Casinos not asking for KYC to register and play, but do require it to withdraw

[EarnOnVictor]

I don`t cares about it. I saw my data in internet several times before KYC. Lots of shops, banks get our data and sell/lose it later. I don`t cares about my data in the internet, i cares only about my credit cards and my phone.

I agree with you that it is useless to care too much about KYC as we may loss our KYC in a various ways especially for the phone companies. But if we loss access of any account which is related to finance or loss our pc/mobile then we will have a great/big loss.

Today there are just two things we have to care about - password/pin to the credit card and the phone(i mean the device). All services today asks 2FA or sms - so without phone it is difficult enough to make something with your data. And without pin it is difficult to get your money. Of course it doesn`t mean that you can don`t care about security, but these two moments are the main things we have to care about it.

I like the twist of things regarding the KYC these days unlike before when people put the KYC so much in their heads. Although some people would still put the issue of privacy in their heads, and the most annoying thing is that you may not find a reasonable amount of money to have warranted such a high level of privacy if you check the accounts of many of them. Being private and secretive are good and I am a very private person, but the manner in which they are taking it is too much.

Fine, you might hide it from the people around you as much as possible, but that of a company that is not even thousands of miles close to your country is extreme. Who is now the person digging you who has a few thousand bucks to that extent? Think of it, KYC is just a document, it is not an access to your account/wallet, and it is just a way for the government and the company to make us more accountable by knowing us, which is a global standard. Or is it the company that doesn't know you in person that will even become a threat to your life in case of fear of one's life? Another annoying issue is that those who are calling privacy concerns for not completing a KYC is that they will be busy completing the KYC in many other places like banks, schools and others that would also ask them for the source of their funds in some cases.

Even those places where they commit their money for long and short-term investments ask for KYC, which includes the buying of lands and properties. So what is their headache about that? What is so important to me with any company is primarily the good service and the pace of money withdrawal, and not the privacy because if the company can come clean and have their address, registration, phone number, account/wallet, regulation, tax, insurance etc details are displayed publicly, how much more my KYC being shared with them, something they will not display publicly.

[erep]

This is why it would really be that important that you should really be reading up those terms and conditions and as much as possible you would really be able to copy it or
screenshot on which if there are some possible alterations then you could somewhat have a fight on this case.

The right solution, we must have evidence for screenshots of all the terms and conditions on the casino site, another alternative solution we can index all responses on the web archive then the evidence can be considered concrete compared to screenshots, we must save all the stacks of text to prove that we have read the terms and conditions so that the casino cannot defend itself for a lie to the users, unless the casino announces an update to make new rules that require KYC then they can avoid all the demands of being accused of being a scam casino.

[promise444c5]

This is why it would really be that important that you should really be reading up those terms and conditions and as much as possible you would really be able to copy it or
screenshot on which if there are some possible alterations then you could somewhat have a fight on this case.

The right solution, we must have evidence for screenshots of all the terms and conditions on the casino site, another alternative solution we can index all responses on the web archive then the evidence can be considered concrete compared to screenshots, we must save all the stacks of text to prove that we have read the terms and conditions so that the casino cannot defend itself for a lie to the users, unless the casino announces an update to make new rules that require KYC then they can avoid all the demands of being accused of being a scam casino.

Yeah! Evidence seem to be the key as we know there only to tackle any matter arising, which is Evidence ( all T&C should be screen shot and kept). if a casino includes KYC is optional and they require it for your funds withdrawal then they are obviously a scam and the only way to tackle them is the way you listed above as they could be cunning  sometimes towards updating  their previous texts and if there's  no evidence , all hope might seem to be lost

[Wiwo]

Well, the truth is that if some type of casino changes its rules, that for me represents a violation of the rights that you have as a player, because you cannot do things like that by changing the rules and without being able to accept the rules, because in a clause they can put it in a very crazy way to never win, just so that the casino benefits, and being in a casino playing something like that is equivalent to cheating, rape, theft, worthy of a casino with bad influences, in fact, in this case things They can happen differently if the casino participates and wants to change the Tos the players have to accept the new Tos that the casino changes, that is the correct and legal way.

