Scientific proof that God exists?

[BADecker]

What is incest? There is more incest going on right now than there ever was at the time of Adam and Eve.

Just think. If evolution happened, some mutated critter, who was just a tiny bit different than his fellows, mated with a non-mutated critter, to form children who carried the mutation only part way. Then that non-mutated critter died, and left his now imperfect mutation in his kids, so that they destroyed the mutating ability altogether.

The whole idea of evolution is about as stupid as you can get. If it worked at all, we would have dozens, or hundreds, or thousands, or millions of different kinds of intelligent, reasoning, human-like species all around us. But we don't. We only have two:
1. People who believe in God, and;
2. People who don't believe in God.

Dude, I have no phuking idea wtf you are on about there. All I can say is you really
need to get out of your little bitcoin thread preaching pious world, take your reality blindfold off, take your fingers out of your
ears, read up on some real science instead of bible bollocks....and please, for phucks sake, educate yourself on evolution....

What I am talking about is this. There is no factual basis for evolution. Here is what I mean.

Evolutionists have taken facts and said that they are part of evolution, when these same facts can fit many other things, as well, and nobody knows if they are part of evolution, or part of something else.

Then, evolutionists have built up a story that they call evolution theory, out of all these facts that can totally fit other things besides evolution, and that they don't factually know fit evolution only or for sure.

Then evolutionists call their story science, when all it is, is religion. Why is it religion? Because all the facts of evolution aren't necessarily part of evolution, but fit other things, as well.

Most so-called evolution facts fit creation, in some other way, better than they fit evolution the way evolutionists state.

If evolution isn't a complete fairy tale, nobody knows it for sure. It is all guesswork.

The fact that someone can't scientifically disprove the scientific laws and facts of cause and effect, entropy, and complexity, shows that all they are talking is religion. And this isn't the topic for religion. All a person needs to do to show that these 3 laws/facts are such, is research them all over the Internet.

Scientific law proves that God exists.

[1715045313]

1715045313

[1715045313]

1715045313

[Yumi027]

Many Scientists now believe the existence of God is not only possible but probable. From their perspective, an intelligent force predating our universe initiated creation. And what’s more, scientific minds have drawn clear links between this force of intelligence and the spiritual realm.

[CWX]

im still looking for the solid proof he exists

[phieudu0408]

That's why its called a religion. That's why there are many religions.

[BADecker]

im still looking for the solid proof he exists

If you saw the proof, would you recognize it?

If someone showed you the proof, would you understand it? Or would you simply have to believe him or not.

If you don't understand the proof but you believe it anyway, then it is a religion for you, and not science.

[Carles Enck]

1. Big Bang
Scientists explain the concept of the creation of the universe in terms of the phenomenon of the big bang. A massive explosion or big bang that led to the formation of nature based on cosmological studies of the early form and development of the universe. In fact, this incident is contained in the explanation of the letter of AL-Anbiya verse 30.

2. Earth
Earth as a human-inhabited planet has an ideal composition for shelter. Naturally, the earth is designed intelligently as an environment for all species of living beings to survive.

3. Water
In any part of the world, no life can survive without water. Thinking about how water can flow around the world, shows the power that governs it.

[BADecker]

бoг ecть и этoмy нe нyжны нayчныe дoкaзaтeльcтвa

Ho ecть нayчныe дoкaзaтeльcтвa для Бoгa, дaжe ecли этo нe нyжнo.

[BADecker]

1. Big Bang
Scientists explain the concept of the creation of the universe in terms of the phenomenon of the big bang. A massive explosion or big bang that led to the formation of nature based on cosmological studies of the early form and development of the universe. In fact, this incident is contained in the explanation of the letter of AL-Anbiya verse 30.

Big Bang and the AL-Anbiya letter leave so much information out, regarding what exists, and how it could work, that they both are simply stories. BB shouldn't even be considered a theory for the beginning of the universe, it is so weak.

2. Earth
Earth as a human-inhabited planet has an ideal composition for shelter. Naturally, the earth is designed intelligently as an environment for all species of living beings to survive.

This is true. But it isn't enough explanation to make it scientific proof for God.

3. Water
In any part of the world, no life can survive without water. Thinking about how water can flow around the world, shows the power that governs it.

This in itself would not be considered scientific proof for or against the existence of God, even though it is something that is marvelous.

[reniela98]

yes i believe that is totally exist in this world were live in   

[karennatz]

it was created for hopeless people. to give them hope, to make them feel better.

there's no proof, really there just none. with that i conclude that "god" doesnt exist.

[Vod]

im still looking for the solid proof he exists

The entire planet is. 

The only person that seems to have found the proof is Badecker, but he is not known for his mental well being.

[qwik2learn]

Many Scientists now believe the existence of God is not only possible but probable. From their perspective, an intelligent force predating our universe initiated creation. And what’s more, scientific minds have drawn clear links between this force of intelligence and the spiritual realm.

You are right, many of the brightest scientific minds knew about Infinite Intelligence, and even committed atheists like Sartre and Anthony Flew eventually acknowledged the probability of that Intelligence.
https://sites.google.com/site/chs4o8pt/eminent_researchers

[solarsun]

Wow, that's deep...   

