Bitcoin Forum
January 26, 2021, 06:44:22 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.21.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 [46] 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [BET] Trump or not Trump 2020, eddie13 vs suchmoon  (Read 10630 times)
TwitchySeal
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358
Merit: 1346


Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!


View Profile
November 06, 2020, 09:15:26 PM
 #901

discussing the election itself is on topic.
Great Cheesy I've been wondering for a while why they keep giving intermediate results while counting. Why's that?
It's as if they're counting how many more votes they have left to count, and then for each newly counted vote publish the new totals. Why don't they just wait until they're done counting, and publish only the final total?

It now seems like they're asking for attention for days, while they have no final data to publish.

You have to consider there are hundreds or even thousands of polling locations in each state, they have to open hundreds of thousands or millions of mail in votes, if it's close they have to verify thousands of individual provisional ballots (often times having to reach out to the voter to verify something), and in most cases they aren't even allowed to begin the process until election day (even though people have been voting for months).

They release whatever info they can when they can because literally the entire world is wants to know and keeping anything secret is a bad look.  There's probably some National Security reason as well, the longer we go without knowing who the president will be, the more exposed to foreign threats...I'm just making that up, but it makes sense.


  ▄▄█████▄▄███████▄▄
 ███████████
     ▀▀███▄
█████████████        ▀██▄
█████████████          ██▄
███████████            ██▄
██▀▀█████▀▀              ██
██                       ██
██                       ██
▀██                     ██▀
 ▀██                   ██▀
  ▀██▄               ▄██▀
    ▀███▄▄       ▄▄███▀
       ▀▀█████████▀▀
███████████    LEADING CRYPTO SPORTSBOOK & CASINO    ███████████
MULTI
CURRENCY
1500+
CASINO GAMES
CRYPTO EXCLUSIVE
CLUBHOUSE
FAST & SECURE
PAYMENTS
..PLAY NOW!..
1611643462
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1611643462

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1611643462
Reply with quote  #2

1611643462
Report to moderator
1611643462
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1611643462

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1611643462
Reply with quote  #2

1611643462
Report to moderator
1611643462
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1611643462

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1611643462
Reply with quote  #2

1611643462
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
PrimeNumber7
Copper Member
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 700
Merit: 878


Am I real?


View Profile
November 07, 2020, 03:28:43 AM
 #902


WI and MI have both been called for Biden.

AZ has been called for Biden as well, though it seems like this call may have been too early. News reports are saying that with the amount of absentee ballots Trump could still pull the state back. - If Biden ends up winning this, then NV can decide the fate of this election.

NV has not been called, it's close right now as they're counting the absentee ballots. I think Trump will pull through and win this.

I agree with the analysis about AZ and NV regarding the tourism industry and why they'll be a bit happier to turn to Trump regarding opening the economy.

GA is going to be tight, Pennsylvania as well. Friday will probably be when we hear about these.
A state being "called" only means that an entity has said that based on the available (almost always incomplete) information (despite what the NY Times wants you to believe), a candidate has a high probability of winning. Ultimately, in order for a candidate to win an election, all the legal votes need to be counted, and the secretary of state needs to certify the results. There is the possibility of litigation that may change the outcome of elections in states in which "all" the votes have been counted. For example, there are alligations that software caused 6,000 votes in MI cast for Trump to count for Biden, and this software is used in over 45 counties in MI.

There are still votes outstanding in AZ and NV, and the margins are slim enough in both states that it is probably inappropriate for any outlet to "call" either of these races.

Remember that Trump does not actually need to win 270 electoral college votes to win the election. All he needs to do is prevent Biden from getting 270 by December 23. If no one has 270 electoral college votes by Dec 23, the new Congress will vote on who becomes the next President, which each state's delegation gets one vote, and Republicans are favored in this regard. Even Mitt Romney is on Trump's side currently, so I would not expect Republicans to be voting for Biden in a congressional election for president.

