|
wooder
|
 |
October 22, 2014, 01:09:50 AM |
|
It does work, and its not open source for several reasons, including the fact it is the most advanced mixer technology on the marketplace and would be cloned immediately...
Please dont call it the "most advanced mixer technology" when its closed source. If you want that title, open source it, have it scrutinized and present your case to the community. Its claims like this that make investors run away. +1 i think so too. and it really sucks to see the price falling like a stone. maybe the blocknet idea wasn't the best idea at all? i think publishing this idea after REV3 was released would be much better as we lost 30% in just a few days. even most of the coins that joined the blocknet train are nearly worthless Coin - Marketcap - Price change last 7 days APEX - $ 62,861 +225.72 % SSD - $ 126,504 +15.98 % SWIFT - $ 491,164 +13.32 % XST - $ 369,854 +1.69 % NHZ - $ 188,442 -13.81 % UTIL - $ 150,427 +31.07 % FIBRE - $ 190,156 -11.86 % XC - $ 1,942,676 -28.71 % Why were only coins added that are nearly worthless? Why didn't you try to get at least one coin that has a market cap > 1M$? And as it seems nearly all of them increased in price only XC lost dramatically. I think a blocknet would make sense when coins that already have a high marketcap join forces to build something big but this somehow feels like XC is used to bring more value to some useless coins. First of all, you are a moron, "Why were only coins added that are nearly worthless?" - Coins are not added, coins can apply to join. "Why didn't you try to get at least one coin that has a market cap > 1M$?" - You angry cause your investment does not go up fast enough? "And as it seems nearly all of them increased in price only XC lost dramatically." - what does that tells you? "I think a blocknet would make sense when coins that already have a high marketcap join forces to build something big but this somehow feels like XC is used to bring more value to some useless coins." - money money money and money again. Full of morons... I'm holding this coin since months, and yeah i'd like to see this coin go up in price like nearly 100% of the investors, i mean why would you invest in something that just looses value? I am not angry I'm just disappointed that XC takes this directoin before REV3 is even released |
|
|
|
|
|
atcsecure
|
|
October 22, 2014, 01:11:35 AM |
|
"Why didn't you try to get at least one coin that has a market cap > 1M$?" - You angry cause your investment does not go up fast enough?
I believe what he's saying is that it appears that very small market cap coins were pumped at the expense of XC according to the charts with the BlockNET release. Insider information probably let developers buy ... so it could be construed as a way for XC to try to give shitcoins some legitimacy. But then again ... I might be mis-reading what he's trying to say. First of all, you are a moron, Maybe don't namecall but have an objective discussion? Why don't you go look at the charts for when the ITO was announced vs the price change |
Join the revolution - XC - Decentralized Trustless Multi-Node Private Transactions
|
|
|
|
wooder
|
|
October 22, 2014, 01:12:02 AM |
|
It does work, and its not open source for several reasons, including the fact it is the most advanced mixer technology on the marketplace and would be cloned immediately...
Please dont call it the "most advanced mixer technology" when its closed source. If you want that title, open source it, have it scrutinized and present your case to the community. Its claims like this that make investors run away. we already begin to see what is doing open source to this community like 'cannabisdarkcoin' .... Open source is just a hype thing that some coin use in the hope of a big pump and backlash them cause of a bad coding and old moded tech ... are you on drugs? without "the" opensouce coin BITCOIN there would be no altcoin at all. Only ripple and NXT would exist but nothing else and i bet even this two coins took a lot of ideas from bitcoin. thats the way it works, innovate or die "we already begin to see what is doing open source to this community like ..." could also be a sentence from some early adopters of bitcoin and btw the closed source world already exists at your bank ... Dev already stated that the coin will be open source at some point. Why the hell do people even bring this up? It makes not sense. Why the hell would we want the coin to be cloned right now? I don't want it to be cloned right now - this was just my answere to "Open source is just a hype thing that some coin use in the hope of a big pump and backlash them cause of a bad coding and old moded tech" |
|
|
|
|
|
atcsecure
|
|
October 22, 2014, 01:12:18 AM |
|
It does work, and its not open source for several reasons, including the fact it is the most advanced mixer technology on the marketplace and would be cloned immediately...