I hope you remember that some of these gambling platforms also used to state it on their policies that their rules are subjected to changes and they will ask you to acknowledge that you have read and understand their conditions of service before accepting the approval for your registration while at the point of signing up, and all we do is to check the button and click yes even though we don't read anything.

Well nit some but almost all the casinos have that column in the terms and conditions that states that all the rules are subject to changes from the casino team, so that law give them the right to change any rule as they want without having the need to consult anyone, this power have been misused many times by those scam casinos,  in the sense  that sometimes they just chose to violate the gamblers right and when the case is against them, they will go to change that part of they rules that back the gamblers to favor them, and at the end the walk away with the gambler funds and there is nothing the gamblers can do about that, many of the scam casinos have done this before and go scout free.

That is why, the moment you register on a kyc casino, you should at least go through the verification process and get your account verified before you make any deposits or play on the sites, this way when you win big, the account wont run into any trouble with the casino and there will not be room for them to manipulate the process since the account is already kyc verified.

[Russlenat]

This is why it would really be that important that you should really be reading up those terms and conditions and as much as possible you would really be able to copy it or
screenshot on which if there are some possible alterations then you could somewhat have a fight on this case.

The right solution, we must have evidence for screenshots of all the terms and conditions on the casino site, another alternative solution we can index all responses on the web archive then the evidence can be considered concrete compared to screenshots, we must save all the stacks of text to prove that we have read the terms and conditions so that the casino cannot defend itself for a lie to the users, unless the casino announces an update to make new rules that require KYC then they can avoid all the demands of being accused of being a scam casino.

Yeah! Evidence seem to be the key as we know there only to tackle any matter arising, which is Evidence ( all T&C should be screen shot and kept). if a casino includes KYC is optional and they require it for your funds withdrawal then they are obviously a scam and the only way to tackle them is the way you listed above as they could be cunning  sometimes towards updating  their previous texts and if there's  no evidence , all hope might seem to be lost

In that case, you should be actively making a screenshot of the TOS as what you saw the moment you sing up will not forever be the same. As the regulation gets tighten, the TOS will also change and could be from non KYC to KYC, and having you not aware of that because you only read the first time you play, that would make you expect that KYC is not a thing in this site where in reality  it's a big one since they are regulated, or have become regulated since they acquire a license. We should neglect this thing, nowadays, KYC is already been a normal thing, if a site does not ask for KYC, or promote they would never ask, you should investigate carefully as that's not usual anymore.

[gunhell16]

I don`t cares about it. I saw my data in internet several times before KYC. Lots of shops, banks get our data and sell/lose it later. I don`t cares about my data in the internet, i cares only about my credit cards and my phone.

I agree with you that it is useless to care too much about KYC as we may loss our KYC in a various ways especially for the phone companies. But if we loss access of any account which is related to finance or loss our pc/mobile then we will have a great/big loss.

Today there are just two things we have to care about - password/pin to the credit card and the phone(i mean the device). All services today asks 2FA or sms - so without phone it is difficult enough to make something with your data. And without pin it is difficult to get your money. Of course it doesn`t mean that you can don`t care about security, but these two moments are the main things we have to care about it.

There are other gambling games like that, where all the information you enter we must also remember or save from our emails, phone number, and password as well.
Because sometimes when they have questions for us for verification, they use that thing so they can check if we are still the real owner who can access our account.

And these kinds of opportunities are actually not made big deals by gamblers, because that's how it is in this age for us to somehow secure our accounts.

[arwin100]

This is why it would really be that important that you should really be reading up those terms and conditions and as much as possible you would really be able to copy it or
screenshot on which if there are some possible alterations then you could somewhat have a fight on this case.

The right solution, we must have evidence for screenshots of all the terms and conditions on the casino site, another alternative solution we can index all responses on the web archive then the evidence can be considered concrete compared to screenshots, we must save all the stacks of text to prove that we have read the terms and conditions so that the casino cannot defend itself for a lie to the users, unless the casino announces an update to make new rules that require KYC then they can avoid all the demands of being accused of being a scam casino.

