|
Tittiez
|
 |
May 02, 2012, 07:37:26 PM |
|
Is this for established miners? or can someone who's only putting out 300Mh/s join up?
I'm here to learn and will be ever expanding.
Well I only have about 250MH/s and my invite was accepted after about a month. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Whoever mines the block which ends up containing your transaction will get its fee.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
bitlane
Internet detective
Sr. Member
 Offline
Activity: 462
Merit: 250
I heart thebaron
|
|
May 02, 2012, 08:39:38 PM |
|
Just out of curiosity....
Why is it that when I use GPUMAX to connect to my main pool, as a proxy service, I am penalized by up to 10% of my total hashing power as reported by my pool ?
Yet, when I connect directly to that same pool and remove GPUMAX from the equation, all stats report as they should ?
I understand that I 'Never make less than mining on my own' (when public work is available to perhaps offset my hash rate loss).but what is happening to those additional hashes ?
This is based on a study of the 6 GH/s that I am currently pointing towards GPUMAX as well as BTCGuild.
BTCGuild--->via--->GPUMAX = 5500 MH/s average reported by BTCGuild.
BTCGuild------------>Direct = 6000 MH/s average reported by BTCGuild.
Is this simply a route problem between the services ? Is this 'overhead' ?
|
|
|
|
|
phorensic
|
|
May 02, 2012, 10:13:51 PM |
|
Woohoo! I'm finally connecting to GPUMAX with cgminer! However, the website stopped working right now, lol. Just in case you weren't aware I am getting: 504 Gateway Time-out
The server didn't respond in time. |
|
|
|
|
pirateat40 (OP)
Avast Ye!
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
"Yes I am a pirate, 200 years too late."
|
|
May 02, 2012, 11:13:40 PM |
|
Just out of curiosity....
Why is it that when I use GPUMAX to connect to my main pool, as a proxy service, I am penalized by up to 10% of my total hashing power as reported by my pool ?
Yet, when I connect directly to that same pool and remove GPUMAX from the equation, all stats report as they should ?
I understand that I 'Never make less than mining on my own' (when public work is available to perhaps offset my hash rate loss).but what is happening to those additional hashes ?
This is based on a study of the 6 GH/s that I am currently pointing towards GPUMAX as well as BTCGuild.
BTCGuild--->via--->GPUMAX = 5500 MH/s average reported by BTCGuild.
BTCGuild------------>Direct = 6000 MH/s average reported by BTCGuild.
Is this simply a route problem between the services ? Is this 'overhead' ?
Don't know, I do know that BTCGuild always shows a little higher speeds, have you checked it with your miner? |
|
|
|
pirateat40 (OP)
Avast Ye!
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
"Yes I am a pirate, 200 years too late."
|
|
May 02, 2012, 11:14:10 PM |
|
Woohoo! I'm finally connecting to GPUMAX with cgminer! However, the website stopped working right now, lol. Just in case you weren't aware I am getting: 504 Gateway Time-out
The server didn't respond in time. Yea we did a quick port change that took the system down for a sec. We should be good to go now. |
|
|
|
|
drakahn
|
|
May 03, 2012, 12:30:57 AM |
|
Just out of curiosity....
Why is it that when I use GPUMAX to connect to my main pool, as a proxy service, I am penalized by up to 10% of my total hashing power as reported by my pool ?
Yet, when I connect directly to that same pool and remove GPUMAX from the equation, all stats report as they should ?
I understand that I 'Never make less than mining on my own' (when public work is available to perhaps offset my hash rate loss).but what is happening to those additional hashes ?
This is based on a study of the 6 GH/s that I am currently pointing towards GPUMAX as well as BTCGuild.
BTCGuild--->via--->GPUMAX = 5500 MH/s average reported by BTCGuild.
BTCGuild------------>Direct = 6000 MH/s average reported by BTCGuild.
Is this simply a route problem between the services ? Is this 'overhead' ?
I get the same thing 4.6GH/s when going straight to mmpool, 4-4.1GH/s through gpumax Its fine when purchases are running |
14ga8dJ6NGpiwQkNTXg7KzwozasfaXNfEU
|
|
|
|
Tittiez
|
|
May 03, 2012, 12:41:46 AM |
|
I get the same thing 4.6GH/s when going straight to mmpool, 4-4.1GH/s through gpumax
Its fine when purchases are running
With my single 6850 I get 250MH/s going straight to mmpool and 225MH/s going through gpumax. |
|
|
|
|
pirateat40 (OP)
Avast Ye!
