Bitcoin Forum
December 09, 2016, 07:42:12 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.13.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Poll
Question: I would purchase mining time with...
BTC - 231 (57.6%)
MTGOXUSD Codes - 31 (7.7%)
Credit Card - 112 (27.9%)
Other e-currency (ie. Dwolla, Paxum) - 27 (6.7%)
Total Voters: 399

Pages: « 1 ... 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 [61] 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 ... 131 »
  Print  
Author Topic: GPUMAX | The Bitcoin Mining Marketplace  (Read 200371 times)
e21
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 105


View Profile
March 27, 2012, 08:51:09 PM
 #1201

I'm getting public work, but ~35% (!) rejects. Anyone else experiencing this?

One of my rigs with 1.7 GH/s running Phoenix 2 is getting 90-100% rejects, also tried phoenix 1.7.5 which got 100% rejects. On a rig with 235MH/s, phoenix 2.0 is running fine, but on newer drivers... Rig with 1.7GH/s is using 5870s/5970s, so if I update the driver I will lose a signifcant amount of MH/s. Also, I am not convinced this is driver related.
 
Have a rig with 1.5GH/s running DiabloMiner 11.12 drivers, which is getting an acceptable amount of rejects, but GPU usage is all over the board, jumping between 0 and 100% usage, and everywhere in between, in no particular order on all of my GPUs, this is resulting in about a 20% decrease in hashrate  Angry

Have a rig with 2.3GHs, using 7970's and DiabloMiner, which also has GPU usage problem, but much worse, resulting in about 50% decreased hashrate.

About a day ago, my rig with 1.5GH/s was working just fine offline, since public work resumed over the past however many hours, this problem started occurring.

I am curious why DiabloMiner, which is not listed as supported by GPUmax, works better than Phoenix 1.7.5 and 2, which are listed as compatible...
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1481312532
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481312532

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481312532
Reply with quote  #2

1481312532
Report to moderator
1481312532
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481312532

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481312532
Reply with quote  #2

1481312532
Report to moderator
minero1
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 145



View Profile
March 27, 2012, 08:55:03 PM
 #1202

I'm getting public work, but ~35% (!) rejects. Anyone else experiencing this?

One of my rigs with 1.7 GH/s running Phoenix 2 is getting 90-100% rejects, also tried phoenix 1.7.5 which got 100% rejects. On a rig with 235MH/s, phoenix 2.0 is running fine, but on newer drivers... Rig with 1.7GH/s is using 5870s/5970s, so if I update the driver I will lose a signifcant amount of MH/s. Also, I am not convinced this is driver related.
 
Have a rig with 1.5GH/s running DiabloMiner 11.12 drivers, which is getting an acceptable amount of rejects, but GPU usage is all over the board, jumping between 0 and 100% usage, and everywhere in between, in no particular order on all of my GPUs, this is resulting in about a 20% decrease in hashrate  Angry

Have a rig with 2.3GHs, using 7970's and DiabloMiner, which also has GPU usage problem, but much worse, resulting in about 50% decreased hashrate.

About a day ago, my rig with 1.5GH/s was working just fine offline, since public work resumed over the past however many hours, this problem started occurring.

I am curious why DiabloMiner, which is not listed as supported by GPUmax, works better than Phoenix 1.7.5 and 2, which are listed as compatible...

are you using BAMT? i had many issues with BAMT with phoenix and phoenix2 until i started using cgminer

but it looks like you have more experience building mining rigs than me so what do i know
rjk
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 420


1ngldh


View Profile
March 27, 2012, 08:58:03 PM
 #1203

FWIW, I have never been able to get a BFL with ufasoft to work on GPUMAX at all. It starts and runs and reports 100% rejects. The same software and miner works on other pools, and I tested with a working login from another rig, so I'm not sure why it rejects everything.

