[ANN] ¤ DMD Diamond 3.0 | Scarce ¤ Valuable ¤ Secure | PoS 3.0 | Masternodes 65%

[polanskiman]

how well established ur node is in network is affecting the POS success chances
its the speed how fast the rumor that u found a new block is spreading in network that influnce the success chance

so addnode and listen=1 for sure helping additional a maxconnections=50 too
and static IP give another boost in connections because other wallets easy find u again

but it really should not matter if ur pos try a few times until successful
a unsuccessful POS atempt dont destroy coin-age

so what worry me more than unsuccessful POS atempts is the report like LTCMAXMYR

this have most time the origin in minting inside wrong fork and once return to main chain u need to run the repairwallet command to fix displayed balance

Already have all those configured in the wallet. Failed attempts happen as much as when I had a different configuration. The only thing I do not have is a fixed IP but that's the case for most people and unless paying 60 USD just for having an IP, this is not going to happen for me  

[1715041406]

1715041406

[1715041406]

1715041406

[1715041406]

1715041406

[cryptonit]

cryptonit

why when I write listen=1 then I have more than 50 connections
but when I write listen=0 then I have a maximum of 10-11 connections?

ur walle feel happy with around 12 connections an dont active establish more
with listen=1 u allow incomming connections to be established above that
up to ur maxconnections setting

[cryptonit]

how well established ur node is in network is affecting the POS success chances
its the speed how fast the rumor that u found a new block is spreading in network that influnce the success chance

so addnode and listen=1 for sure helping additional a maxconnections=50 too
and static IP give another boost in connections because other wallets easy find u again

but it really should not matter if ur pos try a few times until successful
a unsuccessful POS atempt dont destroy coin-age

so what worry me more than unsuccessful POS atempts is the report like LTCMAXMYR

this have most time the origin in minting inside wrong fork and once return to main chain u need to run the repairwallet command to fix displayed balance

Already have all those configured in the wallet. Failed attempts happen as much as when I had a different configuration. The only thing I do not have is a fixed IP but that's the case for most people and unless paying 60 USD just for having an IP, this is not going to happen for me  

i forgot to add latency and when we analyzed that u had like three time higher than me towards the nodes connected with u

[paladin281978]

cryptonit

why when I write listen=1 then I have more than 50 connections
but when I write listen=0 then I have a maximum of 10-11 connections?

ur walle feel happy with around 12 connections an dont active establish more
with listen=1 u allow incomming connections to be established above that
up to ur maxconnections setting

I did not understand. Google translator does not understand the meaning of giving. Google does not understand the abbreviated words
what to write in .conf?
this?

listen=1
noirc=0
addnode=193.68.21.19
addnode=54.191.208.14
addnode=54.255.133.30
addnode=54.86.164.216
bantime=600
maxconnections=50

but on the first page stated that it is for:
This is for exchanges, and those who do a lot of transactions.

[kiklo]

Example:

In POS failed mintings are normal, one way to decrease the number that fail , is to use coin control
and combine the smaller amounts into a larger amount.
If you look at your chart everything that was over 13 interest minted, and most everything with under 1 interest failed to mint. We called it Dust when the amount are too small to mint.
So combining the dust (smaller amounts) together for minting will increase the chance of minting.
Fyi: Coin age does reset when you combine the smaller amounts.

 

[lecaillou]

Me I have no .conf file, 58 connection and no POS failed 
It is very important to add the .conf files?

[cryptonit]

Me I have no .conf file, 58 connection and no POS failed 
It is very important to add the .conf files?

as u proof it works fine without

[cryptonit]

In POS failed mintings are normal, one way to decrease the number that fail , is to use coin control
and combine the smaller amounts into a larger amount.
If you look at your chart everything that was over 13 interest minted, and most everything with under 1 interest failed to mint. We called it Dust when the amount are too small to mint.
So combining the dust (smaller amounts) together for minting will increase the chance of minting.
Fyi: Coin age does reset when you combine the smaller amounts.

 

dmd pos have a feature called group stake
coins with age abover 30 days and combined size below 100 dmd
try to mint together and if successful they merged together
manual use of coin control is not required
dmd have successful anti dust mechanism

but as the word pos atempt say they can fail
thats normal behavior and they will try again

[alba77]

Thank you all for your answers. I will try some of the suggestions, and Pos patiently

[kiklo]

In POS failed mintings are normal, one way to decrease the number that fail , is to use coin control
and combine the smaller amounts into a larger amount.
If you look at your chart everything that was over 13 interest minted, and most everything with under 1 interest failed to mint. We called it Dust when the amount are too small to mint.
So combining the dust (smaller amounts) together for minting will increase the chance of minting.
Fyi: Coin age does reset when you combine the smaller amounts.

 

dmd pos have a feature called group stake
coins with age abover 30 days and combined size below 100 dmd
try to mint together and if successful they merged together
manual use of coin control is not required
dmd have successful anti dust mechanism

but as the word pos atempt say they can fail
thats normal behavior and they will try again

What size amounts are Group staked together, because his interest attempts show a very small amount being minted. Which makes it look like the group stake is not working for him.
Question: does the group stake only occur at specific times?