Yeah! Evidence seem to be the key as we know there only to tackle any matter arising, which is Evidence ( all T&C should be screen shot and kept). if a casino includes KYC is optional and they require it for your funds withdrawal then they are obviously a scam and the only way to tackle them is the way you listed above as they could be cunning  sometimes towards updating  their previous texts and if there's  no evidence , all hope might seem to be lost

In that case, you should be actively making a screenshot of the TOS as what you saw the moment you sing up will not forever be the same. As the regulation gets tighten, the TOS will also change and could be from non KYC to KYC, and having you not aware of that because you only read the first time you play, that would make you expect that KYC is not a thing in this site where in reality  it's a big one since they are regulated, or have become regulated since they acquire a license. We should neglect this thing, nowadays, KYC is already been a normal thing, if a site does not ask for KYC, or promote they would never ask, you should investigate carefully as that's not usual anymore.

That's more better action to do so that we have something to show when sudden changes will happen and they can't avoid to the claims we want to ask after that. Also we should expect about those KYC requirements to be asked by this casinos since its part of the regulation and we need to understand that this is how government regulate this businesses so we need to comply on the requirements ask if we still want to gamble on those casino. But if some casino will say that they would never ask for KYC but we can see that its different on what they have written on their TOS and there's something suspicious happening then I guess much better if we just avoid those casino since I find them so risky.

[Dunamisx]

Well, the truth is that if some type of casino changes its rules, that for me represents a violation of the rights that you have as a player, because you cannot do things like that by changing the rules and without being able to accept the rules, because in a clause they can put it in a very crazy way to never win, just so that the casino benefits, and being in a casino playing something like that is equivalent to cheating, rape, theft, worthy of a casino with bad influences, in fact, in this case things They can happen differently if the casino participates and wants to change the Tos the players have to accept the new Tos that the casino changes, that is the correct and legal way.

I hope you remember that some of these gambling platforms also used to state it on their policies that their rules are subjected to changes and they will ask you to acknowledge that you have read and understand their conditions of service before accepting the approval for your registration while at the point of signing up, and all we do is to check the button and click yes even though we don't read anything.

That would be their main weapon for those situations on which they would really be having that kind of reasoning about their terms and conditions on which this is something that they would really be throwing at you and on the time that you've been telling to yourself that you havent been able to read up those long pile of text then you would really be having thoughts to yourself that you might really have that mistakes
that you have done on which you wont really be having those questioning because you do believe that you had missed out something on their terms.

This is why it would really be that important that you should really be reading up those terms and conditions and as much as possible you would really be able to copy it or
screenshot on which if there are some possible alterations then you could somewhat have a fight on this case.

We cannot win over the casinos because when setting up their policies, they must have included all the necessary future policies they may try to introduce under their terms and conditions in which we must have also accepted to go by, i don't think we can sue them for anything related to what they have requested from us even though its at our own expenses, we are expected to be able to fulfil all their terms and conditions in other for us to have enough satisfaction in using their platform.

[EarnOnVictor]

This is why it would really be that important that you should really be reading up those terms and conditions and as much as possible you would really be able to copy it or
screenshot on which if there are some possible alterations then you could somewhat have a fight on this case.

The right solution, we must have evidence for screenshots of all the terms and conditions on the casino site, another alternative solution we can index all responses on the web archive then the evidence can be considered concrete compared to screenshots, we must save all the stacks of text to prove that we have read the terms and conditions so that the casino cannot defend itself for a lie to the users, unless the casino announces an update to make new rules that require KYC then they can avoid all the demands of being accused of being a scam casino.

Yeah! Evidence seem to be the key as we know there only to tackle any matter arising, which is Evidence ( all T&C should be screen shot and kept). if a casino includes KYC is optional and they require it for your funds withdrawal then they are obviously a scam and the only way to tackle them is the way you listed above as they could be cunning  sometimes towards updating  their previous texts and if there's  no evidence , all hope might seem to be lost

In that case, you should be actively making a screenshot of the TOS as what you saw the moment you sing up will not forever be the same. As the regulation gets tighten, the TOS will also change and could be from non KYC to KYC, and having you not aware of that because you only read the first time you play, that would make you expect that KYC is not a thing in this site where in reality  it's a big one since they are regulated, or have become regulated since they acquire a license. We should neglect this thing, nowadays, KYC is already been a normal thing, if a site does not ask for KYC, or promote they would never ask, you should investigate carefully as that's not usual anymore.

