Casinos not asking for KYC to register and play, but do require it to withdraw

[mak013]

First thing i think about is not to show my money to anybody. When you gamble in unknown casinos it is anyway bad decision - you risk and your money, and your data both. And when someone can connect you with your money it is really bad. But i can only repeat what i said long ago - when someone knows that you have money - he can get all your data anyway. The main question is the sum, that becomes interesting for someone serious.

Yes, basically those are the risks that one can suffer when it comes to a casino that makes a difference, because when we are in a casino we do take risks, from the moment we make the first deposit until we make the withdrawal, now more. never because the thing is very given that KYC has to be done compulsorily in all casinos, that is what many do not like, and I personally do not like it, however those are the conditions, so that's what I say , Playing in a place that you know is safe, things are likely to be done that way.

What we have to be clear about is that we as players have to do what is safe for us and guarantees us playing well, because data leaks are something that can happen, so since we are in a casino it is already a risk, of course In fact, everything is a risk, it's just that sometimes we have to take risks and do what we like.

I think that we always risk when give our money to somebody. Sometimes risks are higher. In casino we risk 3 times: deposit, bet, withdraw. The KYC possible increase risk when you withdraw and need your money fast but anyway withdrawal is a risk with KYC or without it.
The main risk with KYC is that someone can use your data. But the same risk you have every moment when you give your data to any organisation.

[Fatunad]

First thing i think about is not to show my money to anybody. When you gamble in unknown casinos it is anyway bad decision - you risk and your money, and your data both. And when someone can connect you with your money it is really bad. But i can only repeat what i said long ago - when someone knows that you have money - he can get all your data anyway. The main question is the sum, that becomes interesting for someone serious.

Yes, basically those are the risks that one can suffer when it comes to a casino that makes a difference, because when we are in a casino we do take risks, from the moment we make the first deposit until we make the withdrawal, now more. never because the thing is very given that KYC has to be done compulsorily in all casinos, that is what many do not like, and I personally do not like it, however those are the conditions, so that's what I say , Playing in a place that you know is safe, things are likely to be done that way.

What we have to be clear about is that we as players have to do what is safe for us and guarantees us playing well, because data leaks are something that can happen, so since we are in a casino it is already a risk, of course In fact, everything is a risk, it's just that sometimes we have to take risks and do what we like.

I think that we always risk when give our money to somebody. Sometimes risks are higher. In casino we risk 3 times: deposit, bet, withdraw. The KYC possible increase risk when you withdraw and need your money fast but anyway withdrawal is a risk with KYC or without it.
The main risk with KYC is that someone can use your data. But the same risk you have every moment when you give your data to any organisation.

One of the main things on why crypto gambling had become that big or popular because of this kind of feature on which it is something that anonymous but the time comes that these platforms did become that centralized for them to be able to make operation continuously on which they don't really have no choice but to accept it out despite the crypto community hates it. So far it isnt really that strictly been implemented because
usually KYC could really be only asked on the time that you had committed some violation and this is something that they would really be asking some KYC but not on the time that you would be making continous withdrawal because if they would really be asking about KYC on the time that you would really be making withdrawal then this is something that shows that they are doing shady thing.

[Wiwo]

One of the main things on why crypto gambling had become that big or popular because of this kind of feature on which it is something that anonymous but the time comes that these platforms did become that centralized for them to be able to make operation continuously on which they don't really have no choice but to accept it out despite the crypto community hates it. So far it isnt really that strictly been implemented because
usually KYC could really be only asked on the time that you had committed some violation and this is something that they would really be asking some KYC but not on the time that you would be making continous withdrawal because if they would really be asking about KYC on the time that you would really be making withdrawal then this is something that shows that they are doing shady thing.

The problem is not centralization but how the bad actors use this so call KYC to victimised gamblers Because ordinarily no one will have a problem with handing out a few details if he is going to enjoy premium features on such sites,  and also exceed limit at some point, kyc is meant to facilitate acceptability of cryptocurrency into the gambling industry since many of them are licensed.


If you supply the site with the required informations and documents that are fully secured to avoid identity theft and date breeze,  and you get the approval and verification on time, I think no one will complain,  but a situation where the gambler supply all the needed documents and information yet will not get verified due to the intention of the bad actors, this are the one that make gamblers to see kyc as an attack on them.

