GMiner v3.42 IronFish/Radiant/Ergo+IronFish+ZIL/KAWPOW/Equihash/Cortex

[peryskop]

Same here performance slightly down

[1701216420]

1701216420

[1701216420]

1701216420

[1701216420]

1701216420

[1701216420]

1701216420

[Yarik47]

Zminer777
Version 1.06 more productive Sol/W ..
Version 1.06 - 5x GTX1070 ~ 230Sol ~ 530W ~ 0.43Sol/W
Version 1.07 - 5x GTX1070 ~ 240Sol ~ 600W ~ 0.38Sol/W
Is it possible to make a special version with new features, but with the old performance?

whats your OC settings? your efficiency should not be so low. which make/model of your 1070s?

I run my EVGA 1070 FTW at little over .50sol/w and the EVGA SC at about .465 sol/w which I have found is max efficiency for both cards using my most stable oc settings of 100/440 for the FTW cards and 100/420 for the SC cards. especially at high difficulty  efficiency becomes more important.

low efficiency ?! then tell me how much your 1070 consumes, what is the temperature and RPM of the cooling system?
It matters to me how my cards work! My 1070 consume ~ 105W and give ~46Sol/s (5x46 = 230)! they heat at the same time 52-54C(38% RPM)!

1.06:
EVGA FTW are 45 sol/s @ 89.57w
EVGA SC are 43.2 sol/s @ 92.75w

Haven't used 1.07 yet

I do not understand then your question about low rates .. you have the same and lower .. can I take screenshots?

[SSowellSVT]

Hey,

Was wondering if you could adjust the ANN for GMiner from "SafeCash" to "Genesis"

GMiner is being added to a "How to Mine" section of the GENX Wiki and would like for that portion to be updated if you can!

Thanks!

[fistsofgod]

1.07 has slightly increased performance on EVGA FTW 1070 but decreased hashrate and increased power draw on EVGA SC

[Zminer777]

Zminer777
Version 1.06 more productive Sol/W ..
Version 1.06 - 5x GTX1070 ~ 230Sol ~ 530W ~ 0.43Sol/W
Version 1.07 - 5x GTX1070 ~ 240Sol ~ 600W ~ 0.38Sol/W
Is it possible to make a special version with new features, but with the old performance?

We will optimize power efficiency in future updates.

Same here performance slightly down

1.07 has slightly increased performance on EVGA FTW 1070 but decreased hashrate and increased power draw on EVGA SC

Try increase power level, new kernels requires more power to achieve full performance

Hey,

Was wondering if you could adjust the ANN for GMiner from "SafeCash" to "Genesis"

GMiner is being added to a "How to Mine" section of the GENX Wiki and would like for that portion to be updated if you can!

Thanks!

I've updated miner's description in the first post

GMiner v1.06 vs GMiner v1.07 vs EWBF v0.6 on Equihash 144,5

Test Rig: 3 x MSI GTX 1080 SEA HAWK (GPU0, GPU1, GPU3) + GIGABYTE GTX 1080 Ti AORUS (GPU2) + EVGA GTX 1080 Ti Founders Edition (GPU4)
Take in account that EWBF display GPUs in wrong order.

EWBF v0.6 on stock settings
295 Sols, 1045W, 0.28 Sol/W
https://imgur.com/a/jUoYV3c

EWBF v0.6 OC mem +850 PL maximum
349 Sols, 1235W, 0.28 Sol/W
https://imgur.com/a/8SlJtHd

GMiner v1.06 on stock settings
325 Sols, 1030W, 0.32 Sol/W
https://imgur.com/a/wzKcW7L

GMiner v1.07 on stock settings
350 Sols, 1161W, 0.30 Sol/W
https://imgur.com/a/Tjj1ca5

GMiner v1.07 on stock settings, increased power level for 1080 Ti to maximum
362 Sols, 1285W, 0.28 Sol/W
https://imgur.com/a/6gyapsf

GMiner v1.07 OC mem +850 PL maximum
392 Sols, 1383W, 0.28 Sol/W
https://imgur.com/a/OFeKEx3

[dmitrich777]

I understand your request, we will add EWBF's API compatibility in next update.

Thank you for responsiveness!
The main advantage of Awesome Miner is the ability to change the parameters of the pool (and mining software) on the fly without going into each rig.
Yes, you added compatibility but only through an external miner. Command line remained ewbf like (exept api key), but -api part became Bminer.
Can you add bminer command line compatiblity together with bminer api compatibility?

[Zminer777]

Thank you for responsiveness!
The main advantage of Awesome Miner is the ability to change the parameters of the pool (and mining software) on the fly without going into each rig.
Yes, you added compatibility but only through an external miner. Command line remained ewbf like (exept api key), but -api part became Bminer.
Can you add bminer command line compatiblity together with bminer api compatibility?

EWBF's API is absurd, it's very hard to comply with it.
Thus we decided implement "BTMiner NebuTech compatible", because it's JSON based HTTP protocol.
We will try to support Awesome Miner better in future updates, currently we can only support it through external miner.

[reciu]

6x1060 6 GB
185 core
200 memory
71% power limit
WINDOWS

1.07 More stable sols 190-199, 560W
Vs
1.06 184-199 sols, 575W

[vrottenberg]

Dear, Zminer777, I really look forward to the function of the failover pool in pools.txt file!

