Scrypt.CC | Scrypt Cloud Mining

[Soylent_Green]

Rewards again reduced by 30%

But hidden. The Ticks are normal, but if you watch the Balance you see that 30% are missing.

Lol.

People in IRC freaking out right now.

So glad i'm out of this mess.

[1714679685]

1714679685

[scumbag]

I still have some MHS left in this site.
I can't withdraw because every time I check how much BTC is left from the rewards, it turned to MHS.

[AizenSou]

Rewards again reduced by 30%

But hidden. The Ticks are normal, but if you watch the Balance you see that 30% are missing.

Lol.

People in IRC freaking out right now.

So glad i'm out of this mess.

I can't stop laughing although I lost around 40 BTCs for this shit. Sorry for people who lost too.

You got CLEANED by TheCultGame.

[cesmak]

No dyask in my moraliy there is no minor or major theft, a theft is a theft and this is a real big serious problem, tring to consider two tefth with two different measures, make you at my eye, not a moral person.....

Very impractical.   While I agree theft is theft, it isn't reasonable to worry the same about every theft.   Someone that steals a carrot from your garden in your open yard doesn't warrant the concern that someone that steals your car does.     

It is very easy for someone that doesn't have a stake in the game to scream bloody murder over a minor loss.   The people trying to unwind from a position are in a different boat.   I don't like it and I want it fixed and returned, but I much rather have all my BTC out.   It is a simple matter of perspective. 

After the hack we lost all earnings for weeks and when they were restored it was only at 20%.   That is major.    That is much more important. 

In this case is not comparing a carrot in an open yard with a vault in a bank, is all inside the same site, that is manipulated by the admin at his will, and you don't have the rules of the game, and for me remains two equally theft, and glad to be out also if i've lost months and months ago quite half a btc....

robbing money is immoral, is not a real open market, where loss you can count for market rollercoasting that happens for the rule of economy, here the admins tomorrow decide a new rule, and you loose other money...

Do you understand that your money are just lost at all until the first signs with the "what so claimed" power outage...

form there, there was no a real market, no real rules, no free will....

You are fighting (to recover your money) with windmill...

Worry about your own money, I'll worry about mine. 

Good luck with your money invested here..... 

[leps]

lol no withdraws for me for 3 weeks it stays in que for 2-3 days than bum gone

[Obada8]

Has any one Login Again ??

[Meepers]

lol no withdraws for me for 3 weeks it stays in que for 2-3 days than bum gone

Me, too.

[ThePhwner]

Just to clarify, there are now people, yorll in particular, taking the position that if we're not currently invested in the scam, we don't "have the right" to discuss and/or point out the scam nature of it. So because I invested briefly in ScryptCC, saw through the bullshit, and backed out, I no longer have the right to comment?

Hang on while I laugh my ass off. If you really find that to be true, then feel free to contact the IC3 and tell them you're sad because you don't like what the bigger boy said about your PonziParty. I'll wait.

By your logic, it's fine to start a scam and take people's coins, the only issues arise when people, who by your weird moral compass don't 'have the right' to comment, choose to.

My 12 year old stepson does the same thing when I point out he's doing something wrong. It's a classic deflection tactic. Just like talking about Paycoin or LTCGear or hinging on one of the elements that make this a scam while ignoring the other 20.

And ddysak while you're on another one of your rants about how much I post, why don't you do a post count for the past, say 8 pages, and see how much of it is your drivel?

Until there's proof of mining from ScryptCC none of you shills and idiots have a defensible position. And dysak, to your point about it being hard to prove mining with ASICs... it's actually quite simple if you're really mining. Especially on your own pools. Nice little thing we call a coinbase. To me the hashrate analysis proves that there's no mining because you can't hide hash; it would be a trivial task to put custom coinbases in blocks mined to prove mining. Of course that assumes that, you are actually mining.


This is the 3rd PM from dysak being upset about my negative trust in him. I'm not responding in PM and I've already laid out my criteria for removing my negative trust from his profile.

It's not about anything between you and me dysak, its about your distortion of reality around ScryptCC. Disprove my claims, and the negative trust will be removed. Post whatever you want on my profile.