Please dont call it the "most advanced mixer technology" when its closed source. If you want that title, open source it, have it scrutinized and present your case to the community. Its claims like this that make investors run away. +1 i think so too. and it really sucks to see the price falling like a stone. maybe the blocknet idea wasn't the best idea at all? i think publishing this idea after REV3 was released would be much better as we lost 30% in just a few days. even most of the coins that joined the blocknet train are nearly worthless Coin - Marketcap - Price change last 7 days APEX - $ 62,861 +225.72 % SSD - $ 126,504 +15.98 % SWIFT - $ 491,164 +13.32 % XST - $ 369,854 +1.69 % NHZ - $ 188,442 -13.81 % UTIL - $ 150,427 +31.07 % FIBRE - $ 190,156 -11.86 % XC - $ 1,942,676 -28.71 % Why were only coins added that are nearly worthless? Why didn't you try to get at least one coin that has a market cap > 1M$? And as it seems nearly all of them increased in price only XC lost dramatically. I think a blocknet would make sense when coins that already have a high marketcap join forces to build something big but this somehow feels like XC is used to bring more value to some useless coins. First of all, you are a moron, "Why were only coins added that are nearly worthless?" - Coins are not added, coins can apply to join. "Why didn't you try to get at least one coin that has a market cap > 1M$?" - You angry cause your investment does not go up fast enough? "And as it seems nearly all of them increased in price only XC lost dramatically." - what does that tells you? "I think a blocknet would make sense when coins that already have a high marketcap join forces to build something big but this somehow feels like XC is used to bring more value to some useless coins." - money money money and money again. Full of morons... I'm holding this coin since months, and yeah i'd like to see this coin go up in price like nearly 100% of the investors, i mean why would you invest in something that just looses value? I am not angry I'm just disappointed that XC takes this directoin before REV3 is even released This is not an XC direction change at all |
Join the revolution - XC - Decentralized Trustless Multi-Node Private Transactions
|
|
|
qawzsx
Sr. Member
 Offline
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
NOT FUD! FACTS!
|
|
October 22, 2014, 01:14:18 AM |
|
It does work, and its not open source for several reasons, including the fact it is the most advanced mixer technology on the marketplace and would be cloned immediately...
Please dont call it the "most advanced mixer technology" when its closed source. If you want that title, open source it, have it scrutinized and present your case to the community. Its claims like this that make investors run away. +1 i think so too. and it really sucks to see the price falling like a stone. maybe the blocknet idea wasn't the best idea at all? i think publishing this idea after REV3 was released would be much better as we lost 30% in just a few days. even most of the coins that joined the blocknet train are nearly worthless Coin - Marketcap - Price change last 7 days APEX - $ 62,861 +225.72 % SSD - $ 126,504 +15.98 % SWIFT - $ 491,164 +13.32 % XST - $ 369,854 +1.69 % NHZ - $ 188,442 -13.81 % UTIL - $ 150,427 +31.07 % FIBRE - $ 190,156 -11.86 % XC - $ 1,942,676 -28.71 % Why were only coins added that are nearly worthless? Why didn't you try to get at least one coin that has a market cap > 1M$? And as it seems nearly all of them increased in price only XC lost dramatically. I think a blocknet would make sense when coins that already have a high marketcap join forces to build something big but this somehow feels like XC is used to bring more value to some useless coins. First of all, you are a moron, "Why were only coins added that are nearly worthless?" - Coins are not added, coins can apply to join. "Why didn't you try to get at least one coin that has a market cap > 1M$?" - You angry cause your investment does not go up fast enough? "And as it seems nearly all of them increased in price only XC lost dramatically." - what does that tells you? "I think a blocknet would make sense when coins that already have a high marketcap join forces to build something big but this somehow feels like XC is used to bring more value to some useless coins." - money money money and money again. Full of morons... I'm holding this coin since months, and yeah i'd like to see this coin go up in price like nearly 100% of the investors, i mean why would you invest in something that just looses value? I am not angry I'm just disappointed that XC takes this directoin before REV3 is even released You should find a ponzi scheme or something. Do you have any idea that a true investor will actually kill for a 100% profit in few months? You are no investor, you're a cheap ass clown. Get lost already and come with something constructive. I bet you don't have > 1 BTC in this coin "I am not angry I'm just disappointed that XC takes this directoin before REV3 is even released" again posting stupid things without reading first. The dev an everybody else from the staff stated that the REV3 will be released before BlockNet. |
|
|
|
|
|
tr8kr
|
|
October 22, 2014, 01:14:50 AM |
|
Dont compare the context of bitcoin with now at the Time of the coding of bitcoin there was no competitor and no money on it , just see where we are ...