[leonair]

First thing i think about is not to show my money to anybody. When you gamble in unknown casinos it is anyway bad decision - you risk and your money, and your data both. And when someone can connect you with your money it is really bad. But i can only repeat what i said long ago - when someone knows that you have money - he can get all your data anyway. The main question is the sum, that becomes interesting for someone serious.

Yes, basically those are the risks that one can suffer when it comes to a casino that makes a difference, because when we are in a casino we do take risks, from the moment we make the first deposit until we make the withdrawal, now more. never because the thing is very given that KYC has to be done compulsorily in all casinos, that is what many do not like, and I personally do not like it, however those are the conditions, so that's what I say , Playing in a place that you know is safe, things are likely to be done that way.

What we have to be clear about is that we as players have to do what is safe for us and guarantees us playing well, because data leaks are something that can happen, so since we are in a casino it is already a risk, of course In fact, everything is a risk, it's just that sometimes we have to take risks and do what we like.

I think that we always risk when give our money to somebody. Sometimes risks are higher. In casino we risk 3 times: deposit, bet, withdraw. The KYC possible increase risk when you withdraw and need your money fast but anyway withdrawal is a risk with KYC or without it.
The main risk with KYC is that someone can use your data. But the same risk you have every moment when you give your data to any organisation.

Always deposit the amount of money in gambling that you will not need for any emergency period. And you won't have any problem losing that money. so from here the quick withdrawal issue does not matter for those who use gambling only for fun. But for those who use gambling as a source of income and spend their important and necessary money on gambling, this is very risky, so those people should use sites that are very reliable and where withdrawal is done quickly. and there it is better to keep their KYC complete from the registration time

[danadc]

Always deposit the amount of money in gambling that you will not need for any emergency period. And you won't have any problem losing that money. so from here the quick withdrawal issue does not matter for those who use gambling only for fun. But for those who use gambling as a source of income and spend their important and necessary money on gambling, this is very risky, so those people should use sites that are very reliable and where withdrawal is done quickly. and there it is better to keep their KYC complete from the registration time

When I play I do it with a small balance, I don't have much to lose, but before I was very wasteful and I didn't care much, what I thought was that I could win and get everything back, but when I played and I played and I didn't see any type of winning back, that frustrated me, then I learned that I shouldn't spend a lot of money because later every time I worked I had to do other things to earn more money and that made everything very difficult for me, that's why every time I did anything in the casino How to spend, I refrained from spending a lot, and I had the idea that I had lost all my money, but that was not good, because things are always much more difficult without money.

When there are many responsibilities and payments, one cannot afford to lose money in a casino, it is money that cannot be recovered.

[Dunamisx]

If you supply the site with the required informations and documents that are fully secured to avoid identity theft and date breeze,  and you get the approval and verification on time, I think no one will complain,  but a situation where the gambler supply all the needed documents and information yet will not get verified due to the intention of the bad actors, this are the one that make gamblers to see kyc as an attack on them.

There have been cases also whereby the gamblers are the causes to this kind of experience because they raised the false alarm first for the gambling platforms to put an eye on them, in supplying anything for KYC, we should make sure they we totally avoid any form of error, such could be termed a suspicious move on us to bypass their regular process and checks for users identity when you're having a different aim from your end.

[mak013]

I think that we always risk when give our money to somebody. Sometimes risks are higher. In casino we risk 3 times: deposit, bet, withdraw. The KYC possible increase risk when you withdraw and need your money fast but anyway withdrawal is a risk with KYC or without it.
The main risk with KYC is that someone can use your data. But the same risk you have every moment when you give your data to any organisation.

One of the main things on why crypto gambling had become that big or popular because of this kind of feature on which it is something that anonymous but the time comes that these platforms did become that centralized for them to be able to make operation continuously on which they don't really have no choice but to accept it out despite the crypto community hates it. So far it isnt really that strictly been implemented because
usually KYC could really be only asked on the time that you had committed some violation and this is something that they would really be asking some KYC but not on the time that you would be making continous withdrawal because if they would really be asking about KYC on the time that you would really be making withdrawal then this is something that shows that they are doing shady thing.