Mining Rig Extraordinaire - the Trenton BPX6806 18-slot PCIe backplane [PICS] Dead project is dead, all hail the coming of the mighty ASIC!
QuantumFoam
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 130


View Profile
March 27, 2012, 09:00:35 PM
 #1204

Public work has ceased it seems. I guess there's still work being done with the migration.
e21
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 105


View Profile
March 27, 2012, 09:05:15 PM
 #1205

I'm getting public work, but ~35% (!) rejects. Anyone else experiencing this?

One of my rigs with 1.7 GH/s running Phoenix 2 is getting 90-100% rejects, also tried phoenix 1.7.5 which got 100% rejects. On a rig with 235MH/s, phoenix 2.0 is running fine, but on newer drivers... Rig with 1.7GH/s is using 5870s/5970s, so if I update the driver I will lose a signifcant amount of MH/s. Also, I am not convinced this is driver related.
 
Have a rig with 1.5GH/s running DiabloMiner 11.12 drivers, which is getting an acceptable amount of rejects, but GPU usage is all over the board, jumping between 0 and 100% usage, and everywhere in between, in no particular order on all of my GPUs, this is resulting in about a 20% decrease in hashrate  Angry

Have a rig with 2.3GHs, using 7970's and DiabloMiner, which also has GPU usage problem, but much worse, resulting in about 50% decreased hashrate.

About a day ago, my rig with 1.5GH/s was working just fine offline, since public work resumed over the past however many hours, this problem started occurring.


I am curious why DiabloMiner, which is not listed as supported by GPUmax, works better than Phoenix 1.7.5 and 2, which are listed as compatible...

are you using BAMT? i had many issues with BAMT with phoenix and phoenix2 until i started using cgminer

but it looks like you have more experience building mining rigs than me so what do i know

Sorry, I guess that information probably would have helped  Grin

No, I am using Windows 7 64bit on all of my rigs.. I just checked my 1.5GHs rig, which has stabilized somewhat after being connected to GPUmax for a while.. hashrate is still about 8-10% below normal though due to drops in GPU usage.

Phoenix 2.0 is now working on my 1.7 GH/s rig for some strange reason.. I went back to run it, so I could grab the error message I was getting and post it here, but now it's working  Embarrassed previously, it was hashing, and trying to submit work, but was returning something about the work submitted being wrong or something.

2.3GH/s rig still is having major drops in GPU usage, I had heard that Tahiti has issues with GPUmax for some reason; has anyone else heard this, or can confirm this? I'm part of the 1% who doesn't typically use cgminer, for various reasons, however I do have a copy downloaded and configured on my 2.3GH/s rig, which I have not tested yet, I will post back with the results of that...

EDIT:
Public work has ceased it seems. I guess there's still work being done with the migration.

Lol.. that is probably why my rigs are working just fine now.. Problem for me seemed to be with public shares only..
jjiimm_64
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1680


View Profile
March 27, 2012, 09:17:20 PM
 #1206

I had heard that Tahiti has issues with GPUmax for some reason;


Tahiti does not have problems with gpumax... diablo miner does.

I have a few 7970 crunching away public and private shares at gpumax using cgminer.

1jimbitm6hAKTjKX4qurCNQubbnk2YsFw
TheSeven
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504


FPGA Mining LLC


View Profile WWW
March 27, 2012, 10:08:30 PM
 #1207

FWIW, I have never been able to get a BFL with ufasoft to work on GPUMAX at all. It starts and runs and reports 100% rejects.
I could probably make MPBM compatible, to have another BFL and GPUMAX compatible miner, also opening GPUMAX's route to other FPGA boards at the same time, if I would finally get that damn invite! (have been waiting for several weeks now)

My tip jar: 13kwqR7B4WcSAJCYJH1eXQcxG5vVUwKAqY
slider1978
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 180



View Profile
March 27, 2012, 10:24:10 PM
 #1208

I had heard that Tahiti has issues with GPUmax for some reason;


Tahiti does not have problems with gpumax... diablo miner does.

I have a few 7970 crunching away public and private shares at gpumax using cgminer.