███████████████████████████
█████████▀▄▄▄▄▄██▀▀████████
█████▀▄█▀▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀▀▄▄▀█████
████ █▀▄███████████▄▀██████
███▄█ ███████▀ ██████ █ ███
██▀█ ███  ▀▀█  ▀██████ █ ██
██ █ ████▄▄      ▀▀▀██ █ ██
██ █ █████▌        ▄██ ████
███▄█ █████▄▄   ▄▄███ █▀███
████▀█▄▀█████▌  ▀██▀▄█ ████
█████▄▀▀▄▄▀▀▀▀   ▄▄█▀▄█████
████████▄██▀▀▀▀▀▀██████████
███████████████████████████
               ▄███▄
            ▄████████

        ▄▄██████████
       █▀▀▀██▀▀▀████
      ███████████
    ▀▀▀████████████
      ▀███████████▀
      ▄███████████▄
 ▄
    ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀███▀▀   ▄
▀▀█▀▀
███████████▀▀▀█▀▀
    ████████████████
   ▄████████████████
▄█████████████████████▄
★ ‎
‎ ★
UP
TO
15%...CASH BACK
EVERY SPIN

‎ ★
        ▄██▄
     ████████▄
     ██████████

    ████████████
     ▄████████▄
    █████████████
  ▄██████████████
  ▀██████████████▀
   █████████████▄
 ▄████████████████▄
████████████████████
 ▀▀▀████████████▀▀▀
       ██████
..PLAY NOW..
nullius
Copper Member
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504
Merit: 2124


There is only one Bitcoin.


View Profile WWW
November 07, 2020, 05:31:42 AM
 #903

I was hoping, if I lost, that it would be clear enough for me to just pay up by now..
But I don't think it is, and shittily I think it might be a while yet..

Same here.  I have been wanting to settle my bet with theymos, and then take a real forum break to catch up on some urgent IRL stuff.  Famous last words.

So, eddie...  Maybe America is a primitive banana republic where people can’t count?  ;-)
National sovereignty for wildlings? I mean really, you must be redpilled on IQ no?
One may imagine that someday soon, perhaps the Chinese may be so magnanimous as to fix this for you.  The difference that you would notice would be a change from an inefficient Communist government that pretends to be Capitalist, to an efficient Capitalist government that pretends to be Communist. :-/

Quite happy that Trump atleast BTFO the pollsters..

Indeed, at least it is fun to see the liberals get antsy.  I am confident that Trump will trump the odds to win my bet for me.  —And if he doesn’t, then I will happily pay 0.01 BTC to the NCLA, then just not give a fuck about who your president is.  Meanwhile, I am bringing popcorn to watch the liberals squirm.  Trump stuff always makes for an exciting show, one way or another.



PrimeNumber7, eddie13, thanks for your thoughtful replies.  I began writing responses to those two posts, but did not yet finish them.

For eddie, here is a part (transplanted to WO where my thought started on that—n.b. that alas, I am not actually following WO now; at this point, I must be at least a hundred pages behind).

philipma1957, you simply don’t remember that over a month ago, I already answered your same essential proposition in WO.  And accusing me of not remembering history is not worth more than “LOL”.

/0 
  😼
“Qui mori didicit, servire dedidicit.”
eddie13
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1736
Merit: 1669


BTC or BUST


View Profile
November 07, 2020, 07:04:55 AM
 #904

there are alligations that software caused 6,000 votes in MI cast for Trump to count for Biden, and this software is used in over 45 counties in MI.

I started a thread on that as soon as I noticed.. Antrim county Michigan fakes Biden votes???!!

Not only Michigan either..
https://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/288421333



Including Maricopa County..

Could get interesting..
TwitchySeal
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358
Merit: 1346


Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!


View Profile
November 07, 2020, 07:25:53 AM
 #905

there are alligations that software caused 6,000 votes in MI cast for Trump to count for Biden, and this software is used in over 45 counties in MI.

I started a thread on that as soon as I noticed.. Antrim county Michigan fakes Biden votes???!!

Not only Michigan either..
https://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/288421333



Including Maricopa County..

Could get interesting..




In response to the false claims made by Republican National Committee chairwoman Ronna McDaniel, the Michigan Department of State issues the following statements of fact:

Michigan’s elections were conducted fairly, effectively and transparently and are an accurate reflection of the will of Michigan voters.
 
The erroneous reporting of unofficial results from Antrim county was a result of accidental error on the part of the Antrim County Clerk. The equipment and software did not malfunction and all ballots were properly tabulated. However, the clerk accidentally did not update the software used to collect voting machine data and report unofficial results.
 
Like many counties in Michigan, Antrim County uses the Dominion Voting Systems election management system and voting machines (ballot tabulators.) The county receives programming support from Election Source. Tabulators are programmed to scan hand marked, paper ballots. When machines are finished scanning the ballots, the paper ballots are retained and a totals tape showing the number of votes for each candidate in each race is printed from the machine.
 