There is no anonymity, even in cryptocurrencies. May be several years ago, when it was not so famous like nowadays. And the KYC willn`t break it. It is an opportunity to steal your money for cheat casinos. I think that there are some one-day casinos, that created for stealing data, but it mostly looks too cheap to attract attention.
If someone don`t like KYC - it is his decision, i can`t agree or disagree with it. But the same time i can say what i think.

I think that we always risk when give our money to somebody. Sometimes risks are higher. In casino we risk 3 times: deposit, bet, withdraw. The KYC possible increase risk when you withdraw and need your money fast but anyway withdrawal is a risk with KYC or without it.
The main risk with KYC is that someone can use your data. But the same risk you have every moment when you give your data to any organisation.

Always deposit the amount of money in gambling that you will not need for any emergency period. And you won't have any problem losing that money. so from here the quick withdrawal issue does not matter for those who use gambling only for fun. But for those who use gambling as a source of income and spend their important and necessary money on gambling, this is very risky, so those people should use sites that are very reliable and where withdrawal is done quickly. and there it is better to keep their KYC complete from the registration time

Yes, i know about it and mostly try to have small sums on my deposit for lazy bets. But there are different situations: big prize, nice odds or match in the other casino, etc. In such situations i want to have an opportunity to move my money fast.

[Hamphser]

First thing i think about is not to show my money to anybody. When you gamble in unknown casinos it is anyway bad decision - you risk and your money, and your data both. And when someone can connect you with your money it is really bad. But i can only repeat what i said long ago - when someone knows that you have money - he can get all your data anyway. The main question is the sum, that becomes interesting for someone serious.

Yes, basically those are the risks that one can suffer when it comes to a casino that makes a difference, because when we are in a casino we do take risks, from the moment we make the first deposit until we make the withdrawal, now more. never because the thing is very given that KYC has to be done compulsorily in all casinos, that is what many do not like, and I personally do not like it, however those are the conditions, so that's what I say , Playing in a place that you know is safe, things are likely to be done that way.

What we have to be clear about is that we as players have to do what is safe for us and guarantees us playing well, because data leaks are something that can happen, so since we are in a casino it is already a risk, of course In fact, everything is a risk, it's just that sometimes we have to take risks and do what we like.

I think that we always risk when give our money to somebody. Sometimes risks are higher. In casino we risk 3 times: deposit, bet, withdraw. The KYC possible increase risk when you withdraw and need your money fast but anyway withdrawal is a risk with KYC or without it.
The main risk with KYC is that someone can use your data. But the same risk you have every moment when you give your data to any organisation.

Always deposit the amount of money in gambling that you will not need for any emergency period. And you won't have any problem losing that money. so from here the quick withdrawal issue does not matter for those who use gambling only for fun. But for those who use gambling as a source of income and spend their important and necessary money on gambling, this is very risky, so those people should use sites that are very reliable and where withdrawal is done quickly. and there it is better to keep their KYC complete from the registration time

Even if we do say that you are spending on the amount that you can afford to lose but still its not something that not will really be  giving up any problem even if its free money or extra. We do know that losing money is never been fun and even if you do deal up with legitimate platforms but still you would really be having on the same feeling or emotions towards loses.  Speaking about legitimate or reputable gambling casino platforms then it wont really be that so hard on making yourself on finding one. We do have that Google on which we could really be able to search up any information that we could really be able to
check on about specially into those casino background check or whatever information it would be.

Usually you would be facing up these withdrawal hold and ask some KYC into those shady ones but somewhat this has become standard because once you do win up big
then there would really be some sort of verification but actually its not really that much of an issue for me.

[EarnOnVictor]

If you supply the site with the required informations and documents that are fully secured to avoid identity theft and date breeze,  and you get the approval and verification on time, I think no one will complain,  but a situation where the gambler supply all the needed documents and information yet will not get verified due to the intention of the bad actors, this are the one that make gamblers to see kyc as an attack on them.

There have been cases also whereby the gamblers are the causes to this kind of experience because they raised the false alarm first for the gambling platforms to put an eye on them, in supplying anything for KYC, we should make sure they we totally avoid any form of error, such could be termed a suspicious move on us to bypass their regular process and checks for users identity when you're having a different aim from your end.

