yuslav
|
|
January 01, 2017, 11:20:29 AM |
|
Try 1380/2200 or 1235/2145
This miner eventually stuck with the memory overclocking. But not a big increase. 690 default. 740-760 during acceleration.
|
I'm an idiot. I believe in Bitcoin!
|
|
|
yuslav
|
|
January 01, 2017, 11:22:30 AM |
|
whats the min. payout from dwarfpool, if using exchange address? Is it 5.0 or 0.2 xmr? Website is confusing. 5 xmr would need at least 40 480's
I got a payment to my exchange address after i collected 1 xmr. Despite it says i should had wait till i get 5 xmr. Nah you don't have to wait for 5+ XMR, the site explain it well, see my above posts. the +5XMR is for hourly payment, if you are in daily payout (the default) you'll get paid as soon as you have 1 XMR (that on the other hand isn't explained well on the website) A link in the signature, there payout whenever you want. 0.01 fee
|
I'm an idiot. I believe in Bitcoin!
|
|
|
doktor83
|
|
January 01, 2017, 11:24:43 AM |
|
Anyone tried minexmr.com ? I just started mining there, but they don't have statistics like dwarfpool ? Anyone can confirm that this pool is ok ?
|
|
|
|
m1n1ngP4d4w4n
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
CryptoLearner
|
|
January 01, 2017, 11:26:37 AM |
|
whats the min. payout from dwarfpool, if using exchange address? Is it 5.0 or 0.2 xmr? Website is confusing. 5 xmr would need at least 40 480's
I got a payment to my exchange address after i collected 1 xmr. Despite it says i should had wait till i get 5 xmr. Nah you don't have to wait for 5+ XMR, the site explain it well, see my above posts. the +5XMR is for hourly payment, if you are in daily payout (the default) you'll get paid as soon as you have 1 XMR (that on the other hand isn't explained well on the website) A link in the signature, there payout whenever you want. 0.01 fee Yes of course you can manual payout too on dwarfpool, but it cost money lol. Minergate i don't like them much....
|
|
|
|
tiamatt
|
|
January 01, 2017, 11:59:05 AM |
|
Try 1380/2200 or 1235/2145
This miner eventually stuck with the memory overclocking. But not a big increase. 690 default. 740-760 during acceleration. I use v.9.5 not v9.6 constant and stable 750-757
|
|
|
|
yuslav
|
|
January 01, 2017, 12:14:04 PM Last edit: January 01, 2017, 05:42:01 PM by yuslav |
|
Try 1380/2200 or 1235/2145
This miner eventually stuck with the memory overclocking. But not a big increase. 690 default. 740-760 during acceleration. I use v.9.5 not v9.6 constant and stable 750-757 Sapphires also 480 th? Yes 9.5 stable on the 480's. I) Thanks for the advice!
|
I'm an idiot. I believe in Bitcoin!
|
|
|
jelin1984
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2408
Merit: 1004
|
|
January 01, 2017, 12:21:15 PM |
|
any link for 9.5 claymore to downloaded?
|
|
|
|
BeneQ
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 67
Merit: 0
|
|
January 01, 2017, 12:58:47 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
tkredmond
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 68
Merit: 0
|
|
January 01, 2017, 01:26:53 PM |
|
any news about when a new version will be released that plays nicely with rx 4xx series?
|
|
|
|
doktor83
|
|
January 01, 2017, 02:12:56 PM |
|
9.6 plays nicely with my 470 nitros. never freeze
|
|
|
|
minerman121
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 45
Merit: 0
|
|
January 01, 2017, 04:33:25 PM |
|
Hi all I didn't know how to work the question properly, so I found no answers. A very quick one though; I am using the Claymore Miner in a pool of choice. I know the M option gives hashrates of individual cards. However if anyone has mined XMR you would notice every so often when a new job is received, you get a hash rate reading. that reading when the new job is received is at least 120-150 Hash LOWER than the combined M option individual card Hash readings, averaged out over, say 5 iterations. Any suggestions as to which is correct? The main reason I want to find the info out is because I am tweaking power consumption to the ideal hash. Optimal profits and all that jazz
|
|
|
|
BeneQ
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 67
Merit: 0
|
|
January 01, 2017, 04:59:45 PM |
|
Meantime Claymore's v9.6 6x sapphire 480 nitro+ 4GB default clocks mining without any problem for last 26h with constant speed 4480 H/s
|
|
|
|
TheKoolaider
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
January 01, 2017, 05:37:59 PM |
|
Hi all I didn't know how to work the question properly, so I found no answers. A very quick one though; I am using the Claymore Miner in a pool of choice. I know the M option gives hashrates of individual cards. However if anyone has mined XMR you would notice every so often when a new job is received, you get a hash rate reading. that reading when the new job is received is at least 120-150 Hash LOWER than the combined M option individual card Hash readings, averaged out over, say 5 iterations. Any suggestions as to which is correct? The main reason I want to find the info out is because I am tweaking power consumption to the ideal hash. Optimal profits and all that jazz Hey there. Regarding your Sum hashrate for your cards, don't worry about that amount, it's truly negligible. Your miner is sending it's correct hashrate to your pool. Even your pool will show different hash readings throughout the mining process. This is normal. I total 6300h/s but can see numbers as low as 5500 and as high as 6700 on the pool website, even though I'm hashing at a solid 6300. Additionally, it takes ~3000 shares for the miner to get to it's optimal hash rate. In other words, you're ok.
