Bitcoin Forum
May 22, 2024, 06:02:19 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 [240] 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 ... 326 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Claymore's CryptoNote AMD GPU Miner v11.3  (Read 2144940 times)
HardFireMiner
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 872
Merit: 120



View Profile
October 14, 2017, 03:15:15 PM
 #4781

My RX'es 570 4GB doesn't work with dmem 1, with dmem 0 they make 10% less.

Switched back to 9.7.

█  █  █  █    / / / / / / / /    Play Games, Earn Crypto!         █  █  █    \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \    Start Earning NOW by Playing Mind Improving Games!     █  █  █  █     \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \  Best Crypto Earning Games for Office Workers!       █  █  █  █  Free Withdrawals of BTC, Doge and ETH 
Eisenkopf89
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 262
Merit: 101



View Profile
October 15, 2017, 10:41:38 AM
 #4782

I have the problem with my RX550 that the software: no asm binary found. Any solution?
mul44
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 105
Merit: 10


View Profile
October 16, 2017, 09:46:08 AM
 #4783

I have the problem with my RX550 that the software: no asm binary found. Any solution?
I also have big problems with this, in version 9.7 everything worked fine, on 450 the card in version 10.2 gives 350 hashes, on 550 card does not want to run like you
ronnieb
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 198
Merit: 1


View Profile
October 16, 2017, 05:05:00 PM
 #4784

Anyway to have vega 56/64 mine with 2 threads with this miner? Seems as though XMR STAK AMD can do it and achieve around 1800h-1900h per card.
Justiciero
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 88
Merit: 10


View Profile
October 16, 2017, 08:41:08 PM
 #4785

Who its better for dual mining sia decred or nothing

I have 1 rig with 3 * GTX 1060 + 1 * GTX 1070

Thanks
RaspoBTC
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1274
Merit: 319


View Profile
October 16, 2017, 09:11:03 PM
 #4786

Who its better for dual mining sia decred or nothing

I have 1 rig with 3 * GTX 1060 + 1 * GTX 1070

Thanks

The best way is to have a look to whattomine.com.
Look at the algorhythm and compare.
The are some good algos for Nvidia ;-).
Justiciero
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 88
Merit: 10


View Profile
October 16, 2017, 09:51:43 PM
 #4787

Who its better for dual mining sia decred or nothing

I have 1 rig with 3 * GTX 1060 + 1 * GTX 1070

Thanks

The best way is to have a look to whattomine.com.
Look at the algorhythm and compare.
The are some good algos for Nvidia ;-).

Thank you.

I was mining Zcash but now I've gone to ETH, I ask that it is better to mine ETH alone or with SIA or DECRED?

Sorry i mistake post.

Thank you

carlo_0000
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1281
Merit: 1003


View Profile
October 17, 2017, 01:09:37 AM
 #4788

you can use arronace multipool miner
it will select the best one

but it s most of the time eth + sia
yoshcat
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 33
Merit: 0


View Profile
October 17, 2017, 08:21:51 AM
 #4789

@Claymore, Hi! Is it possible to add support for older cards? HD Series 69xx
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325

Miners developer


View Profile
October 17, 2017, 12:14:37 PM
 #4790

@Claymore, Hi! Is it possible to add support for older cards? HD Series 69xx

v10 supports only ASM mode, so old cards are not supported, also RX550 is not supported currently.
I can add non-ASM mode but it will work slowly, so it's better to use v9.7 for cards that are not supported by v10.

Please read Readme and FAQ in the first post of this thread before asking any questions, probably the answer is already there.
List of my miners: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3019607
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325

Miners developer


View Profile
October 17, 2017, 12:16:14 PM
 #4791

I've just uploaded v10.2 for Linux.

Please read Readme and FAQ in the first post of this thread before asking any questions, probably the answer is already there.
List of my miners: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3019607
fr4nkthetank
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2294
Merit: 1182


Now the money is free, and so the people will be


View Profile
October 17, 2017, 02:36:59 PM
 #4792

Anyway to have vega 56/64 mine with 2 threads with this miner? Seems as though XMR STAK AMD can do it and achieve around 1800h-1900h per card.

better stick with xmr stak amd, or the new xmr miner that came out...forget the name just off the top of my head.  claymore will probably address this in v11, but for now VEGA is better mined with something else.  I get almost 1900 not pushing the mem too hard on 56, rock stable.
garytheasshole
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 406
Merit: 105


Chosŏn Minjujuŭi Inmin Konghwaguk


View Profile WWW
October 17, 2017, 02:38:19 PM
 #4793

Anyway to have vega 56/64 mine with 2 threads with this miner? Seems as though XMR STAK AMD can do it and achieve around 1800h-1900h per card.

better stick with xmr stak amd, or the new xmr miner that came out...forget the name just off the top of my head.  claymore will probably address this in v11, but for now VEGA is better mined with something else.  I get almost 1900 not pushing the mem too hard on 56, rock stable.
That's amazing, how much power do they pull?