I don't think it much when I read from a customer that the casino or any company are not verifying their documents, claiming they are rejecting it after many submissions in some cases. This is because the customers might lie and not tell the actual truth of what transpired between them and the company. Many will have bad documents submitted and would be pressurizing the company to verify them for them, while some will poorly scan/snap the documents or even provide illegitimate documents and expect the company to verify them. It is not until one hears both sides that the truth can be known.

This makes me think towards my angle, I've been dealing with more than 50 companies for decades and these are companies that require KYC and document submission, but none has ever denied my KYC approval and neither has any of them blocked my account or swindled me with the money deposited. This can only be for the reason that I do the right thing with them. That is why I think at times that there could be some things many people are doing wrongly with the companies that cause the issue. But since people can't verify both sides, they often talk ill of the company even in reviews.

[LUCKMCFLY]

First thing i think about is not to show my money to anybody. When you gamble in unknown casinos it is anyway bad decision - you risk and your money, and your data both. And when someone can connect you with your money it is really bad. But i can only repeat what i said long ago - when someone knows that you have money - he can get all your data anyway. The main question is the sum, that becomes interesting for someone serious.

Yes, basically those are the risks that one can suffer when it comes to a casino that makes a difference, because when we are in a casino we do take risks, from the moment we make the first deposit until we make the withdrawal, now more. never because the thing is very given that KYC has to be done compulsorily in all casinos, that is what many do not like, and I personally do not like it, however those are the conditions, so that's what I say , Playing in a place that you know is safe, things are likely to be done that way.

What we have to be clear about is that we as players have to do what is safe for us and guarantees us playing well, because data leaks are something that can happen, so since we are in a casino it is already a risk, of course In fact, everything is a risk, it's just that sometimes we have to take risks and do what we like.

I think that we always risk when give our money to somebody. Sometimes risks are higher. In casino we risk 3 times: deposit, bet, withdraw. The KYC possible increase risk when you withdraw and need your money fast but anyway withdrawal is a risk with KYC or without it.
The main risk with KYC is that someone can use your data. But the same risk you have every moment when you give your data to any organisation.

Well, if we consider that we take risks at every moment to carry out any activity, then we could have a better understanding of things.

For example, I am a person who joins any bank, or any FIAT style organization. What is emphasized here is that Fiat money is what is legal, what is common and what many people strive to protect because it has a higher order of legitimacy, however, in an online casino with crypto, I believe that criminals have more free rein to do their misdeeds, because Governments require KYC, but at the end of the day we know that they will use that same KYC in some moment against us and that is the only thing that should be avoided, that is why so much drama with the KYC to withdraw, although as I have said many times the casinos should be more Illustrative , instead of announcing that they make deposits, they should say that they first make the verification of their KYC to be able to make the deposit, that would be the most loyal thing they could do to avoid all these problems , but I think that not even with the dragon spheres ocn 3 wishes would I do it.

[delfastTions]

First thing i think about is not to show my money to anybody. When you gamble in unknown casinos it is anyway bad decision - you risk and your money, and your data both. And when someone can connect you with your money it is really bad. But i can only repeat what i said long ago - when someone knows that you have money - he can get all your data anyway. The main question is the sum, that becomes interesting for someone serious.

Yes, basically those are the risks that one can suffer when it comes to a casino that makes a difference, because when we are in a casino we do take risks, from the moment we make the first deposit until we make the withdrawal, now more. never because the thing is very given that KYC has to be done compulsorily in all casinos, that is what many do not like, and I personally do not like it, however those are the conditions, so that's what I say , Playing in a place that you know is safe, things are likely to be done that way.

What we have to be clear about is that we as players have to do what is safe for us and guarantees us playing well, because data leaks are something that can happen, so since we are in a casino it is already a risk, of course In fact, everything is a risk, it's just that sometimes we have to take risks and do what we like.

I think that we always risk when give our money to somebody. Sometimes risks are higher. In casino we risk 3 times: deposit, bet, withdraw. The KYC possible increase risk when you withdraw and need your money fast but anyway withdrawal is a risk with KYC or without it.
The main risk with KYC is that someone can use your data. But the same risk you have every moment when you give your data to any organisation.

Well, if we consider that we take risks at every moment to carry out any activity, then we could have a better understanding of things.