|
|
|
|
m1n1ngP4d4w4n
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
CryptoLearner
|
|
January 01, 2017, 05:51:23 PM |
|
Hello fellow miners, I perused the thread quite a bit in search of informations, but overall i didn't saw much about hash/electricity ratio for RX470/480 cards. Can you post some datas for example CARD MODEL - BIOS / OC - HASH - POWER - Claymore GPU miner version ? ie sapphire RX 480 nitro+ 8Go - STOCK / 1500-1000 - 750 - 120W - 9.6 Would be awesome, thanks in advance and happy new year PS : any good link is appreciated too PS2 : i saw this one http://monerobechmarks.byethost5.com/ but most data are a tad old and most wattage infos / bios are missing , i would love it hear it directly from our miners
|
|
|
|
citronick
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1080
---- winter*juvia -----
|
|
January 01, 2017, 10:45:32 PM |
|
Meantime Claymore's v9.6 6x sapphire 480 nitro+ 4GB default clocks mining without any problem for last 26h with constant speed 4480 H/s
which crimson driver did you use?
|
If I provided you good and useful info or just a smile to your day, consider sending me merit points to further validate this Bitcointalk account ~ useful for future account recovery...
|
|
|
jelin1984
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2408
Merit: 1004
|
|
January 01, 2017, 11:40:33 PM |
|
i have problem i can not connect at dwrpool how i can fix that? ??
|
|
|
|
pehoko
|
|
January 02, 2017, 12:42:58 AM |
|
Which is normal value of "gpu load" with this miner?
|
|
|
|
dagnazty
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
|
|
January 02, 2017, 02:23:18 AM |
|
Is anyone else having to run Low Intensity mode to maximize hashrate with RX 480? Or is anyone getting invalid shares through minergate? Version 9.6
|
|
|
|
aaronsace
|
|
January 02, 2017, 02:42:48 AM |
|
Please allow workernames as username, not only wallet addresses
bumping this once more Ok I will release new version in 2-4 days, I will update many things. Cool, just noticed this post; should be soon then. Waiting for this update so it works on MultiPoolMiner for MiningPoolHub. https://github.com/aaronsace/MultiPoolMiner/releases
|
|
|
|
GabryRox
|
|
January 02, 2017, 03:29:01 AM |
|
Well, after initial good results on both my rigs with 9.6, I now have problems with both. Woke up this morning to rig #2 (6x RX 470s) crashed and all fans blasting. This happened the night before with core/clock settings of 1200/1950, so I had lowered it to 1200/1920. It ran all day fine then just a few minutes ago, I check it and I had the same "Open CL hung in thread 10 & 11" issue that had occurred the night before. Now I have it set at default 1242/1900, so we will see how that goes.
On Rig #1 that had been running 4x rx 470s for over 4 days straight at 1242/1900, it just experienced that sporadic fan blasting issue that others have encountered. So, I had to reboot and reset that one as well.
Bottom line, there definitely appear to be stability issues with the 4xx series cards, so hopefully this is something that can be addressed in the forthcoming v10.
I know this belongs on the CPU thread but I have also seen weird things going on with Claymore CPU XMR Miner 3.5. I have 3 K series i7's mining it and on 2 of my 3 PCs, the hash-rate has inexplicably dropped by about 10-15%. This is after restarting and rebooting several times and there is nothing else running CPU wise, yet for some reason it's not as effective.
Really looking forward to the GPU miner update. Thanks in advance Claymore!
|
|
|
|
|