synechist
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market
|
|
August 17, 2014, 10:09:53 PM |
|
Hello all "Whitepaper," a term in cryptoland ostensively used to describe anything from a diagram to a full scholarly presentation, now pertains to this, Dan's diagrammatic summary of Rev 2 RC 1's trustless mixing process. Some details attendant upon this: - We anticipate you'll have a lot of questions about this, so Dan will host a Q&A session this evening here. The intention is to use Dan's summary to build up a public record of shared understanding about XC's technology. - Trustless mixing is highly similar to, though predates, "coinshuffle", a paper for which is accessible here. - For clarity, XC's trustless mixing is, in a nutshell, a randomised multipath version of coinshuffle on top of the encrypted P2P Xnode communication protocol. See you later. Let's add in the link as a regular linked text so people don't get confused: http://downloads.xc-official.com/XCurrency/xc-rev2_rc1_summary.pdfAnyone who hasn't read the CoinShuffle whitepaper yet might want to take a look at the following summary: http://crypsys.mmci.uni-saarland.de/projects/CoinShuffle/Of course XC is way beyond this coinshuffle algo by adding major security through multipath tech! Dan also created multipath (including something similar to CoinShuffle) before CoinShuffle was published.
|
Co-Founder, the Blocknet
|
|
|
mig5000
|
|
August 17, 2014, 10:10:52 PM |
|
Antopolous is writing a chapter on the alt-currencies and XC is not mentionned in either the POS nor the anon sub chapter. Can any of you pm him to add a summary of XC
|
|
|
|
CryptoGretzky
|
|
August 17, 2014, 10:17:01 PM |
|
Antopolous is writing a chapter on the alt-currencies and XC is not mentionned in either the POS nor the anon sub chapter. Can any of you pm him to add a summary of XC
How can someone write about something if they don't know what's out there?!?! It's not like XC is an unknown coin....
|
|
|
|
Teka (OP)
|
|
August 17, 2014, 10:18:28 PM |
|
Antopolous is writing a chapter on the alt-currencies and XC is not mentionned in either the POS nor the anon sub chapter. Can any of you pm him to add a summary of XC
How can someone write about something if they don't know what's out there?!?! It's not like XC is an unknown coin.... Tweeted at him since it's more public - https://twitter.com/DrasticRaven/status/501130305580060674
|
|
|
|
Coinster2014
Member
Offline
Activity: 65
Merit: 10
|
|
August 17, 2014, 10:24:11 PM Last edit: August 17, 2014, 11:17:06 PM by Coinster2014 |
|
Antopolous is writing a chapter on the alt-currencies and XC is not mentionned in either the POS nor the anon sub chapter. Can any of you pm him to add a summary of XC
How can someone write about something if they don't know what's out there?!?! It's not like XC is an unknown coin.... Tweeted at him since it's more public - https://twitter.com/DrasticRaven/status/501130305580060674I was trying to look for a list of all the PR that XC have and was also published by major sites, but I can't find a list of them all. Do you have a list of these PR? Maybe you should have it on both our OP and our website. I think that is so important to do proper research.
|
|
|
|
synechist
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market
|
|
August 17, 2014, 10:33:49 PM |
|
Antopolous is writing a chapter on the alt-currencies and XC is not mentionned in either the POS nor the anon sub chapter. Can any of you pm him to add a summary of XC
How can someone write about something if they don't know what's out there?!?! It's not like XC is an unknown coin.... Tweeted at him since it's more public - https://twitter.com/DrasticRaven/status/501130305580060674I was trying to look for a list of all the PR that we have and was also published by major sites, but I can't find a list of them all. Do we have a list of these great PR? Maybe we should have it on both our OP and our website. I think that is so important. Hmm... yes I've been considering that. It would fit into the timeline on the OP pretty well actually.
|
Co-Founder, the Blocknet
|
|
|
CryptoGretzky
|
|
August 17, 2014, 10:36:24 PM |
|
Antopolous is writing a chapter on the alt-currencies and XC is not mentionned in either the POS nor the anon sub chapter. Can any of you pm him to add a summary of XC
How can someone write about something if they don't know what's out there?!?! It's not like XC is an unknown coin.... Tweeted at him since it's more public - https://twitter.com/DrasticRaven/status/501130305580060674I was trying to look for a list of all the PR that we have and was also published by major sites, but I can't find a list of them all. Do we have a list of these great PR? Maybe we should have it on both our OP and our website. I think that is so important. Hmm... yes I've been considering that. It would fit into the timeline on the OP pretty well actually. Great idea! Potential investors can see that XC is different than all the other crap coins.