For example, I am a person who joins any bank, or any FIAT style organization. What is emphasized here is that Fiat money is what is legal, what is common and what many people strive to protect because it has a higher order of legitimacy, however, in an online casino with crypto, I believe that criminals have more free rein to do their misdeeds, because Governments require KYC, but at the end of the day we know that they will use that same KYC in some moment against us and that is the only thing that should be avoided, that is why so much drama with the KYC to withdraw, although as I have said many times the casinos should be more Illustrative , instead of announcing that they make deposits, they should say that they first make the verification of their KYC to be able to make the deposit, that would be the most loyal thing they could do to avoid all these problems , but I think that not even with the dragon spheres ocn 3 wishes would I do it.

In my opinion, it would be correct to draw a clear line between fiat payments in casinos, which are completely personalized and use verified bank accounts, and payments in cryptocurrencies, which are completely anonymous and the owner of a cryptocurrency deposit in a casino can maintain this complete anonymity. 
Unfortunately, now legislators, introducing de-anonymization into cryptocurrency, completely ignore and have spoiled the main property of cryptocurrency as anonymous money.  And this offensive from exchanges and casinos is also very active.  Fewer and fewer casinos do not require identity verification.  And voluntarily reporting and distributing your personal data to dozens of not very reliable businesses, in my opinion, can generally be considered a crime against a person’s right to privacy. 
Legislators need to start protecting these very human rights to privacy in the issue of cryptocurrency payments.   Unfortunately, no one from Congress even says anything on this topic.  In any case, I have not heard anything intelligible from congressmen about this approach to the problem. 
But the problem exists, this is obvious.

[mak013]

I think that we always risk when give our money to somebody. Sometimes risks are higher. In casino we risk 3 times: deposit, bet, withdraw. The KYC possible increase risk when you withdraw and need your money fast but anyway withdrawal is a risk with KYC or without it.
The main risk with KYC is that someone can use your data. But the same risk you have every moment when you give your data to any organisation.

Well, if we consider that we take risks at every moment to carry out any activity, then we could have a better understanding of things.

For example, I am a person who joins any bank, or any FIAT style organization. What is emphasized here is that Fiat money is what is legal, what is common and what many people strive to protect because it has a higher order of legitimacy, however, in an online casino with crypto, I believe that criminals have more free rein to do their misdeeds, because Governments require KYC, but at the end of the day we know that they will use that same KYC in some moment against us and that is the only thing that should be avoided, that is why so much drama with the KYC to withdraw, although as I have said many times the casinos should be more Illustrative , instead of announcing that they make deposits, they should say that they first make the verification of their KYC to be able to make the deposit, that would be the most loyal thing they could do to avoid all these problems , but I think that not even with the dragon spheres ocn 3 wishes would I do it.

That`s what i`m talking about! If the casino make us KYC, they have to do it before the first deposit. At least we must have an opportunity to KYC ourselves. In such way gambler can choose his way - if he don`t want to KYC he can change casino, if he don`t afraid of it - he KYC and has no problem with withdrawals. But casinos don`t want to lose such opportunity to cheat.

[Taskford]

I think that we always risk when give our money to somebody. Sometimes risks are higher. In casino we risk 3 times: deposit, bet, withdraw. The KYC possible increase risk when you withdraw and need your money fast but anyway withdrawal is a risk with KYC or without it.
The main risk with KYC is that someone can use your data. But the same risk you have every moment when you give your data to any organisation.

Well, if we consider that we take risks at every moment to carry out any activity, then we could have a better understanding of things.

For example, I am a person who joins any bank, or any FIAT style organization. What is emphasized here is that Fiat money is what is legal, what is common and what many people strive to protect because it has a higher order of legitimacy, however, in an online casino with crypto, I believe that criminals have more free rein to do their misdeeds, because Governments require KYC, but at the end of the day we know that they will use that same KYC in some moment against us and that is the only thing that should be avoided, that is why so much drama with the KYC to withdraw, although as I have said many times the casinos should be more Illustrative , instead of announcing that they make deposits, they should say that they first make the verification of their KYC to be able to make the deposit, that would be the most loyal thing they could do to avoid all these problems , but I think that not even with the dragon spheres ocn 3 wishes would I do it.

That`s what i`m talking about! If the casino make us KYC, they have to do it before the first deposit. At least we must have an opportunity to KYC ourselves. In such way gambler can choose his way - if he don`t want to KYC he can change casino, if he don`t afraid of it - he KYC and has no problem with withdrawals. But casinos don`t want to lose such opportunity to cheat.