+1, I have 3 7970's on cgminer and GPUMax with no trouble.
imsaguy
General failure and former
VIP
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 574

Don't send me a pm unless you gpg encrypt it.


View Profile WWW
March 27, 2012, 10:26:54 PM
 #1209

I had heard that Tahiti has issues with GPUmax for some reason;


Tahiti does not have problems with gpumax... diablo miner does.

I have a few 7970 crunching away public and private shares at gpumax using cgminer.

+1, I have 3 7970's on cgminer and GPUMax with no trouble.

Me too.  Cgminer crashes out on project #2 while running the 7970s, but gpumax runs them fine.

Coming Soon!™ © imsaguy 2011-2013, All rights reserved.

EIEIO:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=60117.0

Shades Minoco Collection Thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=65989
Payment Address: http://btc.to/5r6
RoloTonyBrownTown
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 350



View Profile
March 27, 2012, 11:24:52 PM
 #1210

The BFL's run fine on GPUMAX with cgminer if that helps.

I haven't tried Ufasoft at all to be honest.

And yes, no paid work at the moment unfortunately (although there was a nice burst for a while last night)

ummas
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 274


View Profile
March 28, 2012, 07:59:24 AM
 #1211

I dont wont to be rud, but in my opinion, if GPUMAX will keep prize of purschases so high, they will loose all customers.
difficulty rises, pize should be going down...

I dont mind staying, but it`s unprofitable ATM.
using gpumax, i must use deepbit for example, and i get more stales (aprox 0.5%)

using P2Pool, i get no fee, less stales = more BTC.

reminder: deepbit pays now aproox 0.0000304sommethink per share. who will buy share for 0.000055 or (oh GOD) for 0.00006??
this prize was ok, when deepbit was paying 0.00004 per share. (it was a time, when i was joining gpumax)ed

@RoloTonyBrownTown
THX for that, i payed for 3 of them. cant tell bought.... :/ you know the 4-6 weeks rule ? Tongue
hashking
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 308


View Profile
March 28, 2012, 01:36:24 PM
 #1212

Anyone getting any public shares yet.
marks1976
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 249



View Profile WWW
March 28, 2012, 03:09:09 PM
 #1213

Anyone getting any public shares yet.


No public work for me.  Was a little last night. 

bitinc-investing.com   bitcoinmetals.us- copper, gold and silver
pirateat40
Avast Ye!
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378


"Yes I am a pirate, 200 years too late."


View Profile WWW
March 28, 2012, 03:10:09 PM
 #1214

We're working out a couple more bugs and purchases will resume.

jjiimm_64
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1680


View Profile
March 28, 2012, 03:15:12 PM
 #1215

I dont wont to be rud, but in my opinion, if GPUMAX will keep prize of purschases so high, they will loose all customers.
difficulty rises, pize should be going down...

I dont mind staying, but it`s unprofitable ATM.
using gpumax, i must use deepbit for example, and i get more stales (aprox 0.5%)

using P2Pool, i get no fee, less stales = more BTC.

reminder: deepbit pays now aproox 0.0000304sommethink per share. who will buy share for 0.000055 or (oh GOD) for 0.00006??
this prize was ok, when deepbit was paying 0.00004 per share. (it was a time, when i was joining gpumax)ed

@RoloTonyBrownTown
THX for that, i payed for 3 of them. cant tell bought.... :/ you know the 4-6 weeks rule ? Tongue

Then go to P2P pool...  bye bye!

1jimbitm6hAKTjKX4qurCNQubbnk2YsFw
BinaryMage
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 546


Ad astra.


View Profile
March 28, 2012, 04:19:35 PM
 #1216

I dont wont to be rud, but in my opinion, if GPUMAX will keep prize of purschases so high, they will loose all customers.
difficulty rises, pize should be going down...

