Bitcoin Forum
April 26, 2024, 10:01:47 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 [757] 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 ... 1035 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] [MINT] Mintcoin (POS / 5%) [NO ICO] [Fair distro, community maintained]  (Read 1369739 times)
paspi
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 185
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 04, 2014, 02:12:25 PM
 #15121

Theres is absolutely no need for android wallet to stake in my opinion.
With an average stake age of 30 days, this would be something totally pointless. I would trade mobile staking to better battery life without a doubt!

+1

In my opinion, your opinion hits the nail on the head. Couldn't agree more.
Although staking is unnecessary for phone use, tablets will benefit from staking. You would be able to keep your whole wallet on your tablet.

Staking won't be included in the initial release of the app, but it'll be added with an update in a couple of weeks, hopefully within 20 days of its release. This is very easy because everything required for staking is included in the library. But our first target for the android wallet should be stability, usability and marketing.

I'm thinking of preventing staking of any transaction smaller than a fixed amount, so CPU cycles and battery won't be wasted for trying to stake 1 MINT.

MINT: MdPQhsGufjm5AXYkHebbnF2A155xDqVfK7
"I'm sure that in 20 years there will either be very large transaction volume or no volume." -- Satoshi
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714125707
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714125707

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714125707
Reply with quote  #2

1714125707
Report to moderator
1714125707
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714125707

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714125707
Reply with quote  #2

1714125707
Report to moderator
acceptance2
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 453
Merit: 250



View Profile WWW
June 04, 2014, 02:43:58 PM
 #15122

Theres is absolutely no need for android wallet to stake in my opinion.
With an average stake age of 30 days, this would be something totally pointless. I would trade mobile staking to better battery life without a doubt!

+1

In my opinion, your opinion hits the nail on the head. Couldn't agree more.
Although staking is unnecessary for phone use, tablets will benefit from staking. You would be able to keep your whole wallet on your tablet.

Staking won't be included in the initial release of the app, but it'll be added with an update in a couple of weeks, hopefully within 20 days of its release. This is very easy because everything required for staking is included in the library. But our first target for the android wallet should be stability, usability and marketing.

I'm thinking of preventing staking of any transaction smaller than a fixed amount, so CPU cycles and battery won't be wasted for trying to stake 1 MINT.

Sounds like a good idea.

I'll be using my computer only for staking and my phone and tablet for sharing and spending.

I suspect that will be the case for most people, I could be wrong.
rlm42
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490
Merit: 250



View Profile
June 04, 2014, 03:37:03 PM
 #15123

Well I just checked the rich list for the first time in a while, and looks like the top addresses have been accumulating a LOT for a long time.. top 50 addresses hold almost 50% of the market, not sure if that is normal? If i'm not wrong I believe we should some huge rises in the future? Just need these whales to play the cards right.. I will continue to stake my little amount  Wink
lcmines
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 91
Merit: 10


View Profile
June 04, 2014, 03:49:26 PM
 #15124

Well I just checked the rich list for the first time in a while, and looks like the top addresses have been accumulating a LOT for a long time.. top 50 addresses hold almost 50% of the market, not sure if that is normal? If i'm not wrong I believe we should some huge rises in the future? Just need these whales to play the cards right.. I will continue to stake my little amount  Wink

Remember that the biggest addresses are those of exchanges.
rlm42
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490
Merit: 250



View Profile
June 04, 2014, 03:52:31 PM
 #15125

Surely some in those top 10 or 20 are people though? or is it first 27 are exchanges ?
lcmines
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 91
Merit: 10


View Profile
June 04, 2014, 04:05:21 PM
 #15126

Surely some in those top 10 or 20 are people though? or is it first 27 are exchanges ?

Could be, would have to check out the blockchain and see which of the biggest addresses are sending out chucks of coins in regular intervals, those would most likely be your exchages. And any addresses acting as black holes would be your accumulators.


Although, a cold storage for an exchange would look like accumulation too, so hard to tell.


The point we can be sure of though, is that Mint will be raising.
lcmines
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 91
Merit: 10


View Profile
June 04, 2014, 06:09:41 PM
Last edit: June 04, 2014, 06:27:48 PM by lcmines
 #15127

One concern I have for the POS of MINT is the 20 day maturity requirement for Staking (network support).