Well, you have a good point, terms and conditions of casinos change over time so what you see today might not be what you would see the next day. That could make the screenshotted terms and conditions by the gambler not to be the same as the current one. Regardless, what you failed to acknowledge is that there are laws casinos must obey too and standard procedures to follow by them, or else, it is not binding on the gambler.

Casinos are to immediately notify their customers when there's a change to their terms and conditions, otherwise, they are wasting their time if it is taken to court with the evidence by the customer and lack of notification by the casino. It is now the choice of the customer to agree to the changed/modified terms and conditions or not after the notification. Not that casinos would just be silently changing them and expect what the customer accepted when opening the account to continue to speak for the modified/changed version of the Ts&Cs, such a casino will be deceiving itself in that regard. Even if the customer did not agree to the change directly, if notified, the continued use of the casino service is automatic proof that he has accepted it. However, the law still prefers that you actually agree to it as better proof of that.

All the standard companies I witnessed the change in their terms and conditions did notify me immediately, and upon assenting to it, they will still send me a copy of such acknowledgement of the changes to make it more official. This is the right way to go about it and not casinos behaving anyhow. Owning to this, a no-KYC casino due to regulations might change to a KYC casino, but must duly notify their customer like I said and not believe that such a huge change must be accepted in ignorance.

[promise444c5]

All the standard companies I witnessed the change in their terms and conditions did notify me immediately, and upon assenting to it, they will still send me a copy of such acknowledgement of the changes to make it more official. This is the right way to go about it and not casinos behaving anyhow. Owning to this, a no-KYC casino due to regulations might change to a KYC casino, but must duly notify their customer like I said and not believe that such a huge change must be accepted in ignorance.

This is more of a right and official way by sending the copy of acknowledgement to every users as soon as there is change in terms and conditions  agreed between the casinos  and their users on registration without further delay, which also show the honesty and transparency of such casino to their various  users

Hence, there won't  be any hidden and compromised terms and condition of such casinos and if there seem to be any allegation from users over the terms and conditions, such casino could easily provide evidence of sent copy acknowledgement of the casino to such users making it easier  to justify  themselves of such form of allegations.

[mak013]

Today there are just two things we have to care about - password/pin to the credit card and the phone(i mean the device). All services today asks 2FA or sms - so without phone it is difficult enough to make something with your data. And without pin it is difficult to get your money. Of course it doesn`t mean that you can don`t care about security, but these two moments are the main things we have to care about it.

I like the twist of things regarding the KYC these days unlike before when people put the KYC so much in their heads. Although some people would still put the issue of privacy in their heads, and the most annoying thing is that you may not find a reasonable amount of money to have warranted such a high level of privacy if you check the accounts of many of them. Being private and secretive are good and I am a very private person, but the manner in which they are taking it is too much.

Fine, you might hide it from the people around you as much as possible, but that of a company that is not even thousands of miles close to your country is extreme. Who is now the person digging you who has a few thousand bucks to that extent? Think of it, KYC is just a document, it is not an access to your account/wallet, and it is just a way for the government and the company to make us more accountable by knowing us, which is a global standard. Or is it the company that doesn't know you in person that will even become a threat to your life in case of fear of one's life? Another annoying issue is that those who are calling privacy concerns for not completing a KYC is that they will be busy completing the KYC in many other places like banks, schools and others that would also ask them for the source of their funds in some cases.

Even those places where they commit their money for long and short-term investments ask for KYC, which includes the buying of lands and properties. So what is their headache about that? What is so important to me with any company is primarily the good service and the pace of money withdrawal, and not the privacy because if the company can come clean and have their address, registration, phone number, account/wallet, regulation, tax, insurance etc details are displayed publicly, how much more my KYC being shared with them, something they will not display publicly.