That's more better they should require this at first so that no confusion related on future implementation and for sure to many can accept that set up rather than this requirement will be ask later on once they request something since their casino might provably get a bad reputation for that reasons.

If they care about the feed back of people they should not deceive by telling they are not KYC compliant but at the end they ask their users especially when withdrawal request has been submitted.

If they cheat and say something misleading then its better to leave their casino and warn our  friends regarding to those misleading claims they are posting on their thread.

[LUCKMCFLY]

One of the main things on why crypto gambling had become that big or popular because of this kind of feature on which it is something that anonymous but the time comes that these platforms did become that centralized for them to be able to make operation continuously on which they don't really have no choice but to accept it out despite the crypto community hates it. So far it isnt really that strictly been implemented because
usually KYC could really be only asked on the time that you had committed some violation and this is something that they would really be asking some KYC but not on the time that you would be making continous withdrawal because if they would really be asking about KYC on the time that you would really be making withdrawal then this is something that shows that they are doing shady thing.

Normally a person who always enters a casino the only thing they think about is winning and withdrawing, I think that is something basic, however all this is sometimes wrapped in an endless number of things that can be very welcoming to please others, Some say it is for fun, others for enjoyment, but I have noticed that almost no one tells the truth, the truth is money, fun and enjoyment if they are on one side, but I think that here the main thing is that, money, In fact, no one goes to a casino just to have fun using play money, everyone goes with money and to spend, but when that right is skewed by something as non-elementary for us as players as a KYC, where the majority is full of rage, because here the common thing is to do things well, so good that the KYC is accepted and verified, but it enters another complication that the verification can last up to days and that complicates everything.

I think that we always risk when give our money to somebody. Sometimes risks are higher. In casino we risk 3 times: deposit, bet, withdraw. The KYC possible increase risk when you withdraw and need your money fast but anyway withdrawal is a risk with KYC or without it.
The main risk with KYC is that someone can use your data. But the same risk you have every moment when you give your data to any organisation.

Well, if we consider that we take risks at every moment to carry out any activity, then we could have a better understanding of things.

For example, I am a person who joins any bank, or any FIAT style organization. What is emphasized here is that Fiat money is what is legal, what is common and what many people strive to protect because it has a higher order of legitimacy, however, in an online casino with crypto, I believe that criminals have more free rein to do their misdeeds, because Governments require KYC, but at the end of the day we know that they will use that same KYC in some moment against us and that is the only thing that should be avoided, that is why so much drama with the KYC to withdraw, although as I have said many times the casinos should be more Illustrative , instead of announcing that they make deposits, they should say that they first make the verification of their KYC to be able to make the deposit, that would be the most loyal thing they could do to avoid all these problems , but I think that not even with the dragon spheres ocn 3 wishes would I do it.

That`s what i`m talking about! If the casino make us KYC, they have to do it before the first deposit. At least we must have an opportunity to KYC ourselves. In such way gambler can choose his way - if he don`t want to KYC he can change casino, if he don`t afraid of it - he KYC and has no problem with withdrawals. But casinos don`t want to lose such opportunity to cheat.

That's more better they should require this at first so that no confusion related on future implementation and for sure to many can accept that set up rather than this requirement will be ask later on once they request something since their casino might provably get a bad reputation for that reasons.

If they care about the feed back of people they should not deceive by telling they are not KYC compliant but at the end they ask their users especially when withdrawal request has been submitted.

If they cheat and say something misleading then its better to leave their casino and warn our  friends regarding to those misleading claims they are posting on their thread.

Well then, because of these things, we must see that as now the KYC is a Mandatory process, well, the cais should not do that, they do not lose anything, in fact so many Problems would be avoided that they would almost be an example for others to copy from them. Of course, not everyone would do this for the simple fact that they believe that people will not enter , but sooner or later everything should only be done by us, of course I Always say something, it is better to trust the casinos that have a high reputation, a high degree of trust so that relatively new casinos are not generated by Others, I am Someone who does not trust much, I am always somewhat suspicious of them.