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
"Yes I am a pirate, 200 years too late."
|
|
May 03, 2012, 12:45:24 AM |
|
I get the same thing 4.6GH/s when going straight to mmpool, 4-4.1GH/s through gpumax
Its fine when purchases are running
With my single 6850 I get 250MH/s going straight to mmpool and 225MH/s going through gpumax. You guys are seeing the MH changes in your miner or just on the pool? |
|
|
|
|
drakahn
|
|
May 03, 2012, 01:01:00 AM |
|
I get the same thing 4.6GH/s when going straight to mmpool, 4-4.1GH/s through gpumax
Its fine when purchases are running
With my single 6850 I get 250MH/s going straight to mmpool and 225MH/s going through gpumax. You guys are seeing the MH changes in your miner or just on the pool? Just on the pool, my miners report the same speeds to both mmpool and gpumax, but mmpool reports different mmpool's stats don't update the fastest though, so it is hard to tell where the problem is |
14ga8dJ6NGpiwQkNTXg7KzwozasfaXNfEU
|
|
|
pirateat40 (OP)
Avast Ye!
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
"Yes I am a pirate, 200 years too late."
|
|
May 03, 2012, 01:03:05 AM |
|
I get the same thing 4.6GH/s when going straight to mmpool, 4-4.1GH/s through gpumax
Its fine when purchases are running
With my single 6850 I get 250MH/s going straight to mmpool and 225MH/s going through gpumax. You guys are seeing the MH changes in your miner or just on the pool? Just on the pool, my miners report the same speeds to both mmpool and gpumax, but mmpool reports different mmpool's stats don't update the fastest though, so it is hard to tell where the problem is Yea, then its not that big of a deal. We'll work on getting it perfect down the road.  |
|
|
|
Fred26
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 43
Merit: 0
|
|
May 03, 2012, 04:09:13 AM |
|
I get the same thing 4.6GH/s when going straight to mmpool, 4-4.1GH/s through gpumax
Its fine when purchases are running
With my single 6850 I get 250MH/s going straight to mmpool and 225MH/s going through gpumax. You guys are seeing the MH changes in your miner or just on the pool? Just on the pool, my miners report the same speeds to both mmpool and gpumax, but mmpool reports different mmpool's stats don't update the fastest though, so it is hard to tell where the problem is Yea, then its not that big of a deal. We'll work on getting it perfect down the road. For what it's worth, those stats sound about right to me, (i.e. about 10% drop when using gpumax with no public work) I have noticed that my gpu usage drops every now and again, and it seems to correlate to new blocks, but not always. It does this on all 3 of my mining pc's. Dunno what it means, but it might help =D |
|
|
|
|
-ck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4088
Merit: 1631
Ruu \o/
|
|
May 03, 2012, 07:51:20 AM |
|
I've spent a busload of time making cgminer be nice to pools and, more so, services like gpumax, so hopefully cgminer users and gpumax alike will find a much better experience upgrading to 2.4.0: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=28402.msg880112#msg880112 |
Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel
2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
|
|
|
imsaguy
General failure and former
VIP
Hero Member
Offline
Activity: 574
Merit: 500
Don't send me a pm unless you gpg encrypt it.
|
|
May 03, 2012, 03:39:19 PM |
|
Tip me before I cap yo ass!
148KkS2vgVi4VzUi4JcKzM2PMaMVPi3nnq
|
|
|
|
pirateat40 (OP)
Avast Ye!
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
"Yes I am a pirate, 200 years too late."
|
|
May 03, 2012, 03:41:43 PM |
|
Thanks for all your hard work.  |
|
|
|
|
Tittiez
|
|
May 04, 2012, 02:50:40 AM |
|
Purchasing is still disabled for me. This may change in the future.
Purchasing seems enabled now! |
|
|
|
|
miscreanity
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1005
|
|
May 04, 2012, 02:53:44 AM |
|
Purchasing is still disabled for me. This may change in the future.
Purchasing seems enabled now! Yep, even had some queued work finally go through. Mighty fine. |
|
|
|
|
|
drakahn
|
|
May 04, 2012, 02:56:33 AM |
|
Purchasing is still disabled for me. This may change in the future.
Purchasing seems enabled now! Yep, even had some queued work finally go through. Mighty fine. This |
14ga8dJ6NGpiwQkNTXg7KzwozasfaXNfEU
|
|
|
|
Shadow383
|
|
May 04, 2012, 03:20:04 AM |
|
Is this for established miners? or can someone who's only putting out 300Mh/s join up?
I'm here to learn and will be ever expanding.
Well I only have about 250MH/s and my invite was accepted after about a month. Oh well, I have a few gigahash available, applied months ago and never heard anything back, not sure on the logic  |
|
|
|
|
|
sadpandatech
|
|
May 04, 2012, 02:13:26 PM |
|
Is this for established miners? or can someone who's only putting out 300Mh/s join up?
I'm here to learn and will be ever expanding.
Well I only have about 250MH/s and my invite was accepted after about a month. Oh well, I have a few gigahash available, applied months ago and never heard anything back, not sure on the logic same |
If you're not excited by the idea of being an early adopter 'now', then you should come back in three or four years and either tell us "Told you it'd never work!" or join what should, by then, be a much more stable and easier-to-use system.
- GA
It is being worked on by smart people. -DamienBlack
|
|
|
BrightAnarchist
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 853
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 04, 2012, 04:58:19 PM |
|
Watching
|
|
|
|
|
|
Poll