Exactly! That is why i`m talking about. Why we must be afraid of KYC? 5-10 years ago we didn`t hear about it but we gave our data to huge quantity of different kind organizations. Today we make the same but care about KYC. Just keep your money safe and don`t worry about KYC. I see lots of private data in darknet - it costs less than $1. This is real price of our data.

Today there are just two things we have to care about - password/pin to the credit card and the phone(i mean the device). All services today asks 2FA or sms - so without phone it is difficult enough to make something with your data. And without pin it is difficult to get your money. Of course it doesn`t mean that you can don`t care about security, but these two moments are the main things we have to care about it.

There are other gambling games like that, where all the information you enter we must also remember or save from our emails, phone number, and password as well.
Because sometimes when they have questions for us for verification, they use that thing so they can check if we are still the real owner who can access our account.

And these kinds of opportunities are actually not made big deals by gamblers, because that's how it is in this age for us to somehow secure our accounts.

Mostly you can recover your password or login using the phone. Of course it takes some times and sometimes need some additional proves but i repeat - today all you need is your phone.

[bakasabo]

Why we must be afraid of KYC? 5-10 years ago we didn`t hear about it but we gave our data to huge quantity of different kind organizations. Today we make the same but care about KYC. Just keep your money safe and don`t worry about KYC. I see lots of private data in darknet - it costs less than $1. This is real price of our data.

I would like to disagree. We should still worry about KYC, or at least pay attention to what information we share. Making verification via receiving sms is one thing, and sending passport or ID picture is completely different. Even though people can do little with my name, surname, date and place of birth and a picture, I would still feel uncomfortable knowing that documents are somewhere. One thing is when you allow some institution to make and keep copy of your personal information, other thing is basically printing and sticking copy of your passport on "every wall of the city".

You, as you say, worry little about KYC, then why no uploading front page of your passport here?

[Fivestar4everMVP]

Why we must be afraid of KYC? 5-10 years ago we didn`t hear about it but we gave our data to huge quantity of different kind organizations. Today we make the same but care about KYC. Just keep your money safe and don`t worry about KYC. I see lots of private data in darknet - it costs less than $1. This is real price of our data.

I would like to disagree. We should still worry about KYC, or at least pay attention to what information we share. Making verification via receiving sms is one thing, and sending passport or ID picture is completely different. Even though people can do little with my name, surname, date and place of birth and a picture, I would still feel uncomfortable knowing that documents are somewhere. One thing is when you allow some institution to make and keep copy of your personal information, other thing is basically printing and sticking copy of your passport on "every wall of the city".

You, as you say, worry little about KYC, then why no uploading front page of your passport here?

Well, this forum respects user's privacy, which is one of the things bitcoin represents, and as such, this forum does not require it's users to share their private and personal informations here except the user wishes to do so on his or her won accord.

But have you bothered to think of this, what if this forum actually required users to submit their private and personal informations for kyc verifications, what if this was a requirement needed by the services we promote and make money from on this forum, what if this was a requirement they need for them to hire us, don't you think alot of users on this forum would have gladly submitted their IDs?, and other personal information, if not for anything, for the money they make on or from this forum through the services they promote..

Well, I leave you to ponder on that, but all the same, kyc is not something we should really worry about, as long as you are only submitting your documents to reputable and we'll trusted platforms, not platforms that will turn around and sell their users private information to other companies money.

[Dunamisx]

This is why it would really be that important that you should really be reading up those terms and conditions and as much as possible you would really be able to copy it or
screenshot on which if there are some possible alterations then you could somewhat have a fight on this case.

The right solution, we must have evidence for screenshots of all the terms and conditions on the casino site, another alternative solution we can index all responses on the web archive then the evidence can be considered concrete compared to screenshots, we must save all the stacks of text to prove that we have read the terms and conditions so that the casino cannot defend itself for a lie to the users, unless the casino announces an update to make new rules that require KYC then they can avoid all the demands of being accused of being a scam casino.