[BitcoinSupremo]

KYC is bloody mandatory these days, mate, but it saves ya heaps of strife when ya wanna have a fair go against the pokies joint that's holding onto ya winnings. Normally, they don't hang onto ya dosh when ya strike it rich and wanna cash out. Once ya've already verified yaself, they don't hassle ya again. So, reckon KYC's a necessary annoyance, but worth it in the end.

[FortuneFollower]

First thing i think about is not to show my money to anybody. When you gamble in unknown casinos it is anyway bad decision - you risk and your money, and your data both. And when someone can connect you with your money it is really bad. But i can only repeat what i said long ago - when someone knows that you have money - he can get all your data anyway. The main question is the sum, that becomes interesting for someone serious.

Yes, basically those are the risks that one can suffer when it comes to a casino that makes a difference, because when we are in a casino we do take risks, from the moment we make the first deposit until we make the withdrawal, now more. never because the thing is very given that KYC has to be done compulsorily in all casinos, that is what many do not like, and I personally do not like it, however those are the conditions, so that's what I say , Playing in a place that you know is safe, things are likely to be done that way.

What we have to be clear about is that we as players have to do what is safe for us and guarantees us playing well, because data leaks are something that can happen, so since we are in a casino it is already a risk, of course In fact, everything is a risk, it's just that sometimes we have to take risks and do what we like.

I think that we always risk when give our money to somebody. Sometimes risks are higher. In casino we risk 3 times: deposit, bet, withdraw. The KYC possible increase risk when you withdraw and need your money fast but anyway withdrawal is a risk with KYC or without it.
The main risk with KYC is that someone can use your data. But the same risk you have every moment when you give your data to any organisation.

Well, if we consider that we take risks at every moment to carry out any activity, then we could have a better understanding of things.

For example, I am a person who joins any bank, or any FIAT style organization. What is emphasized here is that Fiat money is what is legal, what is common and what many people strive to protect because it has a higher order of legitimacy, however, in an online casino with crypto, I believe that criminals have more free rein to do their misdeeds, because Governments require KYC, but at the end of the day we know that they will use that same KYC in some moment against us and that is the only thing that should be avoided, that is why so much drama with the KYC to withdraw, although as I have said many times the casinos should be more Illustrative , instead of announcing that they make deposits, they should say that they first make the verification of their KYC to be able to make the deposit, that would be the most loyal thing they could do to avoid all these problems , but I think that not even with the dragon spheres ocn 3 wishes would I do it.

The suggestion to make KYC verification a prerequisite for deposits could indeed streamline the process, setting clear expectations for users while aiming to enhance trust and transparency.
From other side, it could make signing up harder and slower for new users, raising concerns about privacy right from the start. While aiming for more trust and transparency, it's key to think about how this might put off newcomers or complicate the initial steps. Your "dragon spheres" analogy adds a fun twist, highlighting the tough task of changing how things are done to be more user friendly. It's crucial to keep looking for ways to balance security, privacy, and ease of use for everyone.

[rodskee]

There have been cases also whereby the gamblers are the causes to this kind of experience because they raised the false alarm first for the gambling platforms to put an eye on them, in supplying anything for KYC, we should make sure they we totally avoid any form of error, such could be termed a suspicious move on us to bypass their regular process and checks for users identity when you're having a different aim from your end.

lets not mentioned those who deserves such restrictions because as gambler we must know what rules in each
site we are dealing and we must comply to never experience issues , but what we need to understand here is that
the casino that is victimizing players because we have seen this many times than players are cheating  gambling site.

[noormcs5]

I think that we always risk when give our money to somebody. Sometimes risks are higher. In casino we risk 3 times: deposit, bet, withdraw. The KYC possible increase risk when you withdraw and need your money fast but anyway withdrawal is a risk with KYC or without it.
The main risk with KYC is that someone can use your data. But the same risk you have every moment when you give your data to any organisation.

There is no doubt that gambling is the risky game and those who gamble know that they are taking risk with their money in order to gain profits and in the process they may lose money too.

However, being not able to KYC even after winning is not termed as bad luck but a scam by the new gambling sites. They will allow you to gamble and deposit without KYC but when you win something and place a withdrawal order they may start to ask for KYC. The bad ones won't approve the KYC and hence your money is stuck in the casino.

To avoid this situation it is always recommended that we do the KYC first so this risk of getting scammed by casinos is eliminated to some extent. Now it only leaves us with luck in gambling and if we have good luck we can make money in gambling and cash it out.

