ssmc2
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2002
Merit: 1040
|
|
August 18, 2014, 01:09:14 AM |
|
So the q&a is on the XC forum.... So people like those idiots in the fud thread wouldn't be able to ask any questions, just us lot, who already pretty much know what's going on.
Would have thought reddit cryptocurrency forum would have been perfect to get a heap more exposure. Oh well.
I agree, an AMA on Reddit would be great in addition to the forum one.
|
|
|
|
G-Bert
|
|
August 18, 2014, 01:14:35 AM |
|
We need everyone else in crypto land to be asking the questions, not just the tiny amount of people who read the forum or even this thread.
|
XChat XJkVnYD4N4oSjNStgbAUD6UyWuBTWuMRgv public key fuYPYmK4Sj57PkU2NKg1gKW91euMKkstQPeeexUcxnb8
|
|
|
RW-Stott
|
|
August 18, 2014, 03:29:36 AM |
|
So the q&a is on the XC forum.... So people like those idiots in the fud thread wouldn't be able to ask any questions, just us lot, who already pretty much know what's going on.
Would have thought reddit cryptocurrency forum would have been perfect to get a heap more exposure. Oh well.
I agree with this. They should open the Q&A up on reddit as well. Hopefully they will do this. +1
|
|
|
|
Driv3n
|
|
August 18, 2014, 03:52:03 AM |
|
Never thought BTC would be this cheap again, picking up XC at this price is easy money.
|
|
|
|
qqNxt
|
|
August 18, 2014, 04:16:58 AM |
|
buying 20btc in xc. pm offer.
|
|
|
|
legoman39
Member
Offline
Activity: 66
Merit: 10
|
|
August 18, 2014, 04:42:37 AM |
|
buy it on the exchanges like everybody else
|
|
|
|
infinitechaos
|
|
August 18, 2014, 04:46:07 AM |
|
buy it on the exchanges like everybody else The community had been tossing around the idea of proposing buy orders off exchange first so as to help maintain market stability and offer transparency with regards to large sells/buys. He is free to ask this here IMHO.
|
|
|
|
qqNxt
|
|
August 18, 2014, 04:50:55 AM |
|
buy it on the exchanges like everybody else I just got scarred from bter exchange. and most big holders don't have their xc on exchanges.
|
|
|
|
milkyway
Member
Offline
Activity: 103
Merit: 10
|
|
August 18, 2014, 05:01:15 AM |
|
buying 20btc in xc. pm offer.
7 BTC for 2670 XC, cause we know the price is gonna rise
|
>>> multiwallet | POS 5% Annual [Anon NanoWallet™ technology] | encrypted communication | Inwallet trading <<<
|
|
|
520Bit
|
|
August 18, 2014, 05:55:23 AM |
|
buying 20btc in xc. pm offer.
8 BTC for 3200 XC if you want.
|
|
|
|
CryptoGretzky
|
|
August 18, 2014, 06:12:04 AM |
|
buy it on the exchanges like everybody else I just got scarred from bter exchange. and most big holders don't have their xc on exchanges. Most big holders also won't be selling their XC at this price level.
|
|
|
|
KimmyF
|
|
August 18, 2014, 07:05:26 AM |
|
Looking at DRK, CLOAK and BC I think its amazing how stable the XC price is. I never thought cloak would drop this far, did anything bad happen over there or its just whales leaving after weeks? It was hype all along. No real support. 700 BTC is all it took to hit the floors. Besides, I never even gave it a 0.1% chance to it due to the name. Who the fuck buys Cloak? Feel the same about all anon coins, except XC of course. Just the name indicates a single shady market most retailers will avoid like ebola. And think that for XC anon is just an option within a large family of other functionality. But its part of the base so must be perfected first, can't wait for the day the framework api opens and thousands of third party developers can start dreaming about developing real products. and even then I will probably not sell from main wallet, maybe some minted coins but that's it.
|
|
|
|
synechist
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market
|
|
August 18, 2014, 07:22:40 AM |
|
So the q&a is on the XC forum.... So people like those idiots in the fud thread wouldn't be able to ask any questions, just us lot, who already pretty much know what's going on.
Would have thought reddit cryptocurrency forum would have been perfect to get a heap more exposure. Oh well.
I agree with this. They should open the Q&A up on reddit as well. Hopefully they will do this. I think the intention is to have another Q&A at the end of the week after everyone's had some time to reflect on the first Q&A. I reckon we should do it on Reddit.
|
Co-Founder, the Blocknet
|
|
|
cryptico
|
|
August 18, 2014, 07:35:32 AM |
|
So the q&a is on the XC forum.... So people like those idiots in the fud thread wouldn't be able to ask any questions, just us lot, who already pretty much know what's going on.