UnclWish
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1484
Merit: 253


View Profile
October 17, 2017, 02:40:26 PM
Last edit: October 17, 2017, 03:45:09 PM by UnclWish
 #4794

Claymore, what about Pitcairn bugs? With -dmem 1 too much incorrect shares. Without -dmem 1 speed less than 9.7. Power consumption in 10.2 is less - it's better than 9.7.
KleinerMiner
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 20
Merit: 0


View Profile
October 17, 2017, 05:02:09 PM
 #4795

Hi!

Pretty sure this is a ridiculous question for you guys but i´m pretty new in mining (especially in monero mining).
I´m using claymore  Miner and everything is working stable and fine.
Also the rigs Performance is (i think) okay... 8x sapphire nitro rx 580 8gb with roundabout 5700-5800h/s with sucking ~940W from wall.

The only weird Thing is that the miner shows me lots (i mean really lots) of "Dev Fee Share Found" Messages.
I mean nearly every line says Dev Fee. wtf!?

Is this normal? On the other side nanopool.org tells me roundabout "correct" hash power.
Are there any hints regarding this question?
And no, i do NOT want disable dev fee and other dick stuff... i´m not asking for this -> just would like to know if this (see screenshot link) behavior is normal.



https://imgur.com/a/3blma

tia, KleinerMeiner
swampfighter
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 9
Merit: 0


View Profile
October 17, 2017, 05:19:11 PM
 #4796

Hi!

Pretty sure this is a ridiculous question for you guys but i´m pretty new in mining (especially in monero mining).
I´m using claymore  Miner and everything is working stable and fine.
Also the rigs Performance is (i think) okay... 8x sapphire nitro rx 580 8gb with roundabout 5700-5800h/s with sucking ~940W from wall.

The only weird Thing is that the miner shows me lots (i mean really lots) of "Dev Fee Share Found" Messages.
I mean nearly every line says Dev Fee. wtf!?

Is this normal? On the other side nanopool.org tells me roundabout "correct" hash power.
Are there any hints regarding this question?
And no, i do NOT want disable dev fee and other dick stuff... i´m not asking for this -> just would like to know if this (see screenshot link) behavior is normal.



https://imgur.com/a/3blma

tia, KleinerMeiner

It's fine. The devfee system is mining at a lower difficulty (5000) so it finds shares faster/more frequently than your miners, which are mining a a higher difficulty.  Keep in mind that your shares are worth much more than the dev's shares as well.
swampfighter
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 9
Merit: 0


View Profile
October 17, 2017, 05:44:45 PM
 #4797

Claymore, what about Pitcairn bugs? With -dmem 1 too much incorrect shares. Without -dmem 1 speed less than 9.7. Power consumption in 10.2 is less - it's better than 9.7.

+1,  the incorrect shares problem happens on both overclocked and non-overclocked cards.  I too have to use 9.7 for my R9 270 cards.   Waiting patiently for a fix.
nowaltcoin
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 158
Merit: 100


View Profile
October 17, 2017, 06:19:02 PM
Last edit: October 17, 2017, 07:18:00 PM by nowaltcoin
 #4798

+1

have 6 * Hd7850 with 25% incorrect shares and 2 R9 270 with 15% incorrect shares.
All cards are non overclocked and working ok with 9.7

A solution would be wonderfull

8 * Blackarrow Prospero at Low-Voltage mining @ ckpool.org
12 * GPU's mining ETN/Sumocoin
You like to mine something different: https://deutsche-emark.de/
garytheasshole
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 406
Merit: 105


Chosŏn Minjujuŭi Inmin Konghwaguk


View Profile WWW
October 17, 2017, 06:20:39 PM
 #4799

+1

have 6 * Hd7850 with 25% incorrect shares and 2 R9 270 with 10% incorrect shares.
All cards are non overclocked and working ok with 9.7

A solution would be wonderfull

Drop me a PM if you ever want to get rid of your 7850s Wink

lncm
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 388
Merit: 13


View Profile
October 17, 2017, 06:26:37 PM
 #4800

Hello there. I think I've found a strange issue, but I may be wrong.

I have a Ryzen 7 1700 system with 16 Gb RAM and 3 video cards: RX 480 4 Gb, RX 580 8Gb, RX 560 4 Gb.

I was mining monero on the CPU with XMR-STAK-CPU and getting around 0,01 XMR a day, and Ether + Siacoin on the graphic cards.

Anyway, I decided to give Claymore's Cryptonote AMD GPU miner a go and I configured it to mine to Nanopool, same acount as xmr-stak.

The machines were properly identified, of course, huge boost in hashrate - Ryzen gets high 400´s/low 500´s, video cards get ~1900 H/s, Nanopool reported average hashrates of ~2300. However, I failed to see an significant increase in balance, same ~ 0,01 XMR a day!

Today I got back to mine XMR in CPU only, and same gains.

Is this even possible?
Pages: « 1 ... 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 [240] 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 ... 326 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!