|
|
|
|
|
|
wooder
|
|
October 22, 2014, 01:16:21 AM |
|
It does work, and its not open source for several reasons, including the fact it is the most advanced mixer technology on the marketplace and would be cloned immediately...
Please dont call it the "most advanced mixer technology" when its closed source. If you want that title, open source it, have it scrutinized and present your case to the community. Its claims like this that make investors run away. +1 i think so too. and it really sucks to see the price falling like a stone. maybe the blocknet idea wasn't the best idea at all? i think publishing this idea after REV3 was released would be much better as we lost 30% in just a few days. even most of the coins that joined the blocknet train are nearly worthless Coin - Marketcap - Price change last 7 days APEX - $ 62,861 +225.72 % SSD - $ 126,504 +15.98 % SWIFT - $ 491,164 +13.32 % XST - $ 369,854 +1.69 % NHZ - $ 188,442 -13.81 % UTIL - $ 150,427 +31.07 % FIBRE - $ 190,156 -11.86 % XC - $ 1,942,676 -28.71 % Why were only coins added that are nearly worthless? Why didn't you try to get at least one coin that has a market cap > 1M$? And as it seems nearly all of them increased in price only XC lost dramatically. I think a blocknet would make sense when coins that already have a high marketcap join forces to build something big but this somehow feels like XC is used to bring more value to some useless coins. First of all, you are a moron, "Why were only coins added that are nearly worthless?" - Coins are not added, coins can apply to join. "Why didn't you try to get at least one coin that has a market cap > 1M$?" - You angry cause your investment does not go up fast enough? "And as it seems nearly all of them increased in price only XC lost dramatically." - what does that tells you? "I think a blocknet would make sense when coins that already have a high marketcap join forces to build something big but this somehow feels like XC is used to bring more value to some useless coins." - money money money and money again. Full of morons... I'm holding this coin since months, and yeah i'd like to see this coin go up in price like nearly 100% of the investors, i mean why would you invest in something that just looses value? I am not angry I'm just disappointed that XC takes this directoin before REV3 is even released This is not an XC direction change at all Not a change in direction but the announcement of the blocknet would have been "better" for XC if they would also have a significant marketcap at least somewhere around XCs current marketcap |
|
|
|
|
stealth923
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1036
Merit: 1000
|
|
October 22, 2014, 01:16:43 AM |
|
It does work, and its not open source for several reasons, including the fact it is the most advanced mixer technology on the marketplace and would be cloned immediately...