Would have thought reddit cryptocurrency forum would have been perfect to get a heap more exposure. Oh well.
I agree with this. They should open the Q&A up on reddit as well. Hopefully they will do this. I think the intention is to have another Q&A at the end of the week after everyone's had some time to reflect on the first Q&A. I reckon we should do it on Reddit. Thank you Synechist I think this is the best option. Professional as usual.
|
|
|
|
CryptoGretzky
|
|
August 18, 2014, 07:55:17 AM |
|
So the q&a is on the XC forum.... So people like those idiots in the fud thread wouldn't be able to ask any questions, just us lot, who already pretty much know what's going on.
Would have thought reddit cryptocurrency forum would have been perfect to get a heap more exposure. Oh well.
I agree with this. They should open the Q&A up on reddit as well. Hopefully they will do this. I think the intention is to have another Q&A at the end of the week after everyone's had some time to reflect on the first Q&A. I reckon we should do it on Reddit. I think it's also best for members of the communities to ask the hard questions now so that we can all be ready for the fudsters to come along. There are too few people asking questions now I think.
|
|
|
|
Pala_00
|
|
August 18, 2014, 08:05:20 AM |
|
Hello XC community, I buy some Xc, but now I have one question. When I Compile the wallet (ubuntu) I get some warnings (Algo files): simd.c:1565:5: warning: invalid conversion from ‘void*’ to ‘sph_simd_small_context*’ [-fpermissive] sc = cc; ^ simd.c: In function ‘void init_big(void*, const u32*)’: simd.c:1576:5: warning: invalid conversion from ‘void*’ to ‘sph_simd_big_context*’ [-fpermissive] sc = cc; ^ simd.c: In function ‘void update_small(void*, const void*, size_t)’: simd.c:1587:5: warning: invalid conversion from ‘void*’ to ‘sph_simd_small_context*’ [-fpermissive] sc = cc; ^ simd.c: In function ‘void update_big(void*, const void*, size_t)’: simd.c:1612:5: warning: invalid conversion from ‘void*’ to ‘sph_simd_big_context*’ [-fpermissive] sc = cc; blake.c: In function ‘void blake64_close(sph_blake_big_context*, unsigned int, unsigned int, void*, size_t)’: blake.c:991:6: warning: invalid conversion from ‘void*’ to ‘unsigned char*’ [-fpermissive] out = dst; ^ blake.c:791:1: warning: initializing argument 1 of ‘void blake32_init(sph_blake_small_context*, const sph_u32*, const sph_u32*)’ [-fpermissive] blake32_init(sph_blake_small_context *sc, ^ blake.c: In function ‘void sph_blake224(void*, const void*, size_t)’: blake.c:1009:23: warning: invalid conversion from ‘void*’ to ‘sph_blake_small_context*’ [-fpermissive] blake32(cc, data, len); groestl.c: In function ‘void groestl_big_close(sph_groestl_big_context*, unsigned int, unsigned int, void*, size_t)’: groestl.c:2952:17: warning: variable ‘buf’ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable] unsigned char *buf; ^ groestl.c: In function ‘void sph_groestl224_init(void*)’: groestl.c:3013:28: warning: invalid conversion from ‘void*’ to ‘sph_groestl_small_context*’ [-fpermissive] etc etc etc for jk, keccak, skein etc etc It's normal? Someone can help me? Thanks xc community! No idea? any one else know what's up with this? Seems these are generic X11 codes and the issue is that they didn't do an explicit cast from void * to each of the individual hashing function required type. Does the wallet work though? If so, I don't think it's a big issue. Yes, the wallet works perfectly... But why these warnings?
|
|
|
|
synechist
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market
|
|
August 18, 2014, 08:08:43 AM |
|
|
Co-Founder, the Blocknet
|
|
|
CryptoGretzky
|
|
August 18, 2014, 08:17:01 AM |
|
That troll... not even worth any time responding to him. He's having his own debate. He's just to fud XC because he has Super... and look at super today. Dumped along with Cloak and DRK. That sure worked well for him.
|
|
|
|
dadon
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1002
Pecvniate obedivnt omnia.
|
|
August 18, 2014, 08:27:31 AM |
|
He was proven wrong and now he is trying to grip on to his dignity( like he has any) by manipulating everything you say, but nice work you made him look utterly pathetic BRAVO!!
|
|
|
|
520Bit
|
|
August 18, 2014, 08:34:04 AM |
|
Like this: If you would like to know more about the "multisig" that XC implements: - it is not what Timerland defines as multisig - a diagrammatic summary of XC's trustless mixing, which uses multisig, is here. - a research paper on "CoinShuffle", published after XC developed trustless mixing but highly similar, is here. Relevance to this topic: entire.
|
|
|
|
|