[ANN] NoirShares UPDATE REQUIRED Advanced Features✔, Unique PoW✔

[anticlimax]

This wallet won't sync. It won't accept old block chain data and hell if it is syncing in the last hour and a half.

I still don't understand why you guys don't allow exchanges to handle this..

Lol starts to download now.. 112k blocks to go.. Stressful situation.

[1714471995]

1714471995

[1714471995]

1714471995

[BarTeam]

This wallet won't sync. It won't accept old block chain data and hell if it is syncing in the last hour and a half.

I still don't understand why you guys don't allow exchanges to handle this..

I'm ready to just boycott this coin, always a headache.

It's not an exchange issue. Check your PMs and don't worry about the snapshot. Your exchange will likely convert your coins.

[clayop]

It's kind of stupid question, please forgive me if you think so.

Can I sell my old NRS now?

[anticlimax]

Sending my nrb to my wallet now.
Has the snapshot been taken already?

Edit.. Wallets fully synced yet says out of sync
I honestly don't have time for this.
Block 125430?

Last block time in debug window is august 13..

[barwizi]

Sending my nrb to my wallet now.
Has the snapshot been taken already?

Edit.. Wallets fully synced yet says out of sync
I honestly don't have time for this.
Block 125430?

Last block time in debug window is august 13..

yes, that is correct. multipool left the diffculty really high, noone  has soloed a block since.

The scripts are starting up now. should take an hour since they will first re-download the chain, make databases and produce a csv file.

I would advise against staking or trying to move anything now.

[anticlimax]

How am I to move nrb off an exchange if blocks aren't being found?
So, if I want my nrs I've got to deal with cryptsy now?

[clayop]

Sending my nrb to my wallet now.
Has the snapshot been taken already?

Edit.. Wallets fully synced yet says out of sync
I honestly don't have time for this.
Block 125430?

Last block time in debug window is august 13..

yes, that is correct. multipool left the diffculty really high, noone  has soloed a block since.

The scripts are starting up now. should take an hour since they will first re-download the chain, make databases and produce a csv file.

I would advise against staking or trying to move anything now.

Has the snapshot taken at block 71850?

Block Height: 71850
Block Time: September 8, 2014, 23:55:23

Block Height: 71851
Block Time: September 9, 2014, 00:03:27

[pjuan]

Hey Folks,

I've downloaded v2.2.5.0-unkNoirbits and I let it sync, but it stopped syncing. I have this in the debug log file:

Code:

ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED
received block 7454491625485c8b2efd
SetBestChain: new best=7454491625485c8b2efd  height=125429  work=480447576640858  date=08/13/14 09:09:37
  nActualTimespan = 176  before bounds
CMainNetDiff -- GetNextWorkRequired RETARGET
nTargetTimespan = 3600    nActualTimespan = 176
Before: 1c50fd4d  0000000050fd4d00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
After:  1c03f5a0  0000000003f5a0c71c71c71c71c71c71c71c71c71c71c71c71c71c71c71c71c7
SetBestChain: new best=afa74b66c005809cb511  height=125430  work=480725268071821  date=08/13/14 09:38:34
ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED
getblocks 125311 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
getblocks 125311 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
received getdata (70 invsz)
getblocks 125311 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
getblocks 125311 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
getblocks 125311 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
getblocks 125311 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
getblocks -1 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
getblocks -1 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
getblocks -1 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
getblocks -1 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
received getdata (240 invsz)
getblocks -1 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
getblocks -1 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
getblocks 125071 to afa74b66c005809cb511 limit 500
  getblocks stopping at 125430 afa74b66c005809cb511
received getdata (119 invsz)
connection timeout
trying connection 213.21.33.12:55884 lastseen=2.1hrs
connection timeout
trying connection 24.18.65.22:55884 lastseen=1.0hrs
Flushed 5252 addresses to peers.dat  460ms
connection timeout
trying connection 74.108.124.159:55884 lastseen=5403.8hrs
connection timeout
trying connection 24.18.65.22:55884 lastseen=1.0hrs
connection timeout
trying connection 24.227.131.66:55884 lastseen=1.3hrs
connection timeout
trying connection 213.21.33.12:55884 lastseen=2.1hrs
connection timeout
trying connection 24.227.131.66:55884 lastseen=1.3hrs
connection timeout
trying connection 213.21.33.12:55884 lastseen=2.1hrs
IRC got join
connection timeout
trying connection 24.18.65.22:55884 lastseen=1.0hrs
connection timeout
trying connection 222.185.134.35:55884 lastseen=34.9hrs
getblocks 124101 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
  getblocks stopping at limit 124600 25d728a721442c4adc17
getblocks 124113 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
  getblocks stopping at limit 124612 47c157a245f8169d0a17