[Crypt0Gore]

I think that we always risk when give our money to somebody. Sometimes risks are higher. In casino we risk 3 times: deposit, bet, withdraw. The KYC possible increase risk when you withdraw and need your money fast but anyway withdrawal is a risk with KYC or without it.
The main risk with KYC is that someone can use your data. But the same risk you have every moment when you give your data to any organization.

There is no doubt that gambling is a risky game and those who gamble know that they are taking risks with their money to gain profits and in the process, they may lose money too.

However, being not able to KYC even after winning is not termed as bad luck but a scam by the new gambling sites. They will allow you to gamble and deposit without KYC but when you win something and place a withdrawal order they may start to ask for KYC. The bad ones won't approve the KYC and hence your money is stuck in the casino.

To avoid this situation it is always recommended that we do the KYC first so this risk of getting scammed by casinos is eliminated to some extent. Now it only leaves us with luck in gambling and if we have good luck we can make money in gambling and cash it out.

I disagree with the part where you said they will allow you to deposit without KYC, this is already common with crypto exchanges too and I believe that all gamblers on this forum know this about crypto exchanges too, why blame the casinos only?

Few crypto exchanges will restrict you from withdrawing if your amount is big and will only allow a certain amount to be withdrawn every 24 hours and some don't even give room for such.

If we can put the blame on online casinos for this act, then gamblers have their blame too, what's stopping them from passing KYC first before even starting to gamble on every online casino they choose to use?

KYC and online casinos are like 5 and 6, always in one, be ready to pass it or forget online gambling, I would rather pass KYC first before using it instead of trying to pass it after I won some money.

[EarnOnVictor]

I think that we always risk when give our money to somebody. Sometimes risks are higher. In casino we risk 3 times: deposit, bet, withdraw. The KYC possible increase risk when you withdraw and need your money fast but anyway withdrawal is a risk with KYC or without it.
The main risk with KYC is that someone can use your data. But the same risk you have every moment when you give your data to any organization.

There is no doubt that gambling is a risky game and those who gamble know that they are taking risks with their money to gain profits and in the process, they may lose money too.

However, being not able to KYC even after winning is not termed as bad luck but a scam by the new gambling sites. They will allow you to gamble and deposit without KYC but when you win something and place a withdrawal order they may start to ask for KYC. The bad ones won't approve the KYC and hence your money is stuck in the casino.

To avoid this situation it is always recommended that we do the KYC first so this risk of getting scammed by casinos is eliminated to some extent. Now it only leaves us with luck in gambling and if we have good luck we can make money in gambling and cash it out.

I disagree with the part where you said they will allow you to deposit without KYC, this is already common with crypto exchanges too and I believe that all gamblers on this forum know this about crypto exchanges too, why blame the casinos only?

Few crypto exchanges will restrict you from withdrawing if your amount is big and will only allow a certain amount to be withdrawn every 24 hours and some don't even give room for such.

If we can put the blame on online casinos for this act, then gamblers have their blame too, what's stopping them from passing KYC first before even starting to gamble on every online casino they choose to use?

KYC and online casinos are like 5 and 6, always in one, be ready to pass it or forget online gambling, I would rather pass KYC first before using it instead of trying to pass it after I won some money.

I understand the school of thought you are bringing this from and I love it as well because the two of them (casinos and exchanges) are dealing with people's deposits and withdrawals. However, to buttress your points, there are many financial services and payment gateways doing this even before online casinos came into operation, and they still do this now. These are companies with the highest level of regulations operating in strict countries like the UK, US and Europe. This is possible because it is allowed by the rules of their regulators to provide a limited financial service for a particular customer/client without verification, and just as you explained what exchanges do, these companies do such as well.

There will be limitations to the amount they can transfer and there can be a certain grace time they can go without verification. This also varies depending on the transaction of the customer/client, the country of residence and how suspicious the customer is. These 3 factors are important and could prompt what many call unjustified calling for KYC completion by casinos, neglecting that the casino they are dealing with is not a no-KYC type. I simply see no fault in any regulated entities calling for the completion of KYC at any time, so far they are regulated and have not advertised no-KYC to you, just know that it might only be a matter of time if you do not do it now, they will ask you to complete it later.