In order to report unofficial results, county clerks use election management system software to combine the electronic totals from tabulators and submit a report of unofficial results. Because the clerk did not update software, even though the tabulators counted all the ballots correctly, those accurate results were not combined properly when the clerk reported unofficial results.
 
The correct results always were and continue to be reflected on the tabulator totals tape and on the ballots themselves. Even if the error in the reported unofficial results had not been quickly noticed, it would have been identified during the county canvass. Boards of County Canvassers, which are composed of 2 Democrats and 2 Republicans, review the printed totals tape from each tabulator during the canvass to verify the reported vote totals are correct.
 
The software did not cause a misallocation of votes; it was a result of user human error. Even when human error occurs, it is caught during county canvasses.
 
It is also completely false that the county had to or will have to hand count all their ballots. The ballots were properly counted by the tabulators. The county had to review the printed tabulator results from each precinct, not each individual ballot.
 
As with other unofficial results reporting errors, this was an honest mistake and did not affect any actual vote totals. Election clerks work extremely hard and do their work with integrity. They are human beings, and sometimes make mistakes. However, there are many checks and balances that ensure mistakes can be caught and corrected.
 
As Detroit officials have stated, hundreds of challengers from both parties were inside their absent voter counting board all afternoon and evening. And even after some left, there were always challengers from both parties in the room. Dozens of reporters were in the room as well. Further, some windows were covered to stop those outside from filming the people and private information in the counting board, while other windows were left uncovered to ensure additional transparency.
 
As was stated by Chris Thomas, who as a contractor for the Detroit City Clerk’s Office served as an advisor on the execution of this election and led challenger relations, and who is the former Michigan Director of Elections, who served under both republican and democrat Secretaries of State during his 40-year-tenure with the Bureau of Elections, no ballots were backdated. Rather, a clerical error was made when some ballot envelopes were received in Detroit satellite offices. Although employees stamped a date of receipt on the envelopes, an employee failed to complete the transaction for receiving the ballot by saving that date in the Qualified Voter File. Therefore, at the absent voter counting board, after discussion with Republican challengers who chose not to challenge the process, staff was instructed to enter that date stamped on the envelope ensuring that no voters were disenfranchised by the clerical error.

https://www.michigan.gov/sos/0,4670,7-127--544676--,00.html

  ▄▄█████▄▄███████▄▄
 ███████████
     ▀▀███▄
█████████████        ▀██▄
█████████████          ██▄
███████████            ██▄
██▀▀█████▀▀              ██
██                       ██
██                       ██
▀██                     ██▀
 ▀██                   ██▀
  ▀██▄               ▄██▀
    ▀███▄▄       ▄▄███▀
       ▀▀█████████▀▀
███████████    LEADING CRYPTO SPORTSBOOK & CASINO    ███████████
MULTI
CURRENCY
1500+
CASINO GAMES
CRYPTO EXCLUSIVE
CLUBHOUSE
FAST & SECURE
PAYMENTS
..PLAY NOW!..
eddie13
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1736
Merit: 1669


BTC or BUST


View Profile
November 07, 2020, 07:44:39 AM
 #906

......

So it was the Clerk's fault, "human error", and not the software's fault, because the software was not "updated" by the clerk, so the software was wrong, but it wasn't the software's fault..

Funny the software should need "updated" just a day or 2 before the election for it to not be totally incorrect, or, for it not to somehow completely skew all race results unsuspiciously to the left..

BTW.. Believing a michigan.gov site under the reign of heil Whitmer about a false vote count? lol no..
actmyname
Copper Member
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2002
Merit: 2288


Ennui for the many


View Profile WWW
November 07, 2020, 08:00:32 AM
 #907

apply occam's razor
& repeat

nullius
Copper Member
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504
Merit: 2124


There is only one Bitcoin.


View Profile WWW
November 07, 2020, 08:23:33 AM
 #908

... The equipment and software did not malfunction and all ballots were properly tabulated. However, the clerk accidentally did not update the software used to collect voting machine data and report unofficial results.
 
Like many counties in Michigan, Antrim County uses the Dominion Voting Systems election management system and voting machines (ballot tabulators.) The county receives programming support from Election Source. Tabulators are programmed to ...
 