Please dont call it the "most advanced mixer technology" when its closed source. If you want that title, open source it, have it scrutinized and present your case to the community. Its claims like this that make investors run away. +1 i think so too. and it really sucks to see the price falling like a stone. maybe the blocknet idea wasn't the best idea at all? i think publishing this idea after REV3 was released would be much better as we lost 30% in just a few days. even most of the coins that joined the blocknet train are nearly worthless Coin - Marketcap - Price change last 7 days APEX - $ 62,861 +225.72 % SSD - $ 126,504 +15.98 % SWIFT - $ 491,164 +13.32 % XST - $ 369,854 +1.69 % NHZ - $ 188,442 -13.81 % UTIL - $ 150,427 +31.07 % FIBRE - $ 190,156 -11.86 % XC - $ 1,942,676 -28.71 % Why were only coins added that are nearly worthless? Why didn't you try to get at least one coin that has a market cap > 1M$? And as it seems nearly all of them increased in price only XC lost dramatically. I think a blocknet would make sense when coins that already have a high marketcap join forces to build something big but this somehow feels like XC is used to bring more value to some useless coins. First of all, you are a moron, "Why were only coins added that are nearly worthless?" - Coins are not added, coins can apply to join. "Why didn't you try to get at least one coin that has a market cap > 1M$?" - You angry cause your investment does not go up fast enough? "And as it seems nearly all of them increased in price only XC lost dramatically." - what does that tells you? "I think a blocknet would make sense when coins that already have a high marketcap join forces to build something big but this somehow feels like XC is used to bring more value to some useless coins." - money money money and money again. Full of morons... Dont be so quick to shoot him down - I think he has made some valid points. By XC associating with other currencies which are "worthless" you can say that the market is reacting by bringing XC down to their level. If all coins are the "same" on blocknet, XC should be worth similar to what the other majority of coins are. I would not be sucked into the marketing hype of "this will increase the user base exponentially".....what if it doesnt?? If I just wanted to use the service of a specific coin why would I not just buy that coin, why go through the need of having to go through the decentralized exchange, potentially get a crap exchange rate, lose money etc. Also, what will happen to the value of XC when other coins fail or dev's go rogue in the blocknet? The failure rate of crypto coins is VERY high. Whats being done is XCs marketcap has been tied to these other coins so if something happens to them, you can expect a knock on effect... |
|
|
|
|
|
Come-In-Behind
|
|
October 22, 2014, 01:18:30 AM |
|
It does work, and its not open source for several reasons, including the fact it is the most advanced mixer technology on the marketplace and would be cloned immediately...
Please dont call it the "most advanced mixer technology" when its closed source. If you want that title, open source it, have it scrutinized and present your case to the community. Its claims like this that make investors run away. +1 i think so too. and it really sucks to see the price falling like a stone. maybe the blocknet idea wasn't the best idea at all? i think publishing this idea after REV3 was released would be much better as we lost 30% in just a few days. even most of the coins that joined the blocknet train are nearly worthless Coin - Marketcap - Price change last 7 days APEX - $ 62,861 +225.72 % SSD - $ 126,504 +15.98 % SWIFT - $ 491,164 +13.32 % XST - $ 369,854 +1.69 % NHZ - $ 188,442 -13.81 % UTIL - $ 150,427 +31.07 % FIBRE - $ 190,156 -11.86 % XC - $ 1,942,676 -28.71 % Why were only coins added that are nearly worthless? Why didn't you try to get at least one coin that has a market cap > 1M$? And as it seems nearly all of them increased in price only XC lost dramatically. I think a blocknet would make sense when coins that already have a high marketcap join forces to build something big but this somehow feels like XC is used to bring more value to some useless coins. First of all, you are a moron, "Why were only coins added that are nearly worthless?" - Coins are not added, coins can apply to join. "Why didn't you try to get at least one coin that has a market cap > 1M$?" - You angry cause your investment does not go up fast enough? "And as it seems nearly all of them increased in price only XC lost dramatically." - what does that tells you? "I think a blocknet would make sense when coins that already have a high marketcap join forces to build something big but this somehow feels like XC is used to bring more value to some useless coins." - money money money and money again. Full of morons... Dont be so quick to shoot him down - I think he has made some valid points. By XC associating with other currencies which are "worthless" you can say that the market is reacting by bringing XC down to their level. If all coins are the "same" on blocknet, XC should be worth similar to what the other majority of coins are. I would not be sucked into the marketing hype of "this will increase the user base exponentially".....what if it doesnt?? If I just wanted to use the service of a specific coin why would I not just buy that coin, why go through the need of having to go through the decentralized exchange, potentially get a crap exchange rate, lose money etc. Also, what will happen to the value of XC when other coins fail or dev's go rogue in the blocknet? The failure rate of crypto coins is VERY high. Whats being done is XCs marketcap has been tied to these other coins so if something happens to them, you can expect a knock on effect... I have to agree, which I why I believe that their should be a group of specially chosen coins, or even just XC that form the core base for Blocknet. I also propose different tiers, with XC being the 1st/core coin, and another 2 being on the 2nd tier, etc. |
|
|
|
|
qawzsx
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
NOT FUD! FACTS!