 

[hallared]

In POS failed mintings are normal, one way to decrease the number that fail , is to use coin control
and combine the smaller amounts into a larger amount.
If you look at your chart everything that was over 13 interest minted, and most everything with under 1 interest failed to mint. We called it Dust when the amount are too small to mint.
So combining the dust (smaller amounts) together for minting will increase the chance of minting.
Fyi: Coin age does reset when you combine the smaller amounts.

 

dmd pos have a feature called group stake
coins with age abover 30 days and combined size below 100 dmd
try to mint together and if successful they merged together
manual use of coin control is not required
dmd have successful anti dust mechanism

but as the word pos atempt say they can fail
thats normal behavior and they will try again

What size amounts are Group staked together, because his interest attempts show a very small amount being minted. Which makes it look like the group stake is not working for him.
Question: does the group stake only occur at specific times?

 

Group stake only occurs for coins older than 30 days.

Before answering questions about DMD PoS it is suitable to have some knowledge. Please do some reading first.
http://bit.diamonds/community/index.php/topic,46.msg376.html#msg376

[shveicar]

Why when Bitcoins grows, the price of the Diamonds fall? This is contrary to common sense.



 

[polanskiman]

how well established ur node is in network is affecting the POS success chances
its the speed how fast the rumor that u found a new block is spreading in network that influnce the success chance

so addnode and listen=1 for sure helping additional a maxconnections=50 too
and static IP give another boost in connections because other wallets easy find u again

but it really should not matter if ur pos try a few times until successful
a unsuccessful POS atempt dont destroy coin-age

so what worry me more than unsuccessful POS atempts is the report like LTCMAXMYR

this have most time the origin in minting inside wrong fork and once return to main chain u need to run the repairwallet command to fix displayed balance

Already have all those configured in the wallet. Failed attempts happen as much as when I had a different configuration. The only thing I do not have is a fixed IP but that's the case for most people and unless paying 60 USD just for having an IP, this is not going to happen for me 

i forgot to add latency and when we analyzed that u had like three time higher than me towards the nodes connected with u

Yes that's what I explained earlier. The fact that I am far away (with many links and gateways to go through) is the major problem and unless networks are optimised this will not change for me.

[polanskiman]

Example:

In POS failed mintings are normal, one way to decrease the number that fail , is to use coin control
and combine the smaller amounts into a larger amount.
If you look at your chart everything that was over 13 interest minted, and most everything with under 1 interest failed to mint. We called it Dust when the amount are too small to mint.
So combining the dust (smaller amounts) together for minting will increase the chance of minting.
Fyi: Coin age does reset when you combine the smaller amounts.

 

Smaller amounts is not the reason why my POS attempts failed more often. Cryptonite and and myself have explained why this happens earlier. Combining smaller DMD amounts is automatically done by the wallet.

The picture I posted was not meant as a question but as an example for the poster who was asking about POS failed attempts in a MAC environment.

[polanskiman]

In POS failed mintings are normal, one way to decrease the number that fail , is to use coin control
and combine the smaller amounts into a larger amount.
If you look at your chart everything that was over 13 interest minted, and most everything with under 1 interest failed to mint. We called it Dust when the amount are too small to mint.
So combining the dust (smaller amounts) together for minting will increase the chance of minting.
Fyi: Coin age does reset when you combine the smaller amounts.

 

dmd pos have a feature called group stake
coins with age abover 30 days and combined size below 100 dmd
try to mint together and if successful they merged together
manual use of coin control is not required
dmd have successful anti dust mechanism

but as the word pos atempt say they can fail
thats normal behavior and they will try again

What size amounts are Group staked together, because his interest attempts show a very small amount being minted. Which makes it look like the group stake is not working for him.
Question: does the group stake only occur at specific times?

 

Sorry to say, but you are wrong. As already stated several times in this thread the numerous failed minting attempts that I am experiencing are due to the fact that I am located far away from the majority of the nodes with a high latency. Please read above and page before.

[LTCMAXMYR]

is someone attacking?
wallet connections jump to 18,and many mined blocks orphaned,
network hashrate drops to 6G from 15G in few minutes
should i add more rigs to fight against?

[polanskiman]

is someone attacking?
wallet connections jump to 18,and many mined blocks orphaned,
network hashrate drops to 6G from 15G in few minutes
should i add more rigs to fight against?

I see 128 as current difficulty. Looking at Danbi's pool blocks seem to be found normally.

[LTCMAXMYR]

is someone attacking?
wallet connections jump to 18,and many mined blocks orphaned,
network hashrate drops to 6G from 15G in few minutes
should i add more rigs to fight against?