In the current coin market 20 days is quite a long time to wait before a wallet can start to support a network that depends solely on staking to verify transactions.

If Mint is poised to take off, thats going to cause a lot of days to be killed and leave even less coins being staked causing the network to slow down even more.



If possible might be a good idea to create two stages of staking, a short term and long term. Of course the short term would give a much smaller return but would allow for a much larger network of support.

Just a little brainstorming. I'm not one to understand the details of the implantation of such a wallet. But I couldn't help notice this situation as the current wallet is taking over 24 hours almost a full day to sync.
skeem
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 229
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 04, 2014, 06:55:03 PM
 #15128

One concern I have for the POS of MINT is the 20 day maturity requirement for Staking (network support).

In the current coin market 20 days is quite a long time to wait before a wallet can start to support a network that depends solely on staking to verify transactions.

If Mint is poised to take off, thats going to cause a lot of days to be killed and leave even less coins being staked causing the network to slow down even more.



If possible might be a good idea to create two stages of staking, a short term and long term. Of course the short term would give a much smaller return but would allow for a much larger network of support.

Just a little brainstorming. I'm not one to understand the details of the implantation of such a wallet. But I couldn't help notice this situation as the current wallet is taking over 24 hours almost a full day to sync.

That is great.

But I suggest only one day of staking, canceling the long term stage.

Coin Revolution
Xpedite
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 258
Merit: 250


DRAMA: Dumb Retards Asking More Attention


View Profile
June 04, 2014, 06:57:07 PM
 #15129

It's starting to look better , volumes are increasing and sell wall of 5 satoshi is a little over two BTC for mintpal and cryptsy combined...

 Wink
bamsterdam
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 453
Merit: 261


Look Morty magic internet money


View Profile
June 04, 2014, 07:21:02 PM
 #15130

One concern I have for the POS of MINT is the 20 day maturity requirement for Staking (network support).

In the current coin market 20 days is quite a long time to wait before a wallet can start to support a network that depends solely on staking to verify transactions.

If Mint is poised to take off, thats going to cause a lot of days to be killed and leave even less coins being staked causing the network to slow down even more.



If possible might be a good idea to create two stages of staking, a short term and long term. Of course the short term would give a much smaller return but would allow for a much larger network of support.

Just a little brainstorming. I'm not one to understand the details of the implantation of such a wallet. But I couldn't help notice this situation as the current wallet is taking over 24 hours almost a full day to sync.

That is great.

But I suggest only one day of staking, canceling the long term stage.

I also think stake is to high. Any comment on this from the Dev? 
Dallas5
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 364
Merit: 250


View Profile WWW
June 04, 2014, 07:34:48 PM
 #15131

One concern I have for the POS of MINT is the 20 day maturity requirement for Staking (network support).

In the current coin market 20 days is quite a long time to wait before a wallet can start to support a network that depends solely on staking to verify transactions.

Just keep it at 20 days, if you stake to fast, creating much more blocks in a year, maybe there will be to many new blocks each day and it will cause problems for the blockchain.

What I like about the upcoming android app, is that it doesn't have to download the whole blockchain before you can use it. At least I think you don't need to?

I just downloaded the mintcoin wallet to another pc and one of the things that bothers me, which goes for all altcoins, is that it needs the whole block chain before you can receive mintcoins. So I propose another idea, mintcoin wallet light a portable wallet which stores info in the same directory as the exe (not in appdata) and doesn't need to download the whole blockchain to receive and send mintcoins.

CoinBounties
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 04, 2014, 07:47:54 PM
 #15132


Still got bounties to complete lets get it guys!
skeem
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 229
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 04, 2014, 08:42:05 PM
 #15133

One concern I have for the POS of MINT is the 20 day maturity requirement for Staking (network support).

In the current coin market 20 days is quite a long time to wait before a wallet can start to support a network that depends solely on staking to verify transactions.

If Mint is poised to take off, thats going to cause a lot of days to be killed and leave even less coins being staked causing the network to slow down even more.