I'm just trying to be reasonable.   When you what your negative trust removed, just message me and I'll remove it as long as you also remove it from me.

That is fair and reasonable.   If you never take me up on the offer that is fine.  

Sincerely,
  dyask

[rhok666]

Just to clarify, there are now people, yorll in particular, taking the position that if we're not currently invested in the scam, we don't "have the right" to discuss and/or point out the scam nature of it. So because I invested briefly in ScryptCC, saw through the bullshit, and backed out, I no longer have the right to comment?

Hang on while I laugh my ass off. If you really find that to be true, then feel free to contact the IC3 and tell them you're sad because you don't like what the bigger boy said about your PonziParty. I'll wait.

By your logic, it's fine to start a scam and take people's coins, the only issues arise when people, who by your weird moral compass don't 'have the right' to comment, choose to.

My 12 year old stepson does the same thing when I point out he's doing something wrong. It's a classic deflection tactic. Just like talking about Paycoin or LTCGear or hinging on one of the elements that make this a scam while ignoring the other 20.

And ddysak while you're on another one of your rants about how much I post, why don't you do a post count for the past, say 8 pages, and see how much of it is your drivel?

Until there's proof of mining from ScryptCC none of you shills and idiots have a defensible position.


This is the 3rd PM from dysak being upset about my negative trust in him. I'm not responding in PM and I've already laid out my criteria for removing my negative trust from his profile. It's not about anything between you and me dysak, its about your distortion of reality around ScryptCC. Disprove my claims, and the negative trust will be removed. Post whatever you want on my profile.

I'm just trying to be reasonable.   When you what your negative trust removed, just message me and I'll remove it as long as you also remove it from me.

That is fair and reasonable.   If you never take me up on the offer that is fine.  

Sincerely,
  dyask

You are just angry about him not accepting your opinion. That is emotional. He has done nothing wrong.
It would be different if he would claim something like to get withdrawals and in reality he does not.
So he doesn't lie and has not scammed anyone.

If he wouldn't believe what he writes, he wouldn't still use scrypt.cc.

I give you a better person to be angry about.
https://btcjam.com/listings/44010-mining-expansion,-trading-and-invest-at-btcjam-%234-
He loaned 30 BTC to invest in scrypt.cc, AFTER it was obvious to be a scam

Then the rewards decreased and he had to open another loan to pay the first:
https://btcjam.com/listings/49807-refinancing:-mining-expansion,-trading-and-invest-at-btcjam-%234-

@ time of opening the loan he had 8500MH/s

#4.My investment at scrypt.cc is about 8500 MHS (=8500000 khs) with current rewards the Monthly Income: 3.54 btc.

Obviously he has no other sources of income that could pay off the debt, otherwise he wouldn't take an additional loan with 50% interest.


Now he is still reeinvesting although he can't pay the rates of the first loan:

An update:
at the moment i have about 10100 Mhs scypt mining (10100000 khs) Monthly Income: 4.21 btc (with current rewards)

When scrypt.cc will finally pay nothing he will have to default.
It is clear that it's not his intention to defraud his investors, but it will happen.

He is probably a trustworthy person but plain stupid. And this with other peoples money.

[owlcatz]

This guy?

Yeah, he's like the king of the scryptards. 

[ThePhwner]

You are just angry about him not accepting your opinion. That is emotional. He has done nothing wrong.
It would be different if he would claim something like to get withdrawals and in reality he does not.
So he doesn't lie and has not scammed anyone.

If he wouldn't believe what he writes, he wouldn't still use scrypt.cc.