Yeah! Evidence seem to be the key as we know there only to tackle any matter arising, which is Evidence ( all T&C should be screen shot and kept). if a casino includes KYC is optional and they require it for your funds withdrawal then they are obviously a scam and the only way to tackle them is the way you listed above as they could be cunning  sometimes towards updating  their previous texts and if there's  no evidence , all hope might seem to be lost

In the situation when they are referring to kyc as optional, then what they mostly mean is that they can allow you to register and gamble even without completing for the kyc request, but that doesn't mean they may not later make demands on that, but the most annoying is that we often get annoyed seeing this because we are at the point of making withdrawals before receiving the notification that we need to complete our kyc, so what i would have suggest to some of these gambling site is to ensure that they don't only request for kyc at the point of making withdrawal, they can demand for such even when the user is not requesting for withdrawals after his registration.

[Fivestar4everMVP]

This is why it would really be that important that you should really be reading up those terms and conditions and as much as possible you would really be able to copy it or
screenshot on which if there are some possible alterations then you could somewhat have a fight on this case.

The right solution, we must have evidence for screenshots of all the terms and conditions on the casino site, another alternative solution we can index all responses on the web archive then the evidence can be considered concrete compared to screenshots, we must save all the stacks of text to prove that we have read the terms and conditions so that the casino cannot defend itself for a lie to the users, unless the casino announces an update to make new rules that require KYC then they can avoid all the demands of being accused of being a scam casino.

Yeah! Evidence seem to be the key as we know there only to tackle any matter arising, which is Evidence ( all T&C should be screen shot and kept). if a casino includes KYC is optional and they require it for your funds withdrawal then they are obviously a scam and the only way to tackle them is the way you listed above as they could be cunning  sometimes towards updating  their previous texts and if there's  no evidence , all hope might seem to be lost

In the situation when they are referring to kyc as optional, then what they mostly mean is that they can allow you to register and gamble even without completing for the kyc request, but that doesn't mean they may not later make demands on that, but the most annoying is that we often get annoyed seeing this because we are at the point of making withdrawals before receiving the notification that we need to complete our kyc, so what i would have suggest to some of these gambling site is to ensure that they don't only request for kyc at the point of making withdrawal, they can demand for such even when the user is not requesting for withdrawals after his registration.

The thing actually is, for some casinos, they usually allow the user register, make a deposit and play on the casino, possibly making a few winnings and withdrawals as well, this probably is to allow the player test the casino out and get acquainted with the operations of the casino, but like you said, a time always comes when the casino will ask the user to verify his or her account, mostly when the user is requesting a withdrawal, and why casinos do this is very understandable because this is the only time that player may comply with the request, the player has already requested a withdrawal which is pending, and for the withdrawal to be processed, he or she needs to submit his or her documents for account verification, the player is likely to submit the document immediately in order to have their withdrawal processed.

But if and when the casino randomly asked the player to submit kyc documents for account verification when the player doesn't have any pending withdrawals, the user may ignore it and possibly look for ways to get his money out of that casino and move to another, and worst is if and when the player actually does not have any money on his account, he or she may likely move to another casino where they may possibly not ask him or her to verify his or her account immediately.

This I believe is the reason why most casino will wait until a player is at the point where they need their withdrawal request to be processed, before the casino askes them for documents for account verification, for the casino knows what this is the best time any player can comply to their kyc demands, requesting for this any other time, the casino might just push the player away to another casino.

[getsats.club]

This is why it would really be that important that you should really be reading up those terms and conditions and as much as possible you would really be able to copy it or
screenshot on which if there are some possible alterations then you could somewhat have a fight on this case.

The right solution, we must have evidence for screenshots of all the terms and conditions on the casino site, another alternative solution we can index all responses on the web archive then the evidence can be considered concrete compared to screenshots, we must save all the stacks of text to prove that we have read the terms and conditions so that the casino cannot defend itself for a lie to the users, unless the casino announces an update to make new rules that require KYC then they can avoid all the demands of being accused of being a scam casino.