|
|
October 22, 2014, 01:21:32 AM |
|
It does work, and its not open source for several reasons, including the fact it is the most advanced mixer technology on the marketplace and would be cloned immediately...
Please dont call it the "most advanced mixer technology" when its closed source. If you want that title, open source it, have it scrutinized and present your case to the community. Its claims like this that make investors run away. +1 i think so too. and it really sucks to see the price falling like a stone. maybe the blocknet idea wasn't the best idea at all? i think publishing this idea after REV3 was released would be much better as we lost 30% in just a few days. even most of the coins that joined the blocknet train are nearly worthless Coin - Marketcap - Price change last 7 days APEX - $ 62,861 +225.72 % SSD - $ 126,504 +15.98 % SWIFT - $ 491,164 +13.32 % XST - $ 369,854 +1.69 % NHZ - $ 188,442 -13.81 % UTIL - $ 150,427 +31.07 % FIBRE - $ 190,156 -11.86 % XC - $ 1,942,676 -28.71 % Why were only coins added that are nearly worthless? Why didn't you try to get at least one coin that has a market cap > 1M$? And as it seems nearly all of them increased in price only XC lost dramatically. I think a blocknet would make sense when coins that already have a high marketcap join forces to build something big but this somehow feels like XC is used to bring more value to some useless coins. First of all, you are a moron, "Why were only coins added that are nearly worthless?" - Coins are not added, coins can apply to join. "Why didn't you try to get at least one coin that has a market cap > 1M$?" - You angry cause your investment does not go up fast enough? "And as it seems nearly all of them increased in price only XC lost dramatically." - what does that tells you? "I think a blocknet would make sense when coins that already have a high marketcap join forces to build something big but this somehow feels like XC is used to bring more value to some useless coins." - money money money and money again. Full of morons... Dont be so quick to shoot him down - I think he has made some valid points. By XC associating with other currencies which are "worthless" you can say that the market is reacting by bringing XC down to their level. If all coins are the "same" on blocknet, XC should be worth similar to what the other majority of coins are. I would not be sucked into the marketing hype of "this will increase the user base exponentially".....what if it doesnt?? If I just wanted to use the service of a specific coin why would I not just buy that coin, why go through the need of having to go through the decentralized exchange, potentially get a crap exchange rate, lose money etc. Also, what will happen to the value of XC when other coins fail or dev's go rogue in the blocknet? The failure rate of crypto coins is VERY high. Whats being done is XCs marketcap has been tied to these other coins so if something happens to them, you can expect a knock on effect... So, we are communists now? ANY coin out there which is not a scam and passes Dan review CAN join BlockNet. What's so hard to understand a simple fact. "By XC associating with other currencies which are "worthless" - you are a moron too. What XC association? XC is something, BlockNet is something else. WTF guys? |
|
|
|
|
qawzsx
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
NOT FUD! FACTS!
|
|
October 22, 2014, 01:23:56 AM |
|
Ok, I'm not going to read this thread anymore. Only a bunch of cheap ass morons crying out loud cause their investment is not returning 237462356% profit fast enough.