I see 128 as current difficulty. Looking at Danbi's pool blocks seem to be found normally.

i add 2G more hashpower(total 5G),i think it is normal now.,if needed,i have 10G more hashpower to join in.
don't be afraid,i am longterm support,i just protect the block chain.
when cryptonit find a way to solve the problem, i will drop hashpower,

[kiklo]

In POS failed mintings are normal, one way to decrease the number that fail , is to use coin control
and combine the smaller amounts into a larger amount.
If you look at your chart everything that was over 13 interest minted, and most everything with under 1 interest failed to mint. We called it Dust when the amount are too small to mint.
So combining the dust (smaller amounts) together for minting will increase the chance of minting.
Fyi: Coin age does reset when you combine the smaller amounts.

 

dmd pos have a feature called group stake
coins with age abover 30 days and combined size below 100 dmd
try to mint together and if successful they merged together
manual use of coin control is not required
dmd have successful anti dust mechanism

but as the word pos atempt say they can fail
thats normal behavior and they will try again

What size amounts are Group staked together, because his interest attempts show a very small amount being minted. Which makes it look like the group stake is not working for him.
Question: does the group stake only occur at specific times?

 

Sorry to say, but you are wrong. As already stated several times in this thread the numerous failed minting attempts that I am experiencing are due to the fact that I am located far away from the majority of the nodes with a high latency. Please read above and page before.

Hey,

Just telling you how the other 5 POS Coins that I Mint, Work.

Now if you say Diamond does not work that way, then I will take your word for it, since it is a hybrid.
Part of the reason , I am in here, is to research your community & your coin since cryptonit wants ZEIT to merge with you like Noble is planning too.

located far away from the majority of the nodes with a high latency

Ok , so what type of internet are you on
 Dial-up or satellite or DSL or Cable ?

Also what Country?

Also is this high latency to a POW node or to your POS Wallets or both ?

 

Edit :
If you look at your chart everything that was over 13 interest minted, and most everything with under 1 interest failed to mint.  So are you saying that your latency was high except when your interest was 13 or higher?  
Because my answer fits better that your high latency answer according to your own Chart.
If it was a problem with latency the higher interest mintings would have failed at the same rate as the lower interest mintings.
Sorry but high latency is the wrong answer, but the Good news just combine your smaller coin into groupings of at least 350 so they won't fail in minting as much.
Sorry automatic Group stake only goes up to 100, so you will have to do it manually.
And if you still don't believe me go get a VPN that is closer to these nodes you are talking about,
it won't make any difference, but at least you will know the truth.

[cryptonit]

If you look at your chart everything that was over 13 interest minted, and most everything with under 1 interest failed to mint.  So are you saying that your latency was high except when your interest was 13 or higher?  
Because my answer fits better that your high latency answer according to your own Chart.
If it was a problem with latency the higher interest mintings would have failed at the same rate as the lower interest mintings.
Sorry but high latency is the wrong answer, but the Good news just combine your smaller coin into groupings of at least 350 so they won't fail in minting as much.
Sorry automatic Group stake only goes up to 100, so you will have to do it manually.
And if you still don't believe me go get a VPN that is closer to these nodes you are talking about,
it won't make any difference, but at least you will know the truth.

kiklo

we dont teach here the "truth" to each other
u can tell us about ur experiences and we will analyze it
its not about who have the correct "truth"
as ZEIT-Knight u should be beyond such outdated mindset

a thing called "truth" isnt existing
existing are models that can be used to explain why and how things works
and our knowledge to improve this models are increasing day by day year by year

in the past there where very well though models that can explain why the earth is the center if the universe
new facts lead to improved models that place the sun in the center of the universe
later the center of milkway galaxy was the center and today im not up to date what we consider to be the center of universe
but none of all that models and explanations was the truth.........

its about gathering facts and analyze it

polanskiman came to us with his low successful minting rate (like below 50%) and our first analysis found no difference to nodes which are mint with 90% or higher success rate beside the higher latency

now u come and tell us about ur experiences we will analyze that too

i can say from my view i rare have a unsuccessful mint (like 1 of 50) but i also have no more single (1 DMD) coin pile most of my coin pile have a size between 30 and 120 DMD which is the result of perfect working auto dust prevention with group stake and split stake to make sure the network have enought coin piles so anytime sure someone have something to mint but on the other side prevent forever coin split and dust.

it might be that wallets with lot 1 DMD pile need more POS atempts and have a higher failure rate
i still see there no problem over time his wallet coin pile structure will also be the same as mine and so should his minting success rate

fact is that small coin pile can also mint i think the lowest minting reward i saw until yet was like 0.002 just the chance is very slim

im not sure we wrote it somewhere but the whole POS design was build around 100 DMD so we can guarantee if u have 100 DMD in ur wallet no matter if its 100x 1 DMD or 1x 100 DMD u will be able to mint POS rewards. ur 350 DMD number as ideal pile size is not as we designed it and its not required. but if analysis says example a group size of 200 DMD would be better its no problem at all for us adapt the code

in a future where 100 DMD is such a big value that maybe normal people dont even have so much in their wallet maybe some people offer a minting service where they hold ur coins to mint for u

but now it really not hard to have above 100 DMD so everyone can easy mint on his own