oldgpuminer
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
|
 |
January 08, 2019, 03:10:34 AM |
|
Using --pers BEAM for the new algo? Or is it not needed?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You can see the statistics of your reports to moderators on the "Report to moderator" pages.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
Zminer777 (OP)
Member

Offline
Activity: 485
Merit: 37
|
 |
January 08, 2019, 03:58:02 AM |
|
Using --pers BEAM for the new algo? Or is it not needed? Not needed. Btw personalization string for beam is “Beam-PoW”
|
|
|
|
niooron
|
 |
January 08, 2019, 04:04:05 AM |
|
Miner exits with no error when run inside a nvidia-docker, with the nvidia/cuda image.
|
|
|
|
logitech69
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 10
Merit: 0
|
 |
January 08, 2019, 09:31:27 AM |
|
Confirmed to be working flawlessly mining BEAM 150,5 with GTX 1070 @ 12-13sol/s  For reference, I was getting 8.5-9sol/s with the official BEAM miner v9.0 Overclock settings with MSI Afterburner for the GTX 1070: Power Limit: 75 Temp Limit: 72 Core Clock: +75 Memory: +500 Fan: 70% Proof: https://imgur.com/2XC2C91Thank you for your work, keep it up!
|
|
|
|
melpheos
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 557
Merit: 5
|
 |
January 08, 2019, 09:40:21 AM |
|
Getting 23:27:23 Total Speed: 70 Sol/s Shares Accepted: 110 Rejected: 0 Power: 381W 0.18 Sol/W
6*1070ti, nice improvement if the figures are the same on the pool side. I have to wait one hour or so to confirm Edit : figures confirmed on pool side, getting around 290 sol/s at pool side with 4*6*1070ti Those are some really good numbers. What are you overclocking with? Using nvinspector to reduce voltage down to 0.6375 I have posted this kind of info here and there on the forum
|
|
|
|
evlo
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 155
Merit: 4
|
 |
January 08, 2019, 10:09:10 AM |
|
Interesting, I thought you can't go under 650mV
|
|
|
|
hashestohashes
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 63
Merit: 0
|
 |
January 08, 2019, 11:53:46 AM |
|
I can get this miner working directly to a pool. however, MiningRigRentals will not connect.
Any ideas as to why?
this in the consol:
""02:21:47 Connected to us-east01.miningrigrentals.com:3333 02:21:47 Subscribed to Stratum Server 02:21:47 Set Nonce: f800002e 02:21:47 Authorized on Stratum Server 02:21:47 Connection Error: End of file 02:21:52 Connected to us-east01.miningrigrentals.com:3333 02:21:52 Subscribed to Stratum Server 02:21:52 Set Nonce: f800002e 02:21:52 Authorized on Stratum Server 02:21:52 Connection Error: End of file 02:21:52 All user mining pools are unavailable 02:21:53 Miner terminated, watchdog will restart process after 10 seconds""
Having the same issue but I am trying to connect directly to pools, I had the same issue with Bminer.
|
|
|
|
melpheos
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 557
Merit: 5
|
 |
January 08, 2019, 12:34:01 PM Last edit: January 08, 2019, 03:55:43 PM by melpheos |
|
Interesting, I thought you can't go under 650mV
