If you look at your chart everything that was over 13 interest minted, and most everything with under 1 interest failed to mint. So are you saying that your latency was high except when your interest was 13 or higher?
Because my answer fits better that your high latency answer according to your own Chart.
If it was a problem with latency the higher interest mintings would have failed at the same rate as the lower interest mintings.
Sorry but high latency is the wrong answer, but the Good news just combine your smaller coin into groupings of at least 350 so they won't fail in minting as much.
Sorry automatic Group stake only goes up to 100, so you will have to do it manually.
And if you still don't believe me go get a VPN that is closer to these nodes you are talking about,
it won't make any difference, but at least you will know the truth.
kiklo
we dont teach here the "truth" to each other
u can tell us about ur experiences and we will analyze it
its not about who have the correct "truth"
as ZEIT-Knight u should be beyond such outdated mindset
a thing called "truth" isnt existing
existing are models that can be used to explain why and how things works
and our knowledge to improve this models are increasing day by day year by year
in the past there where very well though models that can explain why the earth is the center if the universe
new facts lead to improved models that place the sun in the center of the universe
later the center of milkway galaxy was the center and today im not up to date what we consider to be the center of universe
but none of all that models and explanations was the truth.........
its about gathering facts and analyze it
polanskiman came to us with his low successful minting rate (like below 50%) and our first analysis found no difference to nodes which are mint with 90% or higher success rate beside the higher latency
now u come and tell us about ur experiences we will analyze that too
i can say from my view i rare have a unsuccessful mint (like 1 of 50) but i also have no more single (1 DMD) coin pile most of my coin pile have a size between 30 and 120 DMD which is the result of perfect working auto dust prevention with group stake and split stake to make sure the network have enought coin piles so anytime sure someone have something to mint but on the other side prevent forever coin split and dust.
it might be that wallets with lot 1 DMD pile need more POS atempts and have a higher failure rate
i still see there no problem over time his wallet coin pile structure will also be the same as mine and so should his minting success rate
fact is that small coin pile can also mint i think the lowest minting reward i saw until yet was like 0.002 just the chance is very slim
im not sure we wrote it somewhere but the whole POS design was build around 100 DMD so we can guarantee if u have 100 DMD in ur wallet no matter if its 100x 1 DMD or 1x 100 DMD u will be able to mint POS rewards. ur 350 DMD number as ideal pile size is not as we designed it and its not required. but if analysis says example a group size of 200 DMD would be better its no problem at all for us adapt the code
in a future where 100 DMD is such a big value that maybe normal people dont even have so much in their wallet maybe some people offer a minting service where they hold ur coins to mint for u
but now it really not hard to have above 100 DMD so everyone can easy mint on his own