I hope the important news gets posted fast enough on the XC official forums.
|
|
|
|
|
|
wooder
|
|
October 22, 2014, 01:25:12 AM |
|
It does work, and its not open source for several reasons, including the fact it is the most advanced mixer technology on the marketplace and would be cloned immediately...
Please dont call it the "most advanced mixer technology" when its closed source. If you want that title, open source it, have it scrutinized and present your case to the community. Its claims like this that make investors run away. +1 i think so too. and it really sucks to see the price falling like a stone. maybe the blocknet idea wasn't the best idea at all? i think publishing this idea after REV3 was released would be much better as we lost 30% in just a few days. even most of the coins that joined the blocknet train are nearly worthless Coin - Marketcap - Price change last 7 days APEX - $ 62,861 +225.72 % SSD - $ 126,504 +15.98 % SWIFT - $ 491,164 +13.32 % XST - $ 369,854 +1.69 % NHZ - $ 188,442 -13.81 % UTIL - $ 150,427 +31.07 % FIBRE - $ 190,156 -11.86 % XC - $ 1,942,676 -28.71 % Why were only coins added that are nearly worthless? Why didn't you try to get at least one coin that has a market cap > 1M$? And as it seems nearly all of them increased in price only XC lost dramatically. I think a blocknet would make sense when coins that already have a high marketcap join forces to build something big but this somehow feels like XC is used to bring more value to some useless coins. First of all, you are a moron, "Why were only coins added that are nearly worthless?" - Coins are not added, coins can apply to join. "Why didn't you try to get at least one coin that has a market cap > 1M$?" - You angry cause your investment does not go up fast enough? "And as it seems nearly all of them increased in price only XC lost dramatically." - what does that tells you? "I think a blocknet would make sense when coins that already have a high marketcap join forces to build something big but this somehow feels like XC is used to bring more value to some useless coins." - money money money and money again. Full of morons... I'm holding this coin since months, and yeah i'd like to see this coin go up in price like nearly 100% of the investors, i mean why would you invest in something that just looses value? I am not angry I'm just disappointed that XC takes this directoin before REV3 is even released You should find a ponzi scheme or something. Do you have any idea that a true investor will actually kill for a 100% profit in few months? You are no investor, you're a cheap ass clown. Get lost already and come with something constructive. I bet you don't have > 1 BTC in this coin "I am not angry I'm just disappointed that XC takes this directoin before REV3 is even released" again posting stupid things without reading first. The dev an everybody else from the staff stated that the REV3 will be released before BlockNet. Yeah, but the market reacts on news and speculations as you can see. Just look at the current price and the price before the announcement. My point was that this blocknet idea should have been announced after REV3 was released and the collaboration should at least be between coins that have a similiar marketcap or provide something really innovative and new |
|
|
|
|
|
wooder
|
|
October 22, 2014, 01:26:19 AM |
|
Ok, I'm not going to read this thread anymore. Only a bunch of cheap ass morons crying out loud cause their investment is not returning 237462356% profit fast enough.
I hope the important news gets posted fast enough on the XC official forums.
mr moron please go. or learn to articulate in a respectful way |
|
|
|
|
stealth923
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1036
Merit: 1000
|
|
October 22, 2014, 01:26:29 AM |
|
It does work, and its not open source for several reasons, including the fact it is the most advanced mixer technology on the marketplace and would be cloned immediately...