Any tips?

[anticlimax]

Hey Folks,

I've downloaded v2.2.5.0-unkNoirbits and I let it sync, but it stopped syncing. I have this in the debug log file:

Code:

ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED
received block 7454491625485c8b2efd
SetBestChain: new best=7454491625485c8b2efd  height=125429  work=480447576640858  date=08/13/14 09:09:37
  nActualTimespan = 176  before bounds
CMainNetDiff -- GetNextWorkRequired RETARGET
nTargetTimespan = 3600    nActualTimespan = 176
Before: 1c50fd4d  0000000050fd4d00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
After:  1c03f5a0  0000000003f5a0c71c71c71c71c71c71c71c71c71c71c71c71c71c71c71c71c7
SetBestChain: new best=afa74b66c005809cb511  height=125430  work=480725268071821  date=08/13/14 09:38:34
ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED
getblocks 125311 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
getblocks 125311 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
received getdata (70 invsz)
getblocks 125311 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
getblocks 125311 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
getblocks 125311 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
getblocks 125311 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
getblocks -1 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
getblocks -1 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
getblocks -1 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
getblocks -1 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
received getdata (240 invsz)
getblocks -1 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
getblocks -1 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
getblocks 125071 to afa74b66c005809cb511 limit 500
  getblocks stopping at 125430 afa74b66c005809cb511
received getdata (119 invsz)
connection timeout
trying connection 213.21.33.12:55884 lastseen=2.1hrs
connection timeout
trying connection 24.18.65.22:55884 lastseen=1.0hrs
Flushed 5252 addresses to peers.dat  460ms
connection timeout
trying connection 74.108.124.159:55884 lastseen=5403.8hrs
connection timeout
trying connection 24.18.65.22:55884 lastseen=1.0hrs
connection timeout
trying connection 24.227.131.66:55884 lastseen=1.3hrs
connection timeout
trying connection 213.21.33.12:55884 lastseen=2.1hrs
connection timeout
trying connection 24.227.131.66:55884 lastseen=1.3hrs
connection timeout
trying connection 213.21.33.12:55884 lastseen=2.1hrs
IRC got join
connection timeout
trying connection 24.18.65.22:55884 lastseen=1.0hrs
connection timeout
trying connection 222.185.134.35:55884 lastseen=34.9hrs
getblocks 124101 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
  getblocks stopping at limit 124600 25d728a721442c4adc17
getblocks 124113 to 00000000000000000000 limit 500
  getblocks stopping at limit 124612 47c157a245f8169d0a17

Any tips?

addnode=crypts.com
addnode=coinwarz.com

Might help to add these to your config file.

[pjuan]

Is the config file located in the .../AppData/Roaming/Noirbits/ directory? Will it be bitcoin.conf?

[barwizi]

Snapshots complete. We will now take the time to carefully integrate the relevant balances into the new chain.  Please note that addresses with below 1.0 balances will be ignored, since they will unnecesarilly bloat the first few blocks.

Full specs on the new chain will be posted in the next 12-24 hours.

[Mario241077]

Snapshot of my wallet is accurate  
9gQHB5GRdrn64uLzQr54z1MyS3wErwVGBU

Barwizi maybe is time to update your site http://www.noirds.com/ ?