I give you a better person to be angry about.
https://btcjam.com/listings/44010-mining-expansion,-trading-and-invest-at-btcjam-%234-
He loaned 30 BTC to invest in scrypt.cc, AFTER it was obvious to be a scam

[SNIP]

1. This isn't a forum for BTCJam. If investors on that platform wanted to fund a loan for gambling, that's on them.

2. The facts in evidence aren't opinions. I'm not angry because dysak doesn't agree with me, I'm frustrated because he's ignoring facts and trying to defend Marcelo's practices. The fractional mining nonsense is a distraction, as is any talk about Paycoin or LTCGear or anything not ScryptCC.  Right now I don't see a need to be tolerant of anyone claiming ScryptCC is mining at all, without any proof of mining. This isn't about feelings and opinions, it's about numbers. And dysak's numbers come from his mind and his mind only, vs publicly available numbers that prove ScryptCC isn't mining. Many of you seem to be blind to the fact that the dysak show has taken focus away from the core problem. If I stop posting will ScryptCC become less of a scam? If I give credibility to this "fractional mining" bullshit will all those people who didn't get their withdrawals suddenly get them? If I remove my negative rating from dysak's profile will Marcelo suddenly be able to prove he's mining?

I will once again state I will stop posting here if dysak can disprove my claims and put the focus back where it needs to be, namely that

PSA: scrypt.cc is a scam, most likely of the "ponzi" variety. You will lose your money if you try to "invest" or "play" or whatever you want to call your participation in this shitshow. You've been warned.

More info here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1102560.0

[ValleyOfTheWolves]

I think we can forget about Rewards going up. with so much fud already impossible.

[ThePhwner]

I think we can forget about Rewards going up. with so much fud already impossible.

LOL. You think payouts are down because of FUD? Payouts dropped during the "power issue" and haven't been back since. Dropped again during the "hack." If any FUD caused payouts to decrease it's Marcelo's FUD-speak of "power outages and hacks and DC moves OH MY."

Payouts are down because deposits are dwindling and/or Marcelo decided to keep more BTC.

[Soylent_Green]

I think we can forget about Rewards going up. with so much fud already impossible.

I would love to read the explanation of how you come to such an absurd thought construct.

But yeah, sounds totally logical.
Not Marcelo is to blame for the low rewards.
This forum is!

That just explains everything!

[ptjims]

will this shit ever end

Hell no we are having too much fun playing the I told you ---- I told you first game

[ValleyOfTheWolves]

I think we can forget about Rewards going up. with so much fud already impossible.

I would love to read the explanation of how you come to such an absurd thought construct.

But yeah, sounds totally logical.
Not Marcelo is to blame for the low rewards.
This forum is!

That just explains everything!

This forum already taken over by 4/5 people claiming scrypt.cc scam ponzi .. if this continue scryptcc The End in short time.

[Viper_Unleashed]

Still a minor percentage will always be left...because there is no limit to GREED

[ThorSWO]

I think we can forget about Rewards going up. with so much fud already impossible.

LOL. You think payouts are down because of FUD? Payouts dropped during the "power issue" and haven't been back since. Dropped again during the "hack." If any FUD caused payouts to decrease it's Marcelo's FUD-speak of "power outages and hacks and DC moves OH MY."

Payouts are down because deposits are dwindling and/or Marcelo decided to keep more BTC.

Wrong once again, dumbass.
Rates normalized after the electricity issue.

[Soylent_Green]

Wrong once again, dumbass.
Rates normalized after the electricity issue.

Reward before that, was between 17.7 and 18.3.
Just for the log: It is 1.4 now.

50 Pages later you still talking shit.
Never gets boring, eh?

[ThePhwner]

I think we can forget about Rewards going up. with so much fud already impossible.

LOL. You think payouts are down because of FUD? Payouts dropped during the "power issue" and haven't been back since. Dropped again during the "hack." If any FUD caused payouts to decrease it's Marcelo's FUD-speak of "power outages and hacks and DC moves OH MY."

Payouts are down because deposits are dwindling and/or Marcelo decided to keep more BTC.

Wrong once again, dumbass.
Rates normalized after the electricity issue.

Yeah ok sure. What about them plummeting after the "hack," dropping when LTC mining difficulty dropped, dropping when LTC price spiked, and still being a pittance of what they were, with the last claim from admin on 7/20 being that they would return to normal rates? Care to attempt to explain those reward drops away? BTW disagreeing with one portion of an argument and ignoring the rest, is just that - myopic and incomplete. Try again.