Requesting the info will always give you a minimum of 650mV but the voltage can go as low as 450mV but with settings lower than 630mV, the performance w/s doesn't increase with any algorithm I have tested so far (and you have to overclock the CPU so much, it become the limiting factor because of instability) Those are the voltagepoint for a 1070ti (probably the same for other 10* serie) but for some reason you can still use in between values nvidiaInspector.exe "-setVoltagePoints:0,450000;400000|462500;400000|475000;400000|481250;400000|493750;400000|500000;400000|512500;400000|525000;400000|531250;400000|543750; 400000|550000;400000|562500;400000|575000;400000|581250;400000|593750;400000|600000;400000|612500;400000|625000;400000|631250;400000|643750;400000|650000;400000|662500; 400000|675000;400000|681250;400000|693750;400000|700000;400000|712500;400000|725000;400000|731250;400000|743750;400000|750000;400000|762500;400000|775000;400000|781250; 400000|793750;400000|800000;400000|812500;400000|825000;400000|831250;400000|843750;400000|850000;400000|862500;400000|875000;400000|881250;400000|893750;400000|900000; 400000|912500;400000|925000;400000|931250;400000|943750;400000|950000;400000|962500;400000|975000;400000|981250;400000|993750;400000|1000000;400000|1012500;400000|1025000; 400000|1031250;400000|1043750;400000|1050000;400000|1062500;400000|1075000;400000|1081250;400000|1093750;400000|1100000;400000|1112500;400000|1125000;400000|1131250; 400000|1143750;400000|1150000;400000|1162500;400000|1175000;400000|1181250;400000|1193750;400000|1200000;400000|1212500;400000|1225000;400000|1231250;400000|1243750;400000|"
|
|
|
|
minertalk
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 38
Merit: 6
|
 |
January 08, 2019, 01:06:12 PM |
|
Confirmed to be working flawlessly mining BEAM 150,5 with GTX 1070 @ 12-13sol/s  For reference, I was getting 8.5-9sol/s with the official BEAM miner v9.0 Overclock settings with MSI Afterburner for the GTX 1070: Power Limit: 75 Temp Limit: 72 Core Clock: +75 Memory: +500 Fan: 70% Proof:  Thank you for your work, keep it up! 75% is too much power asus 1070ti here power 50% core +240 memory +700
beam-cuda-miner-1.0.0.82 9-10sols/ Gminer 13sol/s but 2% go to dev and is not open source so can be more than 2% 15:03:25 Share Accepted 15:03:47 Temperature: GPU0 47C 15:03:47 Speed: GPU0 13 Sol/s 15:03:47 Power: GPU0 88W 0.15 Sol/W 15:03:47 Total Speed: 13 Sol/s Shares Accepted: 24 Rejected: 0 Power: 88W 0.15 Sol/W 15:03:47 Uptime: 0d 00:03:00 Electricity: 0.004kWh 15:04:01 Share Accepted 15:04:02 Share Accepted 15:04:05 Share Accepted 15:04:17 Temperature: GPU0 47C 15:04:17 Speed: GPU0 14 Sol/s 15:04:17 Power: GPU0 88W 0.16 Sol/W 15:04:17 Total Speed: 14 Sol/s Shares Accepted: 27 Rejected: 0 Power: 88W 0.16 Sol/W 15:04:17 Uptime: 0d 00:03:30 Electricity: 0.005kWh 15:04:21 Share Accepted 15:04:28 Share Accepted 15:04:29 Share Accepted 15:04:30 Share Accepted 15:04:32 New Job: 6 15:04:39 Share Accepted 15:04:40 New Job: 7 15:04:44 Share Accepted 15:04:47 Temperature: GPU0 47C 15:04:47 Speed: GPU0 13 Sol/s 15:04:47 Power: GPU0 88W 0.15 Sol/W 15:04:47 Total Speed: 13 Sol/s Shares Accepted: 33 Rejected: 0 Power: 88W 0.15 Sol/W 15:04:47 Uptime: 0d 00:04:00 Electricity: 0.006kWh 15:04:48 Share Accepted 15:04:49 Share Accepted 15:05:03 Share Accepted 15:05:05 New Job: 8 15:05:08 Share Accepted 15:05:08 Share Accepted 15:05:10 New Job: 9 15:05:17 Temperature: GPU0 47C 15:05:17 Speed: GPU0 13 Sol/s 15:05:17 Power: GPU0 88W 0.15 Sol/W 15:05:17 Total Speed: 13 Sol/s Shares Accepted: 38 Rejected: 0 Power: 88W 0.15 Sol/W 15:05:17 Uptime: 0d 00:04:30 Electricity: 0.007kWh
|
|
|
|
dafuzz_rsa
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 40
Merit: 0
|
 |
January 08, 2019, 02:30:26 PM |
|
Tried running this on my 980Ti. Getting between 1-2 Sols/s on 150_5. limitation on the algo or just needs some work?