... The software did not cause a misallocation of votes; it was a result of user human error. Even when human error occurs, it is caught during county canvasses. ...

https://www.michigan.gov/sos/0,4670,7-127--544676--,00.html
So it was the Clerk's fault, "human error", and not the software's fault, because the software was not "updated" by the clerk, so the software was wrong, but it wasn't the software's fault..

Funny the software should need "updated" just a day or 2 before the election for it to not be totally incorrect, or, for it not to somehow completely skew all race results unsuspiciously to the left..

Anybody who imagines that voting be important (as I don’t) should dig through the archives of the RISKS Digest for decades of discussion about the RISKS of voting machines, voting machine software, human error, etc., etc.  Voting systems have been a longtime major focus there.  I also expect that RISKS will probably carry discussion of what is now happening in the United States; you may want to contribute, if you have a mind for computer security.  (PrimeNumber7 particularly may like this, if he’s not already a secret subscriber.  Unfortunately, I myself have not followed it for some few years.)

RISKS Digest: Forum on Risks to the Public in Computers and Related Systems:
https://catless.ncl.ac.uk/Risks/

Oh, the RISKS of being catless! 😿

RISKS is an old-school computer security thing, published since 1985 and known to anybody who is serious these matters.  It is sufficiently “notable” that it has a lamentably inadequate Wikipedia page:

It is a moderated forum concerned with the security and safety of computers, software, and technological systems. Security, and risk, here are taken broadly; RISKS is concerned not merely with so-called security holes in software, but with unintended consequences and hazards stemming from the design (or lack thereof) of automated systems. Other recurring subjects include cryptography and the effects of technically ill-considered public policies.

Highlighting is thereby added to subjects that should be of particular interest to denizens of the Bitcoin Forum.  I should catch up, and see what they’ve been saying about cryptocurrency—I would guess, probably tearing up an awful lot of RISKy bad code.  Because idiots want their dancing pigs!

My previous mention of RISKS on this forum:

On the other hand, I could say that people/users can be blame too for this inexplicable continuous hacking & bad news. Why?
Simply because most of them don't want projects that are slow on production. They only think about the "hype" without realizing that there is a proper flow for conducting new features. They passively pushes the developers/coders to do an early releases that have greater chances for bugs and errors. This is a very common thing on some projects here in bctalk  Wink

This is what RISKS-subscriber types used to call “dancing pigs”.  People will not pay for correct, reliable, secure things.  People will not wait for them, either.  They want their dancing pigs, and they want them now!

/0 
  😼
“Qui mori didicit, servire dedidicit.”
Gyfts
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1638
Merit: 1293



View Profile
November 07, 2020, 03:32:08 PM
 #909

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/06/us/politics/stacey-abrams-georgia.html

Read this article, probably behind paywall but I'll summarize -- Stacey Abrams is responsible for Georgia turning blue this election cycle.

She deserves praise from democrats, black vote turned out and cost Trump the state.

Now, the unfortunate thing is I don't think these people will turn out for the Georgia runoff election which means good chance Republicans secure a solid 52-48 senate majority. Just about the only silver lining this election cycle. That, and probably the house victories.

███████████████████████████
█████████▀▄▄▄▄▄██▀▀████████
█████▀▄█▀▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀▀▄▄▀█████
████ █▀▄███████████▄▀██████
███▄█ ███████▀ ██████ █ ███
██▀█ ███  ▀▀█  ▀██████ █ ██
██ █ ████▄▄      ▀▀▀██ █ ██
██ █ █████▌        ▄██ ████
███▄█ █████▄▄   ▄▄███ █▀███
████▀█▄▀█████▌  ▀██▀▄█ ████
█████▄▀▀▄▄▀▀▀▀   ▄▄█▀▄█████
████████▄██▀▀▀▀▀▀██████████
███████████████████████████
               ▄███▄
            ▄████████

        ▄▄██████████
       █▀▀▀██▀▀▀████
      ███████████
    ▀▀▀████████████
      ▀███████████▀
      ▄███████████▄
 ▄
    ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀███▀▀   ▄
▀▀█▀▀
███████████▀▀▀█▀▀
    ████████████████
   ▄████████████████
▄█████████████████████▄
★ ‎
‎ ★
UP
TO
15%...CASH BACK
EVERY SPIN

‎ ★
        ▄██▄
     ████████▄
     ██████████

    ████████████
     ▄████████▄
    █████████████
  ▄██████████████
  ▀██████████████▀
   █████████████▄
 ▄████████████████▄
████████████████████
 ▀▀▀████████████▀▀▀
       ██████
..PLAY NOW..
TwitchySeal
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358
Merit: 1346


Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!