You are quite right

We are restructuring to enable more user and investor control of NRS. Using Blockchain based voting, we want to get a community chosen management for a NRS as a currency/share and the DAC built with it. We hope to lure developer talent by introducing automatic payroll. This also coincides with the dividend payout to those who helped us set up.

Barwizi just can't be there to handle everything coding wise and as time passes and projects accumulate, we'll need people doing specifically assigned tasks, a position has been created to handle those issues. This falls under Marketing, so when you vote after the new chain is released, vote for a CMO that meets your expectations. All positions in the DAC are eligible for voting, including CEO, this is because once we are sure the software is stable, Barwizi will be stepping down. His job is managing and developing for the group, not a single platform.

As part of our restructuring strategy, the officer positions are increased by 2. We need as much help as we can get. Officers are incentivised by 1) the payment for services rendered 2) community will fire you if you are not being productive 3) The better they perform, the greater the value of their payout.  

If all want it. I would offer myself for voting as an officer

[pvkpgp]

Snapshots complete. We will now take the time to carefully integrate the relevant balances into the new chain.  Please note that addresses with below 1.0 balances will be ignored, since they will unnecesarilly bloat the first few blocks.

Full specs on the new chain will be posted in the next 12-24 hours.

ok？

[barwizi]

Snapshot of my wallet is accurate  
9gQHB5GRdrn64uLzQr54z1MyS3wErwVGBU

Barwizi maybe is time to update your site http://www.noirds.com/ ?

You are quite right

We are restructuring to enable more user and investor control of NRS. Using Blockchain based voting, we want to get a community chosen management for a NRS as a currency/share and the DAC built with it. We hope to lure developer talent by introducing automatic payroll. This also coincides with the dividend payout to those who helped us set up.

Barwizi just can't be there to handle everything coding wise and as time passes and projects accumulate, we'll need people doing specifically assigned tasks, a position has been created to handle those issues. This falls under Marketing, so when you vote after the new chain is released, vote for a CMO that meets your expectations. All positions in the DAC are eligible for voting, including CEO, this is because once we are sure the software is stable, Barwizi will be stepping down. His job is managing and developing for the group, not a single platform.

As part of our restructuring strategy, the officer positions are increased by 2. We need as much help as we can get. Officers are incentivised by 1) the payment for services rendered 2) community will fire you if you are not being productive 3) The better they perform, the greater the value of their payout.  

If all want it. I would offer myself for voting as an officer

I will provide guide on how to set up at launch

[BarTeam]

You can also add me as backup.

[amartinz]

I can't understand what's happening.
1. I transferred my NRS from Cryptsy to local wallet yesterday.
2. Snapshot was taken.
3. Now I can transfer my "old" NRS back to Cryptsy and sell them to poor people who don't know about NRS+NRB merge?
4. I will recieve some "new" NRS when the new blockchain will be started?
...
PROFIT?!

[anticlimax]

It seems to me the nrs price was some what artificially inflated to give an edge to nrs holders in this transfer.

[barwizi]

It seems to me the nrs price was some what artificially inflated to give an edge to nrs holders in this transfer.

I noticed as well,  we'll be using the price snapshot along with market data so we should see viable rates. 

[NoirGroup LLDC]

It seems to me the nrs price was some what artificially inflated to give an edge to nrs holders in this transfer.

ding ding ding!

Barwizi is manipulating the whole thing.

He is running a long time scam.

He even stole (he said he turned it into "donations" in the latest newsletter) my and Koonta's BTC from the General Fund holdings, because we exposed what he was doing.

I asked for a refund but instead he decided to steal the BTC.

Don't trust him.

1) what does Barwizi gain from manipulating this? Please state your reasons clearly so we can see if you have a point or this is more of your FUD.

2)

Barwizi is manipulating the whole thing.

  Do you have proof or is this your opinion?