[BADecker]

Keeping in mind that 'apparently' god and the devil 'changed places..' ha de fuckin ha..

As I see it, a bunch of gay faggot's into shaggin kids, and seperating the dads from said kid's in order to do so set up some sick blood drinkin shit where idiot's, dress up and know for a fact they can call up an aparition of what one might call a diety.. of sort's. But this one's more clever than me, because my star sign says I am lucifer on earth as we speak. But we never spoke.

Yet I am god. Not dead yet but cannot be, for eternity is endless repetition of the fractal math of the magic square's, correct?

Time exist's without space, for it has no form to adhere to , being the magnet I tell you to stick to, full fuckin stop.

Scared of Iron?

Meet the latest drone strike tool: wooden pelet's laden with holy water. Fired by air/water compression at a speed that will make vamp's melt in broad daylight.

Haha, question is folks, where am I , um, being 'real', or not?

Edited because it wasn't posted before it was..

I like to drink, n talk shite. That's obvious. It's my hobby. It takes my brain away from sellin idea's to terrorist's n shit, but being human, I need something to pick on, and me, I prefer what I like to call, wait for it, the bully. Freemasonry. When I first 'communed' (aka communicated) with BADecker, he would starve all of whatever for his beleif structure. Read back, it's in the argument's aka for/against..

In this is his admission he fancie's lucifer over god, for he fail's to see god provide's, not take's away..

He fails to see the athiest that sit's with god. and the devil.

There's a reason the athiest exist's. We know, but dont choose side's. We're not that fuckin stupid.

Away sacrifice, ye pitiful lambs to the slaughter, and may ye see yer kids blood as ye wash..

In the end, folk's, I am a lone wolf on a keyboard thinking aloud without speaking. The word's flow yet I know not how it types, for I watch my fingers type making sure they dont make a mistake, or at leat as little as possible, and then friend's say, did you see what you just wrote, I say, I never wrote, I watched my finger's create pattern's out of movement.. whan I read what was typed, I was like, wow...

Falasha..

I have to fin tonight with this. Freemasonry existing is the scientific proof that god's opposite exist's, and has opposite result's in said magic (that's currently being taught on screens everywhere, proving my point) to the god we SHOULD believe in. (Who-ever the fuck that one is) BADecker's god, the church, is finished, because that church's god is lucifer, and why the next mass burning of witches and those using witchcraft, will be burnt on the same day using your own god blessed tools of destruction. I mean, c'mon, you thought god invented nukes to kill the enemies of god? NO. It would take that many nukes to kill lucifer's worshipper's, freemasonry. Fuck the good. As long as we kill the baby sacrificer's, all WILL be good.

Would you mind at least pointing to which part of all your, above ^^^, drivel is scientific proof that God exists? That is, do you think you can even find it?

[BADecker]

More scientific proof that God exists:

1. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1373864.msg23796852#msg23796852

2. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i2KP1vWkQ6Y

3. http://mathworld.wolfram.com/GoedelsIncompletenessTheorem.html

4. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/goedel-incompleteness/

[BCEmporium]

More scientific proof that God exists:

1. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1373864.msg23796852#msg23796852

2. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i2KP1vWkQ6Y

3. http://mathworld.wolfram.com/GoedelsIncompletenessTheorem.html

4. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/goedel-incompleteness/

There's an actual generalization of Goedel's theorem that resolves that issue. Is that generalization God?

[Vod]

More scientific proof that God exists:

1. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1373864.msg23796852#msg23796852

2. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i2KP1vWkQ6Y

3. http://mathworld.wolfram.com/GoedelsIncompletenessTheorem.html

4. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/goedel-incompleteness/

Wow - why have the millions of atheists around the world not heard of your delusions?

Proof would end the entire argument instantly. 

[BADecker]

More scientific proof that God exists:

1. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1373864.msg23796852#msg23796852

2. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i2KP1vWkQ6Y

3. http://mathworld.wolfram.com/GoedelsIncompletenessTheorem.html

4. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/goedel-incompleteness/

Wow - why have the millions of atheists around the world not heard of your delusions?

Proof would end the entire argument instantly. 

It isn't a scenario of not leading the horse to water. It is a scenario of the horse not drinking, of its own volition.

[Vod]

It isn't a scenario of not leading the horse to water. It is a scenario of the horse not drinking, of its own volition.

Right - so every single horse in the world refuses to drink, of it's own volition.

OOOOOOR - you are delusional. 

[Astargath]

More scientific proof that God exists:

1. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1373864.msg23796852#msg23796852

2. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i2KP1vWkQ6Y

3. http://mathworld.wolfram.com/GoedelsIncompletenessTheorem.html

4. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/goedel-incompleteness/

The consensus response is that Gödel's incompleteness theorem applies only to axiomatic formal systems (e.g. mathematics). Theology is not a formal system.

Therefore, Gödel's incompleteness theorem cannot be applied to theology.

Of course religious people would apply it because that's what you do with every single ''proof'' of god which always turns out to be false.