If possible might be a good idea to create two stages of staking, a short term and long term. Of course the short term would give a much smaller return but would allow for a much larger network of support.

Just a little brainstorming. I'm not one to understand the details of the implantation of such a wallet. But I couldn't help notice this situation as the current wallet is taking over 24 hours almost a full day to sync.

That is great.

But I suggest only one day of staking, canceling the long term stage.

I also think stake is to high. Any comment on this from the Dev? 

Another problem I care about is that mintcoin has no FreeBSD native version. I seriouly care about this.

Coin Revolution
Crindon
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434
Merit: 250



View Profile
June 04, 2014, 08:46:04 PM
 #15134

I think it would be a good idea for someone to do a PRWeb campaign after mintcointeam announces the official big news.

If another major news site grabs it and it goes mainstream, the whales will think that the mainstream people will buy in, so that the whale will buy in big early on.

This could shatter all previous price records. We won't stop at 200 satoshis, but higher.
Tyke
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1441
Merit: 1161


View Profile
June 04, 2014, 09:07:15 PM
 #15135

Mintcoin is in my book called Cryptocurrency "The Alt-ernative".  Here is first draft of IFC:


https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=356065.msg7131241#msg7131241


Mintcoin will look similar to this.  Coin specifications, history, exchanges and other miscellaneous details will be included.  Please help fund the publication of this book which I plan to publish this summer.  

MZKhgDfWYxfWpkpC9Jn6ZtpBQduBSKvfet


litemaster
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 169
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 05, 2014, 12:02:17 AM
 #15136

One concern I have for the POS of MINT is the 20 day maturity requirement for Staking (network support).

In the current coin market 20 days is quite a long time to wait before a wallet can start to support a network that depends solely on staking to verify transactions.

If Mint is poised to take off, thats going to cause a lot of days to be killed and leave even less coins being staked causing the network to slow down even more.



If possible might be a good idea to create two stages of staking, a short term and long term. Of course the short term would give a much smaller return but would allow for a much larger network of support.

Just a little brainstorming. I'm not one to understand the details of the implantation of such a wallet. But I couldn't help notice this situation as the current wallet is taking over 24 hours almost a full day to sync.

That is great.

But I suggest only one day of staking, canceling the long term stage.

I also think stake is to high. Any comment on this from the Dev? 

Another problem I care about is that mintcoin has no FreeBSD native version. I seriouly care about this.

YES, should have wallets for Win, Mac, Ubuntu, Android and other Linix distros if possible.
Also a Armory type of interface with paper backups etc... and tons of security would be awesome.


BITCOIN: 13UY67yfRjRVMR6hauZJbauHiDfeM2qXSg
MINTCOIN: MdVzxTfLDrzdij9vpee1YJGotBahfsfmqs
ASIACOIN: AH7dunb5G99XzCNj1KnGCdPkqc27pRPfBu
jakema
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 51
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 05, 2014, 04:40:26 AM
 #15137

I had a bit of time so i made another  Grin

https://i.imgur.com/5mmabal.png

Mint - MfnNGozdXuY8MQHt8V2hM7smBGVdnLBN4y
ttyler333
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 76
Merit: 10


View Profile WWW
June 05, 2014, 05:03:48 AM
 #15138

what are the predictions? is mint coming back? thinking about buyin a few Wink

Now is a good time to buy it,
The market environment is very good now, its price will rise! Smiley

sharecoin:SWgYjAecZT38Y9pYEPbLmyjRvf8Uht7q9U
ttyler333
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 76
Merit: 10


View Profile WWW
June 05, 2014, 05:05:06 AM
 #15139

I bought half a million today , that should speak for itself  Wink

Today I bought a lot of, I am very optimistic about its prospects! Wink

sharecoin:SWgYjAecZT38Y9pYEPbLmyjRvf8Uht7q9U
Arcainis
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 28
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 05, 2014, 08:27:32 AM
 #15140

Hi!
I just downloaded the latest version of the wallet, but it doesnt seem to work. What am I doing wrong? Is there another stable version?
Cheers!
Pages: « 1 ... 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 [757] 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 ... 1035 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!