|
|
|
|
evlo
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 155
Merit: 4
|
 |
January 08, 2019, 03:23:56 PM |
|
Interesting, I thought you can't go under 650mV
Requesting the info with always give you a minimum of 650mV but the voltage can go as low as 450mV but with settings lower than 630mV, the performance w/s doesn't increase with any algorithm I have tested so far (and you have to overclock the CPU so much, it become the limiting factor because of instability) Those are the voltagepoint for a 1070ti (probably the same for other 10* serie) but for some reason you can still use in between values nvidiaInspector.exe "-setVoltagePoints:0,450000;400000|462500;400000|475000;400000|481250;400000|493750;400000|500000;400000|512500;400000|525000;400000|531250;400000|543750; 400000|550000;400000|562500;400000|575000;400000|581250;400000|593750;400000|600000;400000|612500;400000|625000;400000|631250;400000|643750;400000|650000;400000|662500; 400000|675000;400000|681250;400000|693750;400000|700000;400000|712500;400000|725000;400000|731250;400000|743750;400000|750000;400000|762500;400000|775000;400000|781250; 400000|793750;400000|800000;400000|812500;400000|825000;400000|831250;400000|843750;400000|850000;400000|862500;400000|875000;400000|881250;400000|893750;400000|900000; 400000|912500;400000|925000;400000|931250;400000|943750;400000|950000;400000|962500;400000|975000;400000|981250;400000|993750;400000|1000000;400000|1012500;400000|1025000; 400000|1031250;400000|1043750;400000|1050000;400000|1062500;400000|1075000;400000|1081250;400000|1093750;400000|1100000;400000|1112500;400000|1125000;400000|1131250; 400000|1143750;400000|1150000;400000|1162500;400000|1175000;400000|1181250;400000|1193750;400000|1200000;400000|1212500;400000|1225000;400000|1231250;400000|1243750;400000|" Thanks, that is great info, it will probably come handy as difficulty rises, currently, for my energy cost, 800mV makes most beam/cent. 650 is most sols/w effective as I did not try to go lower.
|
|
|
|
Zminer777 (OP)
Member

Offline
Activity: 485
Merit: 37
|
 |
January 08, 2019, 04:27:31 PM |
|
Tried running this on my 980Ti. Getting between 1-2 Sols/s on 150_5. limitation on the algo or just needs some work?
Current Equihash 150,5 implementation is base, we will release much more optimized version within few days, please be patient.
|
|
|
|
baraday
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 20
Merit: 0
|
 |
January 08, 2019, 07:20:08 PM |
|
Any plans on 1060 3gb support for 150,5?
This algo use 4300mb on GPU. Its imbossible. thats not entirely true, lollidieb (the developer of the official miner) released an openCL version, that is capable of mining with 3GB memory. saw it somewhere in the discord channel some days ago and tried it with some of my HD7970/280x not much hashrate (2,5-5 sol/s), but it works and some people confirmed running it with nvidia cards. Edit: found it
|
|
|
|
ivcelmik
|
 |
January 08, 2019, 08:41:06 PM |
|
Any plans on 1060 3gb support for 150,5?
This algo use 4300mb on GPU. Its imbossible. thats not entirely true, lollidieb (the developer of the official miner) released an openCL version, that is capable of mining with 3GB memory. saw it somewhere in the discord channel some days ago and tried it with some of my HD7970/280x not much hashrate (2,5-5 sol/s), but it works and some people confirmed running it with nvidia cards. Edit: found it Nvidia 1060 3G - 5 sol so with gminer i think we can get 6-8 sol on beam
|
|
|
|
evlo
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 155
Merit: 4
|
 |
January 08, 2019, 09:41:13 PM |
|
I tried to undervolt to 635, but it does not seem to do anything if i go under 650, at least on 1060s, power consumption wise, maybe hashrate is little lower, but within what i expect for the same kind of rig i'm testing it on.
|
|
|
|
Sigi
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 16
Merit: 0
|
 |
January 08, 2019, 11:27:35 PM |
|
Can someone help me with this weird thing? When I run gminer I get notification 'Anti-hacking system detected modification of the miner memory. If you using an antivirus, add miner to antivirus exceptions' I added miner to Avira antivirus exceptions, but it didn't help. Then I uninstalled Avira and still got the same error. I disabled Comodo firewall and Malwarebytes Anti-Malware, but still got the same error. I have no other anti-whatewer protection on my system, yet the miner doesn't work. https://imgur.com/ZbDMtB1
|
|
|
|
evlo
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 155
Merit: 4
|
 |
January 09, 2019, 01:00:18 AM |
|
windows 1809 drivers do not contain nvidia-smi and your miner expects, i guess, nvidia management library, in the nvidia-smi directory in program files so it does not start mining on windows 1809
|
|
|
|
Sigi
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 16
Merit: 0
|
 |
January 09, 2019, 01:09:29 AM |
|
I have windows 7
|
|
|
|
evlo
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 155
Merit: 4
|
 |
January 09, 2019, 01:19:14 AM |
|
That was report for the creator of this miner, I will try to find better place to post it.
|
|
|
|
psychopatical
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
|
 |
January 09, 2019, 04:59:12 AM |
|
Running gminer with 1080 and 1060 rigs. Have near 10% delay shares on sparkpool. Any suggestions how to reduce this percentage?
|
|
|
|
|