View Profile
November 09, 2020, 02:34:59 AM
 #910

(I haven't verified this or anything)



(don't get any ideas eddie)

  ▄▄█████▄▄███████▄▄
 ███████████
     ▀▀███▄
█████████████        ▀██▄
█████████████          ██▄
███████████            ██▄
██▀▀█████▀▀              ██
██                       ██
██                       ██
▀██                     ██▀
 ▀██                   ██▀
  ▀██▄               ▄██▀
    ▀███▄▄       ▄▄███▀
       ▀▀█████████▀▀
███████████    LEADING CRYPTO SPORTSBOOK & CASINO    ███████████
MULTI
CURRENCY
1500+
CASINO GAMES
CRYPTO EXCLUSIVE
CLUBHOUSE
FAST & SECURE
PAYMENTS
..PLAY NOW!..
eddie13
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1736
Merit: 1669


BTC or BUST


View Profile
November 09, 2020, 02:46:43 AM
 #911

(don't get any ideas eddie)

 Roll Eyes
What's that supposed to mean?

IDK what their standard for an outcome is, but this is on the EC, or they have balls to call/pay it and possibly have to pay out both sides if shit happens..
BayAreaCoins
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2758
Merit: 1169


FreeBitcoins.com Secretary


View Profile WWW
November 09, 2020, 02:47:50 AM
 #912

(I haven't verified this or anything)



(don't get any ideas eddie)

I'm shocked they already graded that bet... eh.

https://polymarket.com/market/will-trump-win-the-2020-us-presidential-election

Is still taking presidential bets.


▄▄███████████▄▄
▄████▀▀`````````▀▀████▄
███▀```````````````````▀███
███`````````````````````````███
██```````````██``██````````````██
██````````▄▄▄▄██▄▄██▄▄▄▄`````````██
██`````````▀██████████████▄````````██
██`````````````███`````▀████`````````██
▐█▌`````````````███`````▄███▀`````````▐█▌
▐█▌`````````````███████████▄``````````▐█▌
▐█▌`````````````███▀▀▀▀▀▀████▄````````▐█▌
▐█▌`````````````███```````████````````▐█▌
██`````````````███`````▄▄████````````██
██`````````▄██████████████▀````````██
██````````▀▀▀▀██▀▀██▀▀▀▀`````````██
██```````````██``██````````````██
███`````````````````````````███
███▄```````````````````▄███
▀████▄▄`````````▄▄████▀
▀▀███████████▀▀
FREE
BITCOINS.com





















`````````▄
````````▄█▄
``````▄█████▄
`````█████████
```▄███████████▄
``███████████████
`█████████████████
███████████████████
███████████████████
██▌▀███████████████
`██``▀████████████
``██▄```▀████████
```▀███▄▄`█████▀
``````▀▀▀▀▀▀▀

FAUCET
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀



``````````````````▄▄▄▄▄▄
``````````````````██████
``````````````````██████
``````````````````██████
``````````██████``██████
``````````██████``██████
``██████``██████``██████
``██████``██████``██████
``██████``██████``██████
``██████``██████``██████
``██████``██████``██████

██████████████████████████
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀

XCHANGE
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀



```````````▄
`````````▄██
```````▄████
`````▄██████████▄
`````▀███████████▄
```````▀████``▀████
█``````▄`▀██````▀██
██▄````██▄`▀``````█
████▄``████▄
`▀███████████▄
``▀██████████▀
```````████▀
```````██▀
```````▀

SWAP
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
nullius
Copper Member
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504
Merit: 2124


There is only one Bitcoin.


View Profile WWW
November 09, 2020, 03:33:31 AM
 #913

Question:
Where do you think it went wrong nulli?
Answer:
... was it just doomed from the start?

On that note, I think ending colonialism may have been a great mistake.. I can think of many 3rd world countries that would be better off under foreign western rule because they obviously just don't have the intelligence to get their shit together on their own in years since..
National sovereignty for wildlings? I mean really, you must be redpilled on IQ no?

So, eddie, which colonial power should take paternalistic stewardship of the mentally retarded, atavistically primitive American third-world shithole that can’t even run an election without Democrat vote-stuffing shenanigans?