Yeah! Evidence seem to be the key as we know there only to tackle any matter arising, which is Evidence ( all T&C should be screen shot and kept). if a casino includes KYC is optional and they require it for your funds withdrawal then they are obviously a scam and the only way to tackle them is the way you listed above as they could be cunning  sometimes towards updating  their previous texts and if there's  no evidence , all hope might seem to be lost

In the situation when they are referring to kyc as optional, then what they mostly mean is that they can allow you to register and gamble even without completing for the kyc request, but that doesn't mean they may not later make demands on that, but the most annoying is that we often get annoyed seeing this because we are at the point of making withdrawals before receiving the notification that we need to complete our kyc, so what i would have suggest to some of these gambling site is to ensure that they don't only request for kyc at the point of making withdrawal, they can demand for such even when the user is not requesting for withdrawals after his registration.

The thing actually is, for some casinos, they usually allow the user register, make a deposit and play on the casino, possibly making a few winnings and withdrawals as well, this probably is to allow the player test the casino out and get acquainted with the operations of the casino, but like you said, a time always comes when the casino will ask the user to verify his or her account, mostly when the user is requesting a withdrawal, and why casinos do this is very understandable because this is the only time that player may comply with the request, the player has already requested a withdrawal which is pending, and for the withdrawal to be processed, he or she needs to submit his or her documents for account verification, the player is likely to submit the document immediately in order to have their withdrawal processed.

But if and when the casino randomly asked the player to submit kyc documents for account verification when the player doesn't have any pending withdrawals, the user may ignore it and possibly look for ways to get his money out of that casino and move to another, and worst is if and when the player actually does not have any money on his account, he or she may likely move to another casino where they may possibly not ask him or her to verify his or her account immediately.

This I believe is the reason why most casino will wait until a player is at the point where they need their withdrawal request to be processed, before the casino askes them for documents for account verification, for the casino knows what this is the best time any player can comply to their kyc demands, requesting for this any other time, the casino might just push the player away to another casino.

This is the reason why we decided to open a lightning network NO-KYC casino.
Because we saw that most of the online casinos that accepts bitcoin (and "crypto") are most likely scam, asking users to make KYC blocking their funds
or banning funds of users because of some "internal policy".
Plus, they are asking emails to register, and they are blocking Tor users instead of creating
a Tor onion service (and if Tor ain't blocked, the website will problably not load correctly).

There are some good lightning network casino that are KYC free, but they are not well developed and they don't allow you to bet a lot of money (most likely
because they are small projects and don't aims big).

We are trying to make a good lightning network casino with a lot of games and without stupid rules.

[panjul07]

Well, I leave you to ponder on that, but all the same, kyc is not something we should really worry about, as long as you are only submitting your documents to reputable and we'll trusted platforms, not platforms that will turn around and sell their users private information to other companies money.

One thing to remember is that reputable platforms does not mean that there will be no "bad employee" who can do something for their own benefits such as doing ilegal document sales once the employee has the access to the user's submitted document.
Worrying about our personal document in this online world is normal especially for those who care about their privacy.
For those who are worrying about KYC, simply do not deal with it and for those who are not worrying then we should not blame those who are worrying about it.
Its all about preferences and each preference has its own consequences and we all should be ready for the consequences.

[LUCKMCFLY]

4.-Which one is more easier to manage than the other?

Based on my personal opinion, I would say that it is much easier to manage a physical casino than an online casino, in an online casino you have to manage many bosses for many of its departments.

I would choose, without a doubt, the physical casino, even though the physical casino would have to invest in security and in certain things that the online casino does not have, in this case incentives, such as gifts, meals, something like that, but that partly come out of the same losses of the players, even so I think that the expense is less than that of an online casino.

Actually, we don't own any online or physical casino, therefore we can only speculate as to which is easy to manage online or offline casino.
The ones who are actually involved in the two businesses can tell us the exact pros and cons of both setups.

However, I would not necessarily agree with the last question's answer that it is difficult to manage an Online Casino as compared to an offline casino. Don't you think that managing a physical casino is more difficult as you have to hire people, manage the building (rented or owned), manage the people coming to the casino etc etc. With online casinos, all of the things will be taken care of by the casino developer when it comes to the design and security etc and it is just a one-time payment as opposed to the physical casino where you have to pay the rent and hire staff to m whom you will need to pay monthly.