|
|
|
|
Pala_00
|
|
August 17, 2014, 10:37:59 PM |
|
Hello XC community, I buy some Xc, but now I have one question. When I Compile the wallet (ubuntu) I get some warnings (Algo files): simd.c:1565:5: warning: invalid conversion from ‘void*’ to ‘sph_simd_small_context*’ [-fpermissive] sc = cc; ^ simd.c: In function ‘void init_big(void*, const u32*)’: simd.c:1576:5: warning: invalid conversion from ‘void*’ to ‘sph_simd_big_context*’ [-fpermissive] sc = cc; ^ simd.c: In function ‘void update_small(void*, const void*, size_t)’: simd.c:1587:5: warning: invalid conversion from ‘void*’ to ‘sph_simd_small_context*’ [-fpermissive] sc = cc; ^ simd.c: In function ‘void update_big(void*, const void*, size_t)’: simd.c:1612:5: warning: invalid conversion from ‘void*’ to ‘sph_simd_big_context*’ [-fpermissive] sc = cc; blake.c: In function ‘void blake64_close(sph_blake_big_context*, unsigned int, unsigned int, void*, size_t)’: blake.c:991:6: warning: invalid conversion from ‘void*’ to ‘unsigned char*’ [-fpermissive] out = dst; ^ blake.c:791:1: warning: initializing argument 1 of ‘void blake32_init(sph_blake_small_context*, const sph_u32*, const sph_u32*)’ [-fpermissive] blake32_init(sph_blake_small_context *sc, ^ blake.c: In function ‘void sph_blake224(void*, const void*, size_t)’: blake.c:1009:23: warning: invalid conversion from ‘void*’ to ‘sph_blake_small_context*’ [-fpermissive] blake32(cc, data, len); groestl.c: In function ‘void groestl_big_close(sph_groestl_big_context*, unsigned int, unsigned int, void*, size_t)’: groestl.c:2952:17: warning: variable ‘buf’ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable] unsigned char *buf; ^ groestl.c: In function ‘void sph_groestl224_init(void*)’: groestl.c:3013:28: warning: invalid conversion from ‘void*’ to ‘sph_groestl_small_context*’ [-fpermissive] etc etc etc for jk, keccak, skein etc etc It's normal?
|
|
|
|
synechist
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market
|
|
August 17, 2014, 10:41:35 PM |
|
Hello all "Whitepaper," a term in cryptoland ostensively used to describe anything from a diagram to a full scholarly presentation, now pertains to this, Dan's diagrammatic summary of Rev 2 RC 1's trustless mixing process. Some details attendant upon this: - We anticipate you'll have a lot of questions about this, so Dan will host a Q&A session this evening here. The intention is to use Dan's summary to build up a public record of shared understanding about XC's technology. - Trustless mixing is highly similar to, though predates, "coinshuffle", a paper for which is accessible here. - For clarity, XC's trustless mixing is, in a nutshell, a randomised multipath version of coinshuffle on top of the encrypted P2P Xnode communication protocol. See you later. Hi all The Q&A has begun! Please feel free to submit any questions on trustless mixing to the topic on the official forum. Dan will wait until a bunch of questions have accumulated and then answer them in one go.
|
Co-Founder, the Blocknet
|
|
|
Kubrat
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
|
|
August 17, 2014, 10:47:28 PM |
|
Antopolous is writing a chapter on the alt-currencies and XC is not mentionned in either the POS nor the anon sub chapter. Can any of you pm him to add a summary of XC
How can someone write about something if they don't know what's out there?!?! It's not like XC is an unknown coin.... Tweeted at him since it's more public - https://twitter.com/DrasticRaven/status/501130305580060674I was trying to look for a list of all the PR that we have and was also published by major sites, but I can't find a list of them all. Do we have a list of these great PR? Maybe we should have it on both our OP and our website. I think that is so important. Hmm... yes I've been considering that. It would fit into the timeline on the OP pretty well actually. Great idea! Potential investors can see that XC is different than all the other crap coins. Yes, this is a good way to get out of the circle. I think only Dan can explain to Him the tech behind XC as a technician and visionary
|
|
|
|
brother3
|
|
August 17, 2014, 11:07:01 PM |
|
Really impressed at XC's resiliency during this bearish phase for alts!
|
|
|
|
policymaker
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
Crypto Currency Supporter
|
|
August 17, 2014, 11:13:46 PM |
|
So we got a whitepaper that people accustomed to coinshuffle will find interesting, and antonopoulos positive about XC as long as it is presented to him in a professional way, as confirmed of him by twitter.
In addition, 80% of most popular alts(and all) are bleeding, but XC was boosted today. Last but not least, there is a live Q & A with Dan Metcalf, head developer of XC in our forums.