Please dont call it the "most advanced mixer technology" when its closed source. If you want that title, open source it, have it scrutinized and present your case to the community. Its claims like this that make investors run away. +1 i think so too. and it really sucks to see the price falling like a stone. maybe the blocknet idea wasn't the best idea at all? i think publishing this idea after REV3 was released would be much better as we lost 30% in just a few days. even most of the coins that joined the blocknet train are nearly worthless Coin - Marketcap - Price change last 7 days APEX - $ 62,861 +225.72 % SSD - $ 126,504 +15.98 % SWIFT - $ 491,164 +13.32 % XST - $ 369,854 +1.69 % NHZ - $ 188,442 -13.81 % UTIL - $ 150,427 +31.07 % FIBRE - $ 190,156 -11.86 % XC - $ 1,942,676 -28.71 % Why were only coins added that are nearly worthless? Why didn't you try to get at least one coin that has a market cap > 1M$? And as it seems nearly all of them increased in price only XC lost dramatically. I think a blocknet would make sense when coins that already have a high marketcap join forces to build something big but this somehow feels like XC is used to bring more value to some useless coins. First of all, you are a moron, "Why were only coins added that are nearly worthless?" - Coins are not added, coins can apply to join. "Why didn't you try to get at least one coin that has a market cap > 1M$?" - You angry cause your investment does not go up fast enough? "And as it seems nearly all of them increased in price only XC lost dramatically." - what does that tells you? "I think a blocknet would make sense when coins that already have a high marketcap join forces to build something big but this somehow feels like XC is used to bring more value to some useless coins." - money money money and money again. Full of morons... Dont be so quick to shoot him down - I think he has made some valid points. By XC associating with other currencies which are "worthless" you can say that the market is reacting by bringing XC down to their level. If all coins are the "same" on blocknet, XC should be worth similar to what the other majority of coins are. I would not be sucked into the marketing hype of "this will increase the user base exponentially".....what if it doesnt?? If I just wanted to use the service of a specific coin why would I not just buy that coin, why go through the need of having to go through the decentralized exchange, potentially get a crap exchange rate, lose money etc. Also, what will happen to the value of XC when other coins fail or dev's go rogue in the blocknet? The failure rate of crypto coins is VERY high. Whats being done is XCs marketcap has been tied to these other coins so if something happens to them, you can expect a knock on effect... So, we are communists now? ANY coin out there which is not a scam and passes Dan review CAN join BlockNet. What's so hard to understand a simple fact. "By XC associating with other currencies which are "worthless" - you are a moron too. What XC association? XC is something, BlockNet is something else. WTF guys? From reading a few posts it was by a "strict application process"....so yes, not every coin could join and they were very "selective" about the features they wanted to bring to BlockNet....Either way, there IS a direct association from coins of blocknet even if it does go open source in the future as they are essentially tying all their features together into a single network via XBridge?? Calling someone a moron shows you have no idea of the wider picture and probably feel trapped in your investment as you see it declining. This is normal. |
|
|
|
|
|
akula999
|
|
October 22, 2014, 01:27:28 AM |
|
It does work, and its not open source for several reasons, including the fact it is the most advanced mixer technology on the marketplace and would be cloned immediately...
Please dont call it the "most advanced mixer technology" when its closed source. If you want that title, open source it, have it scrutinized and present your case to the community. Its claims like this that make investors run away. +1 i think so too. and it really sucks to see the price falling like a stone. maybe the blocknet idea wasn't the best idea at all? i think publishing this idea after REV3 was released would be much better as we lost 30% in just a few days. even most of the coins that joined the blocknet train are nearly worthless Coin - Marketcap - Price change last 7 days APEX - $ 62,861 +225.72 % SSD - $ 126,504 +15.98 % SWIFT - $ 491,164 +13.32 % XST - $ 369,854 +1.69 % NHZ - $ 188,442 -13.81 % UTIL - $ 150,427 +31.07 % FIBRE - $ 190,156 -11.86 % XC - $ 1,942,676 -28.71 % Why were only coins added that are nearly worthless? Why didn't you try to get at least one coin that has a market cap > 1M$? And as it seems nearly all of them increased in price only XC lost dramatically. I think a blocknet would make sense when coins that already have a high marketcap join forces to build something big but this somehow feels like XC is used to bring more value to some useless coins. First of all, you are a moron, "Why were only coins added that are nearly worthless?" - Coins are not added, coins can apply to join. "Why didn't you try to get at least one coin that has a market cap > 1M$?" - You angry cause your investment does not go up fast enough? "And as it seems nearly all of them increased in price only XC lost dramatically." - what does that tells you? "I think a blocknet would make sense when coins that already have a high marketcap join forces to build something big but this somehow feels like XC is used to bring more value to some useless coins." - money money money and money again. Full of morons... Lets relax with the name calling. |
Bitcoin: 1FzZehkiwfeeUmfmBrym8VvXX7gUj3miHe
XMR: 4AqrzGPfEKeZrVXyPDNXUrNeKZZGNYiXMDoY49PvdffKNTRg6xp2Qz74SZ72gT5F9HH8Vaic99ndRg6 UBGcVijaNStQjwwf
|
|
|
IMJim
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000
|
|
October 22, 2014, 01:37:33 AM |
|
This thread is usually a pleasant each day, not the last few. So many fricken children in crypto. Price drop and the world is ending. Announcement of new tech coming and all the childish debate going back and forth.