I dont mind staying, but it`s unprofitable ATM.
using gpumax, i must use deepbit for example, and i get more stales (aprox 0.5%)

using P2Pool, i get no fee, less stales = more BTC.

reminder: deepbit pays now aproox 0.0000304sommethink per share. who will buy share for 0.000055 or (oh GOD) for 0.00006??
this prize was ok, when deepbit was paying 0.00004 per share. (it was a time, when i was joining gpumax)ed

@RoloTonyBrownTown
THX for that, i payed for 3 of them. cant tell bought.... :/ you know the 4-6 weeks rule ? Tongue

No offense, but if you're buying shares on GPUMAX and sending them to PPS pools, you're kinda missing the point.

In any case, leave if you want, more BTC for the rest of us!

-- BinaryMage -- | OTC | PGP
rjk
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 420


1ngldh


View Profile
March 28, 2012, 04:20:42 PM
 #1217

No offense, but if you're buying shares on GPUMAX and sending them to PPS pools, you're kinda missing the point.

In any case, leave if you want, more BTC for the rest of us!
Derpbit offers proportional, btw.

Mining Rig Extraordinaire - the Trenton BPX6806 18-slot PCIe backplane [PICS] Dead project is dead, all hail the coming of the mighty ASIC!
P4man
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504



View Profile
March 28, 2012, 04:35:17 PM
 #1218

No offense, but if you're buying shares on GPUMAX and sending them to PPS pools, you're kinda missing the point.

But wherever else you send them, how can you achieve a positive ROI?

Since you cant time the purchases precisely (AFAIK), its rather useless for hopping. YOu might try hopping with purchased shares by sending them to your own proxy and hop from there, but aside from the stales I suspect that would cause, and your proxy that would have to withstand such massive spikes, AFAIK gpumax doesnt even let you send them to any pool other than the ones they approved. Even if you could, good luck getting >160% PPS from hopping these days.

So I guess Im missing the point too. Who is buying at 160% PPS and what for?

Glasswalker
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 350



View Profile WWW
March 28, 2012, 04:36:30 PM
 #1219

FWIW, I have never been able to get a BFL with ufasoft to work on GPUMAX at all. It starts and runs and reports 100% rejects.
I could probably make MPBM compatible, to have another BFL and GPUMAX compatible miner, also opening GPUMAX's route to other FPGA boards at the same time, if I would finally get that damn invite! (have been waiting for several weeks now)

FYI: I'm running MPBM Testing branch with my Icarus FPGA cluster, and it's mining on GPUMax right now just fine.

Just trying to make Bitcoin a Success... One crazy project at a time. (13rwPKskyATcAq3PpnCikfFG8989DQ8M3c)
HashVoodoo Open Source FPGA Mining Bitstream: https://github.com/pmumby/hashvoodoo-fpga-bitcoin-miner
BinaryMage
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 546


Ad astra.


View Profile
March 28, 2012, 04:47:30 PM
 #1220

No offense, but if you're buying shares on GPUMAX and sending them to PPS pools, you're kinda missing the point.

In any case, leave if you want, more BTC for the rest of us!
Derpbit offers proportional, btw.

Yeah, but he was specifically talking about PPS.

No offense, but if you're buying shares on GPUMAX and sending them to PPS pools, you're kinda missing the point.

But wherever else you send them, how can you achieve a positive ROI?

Since you cant time the purchases precisely (AFAIK), its rather useless for hopping. YOu might try hopping with purchased shares by sending them to your own proxy and hop from there, but aside from the stales I suspect that would cause, and your proxy that would have to withstand such massive spikes, AFAIK gpumax doesnt even let you send them to any pool other than the ones they approved. Even if you could, good luck getting >160% PPS from hopping these days.

So I guess Im missing the point too. Who is buying at 160% PPS and what for?


My guesses are private pools, volume testing (of mining proxies or whatnot) and sheer bets that a proportional pool will get lucky.

There is supposedly some secret reason that no one will reveal (see the thread a while back), but I have not managed to figure out what it is.

-- BinaryMage -- | OTC | PGP
Pages: « 1 ... 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 [61] 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 ... 131 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!