What a great day for XC!
|
|
|
|
Pala_00
|
|
August 17, 2014, 11:46:04 PM |
|
Hello XC community, I buy some Xc, but now I have one question. When I Compile the wallet (ubuntu) I get some warnings (Algo files): simd.c:1565:5: warning: invalid conversion from ‘void*’ to ‘sph_simd_small_context*’ [-fpermissive] sc = cc; ^ simd.c: In function ‘void init_big(void*, const u32*)’: simd.c:1576:5: warning: invalid conversion from ‘void*’ to ‘sph_simd_big_context*’ [-fpermissive] sc = cc; ^ simd.c: In function ‘void update_small(void*, const void*, size_t)’: simd.c:1587:5: warning: invalid conversion from ‘void*’ to ‘sph_simd_small_context*’ [-fpermissive] sc = cc; ^ simd.c: In function ‘void update_big(void*, const void*, size_t)’: simd.c:1612:5: warning: invalid conversion from ‘void*’ to ‘sph_simd_big_context*’ [-fpermissive] sc = cc; blake.c: In function ‘void blake64_close(sph_blake_big_context*, unsigned int, unsigned int, void*, size_t)’: blake.c:991:6: warning: invalid conversion from ‘void*’ to ‘unsigned char*’ [-fpermissive] out = dst; ^ blake.c:791:1: warning: initializing argument 1 of ‘void blake32_init(sph_blake_small_context*, const sph_u32*, const sph_u32*)’ [-fpermissive] blake32_init(sph_blake_small_context *sc, ^ blake.c: In function ‘void sph_blake224(void*, const void*, size_t)’: blake.c:1009:23: warning: invalid conversion from ‘void*’ to ‘sph_blake_small_context*’ [-fpermissive] blake32(cc, data, len); groestl.c: In function ‘void groestl_big_close(sph_groestl_big_context*, unsigned int, unsigned int, void*, size_t)’: groestl.c:2952:17: warning: variable ‘buf’ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable] unsigned char *buf; ^ groestl.c: In function ‘void sph_groestl224_init(void*)’: groestl.c:3013:28: warning: invalid conversion from ‘void*’ to ‘sph_groestl_small_context*’ [-fpermissive] etc etc etc for jk, keccak, skein etc etc It's normal? Someone can help me? Thanks xc community!
|
|
|
|
RW-Stott
|
|
August 18, 2014, 12:01:30 AM |
|
Hello all "Whitepaper," a term in cryptoland ostensively used to describe anything from a diagram to a full scholarly presentation, now pertains to this, Dan's diagrammatic summary of Rev 2 RC 1's trustless mixing process. Some details attendant upon this: - We anticipate you'll have a lot of questions about this, so Dan will host a Q&A session this evening here. The intention is to use Dan's summary to build up a public record of shared understanding about XC's technology. - Trustless mixing is highly similar to, though predates, "coinshuffle", a paper for which is accessible here. - For clarity, XC's trustless mixing is, in a nutshell, a randomised multipath version of coinshuffle on top of the encrypted P2P Xnode communication protocol. See you later. Hi all The Q&A has begun! Please feel free to submit any questions on trustless mixing to the topic on the official forum. Dan will wait until a bunch of questions have accumulated and then answer them in one go. +1
|
|
|
|
dadon
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1002
Pecvniate obedivnt omnia.
|
|
August 18, 2014, 12:12:02 AM |
|
Hello XC community, I buy some Xc, but now I have one question. When I Compile the wallet (ubuntu) I get some warnings (Algo files): simd.c:1565:5: warning: invalid conversion from ‘void*’ to ‘sph_simd_small_context*’ [-fpermissive] sc = cc; ^ simd.c: In function ‘void init_big(void*, const u32*)’: simd.c:1576:5: warning: invalid conversion from ‘void*’ to ‘sph_simd_big_context*’ [-fpermissive] sc = cc; ^ simd.c: In function ‘void update_small(void*, const void*, size_t)’: simd.c:1587:5: warning: invalid conversion from ‘void*’ to ‘sph_simd_small_context*’ [-fpermissive] sc = cc; ^ simd.c: In function ‘void update_big(void*, const void*, size_t)’: simd.c:1612:5: warning: invalid conversion from ‘void*’ to ‘sph_simd_big_context*’ [-fpermissive] sc = cc; blake.c: In function ‘void blake64_close(sph_blake_big_context*, unsigned int, unsigned int, void*, size_t)’: blake.c:991:6: warning: invalid conversion from ‘void*’ to ‘unsigned char*’ [-fpermissive] out = dst; ^ blake.c:791:1: warning: initializing argument 1 of ‘void blake32_init(sph_blake_small_context*, const sph_u32*, const sph_u32*)’ [-fpermissive] blake32_init(sph_blake_small_context *sc, ^ blake.c: In function ‘void sph_blake224(void*, const void*, size_t)’: blake.c:1009:23: warning: invalid conversion from ‘void*’ to ‘sph_blake_small_context*’ [-fpermissive] blake32(cc, data, len); groestl.c: In function ‘void groestl_big_close(sph_groestl_big_context*, unsigned int, unsigned int, void*, size_t)’: groestl.c:2952:17: warning: variable ‘buf’ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable] unsigned char *buf; ^ groestl.c: In function ‘void sph_groestl224_init(void*)’: groestl.c:3013:28: warning: invalid conversion from ‘void*’ to ‘sph_groestl_small_context*’ [-fpermissive] etc etc etc for jk, keccak, skein etc etc It's normal? Someone can help me? Thanks xc community! No idea? any one else know what's up with this? Welcome to the community BTW!! you made a good choice buying XC it has a bright future