3)

He is running a long time scam.

see above question, baseless accusations are treated as FUD and unless you can prove even just slightly what you are saying, i may have to moderate your posts (i'd rather not), free speech is encouraged, libel is not.

4)

He even stole (he said he turned it into "donations" in the latest newsletter) my and Koonta's BTC from the General Fund holdings, because we exposed what he was doing.

Let us review that,

He IMO did not steal. He acted in the best interests of GF members by removing you. And your "donation" became such after you in cahoots with Koontas sought to discredit Barwizi and the group. Honestly, after all the negative posts you've made against him and against this group, do you still feel you should be treated as past of something you have tried (and failed) to destroy? IMO you both ceased to be GF shareholders the moment you started to intentionally and actively devalue the shares.

I think it is unfair that you first devalue everyone's shares, then move to ask for a refund, wow.

Your ill fated attempt at calling him out and discrediting him ended with Koontas locking the the thread after some interesting facts were revealed, also i note that in the same thread a quick accounting was throw in which you all conveniently ignored.  Which left you exposed as FUDsters and lacking any evidence to support your claims.

My advice to you is simple, 1 , Get some facts before you make accusations, when the time comes to back them up and you are empty handed,   your reputation suffers . 2) Meet with some GF shareholders and ask for support, if they feel sorry for you they may convince Barwizi. Else wise , spamming this thread is a bad idea and will not help you in any way.

[barwizi]

It seems to me the nrs price was some what artificially inflated to give an edge to nrs holders in this transfer.

ding ding ding!

Barwizi is manipulating the whole thing.

He is running a long time scam.

He even stole (he said he turned it into "donations" in the latest newsletter) my and Koonta's BTC from the General Fund holdings, because we exposed what he was doing.

I asked for a refund but instead he decided to steal the BTC.

Don't trust him.

1) what does Barwizi gain from manipulating this? Please state your reasons clearly so we can see if you have a point or this is more of your FUD.

2)

Barwizi is manipulating the whole thing.

  Do you have proof or is this your opinion?

3)

He is running a long time scam.

see above question, baseless accusations are treated as FUD and unless you can prove even just slightly what you are saying, i may have to moderate your posts (i'd rather not), free speech is encouraged, libel is not.

4)

He even stole (he said he turned it into "donations" in the latest newsletter) my and Koonta's BTC from the General Fund holdings, because we exposed what he was doing.

Let us review that,

He IMO did not steal. He acted in the best interests of GF members by removing you. And your "donation" became such after you in cahoots with Koontas sought to discredit Barwizi and the group. Honestly, after all the negative posts you've made against him and against this group, do you still feel you should be treated as past of something you have tried (and failed) to destroy? IMO you both ceased to be GF shareholders the moment you started to intentionally and actively devalue the shares.

I think it is unfair that you first devalue everyone's shares, then move to ask for a refund, wow.

Your ill fated attempt at calling him out and discrediting him ended with Koontas locking the the thread after some interesting facts were revealed, also i note that in the same thread a quick accounting was throw in which you all conveniently ignored.  Which left you exposed as FUDsters and lacking any evidence to support your claims.

My advice to you is simple, 1 , Get some facts before you make accusations, when the time comes to back them up and you are empty handed,   your reputation suffers . 2) Meet with some GF shareholders and ask for support, if they feel sorry for you they may convince Barwizi. Else wise , spamming this thread is a bad idea and will not help you in any way.

 

He even stole (he said he turned it into "donations" in the latest newsletter) my and Koonta's BTC from the General Fund holdings, because we exposed what he was doing.

LOL, if you want i can post proof that i tried to buy you out and you ignored my offer. So 1) you would not sell and 2) you were trying to pull the group down . I acted well within my mandate as CEO to cut you off. I am not taking those shares for myself, rather they will be divided among the GF shareholders to mitigate the damage you have done with you lies and spamming.

Why did you guys lock the thread where you tried to call me out? You love posting when i am too busy to respond, the day i do respond, the thread is locked. That says a lot about you and what you are selling.

so it's simple PROOF or GTFO.