America is a dumb kid country that never grew up, after it ran away from Daddy England.  But the whilom Imperial Brits bolloxed the governance of their colonies; I think that America would be better off under the rule of a Continental European power.  (If but only at least one of them would restore a sane government; the fuckwit E.U. may as well be American.)

If people with a IQ under 100 weren't allowed to vote there wouldn't be any Dem. American votes. That would be no fun.
FYFY.

To be clear, eddie, I partly agree with you about colonialism—and I do know all about IQ.

I mean really, you must be redpilled on IQ no?

Protip:  The existence of liberal pseudointellectuals, some of whom score highly on psychometric tests of general intelligence, proves empirically that IQ is necessary but insufficient.  The perplexing problem of high-IQ idiots is one that I have spent years examining; but I will avoid hereby launching into a five thousand word scholarly essay on the topic...

Moreover, I don’t do drugs.  Thus, I don’t take any pills randomly offered to me by some weirdo black dude who wears sunglasses at night.

Whereas that “redpilled” metaphor is used by a spectrum of groups for which it ranges from incongruous, to... peinlich!

Sie sind entartet!

 ... a Wachowski brothers “sisters” story starring a Eurasian mutt, a black, and an ostensible female who would be completely androgynous if her breasts and buttocks were not so ample, with a plot about the salvation of Zion.



...Lilly Wachowski, who came out as trans along with her sister Lana after the films came out...

The Matrix first hit screens in 1999, when Lilly says "the corporate world wasn't ready" for an allegory - a story that can be interpreted to reveal a hidden meaning - about transgender people.

[...]

Once upon a time, I descended into the land of #redpilled #goyimknow to explain to them how foolish they look, using an image of a black man offering drugs as their allegory for discovering Adolf Hitler.  Just call me helpful.

Translation: *cringe*

a conversation I once with an old Jew about the worst humiliation to Hitler being entomoid neo-Nazis.

/0 
  😼
“Qui mori didicit, servire dedidicit.”
philipma1957
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2912
Merit: 3001



View Profile
November 09, 2020, 03:44:53 AM
Merited by Gyfts (1)
 #914

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/06/us/politics/stacey-abrams-georgia.html

Read this article, probably behind paywall but I'll summarize -- Stacey Abrams is responsible for Georgia turning blue this election cycle.

She deserves praise from democrats, black vote turned out and cost Trump the state.

Now, the unfortunate thing is I don't think these people will turn out for the Georgia runoff election which means good chance Republicans secure a solid 52-48 senate majority. Just about the only silver lining this election cycle. That, and probably the house victories.

Actually if you look at Trump's 4 years and this election> Trump was helpful  to the Republican/conservative movement.

A) 200 conservative federal judges
B) 6 to 3 margins in the Supreme Court.
C) most likely holds the senate
D) most likely gained in the house.


If the cases go to the supreme court and they decide against trump it is a victory for the republicans. As Biden would have no ability to stack the court by diluting it to 13 judges..   Republicans would be able to say the court was not bipartisan they ruled against Trump.

So basically Trump has already won if you are a republican he helped you out greatly.

If you are a trump fan you have already won an election in 2016 and can help push trump and his daughter back into the office in 2024.

I can be sure That Trump is going to play it this way.  He will concede and run in 2024. He will open up Twitter Trump and call out the dems. for 4 years. Then TRUMP TRUMP ticket in 2024.

I can see it now.  I predict that he wins the 2024 election for sure. Another president did this years ago.  Some one please chime in with his name.

I see BTC as the super highway and alt coins as taxis and trucks needed to move transactions.
iamsheikhadil
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 672
Merit: 114


When these walls fall down, I will stand by you <3


View Profile
November 09, 2020, 05:17:43 AM
 #915

I can be sure That Trump is going to play it this way.  He will concede and run in 2024. He will open up Twitter Trump and call out the dems. for 4 years. Then TRUMP TRUMP ticket in 2024.

I can see it now.  I predict that he wins the 2024 election for sure. Another president did this years ago.  Some one please chime in with his name.