|
|
|
|
CryptoGretzky
|
|
August 18, 2014, 12:14:39 AM Last edit: August 18, 2014, 12:27:01 AM by CryptoGretzky |
|
Hello XC community, I buy some Xc, but now I have one question. When I Compile the wallet (ubuntu) I get some warnings (Algo files): simd.c:1565:5: warning: invalid conversion from ‘void*’ to ‘sph_simd_small_context*’ [-fpermissive] sc = cc; ^ simd.c: In function ‘void init_big(void*, const u32*)’: simd.c:1576:5: warning: invalid conversion from ‘void*’ to ‘sph_simd_big_context*’ [-fpermissive] sc = cc; ^ simd.c: In function ‘void update_small(void*, const void*, size_t)’: simd.c:1587:5: warning: invalid conversion from ‘void*’ to ‘sph_simd_small_context*’ [-fpermissive] sc = cc; ^ simd.c: In function ‘void update_big(void*, const void*, size_t)’: simd.c:1612:5: warning: invalid conversion from ‘void*’ to ‘sph_simd_big_context*’ [-fpermissive] sc = cc; blake.c: In function ‘void blake64_close(sph_blake_big_context*, unsigned int, unsigned int, void*, size_t)’: blake.c:991:6: warning: invalid conversion from ‘void*’ to ‘unsigned char*’ [-fpermissive] out = dst; ^ blake.c:791:1: warning: initializing argument 1 of ‘void blake32_init(sph_blake_small_context*, const sph_u32*, const sph_u32*)’ [-fpermissive] blake32_init(sph_blake_small_context *sc, ^ blake.c: In function ‘void sph_blake224(void*, const void*, size_t)’: blake.c:1009:23: warning: invalid conversion from ‘void*’ to ‘sph_blake_small_context*’ [-fpermissive] blake32(cc, data, len); groestl.c: In function ‘void groestl_big_close(sph_groestl_big_context*, unsigned int, unsigned int, void*, size_t)’: groestl.c:2952:17: warning: variable ‘buf’ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable] unsigned char *buf; ^ groestl.c: In function ‘void sph_groestl224_init(void*)’: groestl.c:3013:28: warning: invalid conversion from ‘void*’ to ‘sph_groestl_small_context*’ [-fpermissive] etc etc etc for jk, keccak, skein etc etc It's normal? Someone can help me? Thanks xc community! No idea? any one else know what's up with this? Seems these are generic X11 codes and the issue is that they didn't do an explicit cast from void * to each of the individual hashing function required type. Does the wallet work though? If so, I don't think it's a big issue.
|
|
|
|
MemoryShock
|
|
August 18, 2014, 12:41:22 AM |
|
I'm impressed that he didn't seem even aware of XC....I think things are going to get very interesting in the next month or so when he and others realize that Dan and team is the real deal. I think that this is a real indicator on just how under the radar XC is...which won't last for too long. Exciting times ahead.
|
|
|
|
dadon
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1002
Pecvniate obedivnt omnia.
|
|
August 18, 2014, 12:59:02 AM |
|
It's been good for us in the know to accumulate as much as we can before the word spreads because when it does watch out...XC has been completely overlooked by 90% of this forum, it's the perfect storm.
|
|
|
|
G-Bert
|
|
August 18, 2014, 01:06:18 AM |
|
So the q&a is on the XC forum.... So people like those idiots in the fud thread wouldn't be able to ask any questions, just us lot, who already pretty much know what's going on.
Would have thought reddit cryptocurrency forum would have been perfect to get a heap more exposure. Oh well.
|
XChat XJkVnYD4N4oSjNStgbAUD6UyWuBTWuMRgv public key fuYPYmK4Sj57PkU2NKg1gKW91euMKkstQPeeexUcxnb8
|
|
|
battbot
|
|
August 18, 2014, 01:08:20 AM |
|
So the q&a is on the XC forum.... So people like those idiots in the fud thread wouldn't be able to ask any questions, just us lot, who already pretty much know what's going on.
Would have thought reddit cryptocurrency forum would have been perfect to get a heap more exposure. Oh well.
I agree with this. They should open the Q&A up on reddit as well. Hopefully they will do this.
|
|
|
|
|