[Yarik47]

Zminer777
Version 1.06 more productive Sol/W ..
Version 1.06 - 5x GTX1070 ~ 230Sol ~ 530W ~ 0.43Sol/W
Version 1.07 - 5x GTX1070 ~ 240Sol ~ 600W ~ 0.38Sol/W
Is it possible to make a special version with new features, but with the old performance?

whats your OC settings? your efficiency should not be so low. which make/model of your 1070s?

I run my EVGA 1070 FTW at little over .50sol/w and the EVGA SC at about .465 sol/w which I have found is max efficiency for both cards using my most stable oc settings of 100/440 for the FTW cards and 100/420 for the SC cards. especially at high difficulty  efficiency becomes more important.

low efficiency ?! then tell me how much your 1070 consumes, what is the temperature and RPM of the cooling system?
It matters to me how my cards work! My 1070 consume ~ 105W and give ~46Sol/s (5x46 = 230)! they heat at the same time 52-54C(38% RPM)!

1.06:
EVGA FTW are 45 sol/s @ 89.57w
EVGA SC are 43.2 sol/s @ 92.75w

Haven't used 1.07 yet

Can I get your exact settings, preferably with screenshots? Core frequency and memory? Voltage and PL? It is interesting to know how you achieved such low power consumption, 90W.

[fistsofgod]

FTW: nvidiaInspector.exe -setBaseClockOffset:12,0,100 -setMemoryClockOffset:12,0,440 -setPowerTarget:12,51
SC: nvidiaInspector.exe -setBaseClockOffset:2,0,100 -setMemoryClockOffset:2,0,420 -setPowerTarget:2,64

1.06 stats:
 FTW @ 100,440,50             
       45.1 Sol/s
       89.6 watts
 SC @ 100,420,64
       43.2 Sol/s
       92.7 watts

1.07 stats:
 FTW @ 100,440,50
       45.9 Sol/s
       90.2 watts
 FTW @ 100,440,51
       46.2 Sol/s
       91.7  watts
 SC @ 100,420,67
       44.3 Sol/s
       98.5 watts

I tied 1.07 with the original OC settings on the SC cards but power draw went up and sols went down so i tried other settings of higher power to see what happens. efficiency just went down. i also tried lower power settings, eff still decreased. I decided to use 1.06 on the SC cards and 1.07 on FTW cards.

Unfortunately I'm unable to achieve 5-10% performance increase as stated in 1.07 notes. from 1.06 at 50% power to 1.07 at 51% power sol's went up little under 3% but power also went up little over 2%. 1.07 on the FTW cards at 51% PL is about the same efficiency as 1.06 at 50% PL

still need to do more comparisons at higher pl

[Yarik47]

FTW: nvidiaInspector.exe -setBaseClockOffset:12,0,100 -setMemoryClockOffset:12,0,440 -setPowerTarget:12,51
SC: nvidiaInspector.exe -setBaseClockOffset:2,0,100 -setMemoryClockOffset:2,0,420 -setPowerTarget:2,64

1.06 stats:
 FTW @ 100,440,50             
       45.1 Sol/s
       89.6 watts
 SC @ 100,420,64
       43.2 Sol/s
       92.7 watts

1.07 stats:
 FTW @ 100,440,50
       45.9 Sol/s
       90.2 watts
 FTW @ 100,440,51
       46.2 Sol/s
       91.7  watts
 SC @ 100,420,67
       44.3 Sol/s
       98.5 watts

I tied 1.07 with the original OC settings on the SC cards but power draw went up and sols went down so i tried other settings of higher power to see what happens. efficiency just went down. i also tried lower power settings, eff still decreased. I decided to use 1.06 on the SC cards and 1.07 on FTW cards.

Unfortunately I'm unable to achieve 5-10% performance increase as stated in 1.07 notes. from 1.06 at 50% power to 1.07 at 51% power sol's went up little under 3% but power also went up little over 2%. 1.07 on the FTW cards at 51% PL is about the same efficiency as 1.06 at 50% PL

still need to do more comparisons at higher pl

Could you take a screenshot ?! I just can not get the card to work under such conditions as you write? Your FTW has a base frequency of 1067MHz! + 100=1700MHz, at such a frequency and a minimum PL, the card works at least 780Mv, and it can not be 90W .

[s-man38]

I can't mine with my RTX 2080 

[Brzina]

What PL for 1070 (asus strix) is the best fot 1.07 version of miner ? Tnx

[MinerMonitoring]

GMiner v1.07 support added for MinerMonitoring.com (https://github.com/JamesSmith2/EthControl/releases/tag/1028)

[Zminer777]

GMiner v1.07 support added for MinerMonitoring.com (https://github.com/JamesSmith2/EthControl/releases/tag/1028)

Thx, great job guys!

[Overdrive5]

Hi, Just stopping by to say thanks for your work in the asic resistant equihash algorithm arena.

We have decided to add your miner to our ZhashOS Release 3.

FYI, ZhashOS is a Power $aving Pendrive OS that also allows users to keep their Win10/7 intact.

More info and download link in 1st post:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4481713.msg40261859#msg40261859

[locoroco2337]

Hi, getting a low hash with this miner, around 25 sol/s per card (1080ti 11Gb) is this right?

Thanks

[Dznutz]

Does this support --pers auto?   I keep getting subscription failed when trying to use the it.

[Overdrive5]

Hi, getting a low hash with this miner, around 25 sol/s per card (1080ti 11Gb) is this right?

Thanks

hmmm, which algo? that seems way to low if it is 144_5. I tested Gminer 1.07 on a 1070ti and got 60 Sol/s in ZhashOS with it.

I set:

Power: 120 watts
cc: 240
mc: 1292

I think a 1080ti likes around 170 watts though.