This is the part about crypto I hate! This community at least went through major efforts to try and keep things professional, whether you're for XC or not.....why not just be civil and respectful fricken human beings?! WHATEVER is gonna happen, will it not be learning lesson for us all.......will it not be fascinating to watch and follow? Seriously people, you fudders and hard core disrespectful debaters need to calm the fuck down and chill!!
You are making it very unpleasant around here for all:-(
|
|
|
|
|
|
MKAxe11
|
|
October 22, 2014, 01:38:19 AM |
|
This discussion lately is really saddening me and I think the main problem is misconception.
First of all, we should distinguish 'FUD' better than just than just calling it that and asking people to leave. There’s a big difference between someone who is here for what we believe is a substantial progress in cryptosphere, but not being certain on recent developments, and someone criticizing from day one and not even interested in our vision.
FUD = 'fear, uncertainty and doubt' are feelings that I can fully understand right now, especially from an investor perspective (looking at recent price development).
It’s a completely different story, if one with no XC holdings what so ever is coming here to stir up emotions – most likely with an personal agenda (e.g. suppressing the price because he wants to benefit his own investment)
So let’s please obey to our community code #1 and #12,
and reassess #3: FUD != FUD -> concern of a supportive community member.
|
XChat:XJFcgcMqfdFxwXfqqfHPZs4uBomRfR6erQ / jwj2cnCPdf3uX53cyWyLreaJaDadj4BwqhdmhHcWFP5d
|
|
|
|
infinitechaos
|
|
October 22, 2014, 02:06:21 AM |
|
I just got home and read the last five pages.
All I've got to say is, some of you need to broaden your perspective.
What XC and the BlockNet aim to accomplish will revolutionize the world as we know it and you guys are nit-picking every little detail and making issues out of non-issues?
I know it's easy to become short-sighted when you see the current value of your investment sinking relative to BTC due to dumping, but try and separate your emotional reaction to the market from what you know to be true about the technology at hand here.
I've been around here since June and the pace of development put forth here is found nowhere else in crypto. When you consider that this is a big picture project that is still very much in beta and that bugs will be found and addressed along the path to that big picture, we have very little to complain about here.
Crypto "problems"...jeez.
|
|
|
|
|
sugarboy321
|
|
October 22, 2014, 02:15:10 AM |
|
Bah, soon as I saw that thread for paid fudders I almost threw up. Nothing but crypto mercenaries. Too bad we cannot password encrypt this thread to post.
|
|
|
|
|
|
MemoryShock
|
|
October 22, 2014, 02:17:42 AM |
|
Just want to re-iterate that a few pages back it was established that there was an active campaign to hire Trolls to 'destroy reputations'.
All the fallacies are rearing their ugly heads it appears.
I bought today. Those coins won't go into the market trolls coffers...(I'm assuming that they exist).
Edit - Post above me beat me to it.
|
|
|
|
|
