complete inability to take on board what other people are saying, that makes me wonder whether you're entirely genuine.

[Soylent_Green]

Oh, Scrypt.cc pay. That is true.

Using the money from the disappeared withdrawals.

There are at least 150 BTC vanished.

They show as processed but never hit the blockchain.
They are just gone.

I would ask anyone who still sends money politely for something.

Please never get children.
We really have enough idiots in the world.

[christophorus]

Why would people lie and say they hadn't been paid? That doesn't make sense.

If this site wasn't a scam I'd be encouraging more and more people to join in. The more who join means there's less MHS (neé KHS) to go around. The scarcer the resource gets the more value it has. The value of my account would go up the more people there are trying to join the party.

By saying the site is a scam people aren't trying to cheat anyone out of money. They're trying to stop you losing money. Yes, you've got paid but that seems to be a mistake rather than the norm.

This site is a scam. Pure and simple.

[ThePhwner]

Why would people lie and say they hadn't been paid? That doesn't make sense.

If this site wasn't a scam I'd be encouraging more and more people to join in. The more who join means there's less MHS (neé KHS) to go around. The scarcer the resource gets the more value it has. The value of my account would go up the more people there are trying to join the party.

By saying the site is a scam people aren't trying to cheat anyone out of money. They're trying to stop you losing money. Yes, you've got paid but that seems to be a mistake rather than the norm.

This site is a scam. Pure and simple.

I think it's safe to start assuming that "got paid" in this scenario simply means "Marcelo hasn't stolen quite everything from me yet."