Yes, I understand the point, but it is easier to manage than a large conglomerate where you have to deal with security, it is easier to deal with hiring staff and renting a site than to Complain to IT security because you let a certain amount be stolen of money? How does the Security entity respond? It is difficult, you cannot determine things like that, currently there Are many security updates, and all that has a big cost, the administration is not complicated, the hard part is the expense, and in a company what is sought is to reduce expenses and That everything is cheaper, that is the objective, in a physical casino the subcontracting of rental staff is only taken as a liability, but the mere fact of protecting Capital is everything, in a casino or online if all the security measures are in place. They are affected, everything fails and money disappears, and that is really delicate.

There are online casinos that do not last much, they become decapitated and cannot respond to withdrawal requests, some say that they allow manual withdrawals, in a physical casino the movement of money is instantaneous, so for me it seems to be easier.

And that's right, it's difficult to Speculate , but roughly I see things like this, I've done some work for people in companies, but they don't have problems with hacks where their money is compromised, maybe their database or something like that. , but it is not worth Worrying about, however in an online casino that risk is always there.

[bakasabo]

Why we must be afraid of KYC? 5-10 years ago we didn`t hear about it but we gave our data to huge quantity of different kind organizations. Today we make the same but care about KYC. Just keep your money safe and don`t worry about KYC. I see lots of private data in darknet - it costs less than $1. This is real price of our data.

I would like to disagree. We should still worry about KYC, or at least pay attention to what information we share. Making verification via receiving sms is one thing, and sending passport or ID picture is completely different. Even though people can do little with my name, surname, date and place of birth and a picture, I would still feel uncomfortable knowing that documents are somewhere. One thing is when you allow some institution to make and keep copy of your personal information, other thing is basically printing and sticking copy of your passport on "every wall of the city".

You, as you say, worry little about KYC, then why no uploading front page of your passport here?

Well, this forum respects user's privacy, which is one of the things bitcoin represents, and as such, this forum does not require it's users to share their private and personal informations here except the user wishes to do so on his or her won accord.

But have you bothered to think of this, what if this forum actually required users to submit their private and personal informations for kyc verifications, what if this was a requirement needed by the services we promote and make money from on this forum, what if this was a requirement they need for them to hire us, don't you think alot of users on this forum would have gladly submitted their IDs?, and other personal information, if not for anything, for the money they make on or from this forum through the services they promote..

Well, I leave you to ponder on that, but all the same, kyc is not something we should really worry about, as long as you are only submitting your documents to reputable and we'll trusted platforms, not platforms that will turn around and sell their users private information to other companies money.

My comment was relied to a user who has said that we should not worry about KYC. If he is so brave to share private data, then why not demonstrate bravery? Personally, I would not share KYC, not on the forum, not to casino. Maybe reputed exchange would be and exception. With the fact that online casino licenses dont cost much, and it isnt costly to open a new casino (compared to exchange), I would avoid giving casinos to much info about myself.

[mak013]

Why we must be afraid of KYC? 5-10 years ago we didn`t hear about it but we gave our data to huge quantity of different kind organizations. Today we make the same but care about KYC. Just keep your money safe and don`t worry about KYC. I see lots of private data in darknet - it costs less than $1. This is real price of our data.

I would like to disagree. We should still worry about KYC, or at least pay attention to what information we share. Making verification via receiving sms is one thing, and sending passport or ID picture is completely different. Even though people can do little with my name, surname, date and place of birth and a picture, I would still feel uncomfortable knowing that documents are somewhere. One thing is when you allow some institution to make and keep copy of your personal information, other thing is basically printing and sticking copy of your passport on "every wall of the city".

You, as you say, worry little about KYC, then why no uploading front page of your passport here?

Your documents are somewhere. The casino is the same like any company where you send copy of your passport. You have no any guarantees that some institution willn`t share your data, include passport with someone else, and he will share it for everybody.

I don`t worry that someone can see me naked, but it doesn`t mean that i have to go for a walk naked. Don`t worry about KYC and give my data for everybody - differs.
PS. I`ve seen at least 2 men, who posted their passport and credit card in chat. I don`t know is it really their data, but i think it is so. So, there are adepts of your idea.