I don't think this is going to happen, like if he reruns, I'm pretty sure he will lose. The thing is he is just trying to cater to his lovers and supporters that he hasn't really lost this election, through which he is saying everyone who voted for Biden is a "fraud". That itself offends almost every Biden voter who might have voted for Trump in 2016. These voters won't forget this at all, and will vote blue again in 2024 if Trump tries to rerun. When Hillary called Trump voters deplorable, it didn't go well. Now Trump said Biden voters are fraud.

suchmoon
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2562
Merit: 6084


https://bpip.org


View Profile WWW
November 09, 2020, 06:05:44 AM
 #916

I can see it now.  I predict that he wins the 2024 election for sure. Another president did this years ago.  Some one please chime in with his name.

Grover Cleveland?

squatz1
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1624
Merit: 1272


Flying Hellfish is a Commie


View Profile
November 09, 2020, 06:50:28 PM
 #917

I can see it now.  I predict that he wins the 2024 election for sure. Another president did this years ago.  Some one please chime in with his name.

Grover Cleveland?

God. I completely forgot that we actually have had a President who has done that before.

Very different time though. Given this age of mass information and media, I don't think that Trump will REALLY run in 2024. Trump will talk about it to keep himself relevant, though I do just expect him to buy some sort of media company or start his own and try to get his massive following to use it for their information.

He's still VERY powerful within the GOP and is the reason that they were able to win down the ballot. MANY people who are currently in office are only there because of Trump (I'm looking at YOU Ron DeSantis)

Nice win on this though SuchMoon.




▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄    ▄▄▄▄                  ▄▄▄   ▄▄▄▄▄        ▄▄▄▄▄   ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄    ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄   ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄   ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
 ▀████████████████▄  ████                 █████   ▀████▄    ▄████▀  ▄██████████████   ████████████▀  ▄█████████████▀  ▄█████████████▄
              ▀████  ████               ▄███▀███▄   ▀████▄▄████▀               ████   ████                ████                   ▀████
   ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄█████  ████              ████   ████    ▀██████▀      ██████████████▄   ████████████▀       ████       ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄████▀
   ██████████████▀   ████            ▄███▀     ▀███▄    ████        ████        ████  ████                ████       ██████████████▀
   ████              ████████████▀  ████   ██████████   ████        ████████████████  █████████████▀      ████       ████      ▀████▄
   ▀▀▀▀              ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀   ▀▀▀▀   ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀  ▀▀▀▀        ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀   ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀        ▀▀▀▀       ▀▀▀▀        ▀▀▀▀▀

#1 CRYPTO CASINO & SPORTSBOOK
  WELCOME
BONUS
.INSTANT & FAST.
.TRANSACTION.....
.PROVABLY FAIR.
......& SECURE......
.24/7 CUSTOMER.
............SUPPORT.
BTC      |      ETH      |      LTC      |      XRP      |      XMR      |      BNB      |     more
Biodom
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2562
Merit: 1716



View Profile
November 09, 2020, 07:21:52 PM
 #918

I can see it now.  I predict that he wins the 2024 election for sure. Another president did this years ago.  Some one please chime in with his name.

Everybody has an opinion, but the name is Grover Cleveland.
Personally, I think that the chance of this happening is low, but non-zero, of course.
suchmoon
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2562
Merit: 6084


https://bpip.org


View Profile WWW
November 09, 2020, 07:51:51 PM
 #919

If anyone would like to make a new "Trump or not Trump" 1:1 bet for 2024 - you know where to find me Smiley. Same conditions as per OP, just add 4 years to dates. 0.01 BTC minimum, 1 BTC max (total budget). Escrow required unless you're in my trust list and the amount is 0.1 BTC or less. To make it more bearable let's make it any Trump and throw in Jared too.

You bet on: Donald J Trump, or one of his children (Ivanka, Don Jr, Eric, Tiffany), or one of his past/current spouses, or Jared Kushner.

I bet on: none of the above.

Any takers?

I predict that he wins the 2024 election for sure.

Let's see how sure Smiley

ibminer
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1549
Merit: 1919


Goonies never say die.


View Profile
November 09, 2020, 09:00:27 PM
 #920

I bet on: none of the above.

Trump vs Biden....  I went with Brewster on this election..


Time for some real facts...

Tom MacDonald - No Lives Matter

 Cool

:-: Bitcointalk Public Information Project (BPIP) :-: New stats, new reports, new design, new parsers, and more!
Don't be obsessed with your desires. The Zen philosopher Basho once wrote, 'A flute with no holes, is not a flute... and a donut with no hole, is a Danish.' He was a funny guy.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 [46] 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!